-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas,
Monday, September 8, 2003, 12:58:21 AM, you wrote:
TF> I also haven't read this. Or I must be getting old - let me find my
TF> Gingko Biloba. Hm. Can you point me to a mid saying that anybody got
TF> a free key because he registered w
>
>I've been sitting here all day trying to figure out how long ago it
>was that TB did NOT support multiple accounts . . .
sorry to be fair it's been a long time since I tried and have been using kmail for he
most part since then. Any email client under windows for only gets occasional use.
MAU,
M> Hello Brook,
>> I've used the bat under windows for years now. As for multiple
>> accounts I dont care anymore since even if it does do it I already have a clinet
>> I have been using jsut as long that does do it.
M> Am I reading correctly? Do you mean you have been using The Bat for
M
Monday, September 8, 2003, 5:14:54 PM, Mark wrote:
M> B) he's hoping that someday *somebody* will pipe up with how
M> to get multiple accounts working on TB.
I've never understood this complaint from people on the list. I
selected TB! quite a few years ago primarily because of its
ability to hand
At 5:14 PM on 9/8/2003, Mark Wieder typed ...
M> Anyway, I figure Brook hangs around because either A) he can't figure
M> out how to unsubscribe and is too embarrassed to ask or B) he's hoping
M> that someday *somebody* will pipe up with how to get multiple accounts
M> working on TB.
TB has lots
Bonjour Deborah,
Monday, September 8, 2003, 4:48:13 AM, j'ai pu lire:
DW> It's my understanding that it isn't a policy, but rather that inaccurate
DW> information was posted on the German website during that period of time,
DW> saying that those who registered TB v1. would get v2 free, & that
DW>
Hi Alexander,
>> I use The Bat! since May '99 and for four years we got MAJOR
>> enhancements for free. If some other company has produced the Bat, the
>> very same program with the same feature set would be in version 4 or 5
>> and not 2.00.6. Believe me 1.60 was a major upgrade t
Monday, September 8, 2003, 6:13:26 AM, Pixie wrote:
P> To a large extent the internet and the instant gratification
P> it brings especially with software is tiresome at times. I
P> used to never know doodle about alpha/beta stages and having
P> the freshest version just wasn't a consideration unle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas,
Monday, September 8, 2003, 12:58:21 AM, you wrote:
TF> I also haven't read this. Or I must be getting old - let me find my
TF> Gingko Biloba. Hm. Can you point me to a mid saying that anybody got
TF> a free key because he registered
Hello Deborah,
Sunday, September 7, 2003, 10:48:13 PM, you wrote:
DW> On Sunday, September 7, 2003, 9:47:39 PM, danger h wrote:
DW> It's my understanding that it isn't a policy, but rather that inaccurate
DW> information was posted on the German website during that period of time,
DW> saying th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Alexander,
Sunday, September 7, 2003, 11:43:58 AM, you wrote:
A> (in short, the article says that anyone who registered between Oct7 2002
A> and Jan5 2003 is eligible for a free update to v2, this has been confirmed
A> in an email from Ritlab
Hello ETM (State of Virginia),
ETM (State of Virginia) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sunday, September 7, 2003 at
6:41:55 PM
ESoV> Sorry, folks, have now read today's thread, realize I freaked and
ESoV> panicked, that some here are considering what I am considering, a
ESoV> buy-now, use-later. H
Hi Jamie,
A>> And what a lot of people are overseeing is that the v2 license is not "one
A>> person" but "one computer". So, if you're using TB on your laptop and your
A>> home computer, you need another full license AFAIK.
JD> I don't know about this, although it seems to be standard practice fo
13 matches
Mail list logo
