Hello FJ!
On Saturday, August 10, 2002 at 11:41:14 AM you wrote:
> As a recipient I prefer to get a top quoted reply that is
> well-written to a convulated message that is quoting in-line.
Nice idea, you are doing a fallacy here - which I haven't the
slightest desire to look up the correct name
Hello Miguel!
On Saturday, August 10, 2002 at 1:30:14 PM you wrote:
>> Does it really matter
> Yes, of course it does.
For the argument about readability: No. The psychological setup for
people is essentially the same (a few years of OE don't wipe out about
1 million years of evolution, or
***
NOTICE: This transmission contains information relating to
Schlumberger's business activities in Libya. If you are a
"United States (U.S.) Person" (i.e., U.S. Citizen; Permanent
Resident Alien "green card holder"; emplo
Saturday, August 10, 2002, Allie C Martin wrote:
> There are restrictions on overly long signatures, i.e., the 4-6 line
> limit. I guess there must be some discretion exercised with the
> excessive salutations with every message to the list.
For those seeking advice and/or inspiration, Sven Guck
Hallo Alaeddin,
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 07:55:01 +0300GMT (11-8-02, 7:39 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
AZM> NOTICE: This transmission contains information relating to
This is a rather pointless disclaimer when sending a message to a
public list. Could you use an address book template for thi
Hello Syafril,
> If you're using other MTA, you will say "sort by receiving date" is the
> "right" way, in that way you will never depending on time clock accuracy
> of sender PC :-)
Yes, I have seen a few "bad click accuracies". Bet the real reason why
I sort on "Date Create" is that when I sta
Hello Dierk,
> For the argument about readability: No
You are probably right, Dierk.
> The psychological setup for people is essentially the same (a few
> years of OE don't wipe out about 1 million years of evolution, or
> actually 4 billion years) regardless if they are in Usenet,
> e-mailing,
> Yes, I have seen a few "bad click accuracies".
I mean bad "clock"...
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.60c
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/
Saturday, August 10, 2002, Urban Ek (that's me!) wrote:
> Maybe a better choice would be '.*@me\.com' to avoid matching domains
> like 'melon.com' etc.
(Desperately seeking for a prevaricaton...)
The regexp '.*@me.com' wouldn't catch domains like 'melon.com'.
I believe that escaping the metachar
Hi all,
Redirect does not seem to set the "Reply-To:" line and as such is a
bit useless as I redirect mail from someone and when the intended
receiver gets the email, they end up writing back to me.
Is this a bug?
TIA
--
Ben Kennish
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Urban,
@11 August 2002, 03:17 +0200 (02:17 UK time) Urban Ek [UE] said to
Allie C Martin:
E> http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/faq/attribution.html
This site advised the use of addresses in the attribution line. I
recommend that you *don't* f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ben,
@11 August 2002, 11:22 +0100 Ben Kennish [BK] said:
BK> Redirect does not seem to set the "Reply-To:" line and ... when
BK> the intended receiver gets the email, they end up writing back to
BK> me.
BK> Is this a bug?
No. It's because you h
Hi Ben,
On Sunday, August 11, 2002 at 11:22:15 [GMT +0100], you wrote:
BK> Redirect does not seem to set the "Reply-To:" line and as such is a
BK> bit useless as I redirect mail from someone and when the intended
BK> receiver gets the email, they end up writing back to me.
BK> Is this a bug?
Wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
@11 August 2002, 20:01 -0700 (04:01 UK time) Paul Wilson in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL Members:
> I have several accounts set up. Each has a unique variation of my
> name.
... but do the default account templat
On Sunday, August 11, 2002, 7:18 AM, you wrote:
MDP> For the same reason, it's also a good idea to modify TB's default
MDP> templates to remove your email address from the signature area.
maybe they shouldn't be in the templates to begin with ?I never
thought about that before, but I sure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Urban Ek [UE] wrote:'
UE> For those seeking advice and/or inspiration, Sven Guckes has a
UE> couple of nice pages:
UE> http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/elm/elm.sig.etiquette.html
Good information.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
@11 August 2002, 08:39 -0400 (13:39 UK time) Paul Cartwright [PC] said
to Marck D Pearlstone:
MDP>> For the same reason, it's also a good idea to modify TB's
MDP>> default templates to remove your email address from the
MDP>> signature area
Hello all,
I just wanted to apologize about the disclaimer included in my previous
message. This is done on the server to every email sent outside of my
domain. I have decided to use my pwersonal email address from now on
instead of work.
Alaeddin
Original Message:
Hello,
I am having a prob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] wrote:'
MDP> This site advised the use of addresses in the attribution line. I
MDP> recommend that you *don't* follow this advice. With messages
MDP> appearing in web based archi
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 11:34:22 +0200 "Miguel A. Urech"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bet the real reason why I sort on "Date Create" is that when I started
> using TB back in January and imported my 7-8 years worth of e-mail
> from my previous client, all imported messages were marked as
> received
Will it ever happen? I've been using linux for many years and the only windows
box I have collects more and more dust. I have paid for the bat but it bairly
gets any use anymore.
--
-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
Hello Dean,
On Saturday, 10. August 2002 at 22:47:18 [GMT -0700] you wrote:
> When all else fails, this is what I do, and have been doing for a couple of
> years. I have given TheBat! a partition of it's own, used Norton Defrag to
> place TheBat! at the end of the partition. At least once
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello TBUDL,
I can't get the PGP plugin to display the correct version line. I am
running PGPckt (build/08) but the version line displayed is PGPckt
(build/06). I tried changing it in the Privacy|OpenPGP|Preferences
dialogue box but it still displays
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Scott,
Sunday, August 11, 2002, 9:23:11 AM, you wrote:
SF> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
SF> Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt (Build/06)
SF> iQA/AwUBPVaPZPTKQBm9muNPEQK6jQCg0iuIHnQON8JduL+DSmx+YebiApEAoI65
SF> VOodUuV/1revdX7BazKBcmcu
SF> =KXt9
SF>
Hi Lars,
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 13:29:05 +0200 (11/08/2002, 12:29 my time),
you [LG] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
LG> When redirecting a message, the original From: is retained, so no
LG> Reply-To is needed, I'd say. And if the original message had a Reply-To
LG> set, the sa
Hello Ben,
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 17:45:50 +0100 GMT (11/08/02, 23:45 +0700 GMT),
Ben Kennish wrote:
BK> But out of curiosity, why isn't there an option in the settings
BK> that lets you "clear reply-to on redirect" ?
BK> Shall I post it as a feature request?
That is your privilege. Keep in mind
Hi Brook,
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 08:24:44 -0700, you wrote:
> Will it ever happen? I've been using linux for many years and the only windows
> box I have collects more and more dust. I have paid for the bat but it bairly
> gets any use anymore.
Try wine (www.winehq.com). It runs, most of the time
TF> But one thing I would like to advise is that optional settings can be
TF> overdone. Please have a look here:
TF> http://www.zentrumderarbeit.org/TheBat%21/img/html-kit_preferences.gif
TF> (180KB). Credit to Peter Palmreuther.
what's that?
--
Ricardo M. Reyes | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This puzzles me: Is there any particular reason why the dialog-
box for tweaking "Sorting Office" rules is non-resizeable?!?!?
And why the hell did they choose that useless small size?!?
/ St
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TB
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, August 11, 2002, 8:42:49 AM, you wrote:
:
> Hello Dean,
> Do you use a virus scanner. I had the same problem when i use AVP Pro
> Scanner. Theres seams to be a problem. I changed my scanner to
> AVG...everything works perfect.
> So try a backup with disabled scanner.
Hello Ricardo,
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 15:28:49 -0300 GMT (12/08/02, 01:28 +0700 GMT),
Ricardo M. Reyes wrote:
TF>> But one thing I would like to advise is that optional settings can be
TF>> overdone. Please have a look here:
TF>> http://www.zentrumderarbeit.org/TheBat%21/img/html-kit_preferences.gi
Hello St,
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 20:45:04 +0200 GMT (12/08/02, 01:45 +0700 GMT),
St - Musaic.Net wrote:
SMN> This puzzles me: Is there any particular reason why the dialog-
SMN> box for tweaking "Sorting Office" rules is non-resizeable?!?!?
I don't see a reason, apart from that all is displaye
Hello Scott Frederick,
On Sunday, August 11 2002 at 09:23 AM PDT, you wrote:
> When I upgraded to 06 from an earlier build I changed the PGP dll to
> display 06. Could that have anything to do with it?
When you installed Build 08 it should have installed the new PGP DLL for
the CKT versions. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick,
Sunday, August 11, 2002, 1:25:47 PM, you wrote:
NA> When you installed Build 08 it should have installed the new PGP
NA> DLL for the CKT versions. It appears that you still have the old
NA> PGP/TB DLL. Take a look in your Main TB Folder
Hello Scott Frederick,
On Sunday, August 11 2002 at 02:16 PM PDT, you wrote:
> I Recently reinstalled my applications to a new partition. I must have
> overwritten the build 08 dll with an old one. But why doesn't the
> version change dialogue put whatever I input?
Because when you use the Plug
St> This puzzles me: Is there any particular reason why the dialog-
St> box for tweaking "Sorting Office" rules is non-resizeable?!?!?
TF> I don't see a reason, apart from that all is displayed that you
TF> need to access.
No - it's not.
My rules have decent descriptive names. Because
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, August 11, 2002, 7:39:22 AM, Thomas F. wrote:
> I don't see how you can display anything in Chinese without a Chinese
> font.
well I got the whole chinese font set installed. I can view chinese
pages with mozilla, when the correct fonts are set.
CGS>> So as long as u can'
St> [it] puzzles me...
It just struck me...The "Connmecting Centre" is sizeable and you
may set it to a size and layout that you find comfortable. And CC
is a dialog box that you pretty much set-and-leave.
BUT the dialog box you desperately need more space in (although
that
Hello Thomas,
> I don't see a reason, apart from that all is displayed that you need
> to access.
Come on Thomas, you have to be a bit more open minded. He's not asking
to make it bigger, just re-sizeable. You could keep it as small as you
wanted for yourself.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech
On Sunday, August 11, 2002, 5:23:18 PM, Miguel A. Urech wrote:
>> I don't see a reason, apart from that all is displayed that you
>> need to access.
> Come on Thomas, you have to be a bit more open minded. He's not asking
> to make it bigger, just re-sizeable. You could keep it as small as you
>
Hello Nick,
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, at 14:23:09 [GMT -0700] (which was 22:23 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:
NA> Hello Scott Frederick,
NA> On Sunday, August 11 2002 at 02:16 PM PDT, you wrote:
>> I Recently reinstalled my applications to a new partition. I must have
>> overwritten the build 08 dll
Hello Michael Thompson,
On Sunday, August 11 2002 at 04:47 PM PDT, you wrote:
> Can you please tell me where I can get this PGP Version?
http://freepages.computers.rootsweb.com/~irfaiad/
You will find the links to Build 08 in the middle of the page.
--
Nick Andriash
Creston, B.C. Canada
__
Hi Bat!
Is there a way to Synchronize Bat between to Computers. While at home
we use our Desktop, but while on the road we use our laptop. Is there
a way so that after returning home we would be able to transfer all
correspondence from the laptop to the Desktop. Example:
All new Address book enti
Hi Brook,
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, at 08:24:44 [GMT -0700] (8:24 AM pst) you wrote:
> Will it ever happen? I've been using linux for many years and the only windows
> box I have collects more and more dust. I have paid for the bat but it bairly
> gets any use anymore.
Have you ever messed with
Hello Clemens,
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 23:30:53 +0200 GMT (12/08/02, 04:30 +0700 GMT),
Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer wrote:
CGS> well, I somehow can't belive that, cause it works in other
CGS> applications too. I think, I just have to live without Asian Font
CGS> support in TheBat, as it is way to
Hello Miguel,
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 00:23:18 +0200 GMT (12/08/02, 05:23 +0700 GMT),
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
>> I don't see a reason, apart from that all is displayed that you need
>> to access.
MAU> Come on Thomas, you have to be a bit more open minded. He's not asking
MAU> to make it bigger, just
46 matches
Mail list logo
