G'day Dwight,
Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 7:32:41 AM, you wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 14, 2006, 1:16:36 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
>> I'm using Foxit Reader for PDF.
> Link? I didn't find anything like this at foxIT.com
http://www.foxitsoftware.com/
I thoroughly recommend this as well
On Tuesday, February 14, 2006, 1:16:36 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
> I'm using Foxit Reader for PDF.
Link? I didn't find anything like this at foxIT.com
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using IMAP with The Bat! 3.70.09 "
Hi Alexander,
on Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:17:41 +0100GMT (14.02.2006, 20:17 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
>>> and a more complete file manager to Explore
>> I've been looking for one for ages, PowerDesk is resource hungry and
>> quirky. Any recommendations?
ASK> Total Commander from www.ghisler.com
If
Hello Dwight A Corrin & everyone else,
on 14-Feb-2006 at 01:43 you (Dwight A Corrin) wrote:
> If you can read a pdf file in a thumbnail, you've got me beat.
I'm using Foxit Reader for PDF. Its small, free, and loads about 15 years
faster than the current Acrobat Reader 7.
--
Best regards,
Ale
Hello Jeff Gaines & everyone else,
on 14-Feb-2006 at 00:22 you (Jeff Gaines) wrote:
>> and a more complete file manager to Explore
> I've been looking for one for ages, PowerDesk is resource hungry and
> quirky. Any recommendations?
Total Commander from www.ghisler.com
--
Best regards,
Alexa
Hello vitalie vrabie & everyone else,
on 14-Feb-2006 at 16:49 you (vitalie vrabie) wrote:
> then, "why don't you people just leave the user 2xClick and fire up
> whichever browser there is installed?"
The problem is, as mentioned a gazillion times, those messages that include
both remote and att
On Monday, February 13, 2006, 7:42:44 PM, Bat Tester wrote:
>>> Try xplorer2. Dual pane and free in the basic version.
>> link?
> http://zabkat.com/
thanks. am I mistaken or are the only files which one can view
graphics and html? I want to view PDF, word, wordperfect, excel, etc.
moving to t
On Monday, February 13, 2006, 5:38:45 PM, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
> Try xplorer2. Dual pane and free in the basic version.
link?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using IMAP with The Bat! 3.70.09 "Qigong" (Beta) on Windows XP v
On Monday, February 13, 2006, 5:22:27 PM, Jeff Gaines wrote:
>> and a more complete file manager to Explore
> I've been looking for one for ages, PowerDesk is resource hungry and
> quirky. Any recommendations?
No. They were complaining specifically about my running powerdesk. I
agree it is resou
On Monday, February 13, 2006, 8:33:22 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Also kindly note that HTML mails (especially newsletters) are a
> fact, we cannot discuss them away. I would like my email client to
> display them completely, if I so choose.
it's ironic that our new IT consultants have branded
Hi,
,- - [ Le dimanche 29 janvier 2006 vers 14:54 Thomas Fernandez écrivait: ] - -
|
>>> TB! will not show those graphics to you.
C>> It is a security feature.
> Beautiful! Thank you. :-)
> If I, as a responsible adult, want to download pictures into my
> received email, what would it hurt the
Hello Stephane,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:24:36 +0100 GMT (13/02/2006, 21:24 +0700 GMT),
Stephane Bouvard [ML] wrote:
SBM> TB can display html, as today some people prefer to send html into
SBM> emails, and if those emails include pictures, TB can display those
SBM> pictures, but if those html email
Hello Elaine,
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:11:42 -0500 GMT (30/01/2006, 10:11 +0700 GMT),
ETM wrote:
>> It is difficult because people are afraid that if you and I can
>> download pictures from the internet, their mother's PC is in
>> danger. That's the only reason for the anti-lobby.
E> Do mothers us
Recently, ETM squawked :
> Neither young nor old seem to
> consider the program, many never heard of it, those who have, have
> no interest.
Ah ... they not forward thinking. They run with the flock yet know not
why
And, best of all, they do not know the beauty of Moldavia ...
--
Regards,
Robe
Hello Elaine!
On Sunday, January 29, 2006, 9:11 PM, you wrote:
>> It is difficult because people are afraid that
>> if you and I can download pictures from the
>> internet, their mother's PC is in danger. That's
>> the only reason for the anti-lobby.
> Do mothers use this program? I'm 70 and on
> It is difficult because people are afraid that
> if you and I can download pictures from the
> internet, their mother's PC is in danger. That's
> the only reason for the anti-lobby.
Do mothers use this program? I'm 70 and one of
the few using it on some very large mailing lists.
Neither young n
Hello Mark,
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:23:19 +0100 GMT (29/01/2006, 23:23 +0700 GMT),
Mark Partous wrote:
MP> Aren't there any programmers that are able to provide us with a plug-in so
MP> that we can get rid of this "debate". Perhaps "Antis" won't object to that
MP> and we finally can leave the "cli
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, January 29, 2006, 2:54:00 PM, you wrote:
TF> If I, as a responsible adult, want to download pictures into my
TF> received email, what would it hurt the other TB-users if I could?
TF> Nobody is forced to do that.
TF> And if I do compromise my system, let it be my problem. I
Hello Jurgen,
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 15:09:30 +0100 GMT (29/01/2006, 21:09 +0700 GMT),
Jurgen Haug wrote:
>> If I, as a responsible adult, want to download pictures into my
>> received email, what would it hurt the other TB-users if I could?
>> Nobody is forced to do that.
JH> *sigh* you are so ri
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, January 29, 2006, 2:54:00 PM, you wrote:
> Yes, it is possible to go phishing when the option to download content
> from the web is enabled. However, in TB it will be set off by default.
> And if you view it in your browser, I'm not sure.
> If I, as a responsible adult, wa
Hello Chris,
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:21:24 -0600 GMT (25/01/2006, 05:21 +0700 GMT),
Chris wrote:
>> TB! will not show those graphics to you.
C> It is a security feature.
Beautiful! Thank you. :-)
Here is a new write-up:
Yes, it is possible to go phishing when the option to download content
fr
Hello Dwight,
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:43:47 -0600 GMT (26/01/2006, 05:43 +0700 GMT),
Dwight A Corrin wrote:
>> A simple button "load remote images now", its visibility
>> configurable, with an extra, again configurable, warning requester
>> may be enough for the daily work.
An option that would b
Hello Dwight A Corrin & everyone else,
on 25-Jan-2006 at 23:43 you (Dwight A Corrin) wrote:
>> A simple button "load remote images now", its visibility configurable,
>> with an extra, again configurable, warning requester may be enough for
>> the daily work.
> Just double clicking and opening in
Hallo Tom,
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:21:04 +1100GMT (26-1-2006, 11:21 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
TL> Does it matter from a security point of view how I configure TB with
TL> respect to plain text / html? To be precise - is it safer to set it
TL> to plain text only or does it not matter due t
On Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 4:01:35 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
> A simple button "load remote images now", its visibility
> configurable, with an extra, again configurable, warning requester
> may be enough for the daily work.
Just double clicking and opening in your browser of choice is pr
Hello Chris & everyone else,
on 25-Jan-2006 at 22:41 you (Chris) wrote:
> Perhaps I did not express myself clearly. I whitelist of servers from
> which it is safe to download certain kinds of content would be nice (not
> a whitelist of senders). Although, it one whitelisted PayPal, phishing
> sch
Alexander S. Kunz @ 1/25/2006 5:41:54 AM
"Displaying HTML"
>> HOWEVER, a whitelist would be nice.
> Actually, I don't think so. The current flood of phishing mails all
> come from a valid "real" bank account email address like
> @postbank.de or something. A whitelist will automate the security
Hello Chris & everyone else,
on 24-Jan-2006 at 23:21 you (Chris) wrote:
> HOWEVER, a whitelist would be nice.
Actually, I don't think so. The current flood of phishing mails all come
from a valid "real" bank account email address like @postbank.de or
something. A whitelist will automate the secu
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:21:24 -0600, Chris wrote:
> HOWEVER, a whitelist would be nice. For example, I could configure The
> Bat! to download images from Amazon's server, my bank's server, and my
> own server, but no others.
> See this feature request:
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=178
Jurgen Haug @ 1/24/2006 10:23:53 AM
"Displaying HTML"
> TB! will not show those graphics to you.
It is a security feature. In malicious e-mail messages, the images
could be coded like this
http://example.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]" />
Then, simply by opening the message, the send would know that
[
Hallo Jack,
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 05:53:06 -0600GMT (24-1-2006, 12:53 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
JSL> Is there a way to get TB! to display the graphics in an HTML email
JSL> without having to launch a browser?
TB will show the messages as long as they're sent along as attachment.
However, TB
Hello Jack,
Tuesday, January 24, 2006, 12:53:06 PM, you wrote:
> Hello one and all,
> Is there a way to get TB! to display the graphics in an HTML email
> without having to launch a browser?
> Empty boxes with little red X's in them don't convey a lot of
> information.
welcome to the club of
32 matches
Mail list logo
