In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Gavin Sinclair [GS] wrote:'
GS> Now that one or two reply templates have been published, could
GS> all this info be shoehorned into the FAQ somewhere?
It's already there in the macro and solutions library:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/Library.
On Wednesday, January 1, 2003, 3:27:37 PM, Gavin wrote:
> Hi all,
> [PGP signatures argably shouldn't be displayed in emails,] but the
> help and the FAQ mention nothing.
Now that one or two reply templates have been published, could all
this info be shoehorned into the FAQ somewhere?
Cheers,
G
>>> That won't work either - PGP has '- ' quoted the lines that start
>>> with '-'.
>
> JA> Then maybe the template on the main site needs to be updated
> JA> no?
>
> Nono - you misunderstand me :-). When you quoted it, there were some
> lines of the macro that begin with '-'. You then PGP sign
Allie Martin,
> We wonder why other clients never incorporate some of the no brainer
> features of TB!. I wonder the same about this feature of PMMail.
Exactly right. Good P G P support is one reason I bought Bat.
Among other things, I use digital signatures to verify consulting
contracts with c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jonathan,
@1-Jan-2003, 11:25 -0600 (17:25 UK time) Jonathan Angliss [JA] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> That won't work either - PGP has '- ' quoted the lines that start
>> with '-'.
JA> Then maybe the template on the main
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, January 01, 2003, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...
JA>> The correct version taken right from the website looks like this:
> ...
> That won't work either - PGP has '- ' quoted the lines that start
> with '-'.
Then maybe the template on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, January 01, 2003, Mary Bull wrote...
J>> [1] See comment a little further down :)
> I think you are right, and I did get caught in trying to quote
> Melissa's MACRO. I am very inexperienced. Would have been better
> just to refer to it
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mary Bull [MB] wrote:'
MB> In my experience reading these lists, there must be two Enter
MB> clicks below the 'cut' line.
For the signature delimiter to work? No, the extra empty lines
aren't necessary. If you prefer having them there then your choic
Hello Allie,
On Wednesday, January 01, 2003, 7:15 AM, you wrote:
< ... >
A> You can do the following:
A> Create an address book entry for TBUDL and using the list address,
A> [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
This entry I had already.
A> Right click the entry and select properties. Hit the 'Reply' tab,
A>
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mary Bull [MB] wrote:'
MB> So I can just "copy and paste" there (isn't it in Accounts,
MB> Properties?) in the same way I did into Quick Templates? Thanks,
MB> Allie. I will try it now.
You can do the following:
Create an address book entry for TBUD
Hello Allie!
On Wednesday, January 1, 2003 at 6:03:49 AM you wrote:
MB>> One good thing about lurking: occasionally a little manna falls
MB>> from heaven. I copied and pasted your template into Quick
MB>> Templates, then I used the backspace button to turn it into one
MB>> long line.
< ... >
A>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jonathan,
@1-Jan-2003, 03:38 -0600 (09:38 UK time) Jonathan Angliss [JA] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
JA> The correct version taken right from the website looks like this:
...
That won't work either - PGP has '- ' quoted t
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mary Bull [MB] wrote:'
MB> One good thing about lurking: occasionally a little manna falls
MB> from heaven. I copied and pasted your template into Quick
MB> Templates, then I used the backspace button to turn it into one
MB> long line.
MB> And it wor
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jonathan Angliss [JA] wrote:'
>> True :) I understand their meaning and still think it's a forest
>> of crap. Even if I thought signing messages in a public forum
>> were a brilliant idea, I'd still think it's noise, because it's
>> metadata, not actu
On Wednesday, January 1, 2003, 5:03:07 PM, Melissa wrote:
> I'll sign this one just for you. ;-)
> Melissa
Heh, no manual deforestation required. Thanks again!
Gavin
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.
Hello Mary,
Thank You for the bunch of "BULL" . (G)
Happy New Years,
Carl -reading the digest version
Wednesday, January 1, 2003, 2:45:03 AM, you wrote:
MB> Hello Melissa!
MB> On Wednesday, January 1, 2003 at 12:03:07 AM you wrote:
M>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
M>> Hash: SHA1
M>
Hello Jonathan!
On Wednesday, January 1, 2003 at 3:38:18 AM you wrote:
J> [1] See comment a little further down :)
I think you are right, and I did get caught in trying to quote
Melissa's MACRO. I am very inexperienced. Would have been better just
to refer to it and let those interested pick it
Hallo Jonathan,
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 03:38:18 -0600GMT (1-1-03, 10:38 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
JA> Notice how on the first line it has the %- on the end, but the
JA> quoted one above has the %- on the second line at the front. I'm
JA> not sure how much of an affect it'd have, but it'd be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, January 01, 2003, Mary Bull wrote...
M>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
M>> Hash: SHA1
[1] See comment a little further down :)
M>> On Tuesday, December 31, 2002, at 8:27:37 PM PST, Gavin Sinclair
M>> wrote:
>>> A lot of messages
Hello Melissa!
On Wednesday, January 1, 2003 at 12:03:07 AM you wrote:
M> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
M> Hash: SHA1
M> On Tuesday, December 31, 2002, at 8:27:37 PM PST, Gavin Sinclair
M> wrote:
>> A lot of messages on this list, and some on others I frequent, use
>> PGP signatures that h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, January 01, 2003, Gavin Sinclair wrote...
>>> A lot of messages on this list, and some on others I frequent, use
>>> PGP signatures that hide the actual message in a forest of crap.
>> :-) One person's "forest of crap" might be another'
On Wednesday, January 1, 2003, 5:03:07 PM, Melissa wrote:
>> A lot of messages on this list, and some on others I frequent, use
>> PGP signatures that hide the actual message in a forest of crap.
> :-) One person's "forest of crap" might be another's wondrous
> choreography of sparkling ciphertex
Hello Gavin,
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 15:27:37 +1100 GMT (01/01/03, 11:27 +0700 GMT),
Gavin Sinclair wrote:
> A lot of messages on this list, and some on others I frequent, use PGP
> signatures that hide the actual message in a forest of crap. The Bat!
> being the powerful program it is, there must be
Hi all,
A lot of messages on this list, and some on others I frequent, use PGP
signatures that hide the actual message in a forest of crap. The Bat!
being the powerful program it is, there must be a way to view the
message without the noise, but the help and the FAQ mention nothing.
Do you guys
24 matches
Mail list logo
