Hi,
Will the filter for deleting messages on the server work with IMAP
servers if the messages are in Inbox and not any other folders?
--
Best regards,
chinchi
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Your problem is, TB! isn't getting chance to send the QUIT message to
the server, as you get kicked off. This results in the clean up
process not happening. Apart from using the Mail Dispatcher, and the
Kill Dupes option, there isn't much you can do without sorting out
your connection
ON Tuesday, February 4, 2003, 2:35:37 PM, you wrote:
S I have an AB template
S for that list, which when I MANUALLY forward a message to it,
S also applies the BCC for the friend. If I let the filter handle
S it, the BCC address to the friend DOESN'T get included.
Hi Spike,
I assume you
Hello Richard,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 01:34:08 -0500 GMT (05/02/03, 13:34 +0700 GMT),
Richard H. Stoddard wrote:
When I am downloading mail from the server, if the process gets timed
out or my connection drops before the session is complete the next time
I attempt to download it always starts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Robert,
@5-Feb-2003, 08:45 +0200 (06:45 UK time) Robert Golovniov said:
What are the anti-smap plugins available for The Bat!?
Right now these are in development for the new Beta and are
discussed on the TBDEV mailing list.
- --
Cheers --
Hello chinchi,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:05:03 +0530 GMT (05/02/03, 14:35 +0700 GMT),
chinchi wrote:
How reliable is the 'kill dupes' command in TB? I have seen it
delete messages that weren't really dupes at all, even tho TB says
that it deletes messages with the same ID and it's not
Hi,
i just installed Windows 2000 Pro on my system - as the 2nd OS, so i can
now dual-boot ... Linux will follow later ;-)
Of course i wanted to move TB to Win2K, so i exported the RIT registry
settings in Win98, installed TB in Win2K, after changing the C: to D: in
all paths imported the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Rob [R] wrote:'
R So what's the best way to install it for every user ; just import the
R registry file again for every user
Yes.
R or is there a better way ??
As far as I know, this is the only
Hi,
When I created a new filer I somehow managed to rename Known filter.
Since then I can't rename it back to the original (or whatever you
like) name. Just clicking and typing a new name doesn't help.
Does anybody know how to rename this filter back?
Tanks in advance.
--
Artiom Koren
Hi Thomas,
Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 2:58:47 PM, you wrote:
TF On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:05:03 +0530 GMT (05/02/03, 14:35 +0700 GMT),
TF chinchi wrote:
How reliable is the 'kill dupes' command in TB? I have seen it
delete messages that weren't really dupes at all, even tho TB says
Hello Bats,
While trying to test BCC in The Bat I send:
A message to myself (f.i. [EMAIL PROTECTED])
with a BCC to
my kids (f.i. [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]),
my wife ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
and myself again,
but now to an external address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Hello Bats,
Tried, but did not find a way to automaticaly drain Emails from people
belonging to the same group, to 1 map.
If this is possible, what if someone belongs to more than 1 group?
--
Best Whishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
@5-Feb-2003, 12:59 +0100 (11:59 UK time) Mark Partous [MP] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MP Tried, but did not find a way to automaticaly drain Emails from
MP people belonging to the same group, to 1 map.
I use the
Dear Mark,
--- Mark Partous / Mittwoch, 05.02.2003, 12:28:52
BCC
While trying to test BCC in The Bat I send:
[...]
Result:
I receive one message [...]
When send such an Email (to myself, BCC to the same group) there is
no problem.
Any idea what's going on?
have you
ON Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 12:05:43 PM, you wrote:
c The need for kill dupes arises because I use IMAP and there's
c nothing in TB that would sync all the messages back and forth. May
c be I should use POP with it till ver 2.0 comes out...
I have been using it as well and found
Hallo Fledermäuse,
sorry to ask here, but you guys seem all to be so advanced in
programming, that the answer will be one shot for you.
I want to learn a programming language, which one should I take? I
have some basic knowledge (used to program in GFA-Basic on my old Amiga,
can do HTML, CSS,
Hallo Mark,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:28:52 +0100GMT (5-2-03, 12:28 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
MP While trying to test BCC in The Bat I send:
MP I receive one message, the one to myself, I suppose.
That would be logical.
MP When I look on the server, I find 2 more messages, both to f.i.
MP
Hello Roelof,
Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 1:47:42 PM, you wrote:
MP When send such an Email (to myself, BCC to the same group) there
MP is no problem.
RO I don't understand what you're trying to say with this.
You should try harder! Anyone can see I meant: :-) (1)
When I send such an
Hello Gerard,
Do they remove dupes without asking or is TB! the cause of the dupes?
No, TB is not the cause of dupes, at least of the ones I have verified.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
Current
Hi Miguel,
Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 6:34:59 PM, you wrote:
MAU Hello Gerard,
Do they remove dupes without asking or is TB! the cause of the dupes?
MAU No, TB is not the cause of dupes, at least of the ones I have verified.
I just did a test. I marked all 81 messages in my inbox as
Hi Eddie,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:16:00 +0100
Eddie Castelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
have you tried with an other Version such as v1.63b5 or so?
Is there any reason why somebody who requests on TBUDL should give the
current Beta a try _before_ anybody has stated it could have that
problem
Hi Mark,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:01:55 +0100
Mark Partous [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MP When send such an Email (to myself, BCC to the same group) there
MP is no problem.
RO I don't understand what you're trying to say with this.
You should try harder! Anyone can see I meant: :-) (1)
When I
Hi Jurgen,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:42:48 +0100 Jurgen Haug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hallo Fledermäuse,
Nice ... what do you think how (in percent of readers) understand your
greeting on this list?
sorry to ask here,
No. You _know_ your question is off-topic, you even mark the subject
acording
Hello Artemich,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:58:53 +0100 GMT (05/02/03, 18:58 +0700 GMT),
Artemich wrote:
When I created a new filer I somehow managed to rename Known filter.
Since then I can't rename it back to the original (or whatever you
like) name. Just clicking and typing a new name doesn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Mark Partous wrote...
While trying to test BCC in The Bat I send:
A message to myself (f.i. [EMAIL PROTECTED])
with a BCC to my kids (f.i. [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]), my wife
Has anyone get the error message--invalid argument for date encoded
when you start the BAT?Any possible solutions?
Thanks.
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Thomas Fernandez wrote...
When I am downloading mail from the server, if the process gets
timed out or my connection drops before the session is complete the
next time I attempt to download it always starts over
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, 15:45:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wondered whether any anti-spam programs are out there which
integrate with TB! or failing that, good unobtrusive anti-spam programs?
I use SpamAssassin (yes, in Windows). It's free and pretty powerful. Very
I have started using a program called Time Matters (ver. 4). It has
an e-mail component, which in turn has a few ways of working. One of
the ways is to interact with the user's alternative MAPI-compliant
e-mail client. In this mode, e-mail sent out of Time Matters becomes
processed in that
Hello Jonathan,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 10:42:03 -0600 GMT (05/02/03, 23:42 +0700 GMT),
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
Yes, it is. For some reason, TB does not correctly store the UIDL of
the mails already downloaded, if you delete messages on server.\
Actually, UIDL is an optional part to POP3, which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Kenneth,
@05-Feb-2003, 11:37 -0500 (16:37 UK time) Kenneth S. Rhee [KSR] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
KSR Has anyone get the error message--invalid argument for date
KSR encoded when you start the BAT?Any possible
Hello Marck,
Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 12:22:00 PM, you wrote:
MDP This happens when you have imported addresses from the OE address
MDP book and allowed it to import Birth Dates too.
MDP One thing -
Incomplete message?
Anyway, when I uncheck the vcf option in the preference menu, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Kenneth,
@05-Feb-2003, 12:25 -0500 (17:25 UK time) Kenneth S. Rhee [KSR] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MDP This happens when you have imported addresses from the OE
MDP address book and allowed it to import Birth Dates too.
Hi Kenneth,
On Wed, 05 Feb 2003 11:37:43 -0500 Kenneth S. Rhee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone get the error message--invalid argument for date encoded
when you start the BAT?
Many before ...
Any possible solutions?
A _working_ wolution is to delete all address book entries you've
Hello!
I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP address
directly (e.g. mailbox@[192.168.203.12]). Here is a good example.
---[Cut]---
[andris@strigidae scripts]$ host mail.tp.ru.
mail.tp.ru has address 80.80.100.216
mail.tp.ru mail is handled (pri=5) by tp.aaanet.ru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
But the inbox arrangement is not working. TM cannot see what is
in TB!. (Nor does hitting TM's 'retrieve' operate TB!'s retrieve
function, although I'm less concerned about that.)
Any idea what might be keeping these children from playing
Hello all,
I'm curious to know if anyone is using (or has tried to) the manual
re-thread script that I explained... a couple of weeks ago?. If so, how
does it work for you? Have you done any changes to improve it or fine
tune it?
Thanks,
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Hello Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris),
On or about Wednesday, February 05, 2003 at 21:14:26GMT +0300
(which was 1:14 PM in the tropics where I live) Andrey G. Sergeev
(AKA Andris) postulated:
AGSAA I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP address
AGSAA directly (e.g.
Hallo Andrey,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 21:14:26 +0300GMT (5-2-03, 19:14 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
AGSAA I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP
AGSAA address directly (e.g. mailbox@[192.168.203.12]). Here is a
AGSAA good example.
[192.168.203.12] isn't an ip-address.
Hello Spike,
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003 at 8:49:01 PM you [S] wrote (at least
in part):
AGSAA I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP address
AGSAA directly (e.g. mailbox@[192.168.203.12]). Here is a good example.
S 8 Snipped alot!
S Correct me if I am wrong,
I'll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Roelof Otten wrote...
AGSAA I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an
IP AGSAA address directly (e.g. mailbox@[192.168.203.12]). Here is
a AGSAA good example.
[192.168.203.12] isn't an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote...
I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP
address directly (e.g. mailbox@[192.168.203.12]).
[..]
In case you want anyone at mail.tp.ru host to be
Hello Jonathan Angliss,
On or about Wednesday, February 05, 2003 at 14:26:01GMT -0600
(which was 3:26 PM in the tropics where I live) Jonathan Angliss
responded:
JA I had noticed that it did this, but I just sent myself two emails just
JA fine, one via a postfix SMTP server, and one via a
Hallo Jonathan,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:18:38 -0600GMT (5-2-03, 21:18 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
JA IP addresses in mailing addresses need to be encased in [ ]
JA otherwise the mail doesn't send. They're called domain literals in
JA the RFC (see RFC822 sec 6.2.3). They are strongly suggested
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Spike wrote...
JA I had noticed that it did this, but I just sent myself two emails
JA just fine, one via a postfix SMTP server, and one via a sendmail
JA SMTP server. Once each over telnet, and via TB!, all 4 arrived
Hello Roelof Otten,
On or about Wednesday, February 05, 2003 at 21:41:18GMT +0100
(which was 3:41 PM in the tropics where I live) Roelof Otten
ruminated:
JA IP addresses in mailing addresses need to be encased in [ ]
JA otherwise the mail doesn't send. They're called domain literals in
JA the
Hello Roelof,
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003 at 9:41:18 PM you [RO] wrote (at least
in part):
RO Without [] I got a test delivered
Which is strange enough. The square brackets are for the server being
able to distinguish between dot-delimited host.network.name and an
IP-address.
Really strange
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 chinchi stated:
c Hi Miguel,
c Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 6:34:59 PM, you wrote:
c I just did a test. I marked all 81 messages in my inbox as unread
c using the message dispatcher and then downloaded them in to an
c empty local inbox. I did this
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 Artemich stated:
A Hi,
A When I created a new filer I somehow managed to rename Known filter.
A Since then I can't rename it back to the original (or whatever you
A like) name. Just clicking and typing a new name doesn't help.
A Does anybody know how to rename
Hello!
Wed Feb 5 2003 23:26:01 Jonathan Angliss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately the The Bat! converts such directly routed addresses
to the following form causing another bounce:
JA [..]
To: postmaster@[80\.80\.100\.216]
^
JA I had noticed that it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote...
To: postmaster@[80\.80\.100\.216]
^
JA I had noticed that it did this, but I just sent myself two emails
JA just fine, one via a postfix SMTP
I have been getting allot of Spam here lately that is addressed to me
along with several random or generated e-mail addresses.
So my question is, how do I create a filter that will trash any
e-mail to me [in either the To: or CC:] that has my address
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) listed with *any* other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wondering if one can set up a filter to trash
email with a date that isn't current? I receive
occasional spam dated like year 2025 or 1992 or a different month,
etc.
Thanks,
David
- --
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Written Wednesday, February 05, 2003 at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ~John,
@5-Feb-1998, 17:14 -0600 (23:14 UK time) ~John [j] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
j I have been getting allot of Spam here lately that is addressed
j to me along with several random or generated e-mail addresses. So
j my
I did it! I did it!
Here is how I done it, I was trying too hard.
I created this Only Me filter:
Move to Not to me folder
, [EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Location : Recipient
Presence : Yes
and placed it last in the list, I moved
Crap! No, it don't work... I still need help.
--
Best Regards,
~John
- - - ~John wrote - - -
I did it! I did it!
Here is how I done it, I was trying too hard.
I created this Only Me filter:
Move to Not to me folder
, [EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED],
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Jurgen Haug wrote...
sorry to ask here, but you guys seem all to be so advanced in
programming, that the answer will be one shot for you.
I want to learn a programming language, which one should I take? I
have
Hello,
I've sometimes (perhaps one time in a day) Access Violation in x ;
it does not disturb the good running of the programm, a simple OK and
the program continues...
Have you got these little errors, if yes, in which frequencies ?
Thanks,
Friendly,
Christophe
Hi Wolffe,
Thursday, February 6, 2003, 3:14:07 AM, you wrote:
W On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 chinchi stated:
c Hi Miguel,
c Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 6:34:59 PM, you wrote:
c I just did a test. I marked all 81 messages in my inbox as unread
c using the message dispatcher and
59 matches
Mail list logo
