On Thursday, June 3, 2004 at 10:12:24 AM, Dirk Zemisch wrote:
> Only signed Messages are good for Latin-1 and Latin-9.
> NoMime encrypted mails are ok for Latin-1 and Latin-9.
[...]
>then for Latin-1
>
>> ABCabc =C4=D6=DC=E4=F6=FC =DF =80
In the iso-charsets 0x80-0xA0 is used for control-charact
On Saturday, June 5, 2004 at 12:29:15 AM, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
>> Latin-1 has no Euro. TB! doesn't send iso-8859-1 but windows-1252.
>
> Despite saying iso-8859-1 in the headers?
Yes.
> | Writing using Latin-1 (ISO-8859-1)
ISO-8859-1 has no EUR. 0x80 is a control-character.
> Source view s
Hello Frank!
On Saturday, June 5, 2004 at 2:45:51 AM you wrote:
> ISO-8859-1 has no EUR. 0x80 is a control-character.
Which is why we have ISO-8859-15.
--
Dierk Haasis
The Bat 2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1
Chat info for ICQ, AIM, MSN, Yahoo, Jabber upon request
Ein Berate
Hello Frank,
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 23:48:19 +0200 GMT (05/06/2004, 04:48 +0700 GMT),
Frank Sproede wrote:
FS> [windows-1252]
>> 1. How?
FS> --snip--
FS> REGEDIT4
[...]
FS> Copy this to a .reg file and import it into your registry.
Will that work under Win98 also?
--
Cheers,
Th
Dear Thomas,
@5-Jun-2004, 15:24 +0700 (05-Jun 09:24 UK time) Thomas Fernandez
[TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Frank:
FS>> --snip--
FS>> REGEDIT4
TF> [...]
FS>> Copy this to a .reg file and import it into your registry.
TF> Will that work under Win98 also?
Only if you 1) e
Hello Frank,
On Saturday, June 5, 2004, at 00:48 Lithuanian Time, you wrote:
FS> The problem is Latin-1 not Latin-9, and this problem can not be solved by
FS> simply adding windows-1252. If you send a mail with an EUR-char in Latin-1,
FS> TB! should warn you that it contains invalid characters.
This is a forwarded message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, August 04, 2000, 3:33:30 AM
Subject: Thawte PGP Support
===8<==Original message text===
Hi,
*
This is an official
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Nick!
On Monday, March 25, 2002 at 7:22:44 PM you wrote:
> ¨¨L
Let's see what happens now with my signing ...
- --
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo
PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPG
Hello Nick!
On Monday, March 25, 2002 at 7:22:44 PM you wrote:
> There is definitely something wrong with 1.60a's implementation of PGP
> because I always see garbage characters like I've indicated here:
Together with this mail another reply to your message is out, the
other one signed. When I
Hello Dierk Haasis,
On Monday, March 25 2002 at 10:38 AM PDT, you wrote:
> > ¨¨L
>
> Let's see what happens now with my signing ...
No strange characters. Hmmm? Did you use TB's PGP Plugin to sign? Wait a
minute... apparently it only happens when you sign/encrypt a message, or at
least th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hei,
Nick Andriash wrote:
> Nick Andriash
> Courtenay, B.C. Canada
> ¨¨L
This is a 'long' standing bug and Ritlabs refuses to fix it. Look at
from 19-11-01:
| I found the following statement from Max in the bugtracker (id 50):
|
Hello Günther Eisele,
On Monday, March 25 2002 at 11:29 AM PDT, you wrote:
> No need to say that I haven't got a reply from the developers, neither to
> private mails, nor to the posting in the list.
Hmmm? I was afraid of something like that. Hopefully once GnuPG 1.0.7 is
released RITLabs will
Hello Peter!
On Tuesday, March 26, 2002 at 1:32:32 PM you wrote:
> If you're using the '@telus.net' address this seems to be a problem on your
> side of the world :-)
@home.com
--
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo
PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 09:04:39 +0100GMT (which was 26.03.02, 09:04 +0100GMT
where I live), Dierk Haasis wrote this about "PGP support broken?":
DH> -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Hi Dierk,
too bad, I don't have Nick's priva
Hello Peter!
On Tuesday, March 26, 2002 at 6:56:42 PM you wrote:
> too bad, I don't have Nick's private key, but it makes me curious. ;-)
for all of you who didn't follow the thread which led to my PGP
encrypted message: It is just a test about those elusively coming and
going of garbage charac
at PGP 7 might be lossing edge, but I'm talking about
the PGP 6.x problems with the plugin...
> All in all, PGP support is quite good in TB! - at least for the basic
> operations needed.
We're currently evaluating The Bat! especially in the PGP context for
my employer. It ne
Hello Johannes!
On Thursday, March 28, 2002 at 4:24:46 PM you wrote:
> Dear Dirk,
Dierk
^
> I understand that PGP 7 might be lossing edge, but I'm talking about
> the PGP 6.x problems with the plugin...
What problems?
--
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http://Interest.Write4U.de/pong
Hei,
Dierk Haasis wrote:
> What problems?
The ones described in the thread you've just replied? E.g.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Regards, Günther ¤I$¤£¤
Automatic virus scanning with F-PROT, ROT13 and a list of changes in 1.54:
http://www.guenther-eisele.de/bat/index_e.htm
TheBat! 1.60, Windows 200
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Dear Dierk,
Going back 10:28 30.03.2002...
> OK, if that happens (have yet to see it), PGP plugins definitely need
> an overhaul. But we first still have to find the culprit.
> How does it break signatures? I've seen some messages with the odd
> characters but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 11:41:40 +0100GMT (which was 30.03.02, 11:41 +0100GMT
where I live), Johannes Posel wrote this about "PGP support broken?":
JP> I do not have the eMail anymore, but I think it was one or two
JP> messages. Migh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Dear Peter,
Going back 13:34 30.03.2002...
> verifies good here.
Okay, well I'll have a look... Note that the characters weren't
inserted in this mail...
Cheers,
Johannesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- --
You can get more of what you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
@ 13:34:00 +0100 [ Sat, 30 Mar 2002], Peter Meyns [PM] contributed
this to our collective wisdom:
...
PM> Ok, I don't use that. I find the plugin for PGP working quite
PM> well. What has happened to GnuPG support in TB!? I can't get it
PM> working any
Hello Johannes,
30. marec 2002, 14:16:03, you wrote:
JP> Okay, well I'll have a look... Note that the characters weren't
JP> inserted in this mail...
JP> öv
^^^
You mean these characters? :)
--
Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/
ICQ: 26266467
[The Bat! v1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 09:38:45 -0500GMT (which was 30.03.02, 15:38 +0100GMT
where I live), Allie C Martin wrote this about "PGP support broken?":
PM>> What has happened to GnuPG support in TB!? I can't get it
PM>> working an
Hello Johannes!
On Saturday, March 30, 2002 at 11:41:40 AM you wrote:
> Oh yes, last thought: It happens *only* when you use "Sign when
> completed". Even if you use the plugin "Sign Entire Text", it's
> fine...
Couldn't verify your messages, yet, because I haven't got your key.
But I received
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Dear Jernej,
Going back 16:20 30.03.2002...
JP>> öv
> ^^^
> You mean these characters? :)
Yeah, this time they were inserted ;) See what I mean?
Cheers,
Johannesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- --
A candidate is a person who gets
Dear Dierk,
Going back 18:31 30.03.2002...
> Couldn't verify your messages, yet, because I haven't got your key.
On it's way ;-)
> But I received an answer by RITLabs (Maxim Masiutin) telling me that
> the bug couldn't be fixed for different reasons. One thing is the
> complexity of the PGP co
Hello Johannes,
On Saturday, March 30, 2002, at 09:42:44 AM -0700, you wrote
the following in regards to "PGP support broken?":
>> But I received an answer by RITLabs (Maxim Masiutin) telling me that
>> the bug couldn't be fixed for different reasons. One thing is t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Dear Dierk,
Going back 11:58 31.03.2002...
> And it didn't render the signature invalid.
I will have a look...
Cheers,
Johannesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- --
A citizen of America will cross the ocean to fight for democracy, but
wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Dear Nick,
Going back 19:57 30.03.2002...
> I've been in contact with Imad who is wanting to develop a TB Plugin that
> will work properly with his CKT Builds. I gave him both Stefan's and
> Maxim's addresses and assured him they would be most receptive. I hav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/7/2002 at 11:10:42 Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM> Just download an updated executable of The Bat! from
MM> http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/the_bat.rar (no need to update a
MM> plugin) and tell whether it has actually been fixed.
The updated exe
Hei,
Dimitry Andric wrote:
> The updated executable does NOT fix the bug on my system
I think there is a (basic) misunderstanding about the bug we're talking
about here: We don't mean the problem of the text in the dialog (which is
the same on I think all systems and not actually a big bug) but
Hi phil,
On Friday 04/08/2000 at 11:47, you wrote:
> What does this mean for someone who doesn't have a key by Sept 1,
> 2000, or for those that have a key, but the year is now 2001?
If they don't get a key by then, they won't be able to get it signed
by Thawte. If they do have one, it will sta
Hello Deryk Lister,
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000 14:01:52 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, August 04, 2000, 8:01:52 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Deryk Lister wrote:
> Hi phil,
> On Friday 04/08/2000 at 11:47, you wrote:
>> What does this mean for someone who doesn't have a key by Sept 1,
>> 2
Hello Marck,
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:55:17 +0100 GMT (05/06/2004, 15:55 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
TF>> Will that work under Win98 also?
MDP> Only if you 1) export a small registry file from regedit under Win98
MDP> and 2) keep the headers but replace the content with the example
MDP> c
35 matches
Mail list logo
