On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 12:12:56 +1000 GMT, Robin Anson wrote:
RA> that if autocompletion failed, using Ctrl+Minus might still complete
RA> the address.
You were lucky I guess. The +/- wasn't working for me either.
-- Pixie
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 95 4.0
_
On Mon 1 September 2003, 23:10:04 +1000, Pixie wrote:
RA>> Looks similar to the problem discussed in the thread starting at
RA>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg58912.html. I
RA>> logged it as a bug, hopefully it not be in V2!
> My last message in "Address book / Autocomplete bug
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 21:33:38 +1000 GMT, Robin Anson wrote:
RA> Looks similar to the problem discussed in the thread starting at
RA> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg58912.html. I
RA> logged it as a bug, hopefully it not be in V2!
HOORAY! I didn't go through the entire thread you be
On Sat 30 August 2003, 21:58:42 +1000, Pixie wrote:
> I'm just hoping it's not something wrong with TB compatibility with
> Windows 95. It'll be my first sign of a backwards compatibility
> problem. I've been using 95 dominantly but I think that I'll check
> this out in my 98 install. If present t
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 11:15:00 +0200 GMT, Roelof Otten wrote:
RO> Well, continuing to spell tbudl should help, at least it does on my
RO> system (also with non-betas), but another option is to use <+>,
RO> it doesn't matter whether you use the + key from the numpad or not.
Yes, that is what is so f
Hallo PIXIE,
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 01:26:46 -0400GMT (30-8-03, 7:26 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
P> I created a new address book 'Mail Lists' with tbudl and tbot
P> entries Set autocomplete to check all address books On a new
P> message entering TB pops in the tbot entry and thats all I can get
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:16:27 +0700 GMT, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF> AB templates are much safer. I create a new message, type TBU in the
TF> TO field, and the address will be autocompleted to TBUDL. That's why I
I've been switching to address book templates somewhat and the
autocomplete feature
Hello PIXIE,
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:41:49 -0400 GMT (26/08/2003, 02:41 +0700 GMT),
PIXIE wrote:
> Well... Seems that I was in error once again. I am in GMT-0400 until
> October 26 @ 2AM. Hadn't crossed my mind that the silly daylight
> savings time hour shift was in effect.
Ouch! You didn't ev
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 01:44:11 +0700 GMT, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF> Your time zone is fine now. And my Windows version will become
TF> obsolete come January 15 - MS already announced that. Dinos should
TF> stick together. ;-)
Well... Seems that I was in error once again. I am in GMT-0400 until
O
Hello PIXIE,
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 14:33:51 -0500 GMT (26/08/2003, 02:33 +0700 GMT),
PIXIE wrote:
> Guess that's what I get for being a hold out and using an obsolete
> version of windows.. :-)
Your time zone is fine now. And my Windows version will become
obsolete come January 15 - MS already ann
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 00:47:35 +0700 GMT, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF> That's what you are sending:
>> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 13:34:01 -0400
Yes I realize that. Kind of strange..
TF> I'm afraid that's exactly the place you want to go.
Sure enough, the TZ was set for "(GMT -05:00) Eastern Time (U
Hello PIXIE,
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 13:34:01 -0400 GMT (26/08/2003, 00:34 +0700 GMT),
PIXIE wrote:
> One thing that caught my attention is for some reason my mail has
> -0400 in the header instead of -0500, as indicated by your template.
That's what you are sending:
> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 13:34:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 22:19:29 +0700 GMT, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 04:05:46 -0400 GMT (25/08/2003, 15:05 +0700 GMT),
Thanks for the snippet from your template, I'm slightly aware of
regular expressions as I use some in other programs. One thing that
caught my attention is for
Hello PIXIE,
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 05:25:15 -0400 GMT (25/08/2003, 16:25 +0700 GMT),
PIXIE wrote:
TF>> can add "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" to that template and it will do
> Correction, add %TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- at least on this
> old 1.62r version -I- am running.. heh heh.
You are still right, I for
Hello PIXIE,
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 04:05:46 -0400 GMT (25/08/2003, 15:05 +0700 GMT),
PIXIE wrote:
> BTW: which macro is generally used in a list for "xxx wrote" reply
> template? I popped in %TONAME but want to double check.
Roelof already gave you good advice. I would like to share my own
templa
Hallo PIXIE,
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 05:13:46 -0400GMT (25-8-03, 11:13 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
P> I'm not real knowledgeable about e-mail headers.. So you mean to say
P> that what I put in the template is added to the message header?
No.
P> I was thinking the templates are basically cosmet
Monday, August 25, 2003, 1:16:27 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF> can add "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" to that template and it will do
Correction, add %TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- at least on this old
1.62r version -I- am running.. heh heh. How do you like the beta 2.x?
--
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows
Monday, August 25, 2003, 4:55:48 AM, Roelof Otten wrote:
RO> %OFromName
Gotcha! Thanks!
RO> On some lists it's frowned upon to put names in the T0-header, so in
RO> those cases %ToName won't suffice.
I'm not real knowledgeable about e-mail headers.. So you mean to say
that what I put in the tem
Hallo PIXIE,
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 04:05:46 -0400GMT (25-8-03, 10:05 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
P> BTW: which macro is generally used in a list for "xxx wrote" reply
P> template? I popped in %TONAME but want to double check.
%OFromName
On some lists it's frowned upon to put names in the T0
Monday, August 25, 2003, 1:16:27 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF> Welcome. :-)
Thanks!
TF> No, there isn't. The defaults are hard-coded.
Bummer. Perhaps this will make its' way into version 2.x? Seems IMAP
related and I read that the IMAP code is getting some due
consideration. The hot-keys ar
Hallo Thomas,
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:16:27 +0700GMT (25-8-03, 7:16 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
TF> Unfortunately, people have now wisened up and don't use folder
TF> templates any more.
That's not quite true. I still use folder templates, even though they
don't insert to-addresses automatic
Hello PIXIE,
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:44:27 -0400 GMT (25/08/2003, 11:44 +0700 GMT),
PIXIE wrote:
> Hi all! Just got around to joining the list.
Welcome. :-)
> I am wanting to choose my own startup defaults for the dispatcher
> read|recieve|delete|open flags. Is there any way to do that?
No, th
Hi all! Just got around to joining the list.
I've been using TB for a few days now and feel pretty comfortable with
it. However there are some areas MIA in the help file and have been
unable to find relevant information in the FAQs and so forth.
I am wanting to choose my own startup defaults for
23 matches
Mail list logo
