On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 01:31:51AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to learn to use PGP with email. Does anyone know a mailing list
on PGP?
Yep, PGP-basics. See on http://www.egroups.com/group/PGP-Basics for
more info, subscription, etc.
--
Lionel Elie Mamane
RFC 1991 (PGP 2.x) 2048
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, July 19, 2000, 10:31:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nnn I need to learn to use PGP with email. Does anyone know a mailing list
nnn on PGP?
Yes... See my signature at the end of this message, or go to the
following URL and join
Hi Curt,
Even though there's a mailing list group selected and displayed,
exporting results in all groups being contained in the exported
list. Am I doing something wrong? Bug? Net-yet-added feature?
Select all the members (or some of them) in a group and use
[File/Export To/Export
Hi Dirk and Christian,
Yes I a few months ago. I have import the Outlook mails in OE and
then Import the mails from OE to TB!.
BTW: I loose some header info at the import (References, Received,
What's "References"? By "Received" I think you mean received
date/time, right?
...), but i
Hi Thomas,
I am the one still using an IMAP server. (It is still working
fine). Is it possible to set something up in order to access
shared folders (on the IMAP server its no problem) or to have
incoming mails visualized to more then on users? (that do not have
necessarily configured the
Hi Marck,
Of course, wrapping has *no* effect on HTML formatted messages
Hmmm, I think TB won't wrap only html messages that hard code their
"width" information, which it shouldn't. For regular html messages
(that don't have such information), TB wraps just fine. At least it
does here.
--
Hi Dirk,
Think about a *.bat file
[example snipped]
Great, that works! Thanks a lot.
It gets trickier, however, when it comes to outgoing mail filter,
since the filter is only triggered when TB is actually sending it
out. Can it be done should I want to do something to my message
"prior to"
Reply begun at:
Thursday, July 20, 2000 6:51:53 AM
Nope, that doesn't do the trick either. I still get ALL the address
book entries of the book of which the group is a member. This is
driving me nuts.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Best regards,
Curt
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 02:50:20 -0700, Ming-Li
Servus Ming-Li,
Am 20.07.2000 so gegen 11:44 meintest Du:
What's "References"? By "Received" I think you mean received
date/time, right?
Nop. It's used for threading and contains the message-ID(s) to which
the message replies, adding the one that you replied to to the already
existing list.
Hello Ben,
Wednesday, July 19, 2000, 6:51:04 PM, you wrote:
N Well, in the EDITOR it also works here, but not in the Mail-VIEWER,
N maybe I have to live with the Workaround from Jason. :-(
BP I have been lamenting the lack of Wrap in the Display of e-mail... What is the
BP workaround (from
Hi Ben,
On 20 July 2000 at 06:40:52 GMT -0600 (which was 13:40 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "No wordwrap in Message-Viewer?":
BP I could have been more explicit. The e-mail I'm having the most
BP problem is from a list. While in some other e-mail
Hi Curt,
Nope, that doesn't do the trick either. I still get ALL the
address book entries of the book of which the group is a member.
This is driving me nuts.
Hm, it works here. I've tried several times. Is it possible a
new feature for the 1.45 beta? I don't know.
--
Best regards,
Reply begun at:
Thursday, July 20, 2000 9:17:10 AM
Thanks for the hint re 1.45. I may get it and try.
Best regards,
Curt
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 05:59:53 -0700, Ming-Li wrote:
Ming-Li Hi Curt,
Nope, that doesn't do the trick either. I still get ALL the
address book entries of the book of
Hi,
ver 1.44
I have al least once per day crash of tb! after I have to reboot.
BFF7B9AG Read of adresses 45485464
00424B31 Read of adresses 45485464
Any idea ?
Octave
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To
Hi Ming-Li,
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 03:50:58 -0700, you wrote:
ML It gets trickier, however, when it comes to outgoing mail filter,
ML since the filter is only triggered when TB is actually sending it
ML out. Can it be done should I want to do something to my message
ML "prior to" sending it on an
Hi Ming-Li,
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 06:08:03 -0700, you wrote:
ML Ok, that's Reference. I still think what Dirk meant by "Received"
ML should be what I said.
I am talking about Received:. That header contain the Routing of the
mails. Thats the first example for an missing header entry that come
me
Hi Dirk,
The interesting Header i am missing are:
Message-ID:
In-reply-To:
References:
And sure the recived time are missing.
This is very strange. I imported all my mail from OE to The Bat not
too long ago (around late May or early June), and I'm sure all the
headers are imported
Hello Marck,
Thursday, July 20, 2000, 7:03:05 AM, you wrote:
BP problem is from a list. While in some other e-mail programs, the
BP lines of the individual messages wrap properly, in the TB they
BP don't. For example they would show as wrapped in Eudora (my last
BP e-mail program).
MDP I'll
TM I am the one still using an IMAP server. (It is still working fine).
TM Is it possible to set something up in order to access shared folders
TM (on the IMAP server its no problem) or to have incoming mails
TM visualized to more then on users? (that do not have necessarily
TM configured the
BP This is my final answer... I can't seem to get it right. :-(( It was (is) a
BP Digest that I am have problems with.
Ah ha! The truth is heard! Ok that does it then, I was just
wondering the other day if digests were ever "fixed" in TB! and
here's one thing that pretty much guarantees
ok BFF7B9AG Read of adresses 45485464
ok 00424B31 Read of adresses 45485464
The address looked like it could be ASCII (aka a bad pointer), but it
translates into "EHTd". Does that string look familiar to you in any
way? (It won't solve the crash but it may help track it down.)
-tom!
--
I'm sure this subject has probably been discussed at one time, but I
can't find anything on it.
It's a simple situation and the answer will probably involve filters
or some such thing but here goes anyway:
In the short time that I have been using TB!, I have managed to
accumulate
Hello TBUDL,
I believe this question was asked before, but I've looked through the
archives, and can find no mention of it.
When a message is sent is it in text or HTML ?
Anyway to select in what format it is sent?
--
Best regards,
Andrew mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Andrew,
Thursday, July 20, 2000, 8:10:12 PM, you wrote:
AJGI Hello TBUDL,
AJGI I believe this question was asked before, but I've looked through the
AJGI archives, and can find no mention of it.
AJGI When a message is sent is it in text or HTML ?
AJGI Anyway to select in what format it
Hello Jamie,
Thursday, July 20, 2000, 2:21:01 PM, you wrote:
JD Hello Andrew,
JD Thursday, July 20, 2000, 8:10:12 PM, you wrote:
AJGI Hello TBUDL,
AJGI I believe this question was asked before, but I've looked through the
AJGI archives, and can find no mention of it.
AJGI When a message is
Hi Ben,
On 20 July 2000 at 10:06:18 GMT -0600 (which was 17:06 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "No wordwrap in Message-Viewer?":
BP It was (is) a Digest that I am have problems with.
Ah-ha this makes some difference. Perhaps this conversation
This message: 20/07/2000 20:33 GMT.
Hello Andrew,
On 20 July 2000 at 14:10:12 GMT -0500 (which was 20:10 where I live)
Andrew ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed:
AJGI When a message is sent is it in text or HTML ?
AJGI Anyway to select in what format it is sent?
It's in plain text, always.
If you
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 17:58:05 +0100, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP Ah-ha this makes some difference. Perhaps this conversation should
MDP be on TBBETA because Digest support has changed in the latest
MDP betas - which I see you are using. It seems that the viewer
MDP isn't wrapping
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 15:05:47 -0400, Lawrence Kalmakoff wrote:
LK What have users been doing (if anything) to off-load old messages
LK while still being able to view them, if necessary?
I created another account solely for archiving purposes. Since I
can filter based on message age,
Hello Curtis,
Thursday, July 20, 2000, 2:54:25 PM, you wrote:
MDP Ah-ha this makes some difference. Perhaps this conversation should
MDP be on TBBETA because Digest support has changed in the latest
MDP betas - which I see you are using. It seems that the viewer
MDP isn't wrapping
Hi Lawrence,
In the short time that I have been using TB!, I have managed to
accumulate over 6000 messages, some of which I would like to
off-load to an archive-type file. One of the few features that
I liked about Outlook 98 was its ability to archive old/selected
messages. I
C I created another account solely for archiving purposes. Since I
C can filter based on message age, I can archive messages by using read
C message filters to move messages to the archive account folders.I run
C them manually at interval periods.
I created two sub-folders for Inbox
Hi Curtis,
On 20 July 2000 at 15:54:25 GMT -0500 (which was 21:54 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "No wordwrap in Message-Viewer?":
C The enhanced digest support is in official release versions of
C TB!. The conversation seems to be in the
I'm using The Bat! Version 1.44
Serial Number EC7D7F61
under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 .
MDP to both. Give the "main" folder a size or time limit to keep the size
MDP down. This makes it easy to browse "current" mail yet still have an
MDP easily accessible archive.
One good
Uups, I should know that the Preferences for a Viewer are hidden in
the Editor Preferences! ;-)
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
Hi there masters of wisdom™ :)
I've got a question. I have 2 computers, a home one and a laptop from
my job. I want to be able to use TB on both, as I will be off home for
a longer time but need to access all my mail (I have 12 accounts).The
company normally uses a mail program that doesnt need
JMP I've got a question. I have 2 computers, a home one and a laptop from
JMP my job. I want to be able to use TB on both, as I will be off home for
JMP a longer time but need to access all my mail (I have 12 accounts).
I use it on two computers as well, with the mail database stored on my
Hello Ming-Li,
Thursday, July 20, 2000, 3:17:22 PM, you wrote:
In the short time that I have been using TB!, I have managed to
accumulate over 6000 messages, some of which I would like to
off-load to an archive-type file. One of the few features that
I liked about Outlook 98 was
Hi Ben,
On 21 July 2000 at 17:07:59 GMT -0600 (which was 00:07 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Archiving old mail messages":
ML Don't select the "Message files (.MSG)" option when you export. Use
ML the "Unix Mailbox" option instead. The output
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 22:18:51 +0100, Miguel Anjo wrote:
MA I created two sub-folders for Inbox and Sent and then I also use
MA read message filters like Curtis.
MA Is there any advantage to use a separate account instead of a separate
MA folder in the same account?
MA I speak in terms
Thursday, July 20, 2000, 5:10:24 PM, Curtis wrote:
C On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 15:05:47 -0400, Lawrence Kalmakoff wrote:
LK What have users been doing (if anything) to off-load old messages
LK while still being able to view them, if necessary?
C I created another account solely for
Hello TBUDL,
I occasionally (ok, so maybe more often :) will delete a message from
my inbox after reading it rather than moving it to its appropriate
project folder.
Is there any way to filter deletes (like outgoing mail) so that it
ends up in a different folder than Trash?
--
Best regards,
Hi SRNA,
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 21:59:09 -0400GMT (21/07/2000, 09:59 +0800GMT),
SRNA wrote:
C I created another account solely for archiving purposes. Since I
C can filter based on message age, I can archive messages by using read
C message filters to move messages to the archive account
On Thursday, July 20, 2000, 2:17:22 PM, Ming-Li wrote:
ML Don't select the "Message files (.MSG)" option when you export. Use
ML the "Unix Mailbox" option instead. The output would be a perfectly
ML readable plain text file with all the messages you select.
Two problems that I experience.
Hi Clif,
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 19:34:28 -0700GMT (21/07/2000, 10:34 +0800GMT),
Clif Oliver wrote:
CO Is there any way to filter deletes (like outgoing mail) so that it
CO ends up in a different folder than Trash?
Define "delete" for me. Especially in contrast to "move". ;-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Hello Nick,
On Thursday, July 20, 2000 at 19:31:06 GMT -0700 (which was 7:31 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Two problems that I experience. First, all the headers are included when
you save messages *.msg.
Sorry, I don't understand. Why is this a problem? This is what TB
46 matches
Mail list logo
