Saturday, 25 May 2002
Hi RapidFX,
On Fri, 24 May 2002, at 16:47:08 [GMT -0800] (which was 12:47 p.m.
here in Eastbourne, N.Z.) you wrote:
R> I can confirm "issues" with 1.60m and XP.
R> flaky is about the correct description also :)
R> Seems leaving Bat! open for lengths of time over 1-2 hours
Hello Dave!
On Friday, May 24, 2002 at 6:37:46 PM you wrote:
> Also, Opera seems more flaky that usual, but also able to access sites
> that I used to have problems with. Anyone have similar flakiness issue
> with Opera since 6.02?
I didn't ever had any problems during the last months, when I b
Hi Dierk,
Saturday, May 25, 2002, 8:50:42 AM, you wrote:
>> Also, Opera seems more flaky that usual, but also able to access sites
>> that I used to have problems with. Anyone have similar flakiness issue
>> with Opera since 6.02?
DH> I didn't ever had any problems during the last months, when
On Saturday, May 25, 2002, 03:18, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Any experience using The Bat! as a service under Windows NT / 2k
> server?
No, sorry.
> I've currently got it configured as a System Task set to launch on
> restart, but that has the following problems:
What do you mean by system task?
>
El viernes 24 de mayo de 2002, 22.18, Mark Wieder decía:
MW> Any experience using The Bat! as a service under Windows NT / 2k
MW> server?
no, but TB is not a service. How do you want to do it?
And, if you don't mind, why do you want to do it?
--
Ricardo M. Reyes | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
El sábado 25 de mayo de 2002, 1.05, Jonathan Angliss decía:
JA> Might not be a TB thing... might be an ISP thing setting a rule saying only one
JA> connection at once from a single IP (odd rule, but you never know). I wouldn't
JA> see that TB! would have a problem as it opens a seperate socket c
On Sat, 25 May 2002 09:25:22 -0300 "Ricardo M. Reyes"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MW> Any experience using The Bat! as a service under Windows NT / 2k
> MW> server?
>
> no, but TB is not a service. How do you want to do it?
Someday in the past I run TB! as Service in NT4 Server, I was using
Fi
On 25 May 2002, 13:25, Ricardo M. Reyes wrote:
> no, but TB is not a service. How do you want to do it?
> And, if you don't mind, why do you want to do it?
~~~
I can think of one reason to want to run TB as a service -- if you're
running it in server mode and don't want it to stop functioning j
Hi Geoff,
On Sat, 25 May 2002 14:43:31 +0100, you wrote:
> The other alternative is to leave a relevant user logged in which,
> depending on physical security around the machine, may not be
> acceptable.
But with NT, you press CTRL ALT DEL, and lock the work station if the person is
walking away
Friday, May 24, 2002, 9:37:46 AM, you wrote:
[snip]
DC> Also, Opera seems more flaky that usual, but also able to access sites
DC> that I used to have problems with. Anyone have similar flakiness issue
DC> with Opera since 6.02?
Yes. I found version 6 to be kind of flakey, in that it
crashes
On Saturday, May 25, 2002, 4:44:33 AM, Ricardo M. Reyes wrote:
> If I check again the failed one, it goes ok.
> It seems to fail when attempting to connect simultaneously to the same
> server, although I don't know if it's a problem at TB or softhome.net.
> Anyone had the same problem?
Yes, al
On Sat, 25 May 2002 09:23:36 +0100 "Julian Beach (Lists)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be good if there could be a way of extending the timeout
> period in TB. I think that I would have had this problem in Outlook,
> but since the timeout was 1 minute, it was rarely a problem.
As far a
GL> On 25 May 2002, 13:25, Ricardo M. Reyes wrote:
GL> I can think of one reason to want to run TB as a service -- if you're
GL> running it in server mode and don't want it to stop functioning just
GL> because no-one's logged onto the machine. The requester is running TB
GL> on NT Server, so that
Marcus-
Thanks. I missed this option. I'll look around for it.
Saturday, May 25, 2002, 2:01:18 AM, you wrote:
MO> There is an option for services: Allow service to interact with
MO> desktop. Maybe this would help? I've never used it with TB! but I have
MO> with other programs and it worked like
Saturday, May 25, 2002, 2:01:18 AM, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
MO> What do you mean by system task?
Sorry - I meant Scheduled Task.
-Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v1.60h on Windows 2000 5.0 Build
2195 Service Pack 2
Current Ver:
tbudl,
I was just going through some folders and changing column size... Is
there a way to auto size them (similar to double clicking the
header separator in the evil applications like -dare I say it- M$
Excel)?
Note, I don't want to change any of the current behavior, just add
the o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas F [TF] wrote:
...
TF> You said it. I used myrealbox this for three years when I lived in
TF> Taiwan, and regardless which ISP I was connected to, it always
TF> delivered all my mails from any account. :-)
At what speed?
Slower than your ISP's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas F [TF] wrote:
...
TF> You need to stay connected until the mail is actually delivered.
TF> Out of the question for me on per-minute dial-up. Same holds true
TF> for an SMTP server on my machine.
MDaemon here can be configured to use an SMTP ho
Hi Thomas,
On Sat, 25 May 2002 13:36:06 +0700, you wrote:
> Hello Reza,
>
> On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:29:46 -0400 GMT (25/05/02, 02:29 +0700 GMT),
> Reza Habib wrote:
>
> RH> Foxmail has a built in smtp server so it will relay your mail to the
> RH> host directly, bypassing the isp. That would be
Hello Allie,
On Sat, 25 May 2002 12:54:14 -0500 GMT (26/05/02, 00:54 +0700 GMT),
Allie C Martin wrote:
ACM> MDaemon here can be configured to use an SMTP host in the sense that
ACM> it delivers mail to another SMTP server, usually your ISP SMTP server
ACM> instead of doing a direct delivery.
OK
Hello Allie,
On Sat, 25 May 2002 12:57:19 -0500 GMT (26/05/02, 00:57 +0700 GMT),
Allie C Martin wrote:
TF>> You said it. I used myrealbox this for three years when I lived in
TF>> Taiwan, and regardless which ISP I was connected to, it always
TF>> delivered all my mails from any account. :-)
AC
On 20020525, Tim Musson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just going through some folders and changing column
> size... Is there a way to auto size them (similar to double
> clicking the header separator in the evil applications like
> -dare I say it- M$ Excel)?
This is a default behaviour in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Om 20:58 op zaterdag 25 mei 2002, Tone Marie Berg:
> This is a default behaviour in Windows which all applications should
> inherit, actually. Explorer does this, and all Windows applications
> behaving "as expected" should do this.
trust me, it is
On Sun, 26 May 2002 01:18:29 +0700 Thomas F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> ACM> MDaemon here can be configured to use an SMTP host in the sense
> ACM> that it delivers mail to another SMTP server, usually your ISP
> ACM> SMTP server instead of doing a direct delivery.
>
> OK then, why would I need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas F [TF] wrote:
...
ACM>> MDaemon here can be configured to use an SMTP host in the sense
ACM>> that it delivers mail to another SMTP server, usually your ISP
ACM>> SMTP server instead of doing a direct delivery.
TF> OK then, why would I need MD
Folks,
I had a problem where I was trying to send a message and my SMTP server was
rejecting my connection. The Bat! told me to check the log file. I thought
it was referring to the account.log file associated with the account, but
the account.log file told me to also check the logfile. So the
26 matches
Mail list logo
