Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-09 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Allie, on Sat, 8 Feb 2003 12:31:22 -0500GMT (08.02.03, 18:31 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] a long and very informative explanation. Thank you very much for your effort! :-) I never gave very much thought to what the role of a moderator implies, so I'm

Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Csaba Kiss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], ~john [j] wrote:' j How do I join the BetaBat list ? You can use the following URL: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=subscribe - -- -=] allie_M [=- {List Moderator} MUA: TB! v1.63

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Csaba Kiss [CK] wrote:' CK The above message contained two lines of useful information. And one quoted line of text. CK Yet look at how big it is with all the unnecessary crap. Are you referring

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Allie, on Sat, 8 Feb 2003 08:42:45 -0500GMT (08.02.03, 14:42 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : CK ...bitching about HTML being bloat. AM That would count as a derogatory remark. This is not allowed on the AM list and worse, you direct it at a

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Walt Newcomb
Hello Peter Re your message: Hype over html text! On Saturday, February 08, 2003 at 08:57:45, Peter Meyns said, more or less, the following: PM Hi Allie, PM on Sat, 8 Feb 2003 08:42:45 -0500GMT (08.02.03, 14:42 +0100GMT here), PM you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Meyns [PM] wrote:' PM Excuse me, Allie. I agree that derogatory remarks are not allowed, and PM I'd like to keep the friendly atmosphere TBUDL is known for, but why is PM it worse to direct it to a

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Walt Newcomb [WN] wrote:' WN Furthermore, derogatory means, ...tending to lesson the reputation WN of a person or thing. WN It seems to me that the _remark_ of CK was not, in fact, derogatory. WN It

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Csaba Kiss [CK] wrote:' CK I agree that the style of my remarks was over the limit, I will be CK careful in the future or if I can't stand the pretentious atmosphere CK I will leave. However, I don't

Re[2]: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Alexander Williams
Peter Meyns: Saturday, February 8, 2003, 10:57:45 AM, you wrote: PM Excuse me, Allie. I agree that derogatory remarks are not allowed, and I'd PM like to keep the friendly atmosphere TBUDL is known for, but why is it PM worse to direct it to a moderator than to any other member? ;-) Well,

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Walt Newcomb
Hello Allie Re your message: Hype over html text! On Saturday, February 08, 2003 at 09:35:48, Allie Martin said, more or less, the following: AM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- AM Hash: SHA1 AM In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], AM Walt Newcomb [WN] wrote:' WN Fur

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Allie, on Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:36:20 -0500GMT (08.02.03, 17:36 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : PM why is it worse to direct it to a moderator than to any other PM member? ;-) AM I don't know what the smiley is supposed to mean. Are you seriously AM

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Alexander, on Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:52:03 -0500GMT (08.02.03, 17:52 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : PM why is it worse to direct it to a moderator than to any other PM member? ;-) AW Well, from the PoV of an outsider-but-Internet-familliar, its much

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Meyns [PM] wrote:' PM Yes, I'm seriously asking. Sorry for the confusion. It's not that I'm in any way more special and above reproach than any other member which is the impression that many

Re[3]: was: Hype over html text! now: PGP question

2003-02-08 Thread alists
Hello Allie, L Saturday, February 8, 2003, 5:42:45 AM, you wrote: AM Are you referring to the PGP signature? I and the other moderators AM here agreed that we should PGP sign all our messages to the list. In AM this way, our messages can be easily verified, especially one like AM

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander Williams [AW] wrote:' AW Well, from the PoV of an outsider-but-Internet-familliar, its AW much like antangoizing the fellow with a large caliber assault AW rifle pointed at your head.

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jurgen Haug [JH] wrote:' JH What is an 'Invalid Signature'? If the signature shows up as invalid it means that the message has not been altered since being signed by the sender. However, there's

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Allie! On Saturday, February 08, 2003, 11:35 AM, you wrote: AW This leaves aside the issue of just being polite to the folks who AW are volunteering their time and effort for your benefit and little AW if any gain, of course ... A This *is* one of my points, come to think of it. I did

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mary Bull [MB] wrote:' MB To me, you are My Hero (one of a few) and a Perfect Man!! blush Why thanks for the words of encouragement and support. /blush PS// Poor me ... far from perfect. ;) - -- -=]

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Allie! On Saturday, February 08, 2003, 2:10 PM, you wrote: MB To me, you are My Hero (one of a few) and a Perfect Man!! A blush Why thanks for the words of encouragement and support. /blush A PS// Poor me ... far from perfect. ;) Just say it is my feminine, southern use of language

DEAD HORSE (was Hype over html text!)

2003-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Csaba, @8-Feb-2003, 17:16 +0100 (16:16 UK time) Csaba Kiss [CK] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: AM That would count as a derogatory remark. This is not AM allowed on the list and worse, you direct it at a AM

Re[2]: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Mike Alexander
Hi Mary, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 7:26:20 PM, you wrote: MB To me, you are My Hero (one of a few) and a Perfect Man!! Mary, I do believe you're flirting. Shame on you! ;-) I agree with what you've said though even though Allie had one occasion (when he was obviously having a bad day g)

Re: DEAD HORSE (was Hype over html text!)

2003-02-08 Thread Mike Alexander
Hi Marck, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 8:31:45 PM, you wrote: MDP For anyone unfamiliar with Dead Horse policy, DEAD means DEAD. NO MDP REPLIES to the list, only off-list or on TBOT. MArck, Sorry if any of my posts have gone past this, but at most I can only check the list once a day at the