Re: I sent RitLabs a message...

2002-08-02 Thread Alain de Gevigney
Hello Allie, On Thu, 1 Aug 2002 at 18:54:30 [GMT -0500] (which was 01:54 where I live) you wrote: ACM In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], ACM Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] wrote: MDP Not every mass-mailing utility is responsible for MDP flooding your inbox with spam. ADR is not

Re: finding email address

2002-08-02 Thread Sudip Pokhrel
Hi Bernd, On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 06:52:24 +0100 GMT (Aug 02, 11:37 my local time), you [BG] wrote BG Then cut and paste the address from CC into the body. I would even BG suggest leaving it there, allowing not only the third party to BG know you forwarded his/her address, ... BG Isn't that the

Re: Keep messages in the base for (days)

2002-08-02 Thread Marcus Ohlstrm
On Friday, August 2, 2002, 01:45, Allie C Martin wrote: S I tried to set a few of my folders to only keep messages for a S couple of days (folder -Properties -General), but the messages S don't get automatically deleted when they should be. What I'm uncertain about is whether or not messages

TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello all, The monthly Mission Statement reminder received yesterday reminded me of something I wanted to propose some time ago. Couldn't these headers: List-help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=help List-unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-ID: The Bat! User Discussion List

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Gerard
ON Friday, August 2, 2002, 11:20:59 AM, you wrote: MAU Hello all, MAU The monthly Mission Statement reminder received yesterday reminded me MAU of something I wanted to propose some time ago. MAU Couldn't these headers: List-help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=help List-unsubscribe:

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Gerard, I agree on your bandwidht concern. Thanks :) As I understand it the headers function as menu items under specials|mailing list but have to be present in each mail. Yes, I know. And, to me, some of the most useless menu options in TB. Of the 25+ mailing list I am subscribed

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Gerard, On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 11:52:58 +0200 GMT (02/08/02, 16:52 +0700 GMT), Gerard wrote: G I agree on your bandwidht concern. Give me (a DUN connection user) please a little math for this waste of bandwidth. Please compare it to ML's that don't use these headers or footers, but many

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Miguel, @02 August 2002, 12:13 +0200 (11:13 UK time) Miguel A. Urech [MAU] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Gerard: MAU ... Of the 25+ mailing list I am subscribed to, only TB ones do MAU use these headers. All YahooGroups

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Marck, All YahooGroups lists do. So do others. I'll be brief to be consistent with my bandwidth conservation campaign. So what! ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c Current Ver: 1.61

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 12:35:47 +0200 Miguel A. Urech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll be brief to be consistent with my bandwidth conservation campaign. So what! ;-) Maybe you may consider to create specific filter which only download body text (content) without message header, or strip out some

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, @02 August 2002, 17:06 +0700 (11:06 UK time) Thomas F. [TF] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Gerard on TBUDL: TF I pay THB 35/hr (about ¤ 0.80/hr). My average download speed is a low TF 1KB/sec. With the volume of

Re: finding email address

2002-08-02 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Bernd. At 1:52 AM on Friday, August 02, 2002 you wrote the following about [finding email address]: BG [...] place the cursor into the CC field, type the BG requested addressee's name until the address is resolved BG by TB! BG Then cut and paste the address from CC into the body. BG [/...]

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Syafril, Maybe you may consider to create specific filter which only download body text (content) without message header, or strip out some headers on the fly while download messages :- I have an even more sophisticated filter that looks for _significant_ text in messages and

Content of X-Mailer Header

2002-08-02 Thread Sudip Pokhrel
Hi Batpeople, How do I automatically insert the content of X-Mailer header (sender's) in the message body of my replies? -- Cheers,Sudip Pokhrel Sudip Kathmandu-NP. PGP Key ID: 0xD93F5185 /Attachments/

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] wrote: MDP The bottom line is that I sincerely believe there should be a MDP footer but am open to suggestions about what is or is not vital MDP information in it.

Re: Content of X-Mailer Header

2002-08-02 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Sudip Pokhrel [SP] wrote: SPHow do I automatically insert the content of X-Mailer header SP(sender's) in the message body of my replies? You can create a quick template containing the

Re: Content of X-Mailer Header

2002-08-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Sudip, @02 August 2002, 17:36 +0545 (12:51 UK time) Sudip Pokhrel [SP] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: SPHow do I automatically insert the content of X-Mailer header SP(sender's) in the message body of my replies?

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Allie. At 8:04 AM on Friday, August 02, 2002 you wrote the following about [TBUDL Bandwidth]: ACM Personally, I believe in the use of a single link to ACM which all the information given is displayed, such as: ACM For important discussion list information please go to: ACM URL I tend to

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jan Rifkinson [JR] wrote: JR I tend to agree with you, Allie. Why don't we try it for a while JR see what happens? If I get more OK's on this approach, especially from my fellow moderator Marck,

Re: Content of X-Mailer Header

2002-08-02 Thread Sudip Pokhrel
Hi Batters, Thanks Marck and Allie for the solution and Sincere apology for the double post. I think it's a sure sign that I should halt my campaign to finish the six pack of Carlsberg... Oh well its Friday ;) -- Cheers,Sudip Pokhrel Sudip

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Allie, @02 August 2002, 07:30 -0500 (13:30 UK time) Allie C Martin in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Jan Rifkinson on TBUDL: JR I tend to agree with you, Allie. Why don't we try it for a while JR see what happens? If I get

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Marck, On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 12:33:29 +0100 GMT (02/08/02, 18:33 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP So, at 1KB/sec that means a .775 second overhead per message to you. MDP That's ¤ 0.000222 per message. At a hundred messages per day, this stays within affordability range for me.

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Miguel, On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 13:47:47 +0200 GMT (02/08/02, 18:47 +0700 GMT), Miguel A. Urech wrote: MAU I have an even more sophisticated filter that looks for MAU _significant_ text in messages and evaluates its length in bytes. MAU If significant text length is less than 5% of total

Re: finding email address

2002-08-02 Thread Luc
Good afternoon Jan, It was foretold that on 2-8-2002 @ 07:47:19 GMT-0400 (which was 13:47:19 where I live) Jan Rifkinson wrote and spread these wise comments on finding email address: snipped a bit JR And if there is no 'real' way to do it, maybe RIT labs will offer JR a shortcut or menu

Re: Content of X-Mailer Header

2002-08-02 Thread Sudip Pokhrel
Hi Marck, On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 13:16:08 +0100 GMT (Aug 02, 18:01 my local time), you [MDP] wrote MDP ,-=[ XMailer QT ]=- MDP %SETPATTREGEXP=^X-Mailer:\s(.*?)\n%REGEXPMATCH=%HEADERS MDP `| This works great. But is it possible to write a macro that inserts Xmailer RegExp

Re: Content of X-Mailer Header

2002-08-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Sudip, @02 August 2002, 19:03 +0545 (14:18 UK time) Sudip Pokhrel [SP] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D Pearlstone: MDP ,-=[ XMailer QT ]=- MDP %SETPATTREGEXP=^X-Mailer:\s(.*?)\n%REGEXPMATCH=%HEADERS MDP

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Marck. At 8:44 AM on Friday, August 02, 2002 you wrote the following about [TBUDL Bandwidth]: MDP Okay - can we have an off-list poll. Anyone who gives-a-fig can a MDP hit one of these: MDP Footers: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=Vote%20Footers MDP URL: mailto:[EMAIL

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jan, @02 August 2002, 09:34 -0400 (14:34 UK time) Jan Rifkinson in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D Pearlstone: Sorry to a bit thick here: are these to vote 'for' or 'against' headers/footers? TIA If you want

Vote URL

2002-08-02 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello all, -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Thomas, So you do not like brief one-liners that are to the point but prefer to receive long verbose messages? ;-) I agree with you, percentages can be quite tricky :-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c

Re: Vote URL

2002-08-02 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Yes, yes, I know. I shouldn't use folder templates :-( -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Vote URL

2002-08-02 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello list members, On Friday, August 2, 2002 at 3:55:40 PM Miguel wrote: MAU Hello all, No ... I don't say it :-) I don't ... I don't say Tricky folder templates :-))) Sh** I did say it ... *SCNR* :-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The

Re: Vote URL

2002-08-02 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Peter, This is an automatic reply. Your message didn't pass the 5% significance rule and it was automatically dumped to the system's JUNK folder, where the intended recipient will have no chance of even taking a look at it. Respectfully, Miguel's 5% Filter :-)

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 15:58:45 +0200 Miguel A. Urech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So you do not like brief one-liners that are to the point but prefer to receive long verbose messages? ;-) I agree with you, percentages can be quite tricky :-) Yupe, that's why Moderators not activate quote

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Neither Winamp nor WinZip could determine which X-mailer was used to write the message that will appear above if you are using TB and select View/View threads by/Reference. If so, you will be able to also see who wrote it, the subject, the date and time it was written and the message ID. Anyway,

OT posting??

2002-08-02 Thread Jason
Hi, Bat users if I intend to seek help on off topic issue with Bat's experts where should I post my msg. to??? if this forum exist?? could someone provide me the URL to subscribe then?? thanks Best regards, Jason Primary e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Gerard
ON Friday, August 2, 2002, 1:33:29 PM, you wrote: snipped Let not forget that you also need to multiply this with the number of subscribers on this group. Als there is a sending as next to the receiving charge. In the end it al adds up. -- Best regards, Gerard

Re: OT posting??

2002-08-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jason, @02 August 2002, 22:35 +0800 (15:35 UK time) Jason [J] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to The Bat Forum: J if I intend to seek help on off topic issue with Bat's experts J where should I post my msg. to??? if this forum

Re: OT posting??

2002-08-02 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, August 02, 2002, Jason wrote... Hi, Bat users if I intend to seek help on off topic issue with Bat's experts where should I post my msg. to??? if this forum exist?? could someone provide me the URL to subscribe then?? If it is off

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 17:00:38 +0200 Miguel A. Urech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Neither Winamp nor WinZip could determine which X-mailer was used to .. BTW. How many percent your filter give false positive result (at least at your point of view) ? I would say 20 to 50% ;-) And you need

Re: Content of X-Mailer Header

2002-08-02 Thread Sudip Pokhrel
Hi Marck, On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 14:29:44 +0100 GMT (Aug 02, 19:14 my local time), you [MDP] wrote MDP Call the first QT XMailer and do this: MDP %IF:%QINLCUDE='XMailer':You are using %QINLCUDE='XMailer' Marck for some reason, it doesn't work. It doesn't return any values, irrespective of whether

Re: Content of X-Mailer Header

2002-08-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Sudip, @02 August 2002, 22:07 +0545 (17:22 UK time) Sudip Pokhrel [SP] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D Pearlstone: MDP %IF:%QINLCUDE='XMailer':You are using %QINLCUDE='XMailer' SP Marck for some reason, it doesn't

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Miguel! On Friday, August 2, 2002 at 1:47:47 PM you wrote: I have an even more sophisticated filter that looks for _significant_ text I am still working on a filter that finds text that is significant to me, copies it out, puts it into a Word document, format it for clearance's sake.

Re: Vote URL

2002-08-02 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Miguel! On Friday, August 2, 2002 at 4:25:31 PM you wrote: Your message didn't pass the 5% significance rule and it was automatically dumped to the system's JUNK folder, where the intended recipient will have no chance of even taking a look at it. I actually thought your original

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Marck! On Friday, August 2, 2002 at 2:44:12 PM you wrote: Footers: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=Vote%20Footers URL: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=Vote%20URL Undecided is (as always with elections*) missing. I don't have enough information to vote other than undecided. *One

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Paul Wilson
Friday, 8/2/02, 10:19 AM Hi Dierk, On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, at 18:41:15 [GMT +0200] (which was 9:41 AM where I live) you wrote about: 'TBUDL Bandwidth' DH One exception, in Northrine-Westphalia there are some locales where DH our next federal election will be held with the help of computers. And DH

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Sudip Pokhrel
Hi Allie, On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 07:04:57 -0500 GMT (Aug 02, 17:49 my local time), you [ACM] wrote ACM Personally, I believe in the use of a single link to which all ACM the information given is displayed, such as: ACM For important discussion list information please go to: URL ACM Upon going to

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, August 02, 2002, Sudip Pokhrel wrote... ACM For important discussion list information please go to: URL ACM Upon going to the URL all the information in the footer will be ACM clearly displayed *and* explained. Keeping the

Re[2]: Content of X-Mailer Header

2002-08-02 Thread Heijo Alting
Hi, I followed this discussion with great interest and now I ask myself, and since I don't know the answer, you: is it also possible to set an alternate X-mailer header? Like this: X-Mailer: my secret e-mail client, version 007a ?

Re: Content of X-Mailer Header

2002-08-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Sudip, @02 August 2002, 23:30 +0545 (18:45 UK time) Sudip Pokhrel [SP] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D Pearlstone: SP It works perfectly when X-mailer header is present, but this macro SP adds the text You are using

Re: Content of X-Mailer Header

2002-08-02 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, August 02, 2002, Heijo Alting wrote... Hi, I followed this discussion with great interest and now I ask myself, and since I don't know the answer, you: is it also possible to set an alternate X-mailer header? Like this:

Re: Content of X-Mailer Header

2002-08-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Heijo, @02 August 2002, 20:40 +0200 (19:40 UK time) Heijo Alting [HA] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: HA I followed this discussion with great interest and now I ask myself, and HA since I don't know the answer, you: is it

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Syafril, And you need type in bla...bla...bla text as above to make your own posting not filter by your junk filter ? LOL! It's simple with a complicated RegExp. ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Dierk, I am still working on a filter that finds text... ... ... ... Then a report is created and sent via e-mail to one of my addresses. That's done by one of the default filters in Becky ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Michael A. Yetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, at 07:30:24 [GMT -0500], Allie C Martin wrote: ACM If I get more OK's on this approach, especially from my fellow ACM moderator Marck, then I'll work on a page this evening. I'm not an ACM accomplished HTML author so don't expect

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Jernej Simoni
Hello Thomas, 2. avgust 2002, 20:39:57, you wrote: SP Keeping the subscribe/unsubscribe footers as it is will benefit those SP who have an access to email but not the Internet. TF I've tried that. For some reason I have never managed to receive or TF send emails without access to the internet.

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 22:25:02 +0200 Jernej Simonèiè [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SP Keeping the subscribe/unsubscribe footers as it is will benefit SPthose who have an access to email but not the Internet. TF I've tried that. For some reason I have never managed to receive TF or send emails

Re: OT posting??

2002-08-02 Thread Michael A. Yetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, at 16:15:25 [GMT +0100], Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP Addresses: MDP Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MDP Subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MDP Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Should these be added to the footer? Mike

a real mystery

2002-08-02 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Bat Folk. Suddenly I can't delete msgs from any folder. If I click on the waste basket icon or DEL, the result is the same, my system locks up for a few seconds. I do have a few unreadable addresses on my HD. I'm wondering if that could have anything to do with it? Ideas

Re: OT posting??

2002-08-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Michael, @02 August 2002, 16:34 -0400 (21:34 UK time) Michael A. Yetto [MAY] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D Pearlstone on tbudl : MDP Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MDP Subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MDP

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread flash
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 12:33:29PM +0100, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: So, at 1KB/sec that means a .775 second overhead per message to you. That's ¤ 0.000222 per message. this calculation doesn't include 'unable to allocate memory problem' on list machine :-))) btw, without all of these luxuries

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread flash
On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 03:33:03AM +0700, Syafril Hermansyah wrote: I think what he meant to say was ...Who have access to e-mail but not the www. Yupe, it is common in big company. If that is the case, I consider subscribing to TB* lists using such a company email address is impolite. I

TUTORIAL

2002-08-02 Thread KoMpLoT
Hi ppl!, looking for a good tutorial about how to config and use TB! at max! thanks!

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Sudip Pokhrel
Hi Thomas, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002 01:39:57 +0700 GMT (Aug 03, 00:24 my local time), you [TF] wrote TF I've tried that. For some reason I have never managed to receive TF or send emails without access to the internet. What am I doing TF wrong? haha... God is punishing you for being too sarcastic ;)

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Sudip Pokhrel
Hi Syafril, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002 03:33:03 +0700 GMT (Aug 03, 02:18 my local time), you [SH] wrote SH Yupe, it is common in big company. Also a cheaper option for lot of people in developing countries -- Cheers,Sudip Pokhrel Sudip Kathmandu-NP.

Re: TUTORIAL

2002-08-02 Thread Michael A. Yetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, at 23:09:04 [GMT -0300], KoMpLoT wrote: K Hi ppl!, looking for a good tutorial about how to config and use TB! at max! K thanks! You might want to start by switching from Outlook Express, or at least avoiding HTML formatted

Re: TUTORIAL

2002-08-02 Thread KoMpLoT
thanks, and yes, I do have TB! installed, it's just that I want to change OE but the problem is that there are many things that I can't figure out how to configure in TB! anyway thanks - Original Message - From: Michael A. Yetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: KoMpLoT on tbudl [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: TUTORIAL

2002-08-02 Thread Mike Yetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 00:25:21 [GMT -0300], KoMpLoT wrote: K thanks, and yes, I do have TB! installed, it's just that I want to change OE K but the problem is that there are many things that I can't figure out how to K configure in TB! K anyway

Re: TUTORIAL

2002-08-02 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 22:25, KoMpLoT wrote: thanks, and yes, I do have TB! installed, it's just that I want to change OE but the problem is that there are many things that I can't figure out how to configure in TB! A good start (as Michael suggested) is TB!s help file. If you cannot find

Re: TUTORIAL

2002-08-02 Thread ETM
I simultaneously ran OE and TB until I was comfortable, probably started in about September and maintained the simultaneous mail programs until January 1. I downloaded mail into TB but allowed it to remain on server. I downloaded mail into OE and deleted mail at the server when I was in OE. I