Hello Viktor,
Tuesday, March 22, 2022, 12:23:42 AM, you wrote:
> thank you, that was exactly it. For some reason I didn't recognize the
> confirmation mail in the spam folder (where it sure enough landed :) ) the
> first time.
> Now I am registered, confirmed, logged in and in TB10.
> Thank
Hi Alex,
Monday, March 21, 2022, 6:40:31 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Viktor,
> Monday, March 21, 2022, 6:52:28 PM, you wrote:
>> Hello list,
>> I'm sorry if I am asking questions already covered, but I cannot find any
>> messages with solutions here.
>> Are those different accounts and possibly a
Hello Viktor,
Monday, March 21, 2022, 6:52:28 PM, you wrote:
> Hello list,
> I'm sorry if I am asking questions already covered, but I cannot find any
> messages with solutions here.
> Since the beta program was announced some time ago, I registered on the Beta
> site, but not much worked
Hello list,
I'm sorry if I am asking questions already covered, but I cannot find any
messages with solutions here.
Since the beta program was announced some time ago, I registered on the Beta
site, but not much worked there.
Today, I installed a beta version.
The first surprise was that,
May 30, 2020
Hello Stefan,
Saturday, May 30, 2020, 10:09:06 AM, you wrote:
> Shortly, I am going to send a message to the group about future
> developments. I hope you excuse me for the delay, it's just a lot of
> things I need to do and pay attention to creates extreme time
>
5/30/2020 10:13 AM
Hi The,
On 5/30/2020 The Bat Beta wrote:
STvT> Hello Ethan,
STvT> Shortly, I am going to send a message to the group about future
STvT> developments. I hope you excuse me for the delay, it's just a lot of
STvT> things I need to do and pay attention to
Hello Ethan,
> Will Beta Testing continue for The Bat. It would be helpful to have an
> update from
> RIT Labs?
Sure :)
Shortly, I am going to send a message to the group about future
developments. I hope you excuse me for the delay, it's just a lot of
things I nee
Hello Ethan,
Saturday, May 30, 2020, 9:30:38 PM, you wrote:
> Will Beta Testing continue for The Bat. It would be helpful to have an
> update from
> RIT Labs?
Excellent question! +1
--
Regards,
A
'Using TBBETA' informat
May 30, 2020
Will Beta Testing continue for The Bat. It would be helpful to have an
update from
RIT Labs?
Thank you.
Jerry
--
Ethan J. Mings
President,
The Desk Consulting Group Inc.
Enabling your organization to anticipate the future with confidence!
1-200 North Service Road W
Hi all,
--
best regards | Using The Bat! Version 7.4.14 (32-bit)
Eddie | on Windows 7 6.1
| Build 7601 Service Pack 1
Current beta is 8.7.0.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hello Rick,
Sunday, July 29, 2012, 2:40:06 PM, you wrote:
Nope - you have the latest. I am one version back as postponed sending
stopped working. I hope Maxim is taking a well deserved rest :)
I agree. I hope Max is taking a well deserved rest.
Jerry
--
Ethan J Mings
President, The Desk
Hello Tbbeta,
Just wondering if I missed a beta in the last couple of weeks?
Jerry
--
Best regards,
Quality mailto:qualityoff...@consultant.com
Current beta is 5.1.6.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hello Tbbeta,
Just wondering if I missed a beta in the last couple of weeks?
Jerry
Nope - you have the latest. I am one version back as postponed sending stopped
working. I hope Maxim is taking a well deserved rest :)
--
Rick
The Logos is digging a channel for water to reach the next
Hallo Eddie,
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 08:04:10 +0200GMT (2-2-2012, 7:04 , where I live),
you wrote:
EC But if I read properly your words, this only is valid for this list I
EC presume. So it's a matter of settings.
Currently I'm not subscribed to any lists that don't set the reply-to
themselves and
Hallo Eddie,
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:16:31 +0200GMT (1-2-2012, 15:16 , where I
live), you wrote:
You don't have to set the reply-to to this list, the list server
does that for you.
EC Ah I didn't know that. So you mean no need to put the Reply-To?
That's right, that's all been taken care
Dear Roelof,
--- Roelof Otten / Wednesday 01. Feb 2012, 18:21:50
Testing IMAP
EC Ah I didn't know that. So you mean no need to put the Reply-To?
That's right, that's all been taken care of since I've been
subscribed to the tb-lists.
Good boy ;)
But if I read properly your words
Hello Tbbeta,
Ok here should be the solution to One problem that nags me since very
long. Let me explain:
Sure you remember that my postings send from TB! using POP did not
reach this list. So what I had to do is to send eMails from the
Browser. I didn't like it as I had to manually set (under
Hallo Eddie,
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:29:15 +0200GMT (30-1-2012, 22:29 , where I
live), you wrote:
EC Using IMAP allows me now to insert the reply-to very easy and I
EC presume with Macro too.
You don't have to set the reply-to to this list, the list server does
that for you.
BTW Your message
Sveiki,
Monday, January 30, 2012, 11:29:15 PM, you wrote:
Hello Tbbeta,
Ok here should be the solution to One problem that nags me since very
long. Let me explain:
Sure you remember that my postings send from TB! using POP did not
reach this list. So what I had to do is to send eMails
Broken?
--
Henk M. de Bruijn
_
The Bat! Natural Email System 4.1.14.1 (RC1) on Microsoft® Windows Vista™
Home Premium Versie 6.0.6001 Service Pack 1 Build 6001 64 bit
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33GHz, 2333 MHz,4
Hi Henk,
on Friday, May 22, 2009, at 19:36:45[GMT +0200](which was 19:36 where
I live) you wrote among others:
Broken?
Broken?
gpg: Unterschrift vom 05/22/09 19:36:40 mittels RSA-Schlüssel ID B464DD0F
gpg: Korrekte Unterschrift von Henk M. de Bruijn
gpg: alias Henk M. de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Henk,
on Fri, 22 May 2009 19:36:45 +0200GMT (22.05.2009, 19:36 +0200GMT
here),
you wrote:
HMdB Broken?
Good here too.
,-
| gpg: Unterschrift vom 05/22/09 19:36:40 mittels RSA-Schlüssel ID
B464DD0F
| gpg: Korrekte Unterschrift von Henk
On Fri, 22 May 2009, at 21:52:35 [GMT +0200] (which was 21:52 where I
live) Peter Meyns wrote:
on Fri, 22 May 2009 19:36:45 +0200GMT (22.05.2009, 19:36 +0200GMT
here),
you wrote:
HMdB Broken?
Good here too.
Thanks guys!
My wanadoo e-mailaddresses have been revoked. You can refresh my key
Is version 4.0 testing anticipated prior to year end or sometime first quarter
next year?
Thanks
--
Ethan J. Mings CBM, CTF, CMQ/OE,CQA
Principal, The Desk
Oakville, Ontario, Canada.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.thedesk.ca
Phone: 905-825-9938 or 1-877-763-7776
Hello Ethan,
Is version 4.0 testing anticipated prior to year end or sometime first
quarter next year?
By Xmas.
--
Vili
The Bat 3.99.6 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag 2
Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, at 20:34:24 [GMT -0500] (which was 2:34 where I
live) Sean Greenwood wrote:
I would like to participate in beta testing. Please forward me a
link if more testers are needed/wanted. Thanks.
The information is at the end of each message
Current beta is 3.99.27 | 'Using
Dear Peter,
-- Samstag, 13. Oktober 2007, 19:55:18:
Ups! Sorry, guys ... . This message was ment to be sent to Max's
private email address.
Honestly speaking, even I am not a crack like you but this answer
interest me also. It's just for the pure curiosity. ;)
--
best regards
people
testing this *before* you release it to the public beta guys. Or are you
doing all the tests yourself and are relying to the tbbeta-members
afterwards? (Something that I cannot believe...)
Is there anything like an alpha/beta policy for upcoming versions in
progress? If so
Hello Everyone!
The last messages I received from TBBETA were my own, posted on
Wednesday, June 14, 2006. This is so for at least two other people I
know about, also.
So this is a test.
But, a bit of heartening info: a BT entry from February 1, 2004, has
been assigned.
Hello tbbeta,
Now that the latest version of TB is not producing duplicates like
it was while using synchronization, can those of you not using sync
give it a try and let us know if there are still issues that others
are not seeing.
Cutis, I know you specifically have not
On Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 7:31:46 AM, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
Can you also confirm the poor folder counts and odd
filtering results are still issues.
Not Curtis, but can confirm poor folder counts. I can't confimr odd
filtering results since I'm using almost exclusively server side
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Stuart,
You wrote:
Cutis, I know you specifically have not been using sync and I am
wondering if the reasons for not using it have now been resolved. I
specifically speaking about your high speed connection as dial -up
Hello Dwight,
Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 8:57:43 AM, you wrote:
Not Curtis, but can confirm poor folder counts. I can't confimr odd
filtering results since I'm using almost exclusively server side
filtering.
Thanks for the reply, Curtis as well. It looks like the solution to
both problems
Hello Matt,
Monday, January 9, 2006, 2:34:28 PM, you wrote:
MT Haven't seen anything since Fridayjust testing.
There have been several messages over the weekend.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Mental backup in progress - Do Not Disturb!
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/
Message
Haven't seen anything since Fridayjust testing.
--
Matt
v. 3.64.03 Christmas Edition
Current beta is 3.64.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester
Hello Rubeo!
On Sunday, December 18, 2005 at about 11:06:47 you wrote:
testing rogue
CF :lol:
I don't get it can see yours but not mine.
We should do more betatesting on it -take it to TBBETA. It is obvious,
that version .14 has the same faults than all versions above .08
Hello Tbbeta,
In the meanwhile you can use 7 as the order number for testing purposes.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current beta is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http
Hello all,
Taking advantage that the list is quite quiet lately, and that I have
some spare time, I'd like to do some testing about BT report:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4021
which is still not closed.
For this test I'd like to create a 3-4 level deep thread. So, I would
10/15/2005 6:15 AM
Hi MAU,
On 10/15/2005 MAU wrote:
M Hello all,
M Taking advantage that the list is quite quiet lately, and that I have
M some spare time, I'd like to do some testing about BT report:
M https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4021
M which is still not closed.
M
Hello MAU,
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M For this test I'd like to create a 3-4 level deep thread. So, I would
M certainly appreciate if some of you would be so kind as to reply to this
M message
One reply.
--
Regards, Richard
| The Bat! 3.61.12 Echo (Beta) with
Hello Paul,
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PVN You got it!
second level!
--
Regards, Richard
| The Bat! 3.61.12 Echo (Beta) with SpamPal POP3 account
| Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2
| F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro 3.0.543.5722 (431) and no
Hello Richard,
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RW second level!
Third level. Do you need any more Miguel?
--
Regards, Richard
| The Bat! 3.61.12 Echo (Beta) with SpamPal POP3 account
| Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2
| F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall
Hello Paul,
You got it!
Thanks :)
Your message ended up in Inbox and not in my TBBeta folder where it
should have been filtered to. Now I have to try to understand why.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.61.12 Echo (Beta)
Hello Richard,
One reply.
Thanks.
Your reply, as Paul's, was not sorted to my TBBeta folder. H!
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.61.12 Echo (Beta)
Current beta is 3.61.12 (Echo) | 'Using
Hallo Paul,
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 06:16:03 -0400GMT (15-10-2005, 12:16 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
M https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4021
M which is still not closed.
M For this test I'd like to create a 3-4 level deep thread. So, I would
PVN You got it!
And on we go.
--
Het was op zaterdag 15 oktober 2005 om 12:02 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'Need help to create a little thread for testing' :
Hoi MAU,
M Taking advantage that the list is quite quiet lately, and that I have
M some spare time, I'd like to do some testing about BT report:
M https
Hello Richard,
Third level. Do you need any more Miguel?
No thanks, that's enough I think. Now I have to understand why your
first reply and Paul's ended up in Inbox but your second and third
levels where properly sorted to TBBeta folder. I'll post my findings.
Thanks again :)
--
Best
Hello MAU,
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M Now I have to understand why your first reply and Paul's ended up in
M Inbox but your second and third levels where properly sorted to
M TBBeta folder.
That's weird, particularly when the following messages get filtered
Het was op zaterdag 15 oktober 2005 om 12:21 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'Need help to create a little thread for testing' :
Hoi Richard,
RW second level!
RW Third level. Do you need any more Miguel?
maybe a fourth?
--
groeten,
Cees
WinErr 00F: Unexplained error - Please tell us how
Hello Roelof,
PVN You got it!
And on we go.
Thanks. I got enough levels to see that Common sub-filter still don't
work as they should. Anyway, I now have to analyse to see if what is
happening now is exactly the same as when the BT report was originally
opened.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A.
Hello Richard,
Saturday, October 15, 2005, 1:30:44 PM, you wrote (possibly edited):
That's weird, particularly when the following messages get filtered
properly. Look forward to reading the results once you've got to the
bottom of the problem.
Adding a little more...depth to the discussion.
Hello Richard,
That's weird, particularly when the following messages get filtered
properly. Look forward to reading the results once you've got to the
bottom of the problem.
Yes, quite weird. See attached GIF. The flagged messages ended up in
Inbox, I manually moved them to TBBeta folder.
Hello Richard,
Look forward to reading the results once you've got to the bottom of
the problem.
The conclusion is simple, common sub-filters still behave as if they
were filters and not sub-filters. The information I included when
opening BT report https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4021
Hello MAU,
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M The conclusion is simple, common sub-filters still behave as if they
M were filters and not sub-filters
Thanks. I've had a look at your report and, fortunately for me, I've
never used sub filters. All of mine are straight
Hello Richard,
Thanks. I've had a look at your report and, fortunately for me, I've
never used sub filters. All of mine are straight filters with different
conditions but easy to manipulate!
Account sub-filters work fine, it's Common ones that don't. I don't
normally use any common filters or
Hello MAU,
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M Account sub-filters work fine, it's Common ones that don't.
I shall remember that if I need to install sub-filters. Thanks.
--
Regards, Richard
| The Bat! 3.61.12 Echo (Beta) with SpamPal POP3 account
| Windows XP (build
Hallo Tony,
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:42:02 +0100GMT (12-10-2005, 12:42 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
TB Just testing my new address, nothing for you to worry about.
Maybe you should worry about the time it took to arrive.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Mr. Bullfrog says: Time is fun when you're
Hello Roelof,
A reminder of what Roelof Otten on TBBETA typed on:
Thursday, October 13, 2005 at 09:35:15 GMT +0200
Maybe you should worry about the time it took to arrive.
The key word there being arrive which it eventually did. I changed my TBOT
address the day before yesterday and
Hello TBBETA,
Just testing my new address, nothing for you to worry about.
--
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.61.01 beta
Current beta is 3.61.12 (Echo) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Peter Meyns wrote:
I'm testing if The Bat! can handle my PGP key when I use PGP version
6.5.8ckt09b3 by the plugin DLL. It doesn't work with GnuPG. (see
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171)
Thank you all for your replies. At least, now I know one way to use
PGP/MIME with The Bat
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, at 19:07:05 [GMT +0200] (which was 19:07 where I
live) Peter Meyns wrote:
Peter Meyns wrote:
I'm testing if The Bat! can handle my PGP key when I use PGP version
6.5.8ckt09b3 by the plugin DLL. It doesn't work with GnuPG. (see
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Henk,
on Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:18:06 +0200GMT, you wrote:
Thank you all for your replies. At least, now I know one way to use
PGP/MIME with The Bat! if need be. :-)
HMdB I am using GPG for this ;-)
I wish I could too...
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, at 19:38:23 [GMT +0200] (which was 19:38 where I
live) Peter Meyns wrote:
Hi Peter,
on Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:18:06 +0200GMT, you wrote:
HMdB I am using GPG for this ;-)
I wish I could too... https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171 is
still alive. ;-)
Yes, I hope our
Hi all,
I'm testing if The Bat! can handle my PGP key when I use PGP version
6.5.8ckt09b3 by the plugin DLL. It doesn't work with GnuPG. (see
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171)
--
Cheers
Peter
The Bat! v3.61.07 Echo :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3
Hello Peter!
On Monday, September 26, 2005, 11:48 AM, you wrote:
I'm testing if The Bat! can handle my PGP key when I use PGP version
6.5.8ckt09b3 by the plugin DLL. It doesn't work with GnuPG. (see
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171)
Good signature here, Peter. PGPlog says Valid
Mary Bull schrieb:
Good signature here, Peter. PGPlog says Valid key.
Thank you for signing my key locally. :-)
(I'm using 6.5.8ckt09b2.)
That's a flaw in the last beta from Imad - he forgot to change the
About data. I'm sure, you're using 09b3 too. ;-)
--
Cheers
Peter
Thunderbird version
Hello Peter!
On Monday, September 26, 2005, 1:00 PM, you wrote:
Good signature here, Peter. PGPlog says Valid key.
Thank you for signing my key locally. :-)
I trust you. :)
(I'm using 6.5.8ckt09b2.)
That's a flaw in the last beta from Imad - he forgot to change the
About data. I'm sure,
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, at 18:48:07 [GMT +0200] (which was 18:48 where I
live) Peter Meyns wrote:
I'm testing if The Bat! can handle my PGP key when I use PGP version
6.5.8ckt09b3 by the plugin DLL. It doesn't work with GnuPG. (see
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171)
Good signature from
Hallo Peter,
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 18:48:07 +0200GMT (26-9-2005, 18:48 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
PM I'm testing if The Bat! can handle my PGP key when I use PGP version
PM 6.5.8ckt09b3 by the plugin DLL. It doesn't work with GnuPG. (see
Checks out fine with PGP 8.1
--
Groetjes, Roelof
,
JW 3.51.3, and 3.51.4 - all playing with this same issue if it is
JW just a bug and not an attempt to implement a new degree of unicode
JW support?
Jay I agree with you. I think that we are not really beta testing but
using beta versions. You may think there isn't a big difference but I
Hallo Henk,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 02:36:56 +0200GMT (22-7-2005, 2:36 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
HDB This message has been signed pgp/mime. In this case I have used digest
HDB algo RIPEMD160.
HDB Till now it has not been possible to verify this message with the Bat!
HDB when this digest algo
On Fri 22-Jul-05 1:05am -0500, Roelof Otten wrote:
Verifies fine with TB 3.51.8
What LDAP server are you using? I have very little luck
verifying with pgp.surfnet.nl. I am beginning to wonder if
there may be a bug in the GnuPG software.
For your signature I get:
gpg: Signature made 07/22/05
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri 22-Jul-05 1:05am -0500, Roelof Otten wrote:
Verifies fine with TB 3.51.8
One follow up question - when I sign with GnuPG and PGP/MIME
turned on, the PGP/MIME does not appear to be working. Are
you or anyone else experiencing this?
- --
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, at 08:05:41 [GMT +0200] (which was 8:05 where I
live) Roelof Otten wrote:
Verifies fine with TB 3.51.8 and PGP 8.1
That's interesting! Testing PGP 8.1
BTW I know that other MUA's do not have any problem with RIPEMD160
--
Henk M. de Bruijn
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, at 13:52:11 [GMT +0200] (which was 13:52 where I
live) I myself wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, at 08:05:41 [GMT +0200] (which was 8:05 where I
live) Roelof Otten wrote:
Verifies fine with TB 3.51.8 and PGP 8.1
That's interesting! Testing PGP 8.1
BTW I know that other
Friday, July 22, 2005, 2:05:02 AM, (Internet Time - @336) you wrote:
Hello Bill,
BM What LDAP server are you using? I have very little luck
BM verifying with pgp.surfnet.nl. I am beginning to wonder if
BM there may be a bug in the GnuPG software.
I have been using pgp.mit.edu to find about
This message has been signed pgp/mime. In this case I have used digest
algo RIPEMD160.
Till now it has not been possible to verify this message with the Bat!
when this digest algo had been used.
--
Henk M. de Bruijn
__
The Bat!
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, at 02:36:56 [GMT +0200] (which was 2:36 where I
live) I myself wrote:
This message has been signed pgp/mime. In this case I have used digest
algo RIPEMD160.
Till now it has not been possible to verify this message with the Bat!
when this digest algo had been used.
It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu 21-Jul-05 7:36pm -0500, Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:
This message has been signed pgp/mime. In this case I have used digest
algo RIPEMD160.
Till now it has not been possible to verify this message with the Bat!
when this digest algo had been
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, at 19:42:57 [GMT -0500] (which was 2:42 where I
live) Bill Mccarthy wrote:
On Thu 21-Jul-05 7:36pm -0500, Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:
This message has been signed pgp/mime. In this case I have used digest
algo RIPEMD160.
Till now it has not been possible to verify this
Henk M. de Bruijn schrieb:
This message has been signed pgp/mime. In this case I have used digest
algo RIPEMD160.
Till now it has not been possible to verify this message with the Bat!
when this digest algo had been used.
Verifies good with Thunderbird/Enigmail, but The Bat! states a
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 02:00:59 +0200, Natasha V Pearce
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay
Could we end this maybe and call him Avi Yashar again?
--
Thanks
Alexander.
Current beta is 3.51.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
On 7/19/05, Alexander S. Kunz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 02:00:59 +0200, Natasha V Pearce
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay
Could we end this maybe and call him Avi Yashar again?
Wow! That's not just OTT (over the top) but also OTW (off the wall)
and NAZI (not any zebra
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:07:24 +0200, Jay Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay
Could we end this maybe and call him Avi Yashar again?
Wow! That's not just OTT (over the top) but also OTW (off the wall)
and NAZI (not any zebra intheworld).
*plonk*
--
No further comment
Alex.
Hallo Jay,
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:07:24 +0300GMT (19-7-2005, 11:07 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
AY Wow! That's not just OTT (over the top) but also OTW (off the wall)
AY and NAZI (not any zebra intheworld).
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just
what name to call me, what epithet to ascribe to me, or my fitness for
beta testing - they should please do so on TBOT, where I will be
happily in absentia.
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro (No OTFE) 3.5.36
Current beta
On 7/19/05, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:07:24 +0200, Jay Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay
Could we end this maybe and call him Avi Yashar again?
Wow! That's not just OTT (over the top) but also OTW (off the wall)
and NAZI (not any zebra intheworld).
*plonk*
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 13:26:09 +0200, Avi Yashar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*plonk*
I hope this means that I will not be the target of any more of your
flames.
Exactly. Its the lovely sound of an email address hitting the deep deep
bottom of a killfilter.
If so, please ask your fellow
Hallo Jay,
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:26:09 +0300GMT (19-7-2005, 13:26 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out
Hallo Alexander,
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:05:19 +0200GMT (19-7-2005, 14:05 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
ASK I am so sick and tired of these endless tirades. And now someone
ASK please moderate me.
Have it your way
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
We are taking course to not-fixed-date releases, which
NVP means no
NVP deadlines and no rush. Only approved by your responses
NVP versions will
NVP be named releases.
Unfortunately a few of us did spot that on occasions the rather buggy
betas we thought we were testing were also
Good day, Natasha.
NVP ICAM. You're free to choose whichever level of TB suits your
NVP current needs. To
NVP help you make this decision, RL posts, on a daily basis,
NVP all their fixes at
NVP http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/daily.txt
NVP and in addition
NVP posts
no idea that instead of this ostensible objective RL was going to use
me
as an alpha tester for a feature or enhancement that would distort the
content
of messages that I transmit.
That is correct, Natasha. And, if I recall correctly, you also had no
idea that you were testing a new feature
. And, if I recall correctly, you also had no
idea that you were testing a new feature that was going to change the
content of your messages. According to Max, the purpose of that MSI
was to fix existing issues in 3.5.xx - which, it seems, did not
include the loss of content in messages that you
On 7/18/05, Chris Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you sure you are cut out for testing software?
Testing software? Yes. Testing a RitLabs email client? I am not sure
any longer... for the reasons stated in my initial message on this
thread.
The simple fact is that I cannot afford to have
Hello Jay,
Monday, July 18, 2005, 11:58:56, you wrote:
With an introduction like that - and with the
BayesIt problem still unresolved - who would imagine that we would be
embarking on an entirely new series of beta (pardon, me, alpha)
testing of a very risky nature?
Do you mean the BayesIt isn't
7/18/2005 7:43 AM
Hi Jay,
On 7/18/2005 Jay Walker wrote:
JW I would definitely have opted out of that cycle.
Opportunity is knocking! Seize it!
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
Current beta is
On 7/18/05, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Monday, July 18, 2005, 11:58:56, you wrote:
With an introduction like that - and with the
BayesIt problem still unresolved - who would imagine that we would be
embarking on an entirely new series of beta (pardon, me, alpha)
testing of a very risky nature
Hello Jay,
Monday, July 18, 2005, 14:56:44, you wrote:
So, pardon me, but no one could have guessed from what you wrote that
this MSI was going to be the beginning of another round of beta
testing (preliminary to an official release). Rather, the only thing
you asked us to check was whether
Hi Liz
NVP We are taking course to not-fixed-date releases, which means no
NVP deadlines and no rush. Only approved by your responses versions will be
NVP named releases.
Unfortunately a few of us did spot that on occasions the rather buggy betas
we thought we were testing were
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
