Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-12 Thread Oleg Zalyalov
Hello, the Bat! list recipients, Tuesday, January 11, 2000, Thomas Fernandez wrote to George M. Menegakis about Interview with RITLabs! Finally!: GMM So mail reading means at least you should have a way to GMM fetch/read/write/send/organize/search mail. TF You *are* describing Outlook here. I

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-12 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hi Christopher, CJT I have just reminded myself a question: what about unicode (utf-8) CJT support? (Interview continues :-) It will be supported, of course. :-) Regards, Stefan ..."Hi-ho, hi-ho, it's hand grenades I throw..." --

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-12 Thread Claudius Regn
Hello Alexander, I'd rather have spell checking than IMAP. I'd rather have html-viewing than IMAP. AVK That's only you, please speak for *yourself* only;-) Alex, do you read what you quote?? ;) "I'd" ~~~ -- With best regards, Claudius Regn

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-12 Thread Claudius Regn
Hello Steve, SL Sure it does. Let's take, for example, non-conformity to the CUA SL standard. Open up TB, pick a folder with 10 messages in it. Now, on the list SL view do this. Select message #1. Hold shift and select message #3. Now, SL press control and select message #6. Now,

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-12 Thread Claudius Regn
Hello Steve, SL No, they do not. Do you really want me to get into my rant about how SL email clients are a shadow of what they could be based on my experience with SL past software on older hardware? They serve well for people receiving/sending less than 10 emails/day and that is why they

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-12 Thread Claudius Regn
Hello Steve, SL No. The standard convention is to have quotes preceded with the symbol. There are different ways to communicate, to write emails, to quote. I quote the way I want to. I exchange emails with enough people from enough countries with enough experience that I decide how to

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-12 Thread Claudius Regn
Hello Steve Lamb, with the email you dare to post here you show your shortcomings. You are just getting really angry and aggressive; the lack of arguments or your bad mood is not a reason to become personal insulting in a public mailing list. With all your net-"culture" you are breaking

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-12 Thread tracer
Hello Steve Lamb, On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 16:29:28 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, January 13, 2000, 7:29:28 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Steve Lamb wrote: Steve Quite frankly, I don't care that someone's opinion is that the sky Steve is orange with leaf brown polka dots everywhere.

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-12 Thread tracer
Hello Angel, On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 16:12:12 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, January 13, 2000, 7:12:12 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Angel wrote: Angel On Wednesday, January 12, 2000 at 16:04:18 ,Claudius scribbled: CR Steve Lamb, is it time to leave this mailing list??? Do you have

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-12 Thread tracer
Hello Steve Lamb, On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 09:34:05 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, January 13, 2000, 12:34:05 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Steve Lamb wrote: You want me to spell check or read html-mails with other applications? Steve Yes. No matter how good the RITLABS

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-11 Thread Claudius Regn
Hello, SL Doesn't do multiple accounts nor does it have a decent overview of what is SL in even a single account. Try again. Outlook would do. Either way, TheBat! is not *just* for fetch/send/store/search mail. -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-11 Thread Claudius Regn
Hello Steve, SL "optional" items to make it comparable to Bat v1.x? You are aware that by SL virtualizing everything in the manner they have described they are adding in SL several layers of complexity? Each layer has its own potential for bugs. Then your conclusion will be: do not try to

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-11 Thread Claudius Regn
Hello George, GMM It doesn't go this way my friend. GMM A mail reader is made for one job. To read mail. As much as your GMM coffee machine is made to make coffee. GMM All i want is to read mail. First: in *your opinion* "it doesn't go this way", my friend. Obviously you consider a

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-11 Thread Claudius Regn
Hello George, GMM Let's draw a line. GMM In order to read mail you should I did not mean hairsplitting. You do. GMM So mail reading means at least you should have a way to GMM fetch/read/write/send/organize/search mail. GMM All the other things are optional. So by that rationality 95% of

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-11 Thread Claudius Regn
Hello Steve, SL clients have a rotten core. Sure, they look pretty, but bite into it, really SL sink your teeth into it and you find it is sour inside with no substance. I don't think so. Almost all mail clients do perfectly offer all the options you described -- and George described to be

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-11 Thread Claudius Regn
Hello Steve, Either way, TheBat! is not *just* for fetch/send/store/search mail. SL No, and that is the problem. An email client should be just for that. SL Outlook would not do because it is not an email client by any stretch of the SL imagination. Hahaha, Steve -- thank you for your

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-11 Thread tracer
Hello Thomas Fernandez, On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 02:57:24 +0800 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 1:57:24 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Thomas Fernandez wrote: LG - Will v2.0 support hooks for virus scanning attachments to messages? SL *VERY* Bad. RB Why the heck

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-11 Thread tracer
Hello Alexander V. Kiselev, On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:43:31 +0300 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 4:43:31 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: Alexander Therefore I wish to solidarize with those who are *against* adding HTML Alexander editing,

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-11 Thread tracer
Hello Oliver Sturm, On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:59:38 +0100 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 1:59:38 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Oliver Sturm wrote: Oliver Hi all, Oliver IMHO, this is mainly loads of discussion about a piece of software Oliver that's supposedly

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-11 Thread tracer
Hello Steve Lamb, On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 23:12:50 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 2:12:50 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Steve Lamb wrote: Steve Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 7:43:06 PM, tracer wrote: Actually I would like the bat to do it with a buildin or addon

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-10 Thread Jason Thompson
Hello Steve and Bat Buddies, I feel I should put in my two cents here, because most of the opinions that are posted to this list are negative ones, critical to one aspect of TB or another. I support TB's growth into areas such as usenet and HTML because the developers have so far proved to me

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-10 Thread tracer
Hello Mark Worsham, On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 15:47:47 -0600 GMT your local time, which was Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 4:47:47 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Mark Worsham wrote: Mark Hi Leif - Mark Monday, January 10, 2000, 3:13:39 PM, you wrote: LG - How many of the items on the wish list are going

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-10 Thread tracer
Hello Mark Aston, On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 23:59:11 + GMT your local time, which was Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 6:59:11 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Mark Aston wrote: Mark Hi Steve, Mark Monday, January 10, 2000, 11:45:12 PM, you wrote: SL Monday, January 10, 2000, 3:30:32 PM, Mark wrote:

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-10 Thread Claudius Regn
Hello George, GMM The only thing I want from my mailer to do is to GMM fetch/send/store/search mail. There'S a pretty nifty onehm, well, I think it was called PINE ;) !! -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat!

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-10 Thread Claudius Regn
Hello Steve, SL And Opera sails above its competition. I don't want to see RITLABS spend SL time competing with Opera Software when they still have a LOT of work to do on SL TB!. I don't want to see Opera Software compete with RITLABS, either. RITLABS software IMHO is evolving and

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-10 Thread Jason Thompson
Hello Steve and Bat Buddies, I don't want to see RITLABS spend time competing with Opera Software when they still have a LOT of work to do on TB!. I don't want to see Opera Software compete with RITLABS, either. I agree with you concerning the web browser RITLabs is planning. There are three

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-10 Thread Moosebreath
Hello Steve, Monday, January 10, 2000, 6:45:01 PM, you wrote: SL On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 06:25:00PM -0800, Jason Thompson wrote: Usenet, on the other hand...Well, I know none of the technical aspects of Usenet, but I've seen that MS Outlook smoothly integrates news and mail into one client.

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-10 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Mark, I agree with you mark. I REALLY like TB from the short time I've used it. And planned to complete my migration from Pegasus Mail shortly... I don't like do-all apps. I use Xnews for news, and Opera for web browsing, and wanted to use TB for email. They should only be integrated in

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-10 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Mark, *exactly* Derek Written in response to your letter of Monday, January 10, 2000, 8:06:44 PM: MA Hi Steve, MA Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 12:28:21 AM, you wrote: but that does not really appeal. Any suggestions for another Windows MUA that come close to TB, as it is now? SL

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-10 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Paul, Written in response to your letter of Monday, January 10, 2000, 10:31:21 PM: P I don't need a Gravity replacement, just an excellent email program P that can post to newsgroups when needed and run local newsgroups via P its own internal server. Really, try to give

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-10 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Steve, *ACK* You mean we agreed? ;) Derek Written in response to your letter of Monday, January 10, 2000, 11:32:06 PM: SL Monday, January 10, 2000, 7:55:48 PM, Derek wrote: I guess the masses want bundled apps. I hate 'em. I'm mad at opera for considering an email client and an

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-10 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello John, Written in response to your letter of Monday, January 10, 2000, 10:46:37 PM: [SNIP] JS ii) I occasionally have need to approve news postings on a private moderated JS newsgroup. Since these arrive via mail, it would be nice to be able to JS inject them into the news system

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-10 Thread Jason Thompson
Hello Steve and Bat Buddies, Points taken. (and I'm out of things to say :) I suppose it's harmless to add news support to TB because if you don't like it, use something else. But if news is implemented, I hope they'll still concentrate their development efforts toward the email aspect of TB.