V I see. Ok, I will upgrade. I use Voyager on Win98 only one month a
V year :), but now it would have been important :). Ok, upgrade. And
V thanks.
Voyager 3.95.06 has been rock solid. I only recall one minor complaint
that Max said would be fixed. The betas of TB do not affect Voyager. I
run
Hi Vili,
on Sun, 18 Feb 2007 08:08:32 -0500GMT (18.02.2007, 14:08 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
V I dont know if it is a bug or not...
V So, I first used my Voyager under Win98SE. First, it complained about
V that Unicode layer, good, installed. It started. When I tried to open
V a mail in new
Hello Peter,
V So, I first used my Voyager under Win98SE. First, it complained about
V that Unicode layer, good, installed. It started. When I tried to open
V a mail in new window or make a search, the focus always jumped back to
V the main window. Even I selected another application
Hi Vili,
on Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:00:17 -0500GMT (18.02.2007, 17:00 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
Which version of Voyager do you use? Here it is 3.95.06.
V 3.86.03. I did not upgrade as 3.9x.x did not seem to be stable for
V me...
Maybe you should give it a try. It works reliably here on XP
Hello Peter,
Which version of Voyager do you use? Here it is 3.95.06.
V 3.86.03. I did not upgrade as 3.9x.x did not seem to be stable for
V me...
Maybe you should give it a try. It works reliably here on XP, 2K and
98SE. What leads you to the assumption it were unstable, when you
didn't
] here on TBBeta. I had
the same problem with 3.86.03 last December, and I learned from Maxim
that Voyager was incompatible with Win98 in that version. But it isn't
any more, so you better upgrade and all will be fine. :)
--
Cheers
Peter
The Bat! v3.96.9 :beta: on WinXP, SP2, 5, 1, build 2600
plenty
, not with Voyager. You should try
anyway. See my recent post.
--
Cheers
Peter
The Bat! v3.96.9 :beta: on WinXP, SP2, 5, 1, build 2600
plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, OTFE disabled
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
Current beta
from Maxim
that Voyager was incompatible with Win98 in that version. But it isn't
any more, so you better upgrade and all will be fine. :)
I see. Ok, I will upgrade. I use Voyager on Win98 only one month a
year :), but now it would have been important :). Ok, upgrade. And
thanks.
--
Vili
2/18/2007 1:28 PM
Hi Vili,
On 2/18/2007 Vili wrote:
V I see. Ok, I will upgrade. I use Voyager on Win98 only one month a
V year :), but now it would have been important :). Ok, upgrade. And
V thanks.
Voyager 3.95.06 has been rock solid. I only recall one minor complaint
that Max said would
Sunday, February 18, 2007
When I tried to open a mail in new window or make a search, the focus always
jumped back to the main window. Even I selected another application, the
Voyager main window has popped up.
Anyone experienced this? Under XP everything is ok.
I see from later
Hi all,
I use the AntispamSniper plugin with Voyager and it worked well until
recently. Now when I mark a false negative as junk, Voyager closes
with this error message:
,- [ Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime Library ]
| Program: M:\Voyager\voyager.exe
| This application has requested the Runtime
Hi all,
on Wed, 7 Feb 2007 14:22:57 +0100GMT I wrote:
PM I use the AntispamSniper plugin with Voyager and it worked well until
PM recently. Now when I mark a false negative as junk, Voyager closes
PM with this error message:
PM ,- [ Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime Library ]
PM | Program: M
I have been ignoring all the voyager messages from the beginning, but
I got handed a flash drive this week, and have now installed it. It
seems to be working fine, but I wanted to inquire whether there were
any things I need to know.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
! Voyager 3.95.06 on Windows XP version 5,1
Current beta is 3.95.08 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners
Hi Nick,
on Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:32:11 -0600GMT (18.01.2007, 20:32 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
I've been using Voyager 3.95.06 and over the last couple of days
noticed that TB!began hanging after a few mail checks
ND I've been closely motoring this for the past couple of weeks and think
ND
Reply to message sent 01/05/2007, @ 15:49:19 (3:49 PM Locally)
~~~
I've been using Voyager 3.95.06 and over the last couple of days
noticed that TB!began hanging after a few mail checks
I've been closely motoring this for the past
Hello Martin,
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MS When I insert the USB stick into an other PC the plugin isn't found.
MS What I am doing wrong?
When you installed it on the USB stick did you tick the box in the
installation dialog for using it with Voyager?
--
Regards
into an other PC and the
stick isn't implemented in Windows as drive H: Voyager doesn't start
and exits with an error message.
You must have something related to drive H: in your
global.ini
file that is in the Voyager directory.
Search for H: in that file.
--
Vili
Hi Vili,
on Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:14:04 -0500GMT (14.01.2007, 18:14 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
The only problem: If I insert the USB stick into an other PC and the
stick isn't implemented in Windows as drive H: Voyager doesn't start
and exits with an error message.
V You must have something
Hello Martin,
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MS So this brings me to the question: Isn't it possible to set this
MS plugin with a relative path? Or isn't it possible to use plugins
MS with Voyager at all?
AntispamSniper is designed to be installed on both TB! and Voyager
Hi Richard,
on Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:33:08 +0100GMT (14.01.2007, 19:33 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
MS So this brings me to the question: Isn't it possible to set this
MS plugin with a relative path? Or isn't it possible to use plugins
MS with Voyager at all?
RW AntispamSniper is designed
Hello all,
Sunday, January 14, 2007, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
RW AntispamSniper is designed to be installed on both TB! and Voyager
RW and, on top of that, it's a terrific programme (IMHO!).
I agree completely! There are no false positives and only a few false
negatives in The Bat! as well
Hi Alexander,
on Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:55:34 +0100GMT (14.01.2007, 19:55 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
RW AntispamSniper is designed to be installed on both TB! and Voyager
RW and, on top of that, it's a terrific programme (IMHO!).
I agree completely! There are no false positives and only a few
Hello Marek,
A reminder of what Marek Mikus typed on:
Sunday, January 14, 2007 at 20:02:00 GMT +0100
MM btw developer of AntispamSniper sent interesting reply about future
MM development into Ritlabs forum:
MM Hi, I'm the developer of AntispamSniper.
MM IMAP support is planned for the
Hello Martin,
Sunday, January 14, 2007, 12:18:45 PM, you wrote:
So this brings me to the question: Isn't it possible to set this
plugin with a relative path? Or isn't it possible to use plugins
with Voyager at all?
Running Agava with no problem.
--
Best regards,
Raymond Morris
TheBat
Hi Martin,
on Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:04:33 +0100GMT (13.01.2007, 14:04 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
MS I have installed Voyager 3.95.06 on a USB stick - runs quite well.
MS The only problem: If I insert the USB stick into an other PC and the
MS stick isn't implemented in Windows as drive H: Voyager
...
I use it on all flavors of Windows and have no problem like this. If
you start it from a shortcut instead of the executable you would
experience this behavior.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.1.2600
No IMAP OTFE
1/10/2007 7:03 AM
Hi Peter,
On 1/10/2007 Peter Hampf wrote:
PH at work I am using Voyager which starts from an encrypted disc. I just
PH saw the file global.ini with a size of 160.000 bytes and found over
PH 4000 - fourthousand - lines like this in it:
PH MslOrder=L:\Voyager\images
Hi Peter,
on Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:44:06 +0100GMT (10.01.2007, 11:44 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
PH at work I am using Voyager which starts from an encrypted disc. I just
PH saw the file global.ini with a size of 160.000 bytes and found over
PH 4000 - fourthousand - lines like this in it:
PH
supplies and manages gmail I would
suspect something initiated from their end. Like you I'm guessing
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
Current beta is 3.95.06 | 'Using TBBETA
Hello Paul
ND Has anyone else at least noticed this to be the first version to
ND trip the firewall into asking for clearance?
Have you experienced this with non-gmail accounts? Is it an inbound or
outbound request? Knowing who supplies and manages gmail I would
suspect something initiated
Ditto with Outpost, as it should be. For whatever reason I assumed
that Nick was referring to requests that occurred after the initial
executable change.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
that it occurred. Just as an experiment I
removed the setting in his McAfee firewall and I was asked the same
question the next time I connected. I'm sure it's a Voyager problem, not
external.
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.95.6 with POP3 account AntispamSniper 1.8.0.5
| Windows XP (build 2600
Okay, this is going to be kinda vague and I don't have much in the way
of empirical data on this, but this is what's happening to me:
I've been using Voyager 3.95.06 and over the last couple of days
noticed that TB!began hanging after a few mail checks with messages
such as:
01/05/2007, 12:56
Hello Nick,
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ND Has anyone else at least noticed this to be the first version to
ND trip the firewall into asking for clearance?
Yes, it did it on my father's PC over Christmas.
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.95.6 with POP3 account
Hi all,
something has changed with Voyager's handling of %COOKIES. I used to
refer to the cookies.txt file by the relative path and it worked.
With the current version Voyager tells me, Cannot open file
tbcookies.txt. When I put the full path in the template, it works.
But that's not an option
confirm.
I use the following in a QT:
%COOKIE=%ProgramDir\smartbat\comments.txt:
and it still works fine.
Is that how you are referring to the relative path?
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
[MUA: TB! Voyager 3.95.06]
[OS: Windows XP 5 1
%COOKIE=%ProgramDir\smartbat\comments.txt:
ND and it still works fine.
ND Is that how you are referring to the relative path?
No, I didn't use %ProgramDir before. But now I do and it works fine.
That's what I was after. Thank you! :)
--
Cheers
Peter
The Bat! Voyager v3.95.06
plenty of POP
after all these years of
hanging around the community!
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
Who's hoping this doesn't constitute enough for a TBOT trouting.
[MUA: TB! Voyager 3.95.06]
[OS: Windows XP 5 1]
Current beta is 3.95.06 | 'Using TBBETA
1/4/2007 3:59 PM
Hi Nick,
On 1/4/2007 Nick Danger wrote:
ND It's nice to finally be of use to someone after all these years of
ND hanging around the community!
Don't worry, this is good stuff!
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
1/2/2007 12:04 PM
Voyager 3.95.06
Hi Max,
I have been using this version of Voyager for several days and I want
to thank you for an excellent release. It is very stable and
performance is very good. I have not yet found anything that does not
function flawlessly and quickly.
Thank You Very
or lack thereof.
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
[MUA: TB! Voyager 3.95.06]
[OS: Windows XP 5 1]
Current beta is 3.95.06 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use
prior to those.
ND I swear I thought others had stated the problem but I've slept many
ND times since then and may be recalling things wrong.
ND Thanks for any confirmation or lack thereof.
Sorry, but it works as expected here.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
and he's running 2K.
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
[MUA: TB! Voyager 3.95.06]
[OS: Windows XP 5 1]
Current beta is 3.95.06 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester
.
PO Confirmed, the Updates entry appears to be missing from the tree on
PO the left side.
It is available at [Other Options]. See Attached.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFEattachment: Other_Options2.jpg
bat functions
missing.
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
[MUA: TB! Voyager 3.95.06]
[OS: Windows XP 5 1]
Current beta is 3.95.06 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester
and that leaves Smart Bat out of luck.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
Current beta is 3.95.06 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT
Attached.
PO I know. However, the tree on the left (in Voyager) is missing the
PO Updates entry (see attached PNG from TB Preferences on how it should
PO look). That's why the Other Options items in Voyager are mixed up and,
PO as Nick wrote, the SmartBat options are actually unavailable.
Confirmed
find an existing entry in bug tracker (but I'll admit to
being pretty lost as to how to do a thorough search) so I submitted
one on this issue:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6158
Hopefully I didn't botch protocol too awfully bad.
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
[MUA: TB! Voyager 3.95.06]
[OS
1/2/2007 5:22 PM
Hi Nick,
On 1/2/2007 Nick Danger wrote:
ND https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6158
ND Hopefully I didn't botch protocol too awfully bad.
Just added my .02.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
Hello Paul,
Tuesday, January 02, 2007, 19:07:33, you wrote:
I have been using this version of Voyager for several days and I want
to thank you for an excellent release. It is very stable and
performance is very good. I have not yet found anything that does not
function flawlessly and quickly
1/2/2007 5:45 PM
Hi Maxim,
On 1/2/2007 Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM Thank you, we will take care of the bug
MM https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6158
Thank You Very Much!
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
Hi all,
on Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:05:04 +0100GMT I wrote:
MM Please try Voyager 3.95.06
MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install-3-95-06.exe
PM Works fine here at home. I'm looking forward to trying it under
PM Win98... :)
Runs well under Win98 except for the mini bug
Hello Alto,
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:25:33 +0100 GMT (31/12/2006, 21:25 +0700 GMT),
Alto Speckhardt wrote:
AS Guten Morgen,
Frohes Neues.
TF I've never had runtime errors with Voyager.
AS I have - on average about one runtime error every two hours. But I'm
AS delighted to agree that the latest
Hallo Thomas,
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 23:02:17 +0700GMT (1-1-2007, 17:02 , where I live),
you wrote:
TF Yes, TB! is designed for multiple clients using the same message base.
Not any more. That functionality has been removed.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Why experiment on animals, when there are so many
Hello all,
Monday, January 1, 2007, Roelof Otten wrote:
TF Yes, TB! is designed for multiple clients using the same message base.
Not any more. That functionality has been removed.
You are wrong, C/S mode was removed, but possibility to share message base
was not limited.
--
Bye
Marek
Hello Marek,
Monday, January 1, 2007, 6:08:18 PM, you wrote:
TF Yes, TB! is designed for multiple clients using the same message base.
Not any more. That functionality has been removed.
MM You are wrong, C/S mode was removed, but possibility to share message base
MM was not limited.
If 2
that I'm back
home, I'll try installing Voyager on the thumb drive and see if I can get it to
work.
--
Best regards,
Perry
Current beta is 3.95.06 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Guten Morgen,
TF I've never had runtime errors with Voyager.
I have - on average about one runtime error every two hours. But I'm
delighted to agree that the latest Voyager version is much better
here. I've seen errors here, too, but there are so few of them that I
can't give a similar average
the times when
AS you could recommend TheBat whole heartedly. Well, The times they are
AS a-changin'.
I have customers still using v2.12 because it suits their needs well.
If you prefer v3.0.1.33 so be it. For me Voyager is the best thing
that happened since I discovered TB 1.1 in 1998 and my customers
12/30/2006 9:09 AM
Hi MAU,
On 12/29/2006 MAU wrote:
M Hello Thomas,
M I have never tried Vogager. Is there a possibility of doing so without
M using OTFE?
No, Voyager uses OTFE by default, and it cannot be turned off.
M I don't know why it shouldn't be optional. I hate it when someone else
Voyager v.3.86.03 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
Current beta is 3.95.06 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http
Hello Paul,
OTFE is purely protecting you.
Please do not insist. _I_ want to decide if I want to be protected or
not. Period.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.95.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
without it and
M probably end up using it. But, by principle, I don't like to be forced
M to use it. It is up to me to decide how important and 'secret' my data
M is.
I agree with this, but as I said, I only use Voyager as a handy way to
connect while travelling. The main TB! on the PCs download
Hello Alto,
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:11 +0100 GMT (29/12/2006, 23:34 +0700 GMT),
Alto Speckhardt wrote:
Please try Voyager 3.95.06
AS Significantly better than its direct predecessor I'd say. Fewer
AS runtime errors than before (fewer, definitly not hardly any as
AS it should be!), faster
12/30/2006 10:16 AM
Hi MAU,
On 12/30/2006 MAU wrote:
M Please do not insist. _I_ want to decide if I want to be protected or
M not. Period.
I hear you _and_ I understand. However, you seem to miss the total
purpose of Voyager. It grew out of Secure Bat with security as a
primary purpose
12/30/2006 10:25 AM
Hi Thomas,
On 12/30/2006 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF I've never had runtime errors with Voyager. I also find that the
TF reaction speed depends on the host computer.
Neither have I had errors. I find that Win 2K is significantly faster
than XP when using USB 2 even when
Hello Perry,
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:43:09 -0500 GMT (28/12/2006, 22:43 +0700 GMT),
Perry Nelson wrote:
MM Please try Voyager 3.95.06
MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install-3-95-06.exe
PN I have download it but not yet installed it. As it turns out I got a 2
PN GB
Hello Thomas,
PN Also while I'm asking for guidance, do I install it and then restore a
PN backup of my regular version in order to import all my settings?
Yes, you can do that.
I have never tried Vogager. Is there a possibility of doing so without
using OTFE?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A.
Hello MAU,
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:17:44 +0100 GMT (29/12/2006, 22:17 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
M I have never tried Vogager. Is there a possibility of doing so without
M using OTFE?
No, Voyager uses OTFE by default, and it cannot be turned off. That's
not a problem, because Voyager is not my main
Hello MAU,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 4:17:44 PM, you wrote:
M I have never tried Vogager. Is there a possibility of doing so without
M using OTFE?
Didn't try it yet either. I've seen instructions to take over the settings
from an existing TB-setup but don't know if there's a FAQ or Wiki
Guten Tag Maxim Masiutin,
Please try Voyager 3.95.06
Significantly better than its direct predecessor I'd say. Fewer
runtime errors than before (fewer, definitly not hardly any as it
should be!), faster reaction and (at least that's my impression)
startup times.
However, still no MessageList
Hello Thomas,
M I have never tried Vogager. Is there a possibility of doing so without
M using OTFE?
No, Voyager uses OTFE by default, and it cannot be turned off.
I don't know why it shouldn't be optional. I hate it when someone else
decides what I should do or not do. I'd probably use
Hello Mark,
M I have never tried Vogager. Is there a possibility of doing so without
M using OTFE?
Didn't try it yet either. I've seen instructions to take over the settings
from an existing TB-setup but don't know if there's a FAQ or Wiki explaining
it.
I don't know either, I've never
but don't know if there's a FAQ or Wiki explaining
MP it.
No need for that! Just create a backup of The Bat! and use it after
the installation of Voyager. It is quite easy. :)
--
Cheers
Peter
The Bat! v3.95.6 :beta: on WinXP, SP2, 5, 1, build 2600
plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, OTFE disabled
AMD
Hello Peter,
M I'd probably use it if I could run it without encryption.
what is wrong with encryption for an application designed to run from a
portable device? Data security is one - if not the - main aspect when
carrying data with you.
Just curious.
There is nothing wrong with
Hello Tbbeta,
Please try Voyager 3.95.06
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install-3-95-06.exe
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current beta is 3.95.06 | 'Using
Hello Simon,
Thursday, December 28, 2006, 15:53:21, you wrote:
I've installed over previous version and all appears to be well.
Thank you for the prompt reply!
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply to message sent 12/28/2006, @ 15:39:59 (7:39 AM Locally)
~~~
Hello Maxim,
Please try Voyager 3.95.06
It installed fine but the other options menu items in preferences
are still messed up as they were in 3.85.06
They are fine
Hi Maxim and fellow beta testers,
Thursday, December 28, 2006, 8:39:59 AM, you wrote:
MM Please try Voyager 3.95.06
MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install-3-95-06.exe
I have download it but not yet installed it. As it turns out I got a 2
GB thumb drive
Hi Maxim,
on Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:39:59 +0200GMT (28.12.2006, 14:39 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
MM Please try Voyager 3.95.06
MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install-3-95-06.exe
Works fine here at home. I'm looking forward to trying it under
Win98... :)
--
Cheers
for the late reply. I do not have the flash drive with the
earlier Voyager version in my possession and have been unable to reach
the person who has it.
I use Voyager exclusively and have been too busy to beta test so do
not have experience with 3.95.04.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.86.03 on Win2k SP4
Yes, The Bat! is currently incompatible with Win98, but we are going to
fix this.
I hope this includes voyager and it's decendents.
--
ck
(note handmade delimiter and happy christmas to all)
Current beta is 3.95.03 | 'Using TBBETA
Hello Charlie,
Saturday, December 23, 2006, 19:26:09, you wrote:
I hope this includes voyager and it's decendents.
Voyager 3.86.03 is OK under Win98.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
12/23/2006 12:59 PM
Hi Maxim,
On 12/23/2006 Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM Hello Charlie,
MM Saturday, December 23, 2006, 19:26:09, you wrote:
I hope this includes voyager and it's decendents.
MM Voyager 3.86.03 is OK under Win98.
Sorry Max, not here. Focus stays with main window, etc. Earlier
Hi Maxim,
on Sat, 23 Dec 2006 19:37:24 +0200GMT (23.12.2006, 18:37 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
MM Saturday, December 23, 2006, 19:26:09, you wrote:
I hope this includes voyager and it's decendents.
MM Voyager 3.86.03 is OK under Win98.
No, it isn't.
--
Cheers
Peter
The Bat! v3.95.4 :beta
Hello Paul,
Saturday, December 23, 2006, 20:00:50, you wrote:
Sorry Max, not here. Focus stays with main window, etc. Earlier
versions are OK.
Which of the earlier versions are OK? What about 3.95.04?
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or a new message be used. They pop up and
immediately lose the focus. I found no way around this apart from
going back to 3.85.03.
The next surprise came when I started my Voyager on her machine. I had
found version 3.86.03 on Ritlabs' download page and installed it. It
works well on my WinXP PC
Hello Peter,
Thursday, December 21, 2006, 19:42:28, you wrote:
yesterday I upgraded my girlfriend's TB!. She has an old notebook
running Win98SE with a P2 processor at 233 MHz.
Yes, The Bat! is currently incompatible with Win98, but we are going to fix
this.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
incompatible with Win98, but we are going to fix
this.
Thank you, that is good to know. :)
I think this particularly important for Voyager users who may not know
which machine they can use next. You should mention it on the download
page.
--
Cheers
Peter
The Bat! v3.95.1 on WinXP, SP2, 5, 1
Hello Maxim,
Thursday, December 21, 2006, 8:03:23 PM, you wrote:
Yes, The Bat! is currently incompatible with Win98, but we are going to fix
this.
Again, I ask my self. When do RitLabs are going to drop support for
legacy systems, and finally focus on long standing more important
issues like
support for
VŠ legacy systems, and finally focus on long standing more important
VŠ issues like IMAP or Unicode support?
I agree they should fix IMAP and Unicode issues, but they should *not*
drop support for Win98 - especially for Voyager. I don't know how many
systems run Win98 right now
Hello Peter Meyns everyone else,
on 21-Dez-2006 at 21:07 you (Peter Meyns) wrote:
I agree they should fix IMAP and Unicode issues, but they should *not*
drop support for Win98 - especially for Voyager. I don't know how many
systems run Win98 right now worldwide, but I guess it's a lot
insists on having the focus. It cannot be minimized nor can other
PM windows like menus or a new message be used. They pop up and
PM immediately lose the focus. I found no way around this apart from
PM going back to 3.85.03.
PM The next surprise came when I started my Voyager on her machine. I had
PM
running Win98SE with a P2 processor at 233 MHz.
MM Yes, The Bat! is currently incompatible with Win98, but we are going to
fix this.
PM Thank you, that is good to know. :)
PM I think this particularly important for Voyager users who may not know
PM which machine they can use next. You should mention
12/21/2006 3:27 PM
Hi Alexander,
On 12/21/2006 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK If you're going to use Voyager from a USB device on Win98 you'll need a
ASK driver for the USB device first. :-)
True. However a minor problem when one carries the driver on a CD.
ASK TB is way more complex than
Hello Alexander,
Thursday, December 21, 2006, 10:20:28 PM, you wrote:
If you're going to use Voyager from a USB device on Win98 you'll need a
driver for the USB device first. :-)
TB is way more complex than it used to be. I've nagged about the
performance of the newer versions compared
Hi Alexander,
on Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:20:28 +0100GMT (21.12.2006, 21:20 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
ASK on 21-Dez-2006 at 21:07 you (Peter Meyns) wrote:
I agree they should fix IMAP and Unicode issues, but they should *not*
drop support for Win98 - especially for Voyager. I don't know how many
Hello Peter,
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:39:22 +0100 GMT (25/11/2006, 16:39 +0700 GMT),
Peter Hampf wrote:
PH Create a batch file with just this line and you are done:
PH reg delete HKCU\Software\Rit\Voyager /f nul 21
PH The part nul 21 is just to redirect any messages.
Thanks. What's the /f
settings part.
Instead of %USERPROFILE% I found that %TEMP% works for what I
intended. It points to the user's local temp file, which is where The
Bat! leaves its rests.
--
Cheers
Peter
The Bat! Voyager v3.80.04
plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP
OS: Windows XP, v.5.1,Build 2600
601 - 700 of 1208 matches
Mail list logo
