I just upgraded to 3.5 from 3.0, and my filters don't seem to work the
way they used to. Filters that checked the recipient fields for a
specific address and moved the message to a specific folder no longer
seem to work; instead the messages are falling into a catch-all filter
at the end of the
Hello,
I have what should be an easy question/answer, but for some reason the
answer is just eluding me and I have to get back to the hospital.
I'm supposed to send an attachment, which for three accounts is no
problem. However, I need to send an proof on invoice from a specific
account
Hello Anthony,
Filters that checked the recipient fields for a specific address and
moved the message to a specific folder no longer seem to work;
Can you copy (Ctrl+C) one of these filters and paste it (Ctrl+V) in a
message here so we can take a look?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El
Hi
On Saturday 28 May 2005 at 3:27:32 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Arjan de Groot wrote:
Rule of thumb: all versions with two or more dots are Beta
versions.
3.0.1.33 has three dots and was the version for sale on the
Ritlabs website when I upgraded from v2.
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Hi
On Friday 27 May 2005 at 10:51:46 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Ouwehand
wrote:
No problem using this one. IIRC, renaming/moving folders and NFS, was
fixed before the 3.5 release.
Thanks. I'll look forward to that when I get around to updating.
I don't often move or rename folders
MAU writes:
Can you copy (Ctrl+C) one of these filters and paste it (Ctrl+V) in a
message here so we can take a look?
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [2D75BAD5.01C4C06A.1734AE5E.04E421D8]
Name: The\20Bat
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`5`15`^Reply-to:[EMAIL
Hello Anthony,
Filter:
{\0D\0A\20`5`15`^Reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5C.dutaint/5C.com\0D\0A}
This, in a more readable form is:
Header matches all as RegExp ^Reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I seem to recall there were some issues with RegExp in latest
betas/releases. In any case, I would suggest
MAU writes:
Filter:
{\0D\0A\20`5`15`^Reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5C.dutaint/5C.com\0D\0A}
This, in a more readable form is:
Header matches all as RegExp ^Reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I seem to recall there were some issues with RegExp in latest
betas/releases. In any case, I would suggest
Hello Dean,
On Sat, 28 May 2005 08:10:45 -0500 GMT (28/05/2005, 20:10 +0700 GMT),
Dean wrote:
D I have what should be an easy question/answer, but for some reason the
D answer is just eluding me and I have to get back to the hospital.
I hope you are staff and not a patient with something
Hello MFPA,
On Sat, 28 May 2005 13:50:33 +0100 GMT (28/05/2005, 19:50 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
Rule of thumb: all versions with two or more dots are Beta
versions.
M 3.0.1.33 has three dots and was the version for sale on the
M Ritlabs website when I upgraded from v2.
That was a post-release,
Hi MFPA,
on Sat, 28 May 2005 13:50:33 +0100GMT (28.05.2005, 14:50 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
Rule of thumb: all versions with two or more dots are Beta
versions.
M 3.0.1.33 has three dots and was the version for sale on the
M Ritlabs website when I upgraded from v2.
So what?! LOL
--
Hello Anthony,
I just tried it: same result. The filter looks like this now:
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [2D75BAD5.01C4C06A.1734AE5E.04E421D8]
Name: The\20Bat
Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MoveMessage folder
MAU writes:
Is your new filter active? It wasn't you you copied it.
It is now. In fact, it fires, but the message is not moved. I added an
action to change the color of the subject line, and it works, but the
message is not being moved. This is the current filter:
TB! Message Filter
On Saturday, May 28, 2005, 08:50:33, MFPA wrote:
Rule of thumb: all versions with two or more dots are Beta
versions.
3.0.1.33 has three dots and was the version for sale on the
Ritlabs website when I upgraded from v2.
Yeah, a beta that happened to be stable and that I still use.
Even the
AdG Rule of thumb: all versions with two or more dots are Beta
AdG versions.
The last stable before 3.5 was 3.0.1.33... :)
--
Vili
Current version is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
On Sat, 28 May 2005 13:50:33 +0100, MFPA wrote:
Rule of thumb: all versions with two or more dots are Beta
versions.
3.0.1.33 has three dots and was the version for sale on the
Ritlabs website when I upgraded from v2.
Version 3.0.1.33 is the latest of the 3.0 Post Release Beta
series, that
Apparently it has something to do with arranging filters in a hierarchy.
Something has changed in the code. Can anyone tell me exactly what
changed, or should I just roll dice to figure it out?
--
Anthony
__
Using The Bat! v3.5 on Windows XP 5.1
Hello Anthony,
MoveMessage folder
\5C\5C\5CLocal\5CIncoming\20mail\20by\20mailing\20list\5CThe\20Bat
Thos only strange thing I see is in your move action. The folder patch
starts with \\\ (3 of them) and I see that in my filters all of them
start with just two (\\). Can you try to edit this
Hello Anthony,
Apparently it has something to do with arranging filters in a hierarchy.
Yes, of course. If a filter above the one in question is triggering and
is not set to Continue processing, the filter in question will not even
be tested.
Something has changed in the code. Can anyone
MAU writes:
Thos only strange thing I see is in your move action. The folder patch
starts with \\\ (3 of them) and I see that in my filters all of them
start with just two (\\). Can you try to edit this action and select the
folder again to see if it does make any difference?
All of the move
MAU writes:
Yes, of course. If a filter above the one in question is triggering and
is not set to Continue processing, the filter in question will not even
be tested.
But the filter _was_ being tested, and it _did_ trigger, because when I
put a change color action in the filter, it was
Hello Anthony,
Clearly, the failure is related to the fact that these filters are
subordinate to another filter. Something that worked before in this
logic has been broken, and now it doesn't work. I suggest that the code
in that area be examined.
OK, you should have mentioned from start
MAU writes:
OK, you should have mentioned from start that you were talking about
sub-filters.
At the beginning I had no particular reason to suspect the subfilter
structure, and therefore no reason to mention it.
Are you perhaps also talking about Common filters and
sub-filters?
Yes, I use
On Sat 28 May 2005, 7:17:11 +1000, Mfpa wrote:
I just tidied up my folder list, grouping folders neatly under
related umbrella folders.
As soon I fetched new mail half the folders were duplicated in
their original places because the move to folder action in the
incoming mail filters did not
Arjan,
Saturday, May 28, 2005, 7:27:32 AM, you wrote:
AdG Rule of thumb: all versions with two or more dots are Beta
AdG versions.
Shouldn't the rule of thumb be that versions on the main product
page are release versions and those on the Beta site are Beta versions
regardless of the numbering?
Hello Dean,
On Sat, 28 May 2005 19:40:25 -0500 GMT (29/05/2005, 07:40 +0700 GMT),
Dean wrote:
D Thanks for the thoughts, it's my Sister in Law. Not good by any
D means...
Sorry to hear, but hope she will bounce back.
D Snip***
TF The only thing I could find is Account / Properties /
TF
26 matches
Mail list logo
