Hello tbudl,
I'm looking into some anti-spam solutions
MailWasher Pro looks like something useful but has one major flaw. If it can't
be 'fixed' I wouldn't even want it for free... :P
The problem is that I doesn't work as a proxy. I have to switch of auto mail
checking in The Bat and let
T I'm looking into some anti-spam solutions MailWasher Pro looks like
T something useful but has one major flaw. If it can't be 'fixed' I
T wouldn't even want it for free... :P The problem is that I doesn't
T work as a proxy. I have to switch of auto mail checking in The Bat
T and let MailWasher
Hello Code,
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
C2 If it wasn't for those darn spammers sending blank
C2 messages with .pdf spam attachments lately, I expect it would be well
C2 over 99% accurate.
Here's what the author has just posted in the forum. Maybe that'll help
you:
Hello Richard,
Tuesday, July 17, 2007, 11:10:37 PM, you wrote:
RW Hello Code,
RW On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 you wrote in
RW mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
C2 If it wasn't for those darn spammers sending blank
C2 messages with .pdf spam attachments lately, I expect it would be well
C2 over 99% accurate.
RW
Hello Code,
Tuesday, July 17, 2007, 10:46:48 PM, you wrote:
T I'm looking into some anti-spam solutions MailWasher Pro looks like
T something useful but has one major flaw. If it can't be 'fixed' I
T wouldn't even want it for free... :P The problem is that I doesn't
T work as a proxy. I have to
Hello Tony,
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
T I'm sure you/the author is right.
T But that forces us/me to the white list path.
T In that case I would even need a spam filter.
Fair enough, I can understand your reticence. I was actually replying to
Code2's post but it
Hello Richard,
Tuesday, July 17, 2007, 11:53:16 PM, you wrote:
RW Hello Tony,
RW On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 you wrote in
RW mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
T I'm sure you/the author is right.
T But that forces us/me to the white list path.
T In that case I would even need a spam filter.
RW Fair enough, I can
T AntiSpamSniper.
T I'll put that on my todo list.
T Was is/it performing well with picture spam? Or where you along
T the happy few that didn't receive 50 stockmarket picture spams a
T day.
T Those guys are busted according to a news article. Not that it
T matters because Now the subject just
On Tuesday, July 17, 2007, at 5:14:03 PM, Code 2 wrote:
I like Richard's blacklist solution for .pdf attachments, but I just
can't risk a false positive on an important e-mail. Maybe the solution is
to filter these to an Unknown folder for periodic review. Kind of a
nearly-Junk Mail folder.
Hello Tony,
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
T I've installed AntispamSniper 15 minutes ago.
I don't think you'll regret it and the author answers questions in the
forum, normally the same day, should you have any problems.
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.99.8 with
Hello Roelof,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 07:39:50 +0200 GMT (16/07/2007, 12:39 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
RO The only difference between the home and pro versions is that some
RO features are unlocked by the pro license, both use the same
RO executable.
Which features would that be?
--
Cheers,
Hallo Thomas,
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 08:27:03 +0700GMT (18-7-2007, 3:27 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO The only difference between the home and pro versions is that some
RO features are unlocked by the pro license, both use the same
RO executable.
TF Which features would that be?
OTFE comes
12 matches
Mail list logo
