t; tab.
--
Bye,
Prezes mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Bat! Voyager Professional v3.64.01, Windows XP 5.1, Build 2600, Service
Pack 2
---
ING Nationale-Nederlanden Polska OFE zarabia najwiecej dla swoich
Bonjour Maxim,
Le vendredi 30 décembre 2005 à 01:50:55, vous écriviez :
MM> Hello TBBETA,
MM> It is now possible to activate Voyager using the Registration Key
MM> block. Previously, only Order Number could have been used for
MM> activation. Now the user can choose from both op
Hi Maxim,
on Fri, 30 Dec 2005, at 02:50:55 [GMT +0200] Maxim wrote:
> It is now possible to activate Voyager using the Registration Key
> block. Previously, only Order Number could have been used for
> activation. Now the user can choose from both options.
If you first choose "ord
Hello TBBETA,
It is now possible to activate Voyager using the Registration Key block.
Previously, only Order Number could have been used for activation. Now the user
can choose from both options.
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_install.exe
[-] (#0005293) it was
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, at 21:21:16 [GMT +0100] (which was 21:21 where I
live) Eddie Castelli wrote:
> I can agree. Me too I wish a well working TB!voy. But we have to work
> a bit to get it to a professional standard.
Yep, including the possibility of using GPG/PGP
The bèta of Mobility Email had i
Dear Nick,
-->> Donnerstag, 22. Dezember 2005, 18:55:30:
>> Probably some have their Christmas spoiled and will not Voyage(r)
> I have to say, though it was very quirky (at least for me) to get it
> up and running, now that it is it's a great gift! For someone who
> goes between a work compu
ing, now that it is it's a great gift! For someone who
goes between a work computer and four different computers at home -
it's something I've been wishing for.
--
òžó Nick
Danger
[MUA: TB! Voyager 3.64.01]
[OS: Windows XP 5 1]
___
Dear Roelof,
-->> Donnerstag, 22. Dezember 2005, 02:38:33:
> The writing to the registry that this version does, argues for it
> still being a beta.
Probably some have their Christmas spoiled and will not Voyage(r) *gg* ;)
--
best regards | Using The Bat! v3.63.14 (Beta)
Roelof Otten [RO] wrote,
> Too bad you can't find it straight from the menu pages. A link from
> products/voyager could come in handy. Unless you still consider this
> a beta. (Though it doesn't say that on startup)
Can you tell us if it still writes to the registry?
--
Reg
Hallo Roelof,
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 02:34:53 +0100GMT (22-12-2005, 2:34 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MM>> Voyager 3.64 is available at
MM>> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install.exe
RO> Too bad you can't find it straight from the menu pages. A li
Hallo Maxim,
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 02:20:22 +0200GMT (22-12-2005, 1:20 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
MM> Voyager 3.64 is available at
MM> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install.exe
Too bad you can't find it straight from the menu pages. A link from
produ
Hello Tbbeta,
Voyager 3.64 is available at
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install.exe
Unfortunately, 3.63.15 did contain an error in the activation procedure, and if
you've activated that version, you will need to activate it again.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Mas
Thanks! Just found that out myself!! :)
--
Christian Grams
Harlekin's-EDV
[using: Windows XP SP2 with TB!3.51.10 (installed via MSI)]
Current beta is 3.63.16 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.h
Hello Peter,
Tuesday, December 20, 2005, 9:51:03 AM, you wrote:
>>But is it intended that I had to reactivate it?
No, it wasn't intended. Sorry.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Curren
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, at 19:20:43 [GMT +0200] (which was 18:20 where I
live) Maxim Masiutin wrote:
> We've updated the Voyager Installer
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_install.exe
> What's new since the last version of Voyager (3.63.09) r
Hello Maxim,
> [-] During the installation it din't ask for OTFE mode (beta issue).
is there a possibility, to install Voyager in the plain mode?
I am not asked during a fresh installation whether I want to activate
the OTFE mode or not. Could someone explain the proceeding to acti
Hello Claude,
Monday, December 19, 2005, 10:01:50 PM, you wrote:
>>What's this file in the voyager install directory (already found it
>>in the previous installation but forgot to tell about...)
Voyager will check the presence of the source drive using this file in future.
No
Hello Marek,
Monday, December 19, 2005, 8:08:07 PM, you wrote:
>>BTW if YOu will not add this as option into GUI, I will not offer
>>editing registry to business users.
Voyager has the same record (CopyToOutboxProhibited) in the INI file.
--
Best regards,
Ma
Hi tbbeta,
What's this file in the voyager install directory (already found it
in the previous installation but forgot to tell about...)
--
Greetings,
Claude Renaud
Skype :
Name : renaud_claude
Number : 0870 445 179
The Bat! Voyager 3.63.15 (BETA) running on Windows XP 5.1
Hello all,
Monday, December 19, 2005, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
> We've updated the Voyager Installer
> What's new since the last version of Voyager (3.63.09) released 11-Dec-2005?
> [+] If you add Registry DWORD Value "CopyToOutboxProhibited"=1 to
> "HKEY_CUR
Is there a link for just the voyager.exe itself without installer?
thanks!
--
Christian Grams
Harlekin's-EDV
[using: Windows XP SP2 with TB!3.51.10 (installed via MSI)]
Current beta is 3.63.15 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.
Hello Tbbeta,
We've updated the Voyager Installer
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_install.exe
What's new since the last version of Voyager (3.63.09) released 11-Dec-2005?
[+] If you add Registry DWORD Value "CopyToOutboxProhibited"=1 to
Hallo Claude,
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:15:04 +0100GMT (18-12-05, 16:15 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
CR> I have TB Pro and Tb Voyager and I would like to know, as TBV mail base
CR> is encrypted, if it is possible, on the same machine to install both
CR> products and access tbv mailbas
Hi all,
I have TB Pro and Tb Voyager and I would like to know, as TBV mail base
is encrypted, if it is possible, on the same machine to install both
products and access tbv mailbase with tb pro and how to set up tb pro
in order to do it : do we have to use OTFE or should we have to specify
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, at 09:20:37 [GMT +0100] (which was 9:20 where I
live) Claude Renaud wrote:
Hello Claude,
> When can we expect to have the next Voyager beta refresh solving the
> previously reported bug of this version ?
Matter of priorities?
--
Henk M. de
Hi all,
When can we expect to have the next Voyager beta refresh solving the
previously reported bug of this version ?
--
Greetings,
Claude Renaud
Skype :
Name : renaud_claude
Number : 0870 445 179
The Bat! Voyager 3.63.09 (BETA) running on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack
Hallo Paul,
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 06:46:33 -0500GMT (13-12-2005, 12:46 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
PVN> Is there a 3.63.08 version of Voyager available?
No.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
4 aces beats full house. Smith & Wesson beats 4 aces.
The Bat! 3.63.08 (Beta)
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Hallo Paul,
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 06:46:33 -0500GMT (13-12-2005, 12:46 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
PVN> Is there a 3.63.08 version of Voyager available? If so, can you
PVN> provide a link?
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person be
12/13/2005 6:45 AM
Hello all,
Is there a 3.63.08 version of Voyager available? If so, can you
provide a link?
Thank You Very Much!
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.63.09 (BETA) on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP No OTFE Opera 9 Beta 1
Hello Marek,
Monday, December 12, 2005, 18:09:13, you wrote:
>>I have installed fresh Voyager from latest installation package and
>>MailTicker doesn't work - when is mode "Show Automatically" selected,
>>no MailTicker appears and when I set "Show Al
Hello,
I have installed fresh Voyager from latest installation package and
MailTicker doesn't work - when is mode "Show Automatically" selected,
no MailTicker appears and when I set "Show Allways", it appears, but
it stays and displays "1 new messages" text only.
Clive...
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:53:01 +, you wrote:
>> There weren't many changes since last update of Voyager:
>
>Pity. I don't see anything that resolves my inability to even install
>the programme in the first place.
Tis a pity! I hope you can get a complete act
Maxim...
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 01:43:22 +0200, you wrote:
>Hello Tbbeta,
>
> We've made installer program for the Voyager which prompts the user the
> destination drive where to copy Voyager files.
>
> Here it is:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_ba
Hello Peter,
Sunday, December 11, 2005, 3:07:48 AM, you wrote:
PO> Uhm, the hour you mentioned has passed.
And you should have been in bed at the time you wrote your message. :-)
(Not that I was...)
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using
The Bat! Version 3.63.08 (Beta)
MyMa
There weren't many changes since last update of Voyager:
Pity. I don't see anything that resolves my inability to even install
the programme in the first place.
--
Regards
Clive Taylor
Current beta is 3.63.09 | &#x
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005, at 01:43:22 [GMT +0200] (which was 0:43 where I
live) Maxim Masiutin wrote:
> We've made installer program for the Voyager which prompts the user
> the destination drive where to copy Voyager files.
> Here it is:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/fi
Hello Maxim Masiutin,
on Sun, 11 Dec 2005 02:49:24 +0200 (2005-12-11 01:49:24 in .nl) in the
message with reference you [MM]
wrote (at least in part):
MM> Within an hour I will update the fixed installation of Voyager
MM> that resolves the issue of copying "userdic.tlx"
U
Hello Tbbeta,
Within an hour I will update the fixed installation of Voyager that resolves
the issue of copying "userdic.tlx"
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current beta
lem as Richard.
The downloaded file should be approx 8MB, instead of around 4MB
earlier. Are you, perhaps, announcing new items on here before you
actually made such a file available, completely, for downloading?
After downloading and installing again, I got:
---
Installing V
Hello Richard,
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 you wrote in
RW> Not here I'm afraid. Downloaded twice just in case the first was a fault
RW> but the same each time.
My bad, well sort of. I didn't look at the file size and had to download
it twice more before it all arrived - that shouldn't happen surely?
Hello Maxim,
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 you wrote in
MM> We've made installer program for the Voyager which prompts the user
MM> the destination drive where to copy Voyager files.
Not here I'm afraid. Downloaded twice just in case the first was a fault
but the same each time. The inst
Hello Tbbeta,
We've made installer program for the Voyager which prompts the user the
destination drive where to copy Voyager files.
Here it is:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_install.exe
There weren't many changes since last update of Voyager:
it?
Over here it runs just fine when called from a nested QT.
You don't mean you tried to use it by calling an external template,
would you? After all you'd need the %Include macro for that...
--
Groetjes, Roelof
"Welcome to Hell. Here's your copy of Windows95." - Satan
Reply to message sent 12/06/2005, @ 22:42:51 (3:42 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Roelof,
> %ProgramDir
Do you know if there's anyway to use that in the "Run external action"
filter? I played around with it and wasn't able to get it to work,
bu
On Tuesday, December 6, 2005, at 23:31:36 [UTC+0100] (Tuesday, December 6,
2005 23:31 my local time) Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 6, 2005, at 15:59:13 [UTC-0600] (Tuesday, December 6,
> 2005 22:59 my local time) Nick Danger wrote:
>> Odd. It works fine when called directly,
On Tuesday, December 6, 2005, at 15:59:13 [UTC-0600] (Tuesday, December 6,
2005 22:59 my local time) Nick Danger wrote:
>> %ProgramDir
> Odd. It works fine when called directly, but doesn't seem to work when
> nested and called via a %QINCLUDE macro.
Probably you use single "%" prefix sign in Q
Reply to message sent 12/06/2005, @ 22:42:51 (3:42 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Roelof,
> %ProgramDir
Odd. It works fine when called directly, but doesn't seem to work when
nested and called via a %QINCLUDE macro.
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
___
Reply to message sent 12/06/2005, @ 22:42:51 (3:42 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Roelof,
> %ProgramDir
BINGO!
Thanks Roelof.
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
Current beta is 3.63.06 | 'Using T
Reply to message sent 12/06/2005, @ 20:51:38 (1:51 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Peter,
> Maybe we need to be able to enter "virtual"/relative folders, like
> %maildir% or %programdir%.
Yeah, it would also be nice for using filters to run exter
Hallo Nick,
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 13:41:13 -0600GMT (6-12-2005, 20:41 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
ND> Is there any way to refer to a text file for cookies in Voyager
ND> without specifying a drive designation?
%ProgramDir
--
Groetjes, Roelof
"In God we trust. All others we mo
Nick,
On 06-12-2005 20:41, you [ND] wrote in
:
ND> Is there any way to refer to a text file for cookies in Voyager
ND> without specifying a drive designation?
Maybe we need to be able to enter "virtual"/relative folders, like
%maildir% or %programdir%.
--
Best regards
Is there any way to refer to a text file for cookies in Voyager
without specifying a drive designation?
Thanks,
--
Fly for now,
òžó Nick
Danger
[MUA: The Bat! v3.63.07 (BETA)]
[OS: Windows XP 5 1]
Current beta is 3.63.06 | '
On Monday, December 5, 2005 @ 10:59:45 AM [-0700], Roelof Otten wrote:
MT>> Not sure if it's been mentioned yet (couldn't tell through all of the
MT>> Voyager related chatter) but now that Voyager seems to be a hot topic,
MT>> shouldn't we create a Voyage
t - I could never
get my common filters loaded into Pro. I'm guessing there's a real
problem associated with common filters and converting to Pro or
Voyager.
For giggles, since I was already in up to my neck, I added some new
common filters to Pro and tried to get Voyager up and runnin
Hi Nick,
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, at 13:55:15 [GMT -0600] (which was 20:55 where I live)
you wrote about: 'Voyager - I'm crying Uncle.'
> Hello Robert,
>> What is your setting for Home Directory in Account Properties/Files &
>> Directories. Did you speficy a com
rting to OTFE almost is like switched to Voyager.
However here it comes.
Create an internal back-up with TB, including everything.
Now copy your complete message base to a safe location (that's not
needed for the transition, but just in case)
Export the TB registry settings to
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, at 20:03:23 [GMT +0100] (which was 20:03 where I
live) Roelof Otten wrote:
HDB>> How do I get other languages than English to work within Voyager. I
HDB>> tried to place a copy of thebat.lng in the main directory and in the
HDB>> maildirectory but no...
; I have for each account and just a Mail Directory set in
> Preferences/System.
A complete path. Because. and this is why I want Voyager so badly,
I have the mail directories on a USB drive - not below the folder with
all of TB's executables.
> I bet you have a hard coded path in your
Hi Nick,
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, at 13:10:28 [GMT -0600] (which was 20:10 where I live)
you wrote about: 'Voyager - I'm crying Uncle.'
>> Did you have all of your accounts stored in the same mail directory
>> or were they in different locations?
> All the accounts ar
sábado, 26 nov 2005 at 16:20, it seems you wrote:
> Thanks!!!
> Can I put a link to this on www.thebat.hu ?
Yes no problem ;-)
--
/\/ Using The Bat! 3.63.06 (Beta) Professional
/ \ / \ / Windows XP (5.1.2600 Service Pack 2)
/\/ e t \/ i c i o
Reply to message sent 12/05/2005, @ 19:55:24 (12:55 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Roelof,
ND>> When trying to restore a backup from my "main" TB! program Voyager
ND>> insists on writing the directories using the original
Hallo Henk,
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 16:43:40 +0100GMT (5-12-2005, 16:43 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
HDB> How do I get other languages than English to work within Voyager. I
HDB> tried to place a copy of thebat.lng in the main directory and in the
HDB> maildirectory but no...
Well,
Hallo Matt,
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 08:59:05 -0800GMT (5-12-2005, 17:59 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
MT> Not sure if it's been mentioned yet (couldn't tell through all of the
MT> Voyager related chatter) but now that Voyager seems to be a hot topic,
MT> shouldn't we c
Hallo Nick,
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 11:09:42 -0600GMT (5-12-2005, 18:09 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
ND> When trying to restore a backup from my "main" TB! program Voyager
ND> insists on writing the directories using the original path.
Can't confirm that. Not the first tim
Well, I spent the better part of the weekend and this morning playing
around trying to get Voyager to a useable point and am tossing in the
towel. Here's my laundry list of woes:
When trying to restore a backup from my "main" TB! program Voyager
insists on writing the direct
Not sure if it's been mentioned yet (couldn't tell through all of the
Voyager related chatter) but now that Voyager seems to be a hot topic,
shouldn't we create a VoyagerBETA list?
--
Matt
v. 3.63.06 (Beta)
Current
Timestamp: Monday, December 5, 2005 local time: 3:39:23 PM
I have a two questions, sorry if some answers already have been given. I
am using Voyager since this weekend and have not really paid attention
till now :-(
How do I get other languages than English to work within Voyager. I
tried to
Hallo Nick,
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 08:27:27 -0600GMT (4-12-2005, 15:27 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
ND> In looking at the home directory in the configuration for my accounts
ND> it references "I:\TB\mail\gmail".
Might that be a directory you specified in one of your templates, for
a cookie file
Hallo Nick,
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 10:27:00 -0600GMT (4-12-2005, 17:27 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
ND> Can anyone tell me what file the filter information (specifically common
ND> filters) is kept in for Voyager?
account.erb (.srb for TB without OTFE)
Common filters are stored in th
Hello Maxim,
Saturday, December 3, 2005, 10:29:06 PM, you wrote:
>>>It seems Voyager stores message base paths in absolute mode, which is
>>>plain wrong.
MM> How did you find out that?
just guessing, I have not tested it at all. It seemed to be a reasonable
ex
Can anyone tell me what file the filter information (specifically common
filters) is kept in for Voyager?
I can't seem to create any common files and wanted to wipe out that
file and see if that helps.
Thanks,
--
Nick
Cu
Reply to message sent 12/3/2005, @ 00:42:40 (5:42 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Roelof,
> What version are you using? I had that error while using TBV
> 3.63.2.0
I upgraded to the recent beta and the quick template problem was
fixed. Thanks.
-
Reply to message sent 12/3/2005, @ 01:20:44 (5:20 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Maxim,
> It's completely mobile. What's the problem?
For me, when I try to run it on another computer I get errors as it's
looking for the folders on drive letters
On Sunday, December 4, 2005, 7:40:43, Mark Partous wrote:
> These settings are loaded every time Windows is being started.
No, they aren't. Registry settings are read-in when the application first
needs them, and they stay cached for a while (registry works similarly to
disk cache, however it's i
Hello Mark Partous & everyone else,
on 04-Dez-2005 at 07:40 you (Mark Partous) wrote:
> Well, I have a lot of software that I only need to use a few times a
> year. These settings are loaded every time Windows is being started. I
> would have preferred a situtation where one would have the choice
Hallo Vili,
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 10:05:22 +0100GMT (4-12-2005, 10:05 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
V> That was my assumption, too. The question wanted to reflect to the
V> opposite of mobile use vs. registry use, while TBV says it is mobile
V> while still using the reg.
It doesn't really
Mark
> Please do not post such self-correcting mails anymore. I had read your
> message skipping the quoted text. Without your correction I wouldn't have
> noticed the "swearing"! :-)
Gosh I'm so sorry I have offended you with my humor. Please accept my
sincerest apology.
--
Neal
___
Hello Roelof,
V>> You and beta testers mentioned that it still stores something in the
V>> registry... If it is totally mobile, why does it store anything in the
V>> registry?
> Because it's not fully rewritten yet. At least that would be my
> assumption.
That was my assumption, too. The ques
Hallo Vili,
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 07:05:39 +0100GMT (4-12-2005, 7:05 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
V> You and beta testers mentioned that it still stores something in the
V> registry... If it is totally mobile, why does it store anything in the
V> registry?
Because it's not fully rewritten yet.
Hello Michael,
Friday, December 2, 2005, 11:43:42 PM, you wrote:
MS> How about moving to a new workstation? With configuration-files you just
MS> have to backup your application and your configuration, copy both on
MS> your new machine and your done. Try this one with applications that need
MS> t
Hello Alexander,
Friday, December 2, 2005, 10:59:49 PM, you wrote:
ASK> Thats a common myth, and it never happened to me even once in 5 1/2 years
ASK> of using different Windows systems.
Good to know the crashes I had and the problems I currently have were due to
"a common myth"! :-)
--
Best
Hello Jernej,
Friday, December 2, 2005, 11:03:05 PM, you wrote:
JS> Registry slow? Get RegMon from sysinternals, and look at the number of
JS> transactions Registry handles per second - (I get an average of 870 on my
JS> computer). Now imagine that all of these were instead querying normal files
Hello Neal,
Saturday, December 3, 2005, 5:38:43 AM, you wrote:
NL> Please do not quote swearing members on this list. This is a clear
NL> violation of the list rules and will not be tolerated. The audience
NL> here is a mixed bunch and this is as much a matter of polite
NL> consideration for othe
Hello Paul,
Saturday, December 3, 2005, 2:59:43 AM, you wrote:
PVN> If we were all perfect why would they put erasers on pencils and
PVN> why do they make replacement erasers?
If we were perfect, would we still need pencils? :-)
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using
The Bat
Hello Maxim,
Sunday, December 4, 2005, 12:20:44 AM, you wrote:
MM> It's completely mobile. What's the problem?
As long as it uses the registry it won't be. :-)
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using
The Bat! Version 3.63.06 (Beta)
MyMacros 1.11
zOmbie's Macros Version 0.7
Hello Maxim,
>>>I see. I just thought, I dont try it between computers until it is
>>>completely mobile.
> It's completely mobile. What's the problem?
You and beta testers mentioned that it still stores something in the
registry... If it is totally mobile, why does it store anything in the
regist
Hello Vili,
Saturday, December 3, 2005, 7:04:14 PM, you wrote:
V> TBV is beta. Still stores some parameters in registry. So, we, you
V> have to wait until it will be COMPLETELY mobile.
As long as it uses the system registry I won't try it out.
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
Maxim,
On 03-12-2005 01:07, you [MM] wrote in
:
MM> The users of The Bat! Professional will use Voyager with their
MM> keys of The Bat! Pro. This means that The Bat! Pro registration is
MM> also valid for Voyager.
Impressive. Thanks.
--
Best regards
Peter Fjelsten
3.62.12 Pr
Hallo Nick,
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 09:34:15 -0600GMT (3-12-2005, 16:34 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
ND> When I try to add/edit a quick template I get the following error:
ND> Ancestor for 'TBXPopupMenu' not found.
What version are you using? I had that error while using TBV 3.63.2.0
--
Groetje
Hallo Nick,
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 09:18:37 -0600GMT (3-12-2005, 16:18 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
ND> I have Voyager up and running but when I took my USB drive and plugged
ND> it into another computer and then ran Voyager all I got was a plethora
ND> of error messages that it coul
Hello Vili,
Saturday, December 03, 2005, 1:01:47 AM, you wrote:
>>I see. I just thought, I dont try it between computers until it is
>>completely mobile.
It's completely mobile. What's the problem?
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Hello Maxim,
>>>TBV is beta. Still stores some parameters in registry. So, we, you
>>>have to wait until it will be COMPLETELY mobile.
> Even if it stores something in the registry, it shouldn't give
> errors about drive letters.
I see. I just thought, I dont try it between computers until
Hello Maxim,
Saturday, December 3, 2005, 12:07:04 AM, you wrote:
> There were opinions in the list that Voyager is another product to make
> money.
And so it should do. You should be rewarded for your efforts.
> The users of The Bat! Professional will use Voyager with their keys of
Hello Fabio,
Saturday, December 03, 2005, 8:35:43 PM, you wrote:
>>It seems Voyager stores message base paths in absolute mode, which is
>>plain wrong.
How did you find out that?
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMA
Hello Vili,
Saturday, December 03, 2005, 8:04:14 PM, you wrote:
>>TBV is beta. Still stores some parameters in registry. So, we, you
>>have to wait until it will be COMPLETELY mobile.
Even if it stores something in the registry, it shouldn't give errors about
drive letters.
--
Best regards,
Ma
An update on filters not keeping changes...
It seems to be a bit more specific at least in my case.
If I make any changes specifying to what accounts certain common
filters are assigned, the changes are lost upon exiting Voyager.
Thanks.
--
Fly for now,
òžó Nick
Danger
[MUA: The Bat
Hello Nick,
Saturday, December 3, 2005, 4:18:37 PM, you wrote:
ND> of error messages that it couldn't open folders as it was looking for
ND> a drive letter that didn't exist.
It seems Voyager stores message base paths in absolute mode, which is
plain wrong. Paths must be
Hello Nick,
> I have Voyager up and running but when I took my USB drive and plugged
> it into another computer and then ran Voyager all I got was a plethora
> of error messages that it couldn't open folders as it was looking for
> a drive letter that didn't exist.
>
Hello Nick...
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 09:34:15 -0600, you wrote:
>Hello again,
>
>When I try to add/edit a quick template I get the following error:
>
>Ancestor for 'TBXPopupMenu' not found.
>
>Ideas?
>
>Thanks,
I can't confirm this. It's worki
Hello again,
When I try to add/edit a quick template I get the following error:
Ancestor for 'TBXPopupMenu' not found.
Ideas?
Thanks,
--
Nick
Current beta is 3.63.06 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat
901 - 1000 of 1222 matches
Mail list logo
