Re[2]: Word Wrap

2006-04-19 Thread Ben Allen
Howdy Thomas, Wednesday, April 19, 2006, 6:33:34 AM, Thomas wrotened: Thomas> Hello Tim, Thomas> On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:27:12 -0700 GMT (19/04/2006, 10:27 +0700 GMT), Thomas> Tim Hamm wrote: TH>> Word wrap doesn't seem to work with certain messages when replying TH>> regularly or with quote

Re: Word Wrap

2006-04-19 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Ben, On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 09:38:55 +0100 GMT (19/04/2006, 15:38 +0700 GMT), Ben Allen wrote: Thomas>> menu item activated. I forgot which, because I wrap manually Thomas>> using ctrl-L (everybody works differently). BA> Mines Alt-L... Also is doesnt wrap pasted text... which can be BA> anno

Re: International Pack

2006-04-19 Thread Martin Schuster
Hello Tim, A question not relating to your question: to me it seems like you start all your threads with a subject "Re: ..." don't you? Or am I missing the original post somehow? -- Martin TB! 3.72.05 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2 Curr

Re[2]: Word Wrap

2006-04-19 Thread Ben Allen
Howdy Thomas, Wednesday, April 19, 2006, 9:55:25 AM, Thomas wrotened: Thomas>>> menu item activated. I forgot which, because I wrap manually Thomas>>> using ctrl-L (everybody works differently). BA>> Mines Alt-L... Also is doesnt wrap pasted text... which can be BA>> annoying.. Thomas> Yes, alt

Re: Word Wrap

2006-04-19 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Ben! On Wednesday, April 19, 2006, 8:21 AM, you wrote: > Thomas> Yes, alt-L, sorry. Does wrap pasted text, but you have place the > Thomas> cursor into the pasted text first. Alt-L works only on the paragraph > Thomas> in which the cursor is located. > Yes thats what I mean... it would b

Re: International Pack

2006-04-19 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Tim, On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:58:31 -0700GMT (19-4-2006, 4:58 +0100, where I live), you wrote: TH> My question is; when I downloaded the International Pack TH> originally and installed it on my machine, where does it install TH> files at? Partially at the program directory and partially in

wish: create sets of account settings to use in different environments?

2006-04-19 Thread Martin Schuster
Hello tbudl, I frequently change from a fast internet connection to a mobile connection and back. Because on the fast line I want to check often and get mails at once while on the mobile connection I want to check less frequent and only headers I need to do the following every time I change my con

Re[2]: Word Wrap

2006-04-19 Thread Tim Hamm
Hello Thomas, Tuesday, April 18, 2006, 10:33:34 PM, you wrote: > Your sig delimiter doesn't work; How about this...? -- Best regards, Timmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' informati

Re: Word Wrap

2006-04-19 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Tim, @19-Apr-2006, 10:32 -0700 (19-Apr 18:32 here) Tim Hamm [TH] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Thomas: >> Your sig delimiter doesn't work; TH> How about this...? Much better! -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v3.72.10 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1

Re[2]: International Pack

2006-04-19 Thread Tim Hamm
Hello Martin, Wednesday, April 19, 2006, 5:16:12 AM, you wrote: > to me it seems like you > start all your threads with a subject "Re: ..." don't you? Yes, that is correct... -- Best regards, Timmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___

Re[2]: Word Wrap

2006-04-19 Thread Tim Hamm
Hello Thomas, Tuesday, April 18, 2006, 10:33:34 PM, you wrote: > Word wrap doesn't automatically wrap quoted text (like whne you are > replying), It seems my original post only had to do with quoted text being wrapped when replying not pasted text... What I found out is that TB follows the form

auto identification with GnuPG

2006-04-19 Thread floydstyle
Hello all, I'd like to know how to auto ident a person using GnuPG. If it is ever possible of course thank you -- Best regards, floydstyle ..A Requiem To The Post-War Dream

Re[3]: Word Wrap

2006-04-19 Thread Tim Hamm
Hello Ben, Wednesday, April 19, 2006, 1:38:55 AM, you wrote: Thomas>> Word wrap doesn't automatically wrap quoted text (like whne you are Thomas>> replying), My apologies everyone... it appears I quoted Thomas's reply when it should have be another member when pointing out the differences in wor

Re: Word Wrap

2006-04-19 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Tim, why is each of your *new* messages to the list marked as "Re:", indicating a reply to a previous message? *puzzled* -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) NP: "Biotron" by Amtinaoüs (from the 1997 album "Nataraja 2") __

Re[2]: Word Wrap

2006-04-19 Thread Tim Hamm
Hello Alexander, Wednesday, April 19, 2006, 12:16:34 PM, you wrote: > why is each of your *new* messages to the list marked as "Re:", > indicating a reply to a previous message? *puzzled* I don't know who put the [2] in the original subject heading...? I've always started out a new messages wi

Re: auto identification with GnuPG

2006-04-19 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Floydstyle, @19-Apr-2006, 14:40 -0400 (19-Apr 19:40 here) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [F] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: F> I'd like to know how to auto ident a person using GnuPG. If it is F> ever possible of course Right now it isn't possible. PGP verification is currently a manual event. There is

Re: Word Wrap

2006-04-19 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Tim! On Wednesday, April 19, 2006, 2:24 PM, you wrote: > I don't know who put the [2] in the original subject heading...? Look in Account/Properties/Templates/Reply. There's a check box for "Use reply numbering in the subject line." Uncheck it and the numbers will no longer appear. And t

Re: Word Wrap

2006-04-19 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Tim Hamm & everyone else, on 19-Apr-2006 at 21:24 you (Tim Hamm) wrote: >> why is each of your *new* messages to the list marked as "Re:", >> indicating a reply to a previous message? *puzzled* > I don't know who put the [2] in the original subject heading...? Thats TheBat's automatic rep

Re: International Pack

2006-04-19 Thread MFPA
Hi On Wednesday 19 April 2006 at 7:11:42 PM, in , Tim Hamm wrote: > Yes, that is correct... That is confusing me as well. Why would you use the subject line "Re: Blah blah" for anything other than a reply to message that had the subject "Blah blah"? -- Best regards, MFPA

Junk mail to delete

2006-04-19 Thread Peter Kerekes
Hello, I have a folder "Junk Mail" using Bayes Filter Plug-in. I set FOLDER | PROPERTIES | NAME - Junk Mail |to Keep messages in the base for (days): choose 1 and tick. But is doesn't work for some reason. I have over 500, all since I last manually deleted. Why isn't it automatically deleting th

Re: Junk mail to delete

2006-04-19 Thread Andreas Schwartmann
Peter Kerekes wrote: Hello, I have a folder "Junk Mail" using Bayes Filter Plug-in. I set FOLDER | PROPERTIES | NAME - Junk Mail |to Keep messages in the base for (days): choose 1 and tick. But is doesn't work for some reason. I have over 500, all since I last manually deleted. Why isn't it au

Re: Junk mail to delete

2006-04-19 Thread Gary Lucas
On Wednesday, April 19, 2006, Peter Kerekes cleverly scripted: > Hello, > I have a folder "Junk Mail" using Bayes Filter Plug-in. I set FOLDER | > PROPERTIES | NAME - Junk Mail |to Keep messages in the base for > (days): choose 1 and tick. > But is doesn't work for some reason. I have over 500,

Mod: Cut mark (was: Junk mail to delete)

2006-04-19 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Andreas, On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 23:31:31 +0200GMT (19-4-2006, 23:31 +0200, where I live), you wrote: AS> Andreas Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel sing

Re[2]: Junk mail to delete

2006-04-19 Thread Peter Kerekes
Hello Andreas, Wednesday, April 19, 2006, 5:31:31 PM, you wrote: Andreas> Peter Kerekes wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have a folder "Junk Mail" using Bayes Filter Plug-in. I set FOLDER | >> PROPERTIES | NAME - Junk Mail |to Keep messages in the base for >> (days): choose 1 and tick. >> >> But is doesn

Re: Junk mail to delete

2006-04-19 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Peter, On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 17:09:20 -0400GMT (19-4-2006, 23:09 +0100, where I live), you wrote: PK> Why isn't it automatically deleting the ones over a day old? You need to set the 'on exit: remove old messages' option. The messages need to be set as read, unless you've got the 'purge unre

Re: Mod: Cut mark

2006-04-19 Thread Andreas Schwartmann
Roelof Otten wrote: Hallo Andreas, You can easily automate this process by including the sig delimiter in your templates. Sorry, I forgot to include my usual signature in this hasty thunderbird setup. :-) Thanks for reminding! Andreas -- www.andreas-schwartmann.de www.justitiacolonia

Re[2]: Junk mail to delete

2006-04-19 Thread Peter Kerekes
Hello Roelof, Wednesday, April 19, 2006, 6:11:07 PM, you wrote: Roelof> Hallo Peter, Roelof> On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 17:09:20 -0400GMT (19-4-2006, 23:09 +0100, where I Roelof> live), you wrote: PK>> Why isn't it automatically deleting the ones over a day old? Roelof> You need to set the 'on exit:

Re: auto identification with GnuPG

2006-04-19 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On 19-4-2006 20:40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'd like to know how to auto ident a person using GnuPG. If it is ever > possible of course Do you mean automaticly retrieving a key of a person using GnuPG? -- Henk M. de Bruijn

Re: Junk mail to delete

2006-04-19 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 00:11:07 +0200GMT (20-4-2006, 0:11 +0200, where I live), Roelof Otten wrote: > On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 17:09:20 -0400GMT (19-4-2006, 23:09 +0100, where I > live), you wrote: PK>> Why isn't it automatically deleting the ones over a day old? > You need to set the 'on exit: remove o

Re[3]: Junk mail to delete

2006-04-19 Thread Tim Hamm
Hello Peter, Wednesday, April 19, 2006, 3:09:07 PM, you wrote: >>> I have a folder "Junk Mail" using Bayes Filter Plug-in. I set FOLDER | >>> PROPERTIES | NAME - Junk Mail |to Keep messages in the base for >>> (days): choose 1 and tick. >>> >>> But is doesn't work for some reason. I have over 500

Re: International Pack

2006-04-19 Thread Chris
MFPA @ 4/19/2006 3:08:07 PM "International Pack" > Why would you use the subject line "Re: Blah blah" for anything > other than a reply to message that had the subject "Blah blah"? Consider a paper memo. In that case, RE means "regarding." -- Chris Quoting when replying to this message is goo

Re: Junk mail to delete

2006-04-19 Thread Chris
Tim Hamm @ 4/19/2006 8:57:30 PM "Junk mail to delete" > Can't mention 3rd party names here From recent messages: Outlook BayseIt X-Ray Becky Pine PGP Windows Eudora eBay Thunderbird What program were you thinking of? -- Chris Quoting when replying to this message is good for you and me. Usi

Re[2]: Junk mail to delete

2006-04-19 Thread Tim Hamm
Hello Chris, Wednesday, April 19, 2006, 7:29:46 PM, you wrote: > What program were you thinking of? Email me separately and I will give you that information. I'm new to TBUDL and thus I am not sure what the policies are of openly promoting 3rd party software...trying not to break any rules...

Re[4]: Junk mail to delete

2006-04-19 Thread The Janitor
20 April 2006 - 06:39 Hello Tim, Thursday, April 20, 2006, 2:57:30 AM, you wrote: TH> Can't mention 3rd party names here Why not? -- Best regards, William Flying with The Bat! Professional version 3.65.03 Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using