Hello Paul,
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:58:29 -0400 GMT (04/10/02, 02:58 +0700 GMT),
Paul Cartwright wrote:
PC> well, I have noticed a LOT more Porn and SPAM in my yahoo account
PC> lately, it does seem to have escalated since I joined spamcop, BUT it
PC> could just be the fact that my Yahoo accou
Hello jwayne,
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:53:48 -0400 GMT (04/10/02, 03:53 +0700 GMT),
jwayne wrote:
j> I have no use for the HTML portion of the message and would like to automate
j> their deletion. Is there any way to do this for my 2000+ old messages?
Unfortunately not, but it has been requested
On Thursday, October 3, 2002, you wrote
> In any case, IMO it's really quite
> discourteous & not even accurate, for that
> matter, to generalize about a nation of
> 280,000,000 individuals.
>
> Jan Rifkinson
> Ridgefield, CT USA
.
Elaine (Alexandria, VA, born and bred in Wisconsin,
Hello Elaine.
At 4:28 PM on Thursday, October 03, 2002 you
[E] wrote the following about 'It's all about
attitude':
E> [...] Americans are a bore (boor?) about
E> this I realize. [/...]
Is that a fact? Let's see
A bore is defined as "A person who evokes
boredom".
A boor is defined
At 04.10.2002 03:52, Joseph N. wrote the following:
> On Thursday, October 03, 2002, Jakob Breivik Grimstveit wrote in
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
JBG>> Two things I would love to see in The Bat!: 1. Indexed
JBG>> searching. 2. When indexing is in place it shouldn't be too hard
On Thursday, October 03, 2002, Jakob Breivik Grimstveit wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
JBG> Two things I would love to see in The Bat!:
JBG> 1. Indexed searching.
JBG> 2. When indexing is in place it shouldn't be too hard to include a
JBG> virtual folder option.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Scott,
@3-Oct-2002, 18:06 -0500 (00:06 UK time) Scott McNay [SM] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
SM> Dierk's message probably should best have gone straight to
SM> one of the moderators instead of being posted in public.
Hi Elaine!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, October 3, 2002, 3:28:04 PM, you wrote:
E> Was that a private (copyrighted?) email shared publicly?
E> Americans are a bore (boor?) about this I realize. Therefore, I
E> lurk more than post. I am afraid of toes (eggs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dierk,
@3-Oct-2002, 23:18 +0200 (22:18 UK time) Dierk Haasis [DH] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> I think you are overlooking a very important point in this
>> message.
DH> Did I really ...?
DH> But honestly, I just wanted
Two things I would love to see in The Bat!:
1. Indexed searching. All folders should be indexed. Headers, body,
the works. At least a possibility to do so. A setting somewhere. Makes
searching 200Mb worth of text mails (without attachments) somewhat
faster :)
2. When indexing is in pl
Hello Lars!
On Thursday, October 3, 2002 at 11:02:12 PM you wrote:
> I think you are overlooking a very important point in this message.
Did I really ...?
But honestly, I just wanted to prove his point ... or ...?
Marck, Allie et al., I'll stop here.
--
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
h
Hello Thomas,
MAU>> Finally some one who understand me! Do you want to marry me? ;-)
>
> Is that now allowed in Spain as well? ;-)
Not yet but, who cares! ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.60c
Curren
I receive lots of eBay notifications for my auctions. eBay sends them out as
HTML messages and provides no preference options to send as text only. TB, of
course, treats the HTML as a deletable attachment. Deleting the HTML attachment
typically reduces the size of a typical message from 12k to
Hi Dierk,
On Thursday, October 3, 2002 at 22:17:53 [GMT +0200], you wrote:
DH> Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
DH> On Thursday, October 3, 2002 at 9:58:13 PM you wrote:
>> Get a life!
>> [...]
DH> I thought this should go - uncut - to the list. Just so I'm not the
DH> only one seeing your point ... a
Hello Dierk
On Thursday, October 3, 2002, you wrote
> I thought this should go - uncut - to the list. Just so I'm not the
> only one seeing your point ... and attitude ... and that you've
> thoroughly read the mission statement for the lists you are
> participating in.
Was that a private (copyr
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
On Thursday, October 3, 2002 at 9:58:13 PM you wrote:
> Get a life!
> -Original Message-
> From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
>behalf of
> "Dierk Haasis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 21:23:15 +0200
> To: "[EMAIL PROTEC
On Thursday, October 3, 2002, 1:37 PM, you wrote:
JO> I believe SpamCop actually warns you that that could happen.
JO> If I read the warning/notice correctly, it's possible for spammmers to
JO> get the new email address when SpamCop sends a complaint to the
JO> spammer's listed (via dns) "ISP".
Hello Ladies and Gents,
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, at 21:23:15 [GMT +0200] (which was 20:23 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:
DH> Hello wenewcomb!
DH> On Thursday, October 3, 2002 at 6:46:00 PM you wrote:
>> I mean this is an AVG function. I find no option in the FREE version either to
>enable or to d
Thanks - I overlooked this.
-Original Message-
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
behalf of "Alexander Cicovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 20:35:10 +0300
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:Re: (no subject)
Hello there,
ON Thursday, October 3, 2002, 4:10:10 PM, you wrote:
DTS> IN/OUT Filter Example:
DTS> I have an email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] I want to
DTS> have a folder for all correspondence to/from SpadeDetectiveAgency.com
Hi David,
Correct me if I am wrong, but if you are receiving emails from the same
Hello wenewcomb!
On Thursday, October 3, 2002 at 6:46:00 PM you wrote:
> I mean this is an AVG function. I find no option in the FREE version either to
>enable or to disable this. In fact, I was unaware of the software's ability to do
>this.
Did anybody already mentioned the words "conversa
Hello Allie,
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 05:54:50 -0500 GMT (03/10/02, 17:54 +0700 GMT),
Allie C Martin wrote:
ACM> They have to listen to a lot of users with different needs and
ACM> desires. Since I've been using TB! there's more than ample evidence
ACM> that they do listen to their users.
May I add a
Hello Miguel,
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:26:15 +0200 GMT (03/10/02, 13:26 +0700 GMT),
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
MAU> Finally some one who understand me! Do you want to marry me? ;-)
Is that now allowed in Spain as well? ;-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.
99 per
Hello David,
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 07:10:10 -0700 GMT (03/10/02, 21:10 +0700 GMT),
David Tod Sigafoos wrote:
DTS> Go into create filters and at that point i have to say if I am
DTS> creating and inni or outti. It would seem to me that it should be
DTS> possible to define this in one place. If I r
Michael-
Thursday, October 3, 2002, 7:43:11 AM, you wrote:
MT> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
While the BugBear virus will indeed search through .tbb files (and
others) looking for email addresses, you still have to launch the damn
thing yourself. Very explicitly, too, after having been warned by TB
th
Hello,
PC>> Unfortunately, the folks at SpamCop aren't listening. They believe they
PC>> are on the side of Righteousness And Good, and thus are above reproach;
PC>> they also seem to have total faith in their technology. But consider:
PC>> I have recently been getting spam addressed to a d
Hello there,
Thursday, October 3, 2002, 7:46:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wcn> Where can I disable this response?
First, run The Bat!
Then go to Options, virus protection. Select the AVG Plugin. Untick
the "Send notification to the sender" option. That should do it.
--
Best regards,
Hello Paul,
Saturday, September 28, 2002, 12:57:09 PM, you wrote:
PC> On Friday, September 27, 2002, 3:09 PM, you wrote:
PC> Unfortunately, the folks at SpamCop aren't listening. They believe they
PC> are on the side of Righteousness And Good, and thus are above reproach;
PC> they also seem to
Where can I disable this response?
-Original Message-
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
behalf of "Alexander Cicovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:28:43 +0300
To: "Jan Rifkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:Re: (no subject)
Hello the
I mean this is an AVG function. I find no option in the FREE version either to enable
or to disable this. In fact, I was unaware of the software's ability to do this.
-Original Message-
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
behalf of "Jan Rifkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi Alexander.
At 12:28 PM on Thursday, October 03, 2002 you
[AC] wrote the following about '(no
subject)':
AC> The AVG plugin automates the response,
AC> and there is a user option to turn this
AC> on/off.
That's what I thought... Thanks.
--
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB! V1.61/W2K_SP
Hello there,
Thursday, October 3, 2002, 7:14:13 PM, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
JR> Do you mean that AVG automates the response
JR> & there is no user option to turn this
JR> on/off? [Sorry, I don't use AVG]
The AVG plugin automates the response, and there is a user option
to turn this on/off.
At 11:47 AM on Thursday, October 03, 2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [wcn] wrote the
following about [(no subject)]:
wcn> [...] The notification was created
wcn> automatically by AVG in conjunction with
wcn> TB!. I had nothing to do with it, as my
wcn> original post clearly indicates. I agree
wcn> it's a
-Original Message-
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
behalf of "Jonathan Angliss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:57:28 -0500
To: "Walt Newcomb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:Re: (no subject)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I received a copy of Bugbear last night. It had changed the sender's address (at
least, from the fact that the email address wasn't valid, and someone else has seen a
copy with a morph of his address, I think that is the case).
Sorry not to be linear in my reply, but the url below states "The
Hello Ladies and Gents,
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, at 15:44:27 [GMT +0200] (which was 14:44 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:
MO> On Thursday, October 3, 2002, 15:07, Michael Thompson wrote:
>> I have just noticed that the new virus, BugBear looks into *.tbb for
>> email addresses. Am I correct or is
Hello Thomas,
Wednesday, October 2, 2002, 9:27:00 PM, you wrote:
TF> I would be insterested in knowing what you intend to do. If you think
TF> the filtering system is not very easy, it is a good time forofficial
TF> suggestion, because the developers are "completely revamping the
TF> filtering
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, October 03, 2002, Walt Newcomb wrote...
> Hard to know whether this worm targets TB!, but I got an email this
> morning that was flagged as containing it. AVG detected it and
> deleted it, even sending an email to the alleged sender sayi
On Thursday, October 3, 2002, 15:07, Michael Thompson wrote:
> I have just noticed that the new virus, BugBear looks into *.tbb for
> email addresses. Am I correct or is the first virsus that targets
> The Bat! message files for email harvests??
Not to question you, but how do you know th
Hello Michael
Re your message: (no subject)
Original Attachments:
Hard to know whether this worm targets TB!, but I got an email this
morning that was flagged as containing it. AVG detected it and deleted
it, even sending an email to the alleged sender saying the sender should
"take appropriate
Hi Allie,
On Thursday, October 3, 2002 05:54 your local time, (16:39 my local
time), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
MAU>> Anyway, it is their software and they have to include the
MAU>> options they believe will sell best whether you or I like them.
ACM> They have to li
Hello Ladies and Gents,
I have just noticed that the new virus, BugBear looks into *.tbb for
email addresses. Am I correct or is the first virsus that targets
The Bat! message files for email harvests??
I think we may be seeing how popular the bat is if viruses are going
for tbb files.
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 07:12:00 -0500
Scott McNay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Doug!
>
> In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> on Thursday, October 3, 2002, 2:12:38 AM, you wrote:
>
> DW> I like autocompleted subject lines. I belong to a list to which I send recipes
>with a
Hi Doug!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, October 3, 2002, 2:12:38 AM, you wrote:
DW> I like autocompleted subject lines. I belong to a list to which I send recipes
with a common beginning to the subject line. This gives me less to change.
You mean like this?
Hey Colin,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.61) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091' was used
to write mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tuesday, October 1, 2002 at 6:03:11 PM.
CT> I'm new to the list, and want to know (before going ahead and
CT> purchasing the bat, can I make Palm Desktop synchronize with the
CT> bat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Miguel A. Urech [MAU] wrote:'
MAU> Yes, but noise can be filtered. And TB people should know a lot
MAU> about filters :-)
They've already apologised and explained that they don't have the
time and resou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Miguel A. Urech [MAU] wrote:'
MAU> If the option *is* checked, the string match is carried out and
MAU> the messages matching the rule(s) are Ignored (in my case) and
MAU> moved to Inbox.
Ok. It is *now
Hello Dierk,
>> I doubt that my opinion counts at all, I never write to developers
>
> Well, the necessary step to make your opinion count, is to make it
> heard (or read). this not only holds for TB! or software development
> ...
Yep, I know. Guess I'm too lazy to write ;-)
--
Best regards,
Hello Miguel!
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002 at 11:30:30 PM you wrote:
> I doubt that my opinion counts at all, I never write to developers
Well, the necessary step to make your opinion count, is to make it
heard (or read). this not only holds for TB! or software development
...
--
Dierk Ha
49 matches
Mail list logo
