Re[2]: Re[2] Inbound TCP Communication

2000-10-01 Thread Graham
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 1 Oct 2000 13:16:04 +0800 Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TF Can you point me to the URL? Is ZoneAlarm free, or how much does it TF cost? I understand it's still being developed? Yes, Zone Alarm is totally free. The URL for this

Re[2]: Inbound TCP Communication

2000-10-01 Thread Charlie Turner (ceejay)
Hello Thomas On 01 October 2000, at 06:13, you wrote TF Hallo Charlie, TF On Sat, 30 Sep 2000 21:38:39 +0100 GMT (01/10/2000, 04:38 +0800 GMT), TF Charlie Turner (ceejay) wrote: CTc Ok, here's something else to think about. My firewall is set up to ask CTc for permission when any new

Re[3]: Re[2] Inbound TCP Communication

2000-10-01 Thread Gerd Ewald
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Graham ! On Sun, 01 Oct 2000 09:05:54 +0100 GMT your local time, which was 01.10.2000, 10:05 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote: TF Can you point me to the URL? Is ZoneAlarm free, or how much does it TF cost? I understand it's still being

Re: Re[2] Inbound TCP Communication

2000-10-01 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Gerd, On 01 October 2000 at 11:57:10 GMT +0200 (which was 10:57 where I live) Gerd Ewald wrote and made these points on the subject of "Re[2] Inbound TCP Communication": GE OT: when do you english-speaking people use "progr

Re[2]: Re[2] Inbound TCP Communication

2000-10-01 Thread Gerd Ewald
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Marck D. Pearlstone ! On Sun, 1 Oct 2000 11:15:03 +0100 GMT your local time, which was 01.10.2000, 12:15 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote: GE OT: when do you english-speaking people use "program" and when GE "programme" ?? When I

Re: Re[2] Inbound TCP Communication

2000-10-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Gerd, and also Graham and Ceejay: thanks a lot for all this info. I will check all this out and let you know if I have further questions, or made a decision. On Sun, 1 Oct 2000 11:57:10 +0200 GMT (01/10/2000, 17:57 +0800 GMT), Gerd Ewald wrote: GE (OT: when do you english-speaking people

OT: Program - Programme [WAS: Re[2]: Re[2] Inbound TCP Communication]

2000-10-01 Thread Gerd Ewald
Hello Thomas Fernandez ! On Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:10:11 +0800 GMT your local time, which was 01.10.2000, 13:10 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote: [...] "Programme": Proper (British) English. I make it a point in my Ooops ? I won't argue with this;

Re[2] Re[2] Inbound TCP Communication

2000-10-01 Thread ClueBusDriver
Hello Thomas, Sunday, October 01, 2000, 1:16:26 AM, you wrote: TF Hallo ClueBusDriver, TF On Sat, 30 Sep 2000 14:02:40 -0700 GMT (01/10/2000, 04:52 +0800 GMT), TF ClueBusDriver wrote: C What firewall software are you using? I have Sybergen's ( it's now C free for personal use) and TB can't

Re: OT: Program - Programme [WAS: Re[2]: Re[2] Inbound TCP Communication]

2000-10-01 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Gerd, On 01 October 2000 at 13:44:36 GMT +0200 (which was 12:44 where I live) Gerd Ewald wrote and made these points on the subject of "OT: Program - Programme [WAS: Re[2]: Re[2] Inbound TCP Communication]": GE In fact your mail m

Re: Re[2] Re[2] Inbound TCP Communication

2000-10-01 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 01 Oct 2000 05:49:05 -0700, ClueBusDriver wrote: C There's another free one called Zonealarm. I used it for awhile and C it was ok until I installed an SP on my win2k machine. The C Zonealarm/Service Pack1 combo were incompatable and cost me

Re: OT: Program - Programme [WAS: Re[2]: Re[2] Inbound TCP Communication]

2000-10-01 Thread Tony Boom
This message: 01/10/2000 13:24 GMT. Hello Gerd, A reminder of what Gerd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on: 01 October 2000 at 13:44:36 GMT +0200 "Programme": Proper (British) English. I make it a point in my GE GEOoops ? I won't argue with this;

Re: OT: Program - Programme [WAS: Re[2]: Re[2] Inbound TCP Communication]

2000-10-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Marck, On Sun, 1 Oct 2000 13:49:07 +0100 GMT (01/10/2000, 20:49 +0800 GMT), Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: GE In fact your mail means, both is used for the same things (other GE than Marck said ? He is British, isn't he) but in two different GE countries ! MDP English *and* a computer

Re: Inbound TCP Communication

2000-10-01 Thread Oliver Sturm
Hi Thomas Fernandez, On Sunday, October 01, 2000 at 7:27:08 AM you wrote: This is the info I just pasted from the log: Quote This one time, the user has chosen to "block" communications. Details: Inbound TCP connection Local address,service is (163.31.23.50,nbsession) Remote

Re: Inbound TCP Communication

2000-10-01 Thread Ming-Li
On Saturday, September 30, 2000, 10:25:51 PM, Thomas wrote: ML I have no idea about your question, but this got me curious. ML Yet here my NSLookup tells me the address belongs to Hinet (the ML domain name is h191.s23.ts31.hinet.net). Where did you look this up? I look at

Re: Re[3]: Re[2] Inbound TCP Communication

2000-10-01 Thread Graham
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 01/10/00 at 11:57 Gerd Ewald wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Graham ! On Sun, 01 Oct 2000 09:05:54 +0100 GMT your local time, which was 01.10.2000, 10:05 (GMT+0200) where

Inbound TCP Communication

2000-09-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello TBUDL! My firewall just told me that the "Application: THEBAT.EXE attempted an Inbound TCP Communication". Local Service: nbsession (139). Remote adress: 163.31.23.191. The remote address belongs to a university in Taiwan, and there are kids who try go get into my computer al

Re: Inbound TCP Communication

2000-09-30 Thread Ming-Li
On Saturday, September 30, 2000, 11:03:46 AM, Thomas wrote: My firewall just told me that the "Application: THEBAT.EXE attempted an Inbound TCP Communication". Local Service: nbsession (139). Remote adress: 163.31.23.191. The remote address belongs to a university in Taiwan,.

Re: Inbound TCP Communication

2000-09-30 Thread Oliver Sturm
Hi Thomas Fernandez, On Saturday, September 30, 2000 at 8:03:46 PM you wrote: And what is nbsession, by the way, as I get that a lot. That's a protocol belonging to the SMB suite, which provides Windows file sharing. But I'm wondering how your firewall can detect an application

Re: Inbound TCP Communication

2000-09-30 Thread Charlie Turner (ceejay)
Hello Thomas On 30 September 2000, at 19:03, you wrote TF Hello TBUDL! TF My firewall just told me that the "Application: THEBAT.EXE attempted TF an Inbound TCP Communication". Local Service: nbsession (139). Remote TF adress: 163.31.23.191. TF The remote address belongs to a

Re[2] Inbound TCP Communication

2000-09-30 Thread ClueBusDriver
Hello Charlie, Saturday, September 30, 2000, 4:38:39 PM, you wrote: CTc Hello Thomas CTc On 30 September 2000, at 19:03, you wrote TF Hello TBUDL! TF My firewall just told me that the "Application: THEBAT.EXE attempted TF an Inbound TCP Communication". Local Service: nbsession (13

Re: Re[2] Inbound TCP Communication

2000-09-30 Thread Graham
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000 16:52:44 -0400 ClueBusDriver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: C What firewall software are you using? I have Sybergen's ( it's now C free for personal use) and TB can't get through it. I give it C authorization though.. C I'm using ZoneAlarm with the ZoneLog Analyser. The Bat.exe

Re: Inbound TCP Communication

2000-09-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Oliver, On Sat, 30 Sep 2000 20:51:47 +0200 GMT (01/10/2000, 02:51 +0800 GMT), Oliver Sturm wrote: And what is nbsession, by the way, as I get that a lot. OS That's a protocol belonging to the SMB suite, which provides Windows OS file sharing. But I'm wondering how your firewall

Re: Inbound TCP Communication

2000-09-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Ming-Li, On Sat, 30 Sep 2000 11:32:22 -0700 GMT (01/10/2000, 02:32 +0800 GMT), Ming-Li wrote: The remote address belongs to a university in Taiwan,... ML I have no idea about your question, but this got me curious. Yet ML here my NSLookup tells me the address belongs to Hinet (the

Re: Re[2] Inbound TCP Communication

2000-09-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo ClueBusDriver, On Sat, 30 Sep 2000 14:02:40 -0700 GMT (01/10/2000, 04:52 +0800 GMT), ClueBusDriver wrote: C What firewall software are you using? I have Sybergen's ( it's now C free for personal use) and TB can't get through it. I give it C authorization though.. I use AtGuard, but since

Re: Re[2] Inbound TCP Communication

2000-09-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Graham, On Sat, 30 Sep 2000 23:31:05 +0100 GMT (01/10/2000, 06:31 +0800 GMT), Graham wrote: C What firewall software are you using? I have Sybergen's ( it's now C free for personal use) and TB can't get through it. I give it C authorization though.. C G I'm using ZoneAlarm with the

Re: Inbound TCP Communication

2000-09-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Charlie, On Sat, 30 Sep 2000 21:38:39 +0100 GMT (01/10/2000, 04:38 +0800 GMT), Charlie Turner (ceejay) wrote: CTc Ok, here's something else to think about. My firewall is set up to ask CTc for permission when any new installation attempts to communicate for CTc the first time. Every