At 16:01 17-09-2000 +0200, Dierk Haasis kindly wrote:
>Sunday, September 17, 2000, 4:57:18 AM, you wrote:
>> So I came here. And now you say I can't say chili peppers? Fuck.
> I am usually not the one to get personal on this list but ... can't
> you as a professional writer not find other
At 17:01 17-09-2000 +0200, Fred van Veen kindly wrote:
>Karin, am I right?
You are ;-)
- K -
--
"When I make a word do a lot of work like that," said
Humpty Dumpty, "I always pay it extra.'"
- Lewis Carroll: Through the Looking-Glass
--
--
Hello All,
On 17-9-2000 12:08:35, Steve wrote:
S> On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 04:21:01AM +0200, Karin Spaink wrote:
>> Is it now.
S> Yes, it has been explained to you several times.
>> I have been on the net for six years and nobody ever told me that they were
>> aggreviated by the fact that I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Karin!
Sunday, September 17, 2000, 4:57:18 AM, you wrote:
> client. So I came here. And now you say I can't say chili peppers? Fuck.
I am usually not the one to get personal on this list but ... can't
you as a professional writer not fin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Januk!
Sunday, September 17, 2000, 5:14:37 AM, you wrote:
> Why would they? They can't see what font you're using. But if you
> try to do any formatting with variable width fonts, it looks really
> bad. ^^ The word formatt
MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MDP> Hash: SHA1
MDP> Hi John,
MDP> On 17 September 2000 at 08:32:16 GMT +0100 (which was 08:32 where I
MDP> live) John Rainer wrote and made these points on the subject
MDP> of "New user, lotsa questions":
JR>> - all I want text to do is to fully word wra
On Saturday, September 16, 2000, 7:57:18 PM, you wrote:
KS> >Please do not use language like this here.
KS> In that case, please inform subscribers via the majardomo welcome message.
Most people do not need this spelled out for them, they just don't do
it as a matter of course in a polite grou
A.,
Regarding your message dated: 17 September 2000...
ACM> You seem to have ''Smart' Tabs' enabled in the editor preferences. With
ACM> this option enabled, the tabbing will vary depending on the situation.
ACM> The tabbing will always adjust in such a way that the cursor ends up in
ACM> line w
Marck,
Regarding your message dated: 17 September 2000...
MDP> TB's TAB is set up for tabular entry. It keys on the spacing in the
MDP> line(s) above - no matter how far above - for tab stops. Like this:
MDP>Col1 Col2 Col3 Col4 Col5
MDP>Tab1
Steve,
Regarding your message dated: 17 September 2000...
SL> That is the Microsoft standard, not /A/ standard. There is a big
SL> difference. AFAIK the CUA (a standard) defines what keystrokes do, not editor
SL> behavior. There is a difference.
True enough but given that TB! runs unde
A.,
Regarding your message dated: 17 September 2000...
ACM> I personally do like the free caret interface myself. Also, for me,
ACM> TB!'s editor took some time to get accustomed to. It was a period of
ACM> adjustment and giving and taking. The end result has been that the
ACM> shortcomings for
On 17-09-2000 at 01:27, Marck D. Pearlstone kindly wrote:
> Hi Karin,
KS>> 1. If you move your cursor down in the window in which you are
KS>> editing your mail (e.g. move it down to the next empty line), it
KS>> goes down but stays in the same column
> Correct. This is not a bug. This is T
Thanks for the replies I have been getting so for.
They are helpful and allow me to understand both
the progam an dthe programmer's goals more
clearly, and thus help me to make up my mind.
First of all, new questions:
1. Why does my reply to Januk gets garbled in the
Subject line and suddenly ge
13 matches
Mail list logo
