Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 11:54:26 + GMT your local time,
which was Friday, February 04, 2000, 6:54:26 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
AM>> Tracer needs to get a new photo. He's all stretched out there.
It looks better.
> Resize tracer's photo
Hello Allie Martin,
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 06:26:18 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, February 04, 2000, 6:26:18 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Allie Martin wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 11:20:07 +, Tony Boom wrote:
>> So where does one find this rogues gallery and how does one submit
This message: 04/02/2000 18:55 GMT.
Friday, February 04, 2000, 3:19:41 PM, Allie wrote:
AM> So, I've noticed. I recognize that photo from your website.
Well it was the only one I had on here at the time. I must scan a new
one though. I don't think my framed mug shot fits in with th
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 06:31:43PM +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
> outburst of Steve's -- but nope, nothing of the kind... Steve, have you been
> cured somehow?;-)
Nope, on vacation. :)
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 51073
Hi there!
On 4 Feb 00, at 15:43, Oleg Zalyalov wrote
about "OT was Re[2]: Message autoview window":
> Friday, February 04, 2000, Steve Lamb wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about
> Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject
>here):
>
&
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 03:34:21 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> I'd send in a pic but then some people would have to face up to the fact I
> might be human. I dunno if they could handle that. :)
We'll see that you're human, but will we also be able to look at
that SQUID device (or what was it calle
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 14:20:52 +, Tony Boom wrote:
> Thanks for the info. I've just had a look. That Leif chap is a bit
> quick, I only sent my mug shot a few minutes ago and it's there
> already.
So, I've noticed. I recognize that photo from your website.
> I got
This message: 04/02/2000 14:07 GMT.
Friday, February 04, 2000, 11:26:18 AM, Allie wrote:
AM> Enjoy! I wouldn't mind seeing some more faces there. Tracer needs to
AM> get a new photo. He's all stretched out there
Thanks for the info. I've just had a look. That Leif chap is a bit
qui
This message: 04/02/2000 13:07 GMT.
Friday, February 04, 2000, 11:34:21 AM, you wrote:
SL> I'd send in a pic but then some people would have to face up to the fact I
SL> might be human. I dunno if they could handle that. :)
Well I've just sent in my photo in, so some people are j
Hi Allie,
On 04 February 2000 at 06:26:18 GMT -0500 (which was 11:26 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
>> So where does one find this rogues gallery and
AM> http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/rogues.shtml
>> how does one submit a photo?
by e-mail to Leif
Friday, February 04, 2000, 3:43:31 AM, Oleg wrote:
> They will think that you have sent a pic of innocent human eaten by you.
Exactly. "Ah, so that was Steve's last victim."
"What did he do?"
"Didn't follow RFC822."
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your sh
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 03:34:21 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> I'd send in a pic but then some people would have to face up to
> the fact I might be human. I dunno if they could handle that. :)
R..O..T..F..L..M..A..O
*wiping away the tears*. I think I could just manage. :)
--
CU, A
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Friday, February 04, 2000, Steve Lamb wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about
Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here):
SL> I'd send in a pic but then some people would have to face up to the fact I
SL> mig
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 06:26:18AM -0500, Allie Martin wrote:
> But believe me, it's a real eye opener, especially when some realize
> that I am male. :)))
I'd send in a pic but then some people would have to face up to the fact I
might be human. I dunno if they could handle that. :)
--
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 11:20:07 +, Tony Boom wrote:
> So where does one find this rogues gallery and how does one submit
> a photo?
http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/rogues.shtml
Enjoy! I wouldn't mind seeing some more faces there. Tracer needs to
get a new photo. He's all stretched out t
This message: 04/02/2000 11:19 GMT.
Hello Allie,
Friday, February 04, 2000, 10:27:50 AM, you wrote:
>> Why? Because
>> following Leif's stroke of brilliance in setting up the rogues
>> gallery site, I now have entries with photos for many members of
>> the list (as well as for my pe
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:59:24 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> Yes - very much so - with one minor correction to the scenario.
> The ticker is unimportant to me as a screen entity. With 50+
> mails arriving every couple of hours, what the ticker has to say
> to me is just about ir
Hi Allie,
On 04 February 2000 at 05:27:50 GMT -0500 (which was 10:27 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
>> I keep it open constantly while reviewing mail in my virtual mail
>> folder ... you know, the one behind the ticker ;-).
AM> Hehehehehe. A stranger
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:17:03 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> I see that, but OTOH use the address auto-view a bit differently.
> I keep it open constantly while reviewing mail in my virtual mail
> folder ... you know, the one behind the ticker ;-). Why? Because
> following Leif's stroke
Hi Allie,
On 04 February 2000 at 04:36:43 GMT -0500 (which was 09:36 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
AM>The other thing is that again I have to make an appeal for some
AM> consistency in functionality here!! If I have the message
AM> autoview/preview
20 matches
Mail list logo