Hi Thomas,
2008/6/12 Thomas Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> When you open the URL manager, it shows the main domain at
> the top (imageshacks.us in your case) and the individual image URLs
> below in the tree. You can select the main URL and choose "Block".
I'll agree that you can block a base U
Hi all,
I'm trying to block any host in imageshack.us as it's the source for
most of the tracking images (and other semi-decent imagery) in my spam
emails. So far, the URL manager doesn't seem to support wildcards - or
does it?
Regards,
Roman
--
On 26/11/2007, Henk M. de Bruijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where have you looked?
Googled it and looked around on the mailing list and on the RITLabs
web page. The URL you sent eluded me for some reason. I'll blame it
on the turkey!
Best regards from a former neighbor (Aachen),
Roman
--
__
On 27/11/2007, Henk M. de Bruijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/news_detail.php?ID=2188
Thanks Henk!
I wonder why I overlooked that. Still, no screenshots yet - I'm
looking forward to when there is more information.
Best regards,
Roman
--
Hi all,
I've been trying to find information on what's going to be new in
version 4, but have been unsuccessful. Did my turkey-induced food
coma blind me or is there nothing out there?
Regards,
Roman
--
Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBU
Hello all,
I just reinstalled Windows and restored TB from backup. From now on I
would like to store attachments with the messages rather than in a
separate directory.
Is there a way to put the previously received attachments that were
stored in a separate directory back into their respective me
On 28/06/06, Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, I'm still uncomfortable with the idea that The Bat! may be spying
on me.
Whichever spyware scanner you have doesn't actually detect a
software's capability of spying on you or it actually doing so. All
these scanners (as well a virus scanner
Hi Batters,
I just created an account for Gmail. POP works fine and after about
three or four POP sessions (why that many, I don't know) I had
downloaded all 900 messages to my Inbox.
I turned on grouping by date and tried threded and non-threaded view
modes, but grouping by date doesn't work co
Hi all,
I'm getting these messaged when trying to receive email:
19.02.2006, 20:56:21: FETCH - receiving mail messages
19.02.2006, 20:56:24: FETCH - Initiating TLS handshake
19.02.2006, 20:56:25: FETCH - Certificate S/N: 0, algorithm: RSA (1024
bits), issued from 14 Feb 2006 to 14 Feb 2007, for 1
On 02/02/06, Alexander S. Kunz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It was indeed talking about quite a while ago when an earlier version
> wasn't running for most people. :-)
"System requirements:
Microsoft Windows XP
Google Desktop 2.0
The Bat! 2.04.08"
TB2? I've been on TB3 for a while now. Does that
Roelof,
On 23/01/06, Roelof Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Via TB's scheduler I'm creating a new backup every week.
> However, this backup overwrites the old backup as it has the same
> name.
> Does anybody know how to give them proper alternating names?
> Something like the date as
On 02/12/05, Mica Mijatovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As to Arj, I have discovered that if I keep such archives on a CD-RW,
> after a pretty short while (perhaps 2 or 3 weeks) they will (almost all
> of them) become unreadable/corrupted, and irrecoverable.
> On "ordinary" CDs they are okay.
Che
On Wednesday, November 30, 2005, 08:11:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks a lot to all members of TB for the Gmail invitations.
I saw this a bit late and now you have yours :-)
If anyone else needs an invite, let me know!
Regards,
Roman
--
If I had been born some time ago I would've bee
On Saturday, November 26, 2005, 22:39:32, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
LG>> Really? I didn't know that some boxed versions came with an e-mail
LG>> address.. At which domain? Ritlabs?
> No, the dial-up login details come with email addresses at the ISP.
> So, you sign up for a dial-up account wiht the I
On Saturday, November 26, 2005, 15:33:25, John Phillips wrote:
> Can you define "safe"?
Safe: does not cause loss of data and/or settings and will not force me to
roll back.
Should be a matter of course for release versions of any software.
Regards,
Roman
--
There are two tragedies in life.
Hi all,
is 3.62.14 safe to use? I know it's the latest release (sic) version, but
many people seem to have a multitude of problems with it. I'm running
3.62.07. Update or not?
Regards,
Roman
--
I love the culture of victimhood. -- Calvin
Cur
On Wednesday, November 23, 2005, 12:45:18, Bob and Melissa wrote:
> Why do I need to put in my ISP email
> address???I thought I would get a seperate email from this
> program...
Did you buy the box version that "comes with" an email address? I seem to
remember something like that...
Regards,
Rom
On Tuesday, November 22, 2005, 10:42:26, MFPA wrote:
> Having read a couple of previous threads on the subject, I intend
> to use the following batch files to automate backing up of TB!'s
> registry entries and mail and program directories.
I like to include the date in the backup file name and ha
On Sunday, November 20, 2005, 05:41:17, Narayana wrote:
> May be this is too early to ask and also may not be the right forum as
> well.
Certainly not too early to ask.
> I am starting to like Voyager. As of today, I have not many issues
> with it. I expect that Ritlabs will announce a pricing po
Hi Andrew,
On Saturday, November 19, 2005, 12:23:39, Andrew wrote:
> Been playing with the latest TB! and Google Desktop Search Plug-in
> (1.0.0.14).
Huh. I had asked for a plug-in like that (or rather, I had asked that TB!
had a search feature as powerful and fast as GDS, but I daydream and
digr
On 04/11/05, Jack S. LaRosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Upon receipt of your message I looked at the 'Don't filter messages
> larger than' box and it's not checked, so there should be no size
> restriction. I too am using v1.28.
That's your problem. Check it.
Roman
--
_
Hi Fredrik,
> Well, I cannot be the only one? How do you manage to read
> mailinglists other than the The Bat ones?
gmail and/or mutt. And I'm not kidding. They work.
Regards,
Roman
--
Chicago got started by a bunch of New Yorkers who said, Gee, I'm enjoying
the crime and poverty, but
Dwight,
On 9/28/05, Dwight A Corrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really don't know what this is. I get lots of HTML mail from various
> lists, and newsletters and -unfortunately- from other users, and don't
> really see this at all.
> I have lots less perfect html rendering when I am using firef
Peter,
On 9/28/05, Peter Meyns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RK> I missed:
> RK> - virtual folders
>
> But these ARE possible, even in T'bird.
apparently I didn't give it enough of a try, then. I overlooked that.
I do also miss quick templates which I forgot to mention in my original post.
Roma
On 9/28/05, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm currently trying out Thunderbird (so far so good). I'm sure thers
> been a few people on this list that have also tried it out too. If so
> what features did you miss from The Bat?
I missed:
- address book templates
- virtual folders
but also:
-
x) [80.283.21.128]
> by mail.gmx.net (mp008) with SMTP; 24 Sep 2005 10:22:23 +0200
> X-Authenticated: #1469024
> From: "Joachim Katzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Roman Katzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Besuch
> Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 10:27:19 +
Has anyone else noticed this?
TB truncates words in its display. Example:
> http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~roman/pictures/thebat_truncates_words.png
As one can see, the name is truncated (last letter missing) and the
subject is, too. In the message source both the name and the subject are
On Saturday, September 10, 2005, 05:16:21, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
> ...and a selective download filter that deletes everything from
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" right on the server. ;-)
> "Haben Sie Neuigkeiten für uns?"
Don't they kick you out if you don't update your data?
Regards,
Roman
--
W
Barry and Feli,
On Friday, September 2, 2005, 04:04:16, Feli Wilcke wrote:
> update to BayesIt 0.8.4 solved the problem for me.
Seems like BayesIt usually creates more problems than it solves.
The list is full of BayesIt problems.
Regards,
Roman
--
Proof by importance: Much useful informati
On 8/23/05, Spike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As my message bases total over 45GB at present, shutting down TB! (all
> accounts and folders set to compress!) takes just over 6 hours.
Holy cr*p! Have you considered deleting some e-mails or storing
attachments in separate directories? How many me
On 8/23/05, Spike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Suggestions??
In addition to what Chris suggested (have computer turn itself off if
there's less than, say, 20% left on your UPS), backup more often (ok,
also has been suggested) and:
leave your mail on the server for a week or so after retrieval. TB
On 8/21/05, Jeff Gaines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found BayesIt very poor even after training. I have switched to K9
> now and find it much better.
AOL that.
I've never gotten BayesIt to work, and I'm not the most
computer-illiterate person out there. When "c't Magazin" (renowned
German com
Hi Batters,
wouldn't it be nice if TB had powerful search features like Gmail or
Apple's Spotlight?
I know that TB's has a search feature, but it's slow since emails
aren't pre-indexed for keywords. Or is there any plugin or other
third-party software that would do that with TB's e-mails?
Regards
On Friday, July 29, 2005, 14:03:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is it possible to copy mail from multiple inboxes into a "super" inbox so
> that the separate inboxes don't require individual checking?
You could set up a virtual folder for that. It keeps the mails in
their original Inboxes but disp
Hi Alexander,
On Tuesday, July 26, 2005, 12:48:59, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
>> Is 3.51 later than 3.5.26 please?
> Yes. The version numbering system was changed a little bit. Quoting
> developer 9Val from the beta list:
And where does 3.5.30 fit in?
Roman
--
We know that the nature of genius
On Sunday, July 3, 2005, 11:51:17, Sam Brown wrote:
> Just for fun I went back to a 1.53 version and the problem still
> showed itself. I do have a 2.12 to try if you think that would help,
> but at this point, I'm thinking the result would likely be the same.
It seems the problem isn't TB's faul
On Saturday, June 4, 2005, 13:23:51, Duncan Strand wrote:
> Where can I download from? The Bat page only has the latest version
> and the beta page all versions result in a 404 error :|
No backup? Hm.
I have an old .msi file from October 2004. Not sure whether that's it.
Does anyone know?
Regards
On Saturday, June 4, 2005, 11:48:50, Duncan Strand wrote:
> I'm using Bat 3.5.25, and on my account it works fine. However on my
> girlfriends account it fails to start properly.
> Any ideas/suggestions?
Seems to be the AV mentioned by others before. Possibly a downgrade to
3.0.1.33 would help.
On Thursday, June 2, 2005, 19:33:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How do I set the background colour and foreground colour of all unread
> messages in all
> accounts and all folders to a particular setting?
Go into Preferences and change the settings for the General Color Group(? -
freely translati
Hi Fredrik,
> grouping by date/sender/recipient sounds really nice, I would like to
> do that, if it is what i think it is, but how?
I'm not sure, maybe they mean sorting by multiple criteria?
As in: click one comlumn to sort by that, hold Control and click a second
column to sort by that also, e
Hi Claude,
> Today I took a look at the ritlabs product home page and did not see
> it mentionned any more..
What was it supposed to do?
Maybe it went the way of TB Voyager, which is supposed to be released Real
Soon Now.
Regards,
Roman
--
Did you hear about the merger of Xerox and Wurli
On Saturday, May 28, 2005, 08:50:33, MFPA wrote:
>> Rule of thumb: all versions with two or more dots are Beta
>> versions.
> 3.0.1.33 has three dots and was the version for sale on the
> Ritlabs website when I upgraded from v2.
Yeah, a beta that happened to be stable and that I still use.
Even th
Hi Mary, hi List,
On Thursday, May 26, 2005, 22:25:37, Mary Bull wrote:
> Only on the RitLabs website, where there's a comparison of v. 3.5 to
> v. 3.1.
Been there, done that.
> V. 3.5.17 (now 3.5.18) is officially a beta. To read about it,
> subscribe to TBBETA. To download it, register as a be
Hi Batters,
what's new... no, what's _fixed_ in 3.5.0.17 (vs. 3.5.0.0.0.0.0.0.0)?
Is there a website on the fixes/changes from version to version?
Regards,
Roman
--
Caffeine Anonymous uses a 12 step program similar to AA, but at its
meetings, members snack on donuts and drink beer.
___
On Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 19:47:07, St - Musaic.Net wrote:
> I just designed a plug-in for my TB featuring a bunch of *very* useful
> things (ie. a *terrific* anti-spam system). One feture I eventually
> added was one that inserts the "correct" subject tag for any mailing
> list ("TBUDL", "TBBTEA"
On Monday, May 16, 2005, 03:11:02, Urban wrote:
> My german is as rusty as my klingon, but I think it's only available in
> paid accounts.
> "Der IMAP4-Zugang ist in den Tarifen GMX ProMail und GMX TopMail
> verfügbar."
Your Klingon must be better than mine. And your German doesn't fail you. :)
Hallo,
On Sunday, May 15, 2005, 21:48:01, Ralph Inselsbacher wrote:
> does anybody use (or try to use) the german ISP GMX with IMAP? Does it
> work for you and if yes, what are your settings for IMAP?
is that even possible with their free accounts? I seem to remember that
only the paid accounts h
On Saturday, May 14, 2005, 07:29:25, Steve Lee wrote:
> I upgraded to Windows Installer 3 and now it shows "The Windows Installer
> Service could not be
> accessed."
Sounds like that service is turned off or terminated. Can you check under
Start -> Settings -> System Settings -> Administration -
On Saturday, May 14, 2005, 06:48:37, Allie Martin wrote:
> I fully concur with this. TB! is the way it is in many ways because of
> the many features I've personally seen asked for on these lists being
> implemented by RIT.
Well, my comment was targeted at bugfixes, really. I didn't make that
cle
On Friday, May 13, 2005, 21:26:02, Ian A. White wrote:
> It is a pity that things like this get changed. I realise that there
> has been a major rewrite, but the previous behaviour was there for
> many versions and I cannot recall anyone asking for it to be changed.
That, however, has been common
On Sunday, May 1, 2005, 15:12:20, Marek Mikus wrote:
> new version 3.5 with major changes in GUI will be released in May, we
> have first Release Candidate actually.
What, no 4.0? I mean, they could make us pay for IMAP support (which would
work better then, promise!) and bugfixes again.
As for
On Saturday, April 9, 2005, 11:34:14, Ralph Inselsbacher wrote:
> Sorry, but can you explain that in a little more detail? What does it help
> me footnotes? Is cookies.txt empty?... If easier for you, you can explain
> it in german too me as well (just use my email...)
My bad. I thought you meant
On Saturday, April 9, 2005, 07:43:10, Ralph Inselsbacher wrote:
> But another problem occured: When the text is inserted again with fn
> (strg-space), it is just an unformatted one-liner. When i hit alt-L to
> format it, i just get a blocked text, with absolutely no formatting that
> it had before
Roelof,
On Saturday, March 26, 2005, 18:40:18, Roelof Otten wrote:
> In that case I'd suggest to alter those AB group templates into quick
> templates (QT) and make the AB templates call the QT.
That's what I did for my "Friends" group, actually.
> In this case it's not really an address book te
Hi Jack,
> I am now running WINXP Pro with two users, both administrators. On my
> login I have TB! set up so that it displays both my account and my
> wife's account. On her login I have TB! set up so that it displays
> only her account.
I'd suggest that you configure TB to put its data into the
Hi Roelof,
> Two options, they're members of another group with its own templates too
> or more likely you've got more than one entry for those addresses.
Hm, for at least one person there was only this one entry in that address
book. I had the same person in a different address book that I had u
Hi Batters,
my address book template for an address book group doesn't work for
everybody in that group. I have set up a group called "friends" with
special templates for new mails and replies.
Now when I reply to some people, these templates work. With other people,
it doesn't. I checked to see w
On Tuesday, March 15, 2005, 16:12:34, Steve Thomas wrote:
> What happened to The Bat! Voyager? The announcement came out but no
> product - at least that I can see on the web site.
They misspelled "Vaporware".
Regards,
Roman
PS: if you find irony, keep it ;)
--
I will try to raise a be
On Thursday, March 3, 2005, 11:11:34, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Yes, but to the list pertaining to the mailer the sender used:
>> X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5 18. September 2003
> On a side remark, this message uses only plain text, so there is no
> need for HTML anyway, but that's of cause
On Tuesday, March 1, 2005, 21:11:30, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Richt-click in the message body and see which encoding is used. It
> probably shows "None". Change that to Central European (ISO or
> Windows) or to Latin-9. See whether that helps.
Thanks for the suggestion. I had tried and not menti
On Tuesday, March 1, 2005, 17:13:20, Roman Katzer wrote:
> I'll try to attach a screenshot. It's about 3KB in size.
*grrmbl*
I thought attachments up to 25KB could be sent? Seems that the list
software filters everything out.
Here it is:
http://home.comcast.net/~merlynzero/utf8bad
Hi Thomas,
On Tuesday, March 1, 2005, 09:40:56, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
RK>> I got a mail encoded in UTF-8 and the "special" characters are
RK>> displayed wrongly.
> Check which font you have set under:
> Options / Preferences / Viewer/Editor / HTML Viewer.
> It appears that the font there does n
Is there no UTF-8 (Unicode) support in TB?
I got a mail encoded in UTF-8 and the "special" characters are displayed
wrongly.
Regards,
Roman
--
If you must drink, please don't drive. Don't even putt.
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using T
On Wednesday, February 23, 2005, 13:01:57, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
> "Mr. SANI BAKOYO, the bank Manager Of Africa Continentale Bank Lagos
> Nigeria" ... would not like this. :-) :-) :-)
He doesn't. Would you _believe_ it, he even wrote me under a _false_
_name_ now!
The world is bad...
Roman
Hello Barry,
> I've now transcribed 83 different regex rules over to Bayesit. I extracted
> them from my copy of MailWasher.
> This seems to have made a dramatic improvement in spam catching. I've now
> reduced the spam failures from 100% (really!) to below 54% in two days.
this seems to be a gre
On Monday, February 21, 2005, 11:19:09, Paul Stephen wrote:
> Is this text added automatically to The Bat messages or do I have to
> write my own macro to add this? (The AVG plug-in works fine.)
I wouldn't bother to add it. Nobody should rely on what a message says.
It just gives a false sense of
On Sunday, February 20, 2005, 12:26:09, WilWilWil wrote:
> Curious, Ritlabs speaks about TB Voyager on their site as if it was
> already available!
Indeed. Also, no mention on when the next update to the regular TB will be
released. "Coming really, really soon. Really!" Is about all I heard since
On Friday, February 18, 2005, 11:45:37, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
> Interesting. This SpamAssassin must really be badly maintained.
Actually, it's pretty well maintained. They just have difficulties with
adjusting to new TB versions but _will_ do their best to do so.
Post a bug report at http://bu
Hello Mike,
On Wednesday, January 26, 2005, 17:14:59, Mike Rourke wrote:
> Decided to try K9 with TB see wow it worked. I have K9 set up to add
> X-text-classification SPAM to the header. I then set up a filter to
> move mail with this header to the junk folder, no problem, so I
> thought.
Makes
Hi Allie,
On Wednesday, January 19, 2005, 19:49:19, Allie Martin wrote:
> One things for sure. My fluent use of ThunderBird has opened up my
> eyes to a lot of problems with TB! and the reverse certainly/obviously
> applies as well.
I'm curious. What do you see as the most important advantages an
Hi Gerard,
> I believe you can do a backup from within TB! and check store "attachments
> with
> msg". If you then delete your current installation and reinstall using
> your
> backup all attachments without an email msg should be gone.
That could work. It's also quite cumbersome, though - not fo
Hi Marten,
> > Any suggestion on how to delete attachment files unassociated with any
> > mail?
> In Options - Files & Directories...
> there's an option - delete attachments when message removed from trash -
Thanks, I should have mentioned that I have that checked. However, it
doesn't seem to wo
Hi Batters,
After reinstalling Windows XP, I set TB to keep its attachments in the
message bodies. Now however, my backups get very large. My backup is
through a shell script that compresses TB's mail folders.
If I set TB to keep attachments in a separate directory, after a while I
have a large nu
On Sunday, November 21, 2004, 05:03:29, Kariem Hussein wrote:
> The only method I have found so far, to delete old messages, is on a
> per-folder-basis.
Create a common virtual folder that watches all folders you have and
select a filter criterion (message older than ...). All messages created
be
Hi Marck,
On Friday, October 29, 2004, 09:36:40, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
> Please include a signature delimiter in your messages. [...]
Well, as has happened to me once, he simply didn't have a signature and
such, no delimiter is required. (I'm not counting putting your name under
the message a
Hello Anne,
On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 13:54:23, Anne wrote:
> Or you could set an Unread Messages display shortcut. I have this set
> to Ctrl+# for Show Only Unread Messages and then I use the preset
> shortcut Ctrl+= to show all messages if I want to see everything.
Again, thanks for a goo
On Sunday, October 17, 2004, 19:55:11, Wayne Howard wrote:
> Does anyone know if there is a way to automate a backup either via the
> interface or via the command line?
I use a Windows .cmd (formerly known as .bat files) script to back up some
of my applications:
--8<--snip---
Hi David,
On Saturday, October 16, 2004, 20:27:12, David M. Dickerson wrote:
> [anti-spam software]
I use K9 (http://keir.net/k9.html), extremely small, very very fast and
good configuration options. Accuracy about 98-99% here.
Roman
Current v
On Saturday, October 16, 2004, 18:08:25, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
> My unread messages are shown bold... :-)
Mine too, but if you've turned threaded views on and one message at the
end of a thread is unread, all previous messages are bold, too.
Roman
--
No culture can live, if it attempts t
On Saturday, October 16, 2004, 14:36:57, Paul White wrote:
> Check the 'Filter' lines of the Account Log. Not the best way but as far
> as I know, the only way.
Thanks, I'll try that and promise to proof-read my messages in the future
:)
Roman
--
Foreign Aid - taxing poor people in rich co
On Saturday, October 16, 2004, 14:17:23, Roelof Otten wrote:
> Apparently something is gone amiss in your update procedure. I'd
> suggest that you delete (or rename) your help file and via
> configuration screen, software panel start to repair the TB
> installation, that ought to do the trick.
It
On Saturday, October 16, 2004, 14:43:21, Roman Katzer wrote:
> Here's a screenshot of mine, I find it too similar.
Hnng. Attachment stripped. Here:
http://kawoserv.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~roman/pictures/icons.png
> Again, is there any way to change this?
Roman
--
Explaining the
Hi Thomas,
On Saturday, October 16, 2004, 14:13:55, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
RK>> the icons for unread vs. read mail in the message flags column are very
RK>> similar and thus hard to tell apart.
> Not confirmed, using standard icons.
Here's a screenshot of mine, I find it too similar.
Again, is t
Hello list,
Finally, how do I turn on message base etc encryption?
Roman
--
Science is based on the irrational belief that because we cannot perceive
reality all at once, things called time and cause and effect exist. --
Dogbert
Current ver
Where is it?
When I go to help from Help->Topics I get:
>"What's new in version 2
>
>Full support of IMAP protocol
>[...]"
Ah well, been there, done that, can't confirm. But I've ranted about this
before. The other help screens also apply to TB2.
Roman
--
Dorothy Parker called her parakee
Hello list,
the icons for unread vs. read mail in the message flags column are very
similar and thus hard to tell apart. Bad UI, no cookie!
Is there a way of changing them?
Roman
--
The House of Representatives held a hearing on cloning; you have to
picture 400 white guys in blue suits and r
Is there a way to see what score BayesIt gave a message?
Just upgraded to 3.0.1.33 and use BayesIt for the forst time (dodn#t work
before).
Roman
--
What is Snow White's favorite drink? Seven up.
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' in
Hallo Thomas,
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 12:08:37, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Have you reported it on TBBETA? - I haven't yet read the 140 messages
> that came in today, but Rit would be interested. FWIW this bug was
> fixed for me a long time ago.
I use a release version and am not subscribe
On Monday, October 11, 2004, 22:42:53, Mary Bull wrote:
> You have described the behavior perfectly. It's a bug.
[...]
> No help for it. You will have to do it that way, I think. :(
And will stay one. ARGH!
> Then you might want to solve your problem by upgrading to v. 3.0.1.
Hm. What about the
Hi all,
I have noticed a couple of times recently that the connection center hangs
when I can't get mail from one of my accounts. It's a regular
POP3-Account, all very vanilla.
Now when I notice that the fetch connection hangs and I try to either
abort or delete the task, the line containing that
On Friday, September 24, 2004, 07:12:52, Anne wrote:
> There are other forums where a less-restrictive view of comments
> and criticism is taken. ;)
Thankfully yes :)
I just wonder why nobody else has an opinion on Maxim's statements (or
even objections to my comments). Even in these free speech
Hi Roelof,
On Wednesday, September 22, 2004, 03:40:57, Roelof Otten wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:21:44 -0400GMT (22-9-2004, 4:21 +0200, where I
> live), you wrote:
RK>> Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
I didn't, actually - it was the list bot. Yes, I'm passing the buck ;
On Tuesday, September 21, 2004, 08:25:54, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
> So if a user will suddenly submit a bug report or a negative message,
> the moderator will either move it to the «technical support» database or
> will delete it from the forum if this message does not require support.
A.k.a. strict
I can't believe it.
It's hardly a year since version 2 came out and I was wondering why there
were so few minor releases in the last weeks. Now RITLabs is releasing
version 3 without functioning IMAP support in V2 (promised) and a whole
load of new, unfixed bugs introduced.
This is a slap in the
On Thursday, August 19, 2004, 05:18:29, Samson wrote:
> thebat's current threading is a good start, but has a long way to go.
*sigh*
I've said this years ago, but the general tenor of the replies was that
it's the other mail client's fault and thus TheBat wouldn't have to
change.
Well, though it m
Hi Batters,
in 2.12 I found a bad IMAP bug. I synchronized folders on one IMAP account
and saw one new message in the Inbox folder of that account. When I
clicked on the new message in the message list, the preview pane showed a
different message (different sender, date, subject etc) from the Inbo
Hi Roelof,
On Saturday, June 26, 2004, 18:32:23, Roelof Otten wrote:
RK>> %FROMADDR="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> You're mixing up two macros. There's the %FromAddr macro that inserts
> the fromaddress into the text. Also there's the %From='address' macro
> that changes the header
Argh.
RK>> Again, this
I'm having trouble with my quick templates. I don't remember when that
started, maybe when I switched over to TB2.
Even the QTs that worked before have ceased to function.
Consider a QT named "foobar" that looks like this:
%FROMADDR="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Now when I do type "foobar " what I get is
On Thursday, June 3, 2004, 03:23:09, Mark Partous wrote:
> First of all, while reading this message, right click on the body (the text
> part) of this message. Click on Smileys, to toggle them off.
[...]
Mark and all the others,
thanks for the kind help and the many replies!
Roman
--
Meteor
Hello Ian,
On Wednesday, June 2, 2004, 22:30:31, Ian A. White wrote:
> I don't simply because I have changed the smiley definition to "<(C)>"
> to avoid just that.
Emmm. Smiley definitions? Where would I find those?
Roman
--
Without computers, it would be virtually impossible for us to accomp
1 - 100 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
