Re: Message autoview window

*sigh* ARGH! Ignore that last email...hit the wrong button before I had my morning caffeine jolt.

Re: Message autoview window

On Friday, February 04, 2000 at 08:57:05 , Alexander scribbled: >Your welcome. BTW, you have my vote for the best rogue photo. AVK>> Mine, too;-) BTW, speaking about these photos: Nick Danger looks really Regards, ~~~Angel ...your RDR "I am out of my mind..but please feel free to leave a me

Re: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

Hello Marck D. Pearlstone, On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 11:54:26 + GMT your local time, which was Friday, February 04, 2000, 6:54:26 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: AM>> Tracer needs to get a new photo. He's all stretched out there. It looks better. > Resize tracer's photo

Re: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

Hello Allie Martin, On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 06:26:18 -0500 GMT your local time, which was Friday, February 04, 2000, 6:26:18 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Allie Martin wrote: > On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 11:20:07 +, Tony Boom wrote: >> So where does one find this rogues gallery and how does one submit

Re: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

This message: 04/02/2000 18:55 GMT. Friday, February 04, 2000, 3:19:41 PM, Allie wrote: AM> So, I've noticed. I recognize that photo from your website. Well it was the only one I had on here at the time. I must scan a new one though. I don't think my framed mug shot fits in with th

Re: Message autoview window

Hi Alexander, Friday, February 04, 2000, 4:57:05 PM, you wrote: AVK> Mine, too;-) BTW, speaking about these photos: Nick Danger looks really AVK> dangerous, and Mark Aston looks astonishing... yeah, really! What jail that AVK> photo has been taken at;-))? I have been lucky enough to escape

Re: OT was Re[2]: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 06:31:43PM +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: > outburst of Steve's -- but nope, nothing of the kind... Steve, have you been > cured somehow?;-) Nope, on vacation. :) -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your ICQ: 51073

Re: Message autoview window

In Reference to "Message autoview window" From Alexander V. Kiselev > Mine, too;-) BTW, speaking about these photos: Nick Danger looks

Re: Message autoview window

In Reference to "Message autoview window" From Alexander V. Kiselev > Mine, too;-) BTW, speaking about these photos: Nick Danger looks

Re: Message autoview window

Hi there! On 4 Feb 00, at 11:01, Allie Martin wrote about "Re: Message autoview window": > Your welcome. BTW, you have my vote for the best rogue photo. Mine, too;-) BTW, speaking about these photos: Nick Danger looks really dangerous, and Mark Aston looks astoni

Re: Message autoview window

On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 07:40:59 -0800, Angel wrote: > pt... TY TY TY Allie for posting that macroline for the Reply > Template. I'd lost the email it was originally posted in. Works > like a charm! :D Your welcome. BTW, you have my vote for the best rogue photo. Denis has my vote for

Re: OT was Re[2]: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

Hi there! On 4 Feb 00, at 15:43, Oleg Zalyalov wrote about "OT was Re[2]: Message autoview window": > Friday, February 04, 2000, Steve Lamb wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about > Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject >here): > &

Re: Message autoview window

On Friday, February 04, 2000 at 07:27:19 , Leif scribbled: LG> For those of you who didn't like my tiara, I edited it out in the new LG> pic on the rogues gallery. I thought the tiara was cute! hehe Does anyone know where my halo got to? Ok Leif...what'd you do with it.. pt... TY TY T

Re: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 03:34:21 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: > I'd send in a pic but then some people would have to face up to the fact I > might be human. I dunno if they could handle that. :) We'll see that you're human, but will we also be able to look at that SQUID device (or what was it calle

Re: Message autoview window

Hello Tony, For those of you who didn't like my tiara, I edited it out in the new pic on the rogues gallery. Leif Gregory -- TBUDL/TBBETA List Moderator ICQ 216395 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Web Site TBUDL FAQ PGP Key ID: 0x

Re: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 14:20:52 +, Tony Boom wrote: > Thanks for the info. I've just had a look. That Leif chap is a bit > quick, I only sent my mug shot a few minutes ago and it's there > already. So, I've noticed. I recognize that photo from your website. > I got

Re: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

This message: 04/02/2000 14:07 GMT. Friday, February 04, 2000, 11:26:18 AM, Allie wrote: AM> Enjoy! I wouldn't mind seeing some more faces there. Tracer needs to AM> get a new photo. He's all stretched out there Thanks for the info. I've just had a look. That Leif chap is a bit qui

Re: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

This message: 04/02/2000 13:07 GMT. Friday, February 04, 2000, 11:34:21 AM, you wrote: SL> I'd send in a pic but then some people would have to face up to the fact I SL> might be human. I dunno if they could handle that. :) Well I've just sent in my photo in, so some people are j

Re: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

Hi Allie, On 04 February 2000 at 06:26:18 GMT -0500 (which was 11:26 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points: >> So where does one find this rogues gallery and AM> http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/rogues.shtml >> how does one submit a photo? by e-mail to Leif

Re: OT was Re[2]: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

Friday, February 04, 2000, 3:43:31 AM, Oleg wrote: > They will think that you have sent a pic of innocent human eaten by you. Exactly. "Ah, so that was Steve's last victim." "What did he do?" "Didn't follow RFC822." -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your sh

Re: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 03:34:21 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: > I'd send in a pic but then some people would have to face up to > the fact I might be human. I dunno if they could handle that. :) R..O..T..F..L..M..A..O *wiping away the tears*. I think I could just manage. :) -- CU, A

OT was Re[2]: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

Hello, the Bat! list recipients, Friday, February 04, 2000, Steve Lamb wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here): SL> I'd send in a pic but then some people would have to face up to the fact I SL> mig

Re: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 06:26:18AM -0500, Allie Martin wrote: > But believe me, it's a real eye opener, especially when some realize > that I am male. :))) I'd send in a pic but then some people would have to face up to the fact I might be human. I dunno if they could handle that. :) --

Re: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 11:20:07 +, Tony Boom wrote: > So where does one find this rogues gallery and how does one submit > a photo? http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/rogues.shtml Enjoy! I wouldn't mind seeing some more faces there. Tracer needs to get a new photo. He's all stretched out t

Re: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

This message: 04/02/2000 11:19 GMT. Hello Allie, Friday, February 04, 2000, 10:27:50 AM, you wrote: >> Why? Because >> following Leif's stroke of brilliance in setting up the rogues >> gallery site, I now have entries with photos for many members of >> the list (as well as for my pe

Re: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:59:24 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: > Yes - very much so - with one minor correction to the scenario. > The ticker is unimportant to me as a screen entity. With 50+ > mails arriving every couple of hours, what the ticker has to say > to me is just about ir

Re: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

Hi Allie, On 04 February 2000 at 05:27:50 GMT -0500 (which was 10:27 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points: >> I keep it open constantly while reviewing mail in my virtual mail >> folder ... you know, the one behind the ticker ;-). AM> Hehehehehe. A stranger

Re: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:17:03 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: > I see that, but OTOH use the address auto-view a bit differently. > I keep it open constantly while reviewing mail in my virtual mail > folder ... you know, the one behind the ticker ;-). Why? Because > following Leif's stroke

Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

autoview/preview window open, select a message which is displayed, AM> and then hit Ctrl+Shift+O, the message autoview window comes up AM> with the address information displayed for the message. But I AM> don't use the message autoview/preview window. Now if I double AM>