Re[3]: html fonts resize

2006-11-16 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Maggie, Thursday, November 16, 2006, 12:16:03 PM, you wrote: MM> Well, I should have left well enough alone. That remapping thing is MM> like spaghetti. While attempting to re-map the Ctrl+Enter I somehow MM> changed the size of the glyphs on the toolbar. Don't ask, I don't know MM> how. W

Re[3]: HTML Links

2004-05-21 Thread jwayne
On Friday, May 21, 2004, 6:19:41 PM, John Cunnane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: JC> Hi All, JC> I believe that we can agree with my first point that clicking on a JC> HTML link in the preview pane takes you to the top of the message on JC> the first click and then opens the browser on the second. I

Re[3]: html email help?

2003-12-21 Thread daveiw
Hi Stuart, Saturday, December 20, 2003, 4:32:06 PM, you wrote: SC> Are you sure the message is not being sent. This is the bug that has SC> been reported, where the message is actually sent, but the window that SC> contains the massage does not close. Check to make sure that your SC> recipients d

Re[3]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

2003-09-10 Thread Dave Kennedy
Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 4:29:36 AM, FJ wrote: F> You're turning things around here. With all communications, F> the presentation and formatting lies with the originator. This F> is true for newspapers, slide show presentations, snail mail F> letters, email, etc.. Ding, ding, ding!!! We hav

Re[3]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

2003-09-10 Thread Dave Kennedy
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 9:50:52 PM, Vishal wrote: V> Right. People like us on this list don't appreciate that. But V> we aren't really representative of the majority. That is such a great point! (I wish I had made it. :) ) We techies so often forget that our view of the world is different tha

Re[3]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

2003-09-09 Thread Dave Kennedy
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 8:59:49 AM, Bill wrote: B> If the goal is COMMUNICATION, plain text wins. If the goal is You are trying to emphasize "COMMUNICATION," right? That's why it's capitalized? I wonder if HTML would have been able to present that across better by using italics or bold font?

Re[3]: html mailto bug

2003-02-24 Thread Spike
Hello Mark Wieder, On or about Monday, February 24, 2003 at 15:47:09GMT -0800 (which was 6:47 PM in the tropics where I live) Mark Wieder posted: MW> Marck- MW> Monday, February 24, 2003, 7:30:00 AM, you wrote: MDP>> You are quite right. That doesn't work at all. Why not use the link MDP>> to e

Re[3]: html mailto bug

2003-02-23 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Spike, Sunday, February 23, 2003, 5:40:59 PM, you wrote: S>>> Where EXACTLY in the registry is this entry? MDP>> HKCR/mailto/shell/open/command S> Does this change require a reboot? I've had the other changes take S> place immediately, such as the 'broken' mailto's with other changes I

Re[3]: HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Spike
Hello Kenneth S. Rhee, On or about Saturday, February 08, 2003 at 13:39:41GMT -0500 (which was 1:39 PM in the tropics where I live) Kenneth pointed out :-)": KSR> folks used to laugh at Macs when they were first introduced Used to? Still do, 100 times every day!! << _*{_SCORN_}*_ >> Is that e

Re[3]: HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Mike Alexander
Hi Kenneth, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 6:39:41 PM, you wrote: KSR> Whether I or we like it or not, as long as MS creates OL and OE, and everyone seems to be enamored with rich text, multimedia e-mails, this will not go away. In fact, I predict that in a couple KSR> of years, we all be sendin

Re[3]: HTML-mail

2001-11-30 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Rick, 30 Nov 2001, 4:08:52 PM, you wrote: RR> Although for the most part I also despise HTML emails, I'm not so RR> certain that at least having the option to use it occasionally would RR> be such a bad idea. The only HTML I used was some occasional bolding RR> or italics which I didn't th

Re[3]: HTML files trouble

2001-06-19 Thread Dennis J. Alcover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: MD5 Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:24 PM Paul, Sorry for you, but I'm glad I'm not the only one. I've yet to find an answer, een after working on it with RIT support for a couple of weeks now. I always end up reverting to 1.51. All the messages look OK there.

Re[3]: HTML Mail viewing (images)

2001-01-10 Thread syv
net.ru><003801c079c2$457fe5c0$0500a8c0@HOME><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <005f01c079c9$27ba92e0$0500a8c0@HOME><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <010201c07a1d$22d68be0$0500a8c0@HOME> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transf

Re[3]: HTML mail

2000-09-15 Thread ztrader
On Friday, September 15, 2000, 2:03:27 AM, you wrote: JH> I shall watch for version 2 with interest - I certainly don't /always/ JH> want to send in HTML, but I like to have the choice. You could always fire up the M$ bloatware :-). That *is* a choice. JH> My other irritation with TB's handling

Re[3]: HTML mail

2000-09-15 Thread John Hinson
Sorry Curtis (and Thomas and Jamie), I only said half of what I meant to. It seems to me you can do all this at the click of a button or key combination 1. Collect for an individual account 2. Send for an individual account 3. Collect/send for an individual account 4. Collect for all accounts 5.

Re[3]: HTML mail

2000-09-15 Thread Jamie Dainton
Hello John Hinson, On Fri, 15 Sep 2000 10:03:27 +0100 GMT your local time, which was Friday, September 15, 2000, 10:03:27 (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time, John Hinson wrote: JH> My other irritation with TB's handling of multiple accounts is that JH> there is no easy button/key combination to coll

Re[3]: HTML mail

2000-09-15 Thread Curtis Campbell
Hello John, Friday, September 15, 2000, 5:03:27 AM, you wrote: JH> My other irritation with TB's handling of multiple accounts is that JH> there is no easy button/key combination to collect email from all JH> accounts. I keep collecting from just one in error. perhaps I have JH> missed something

Re: [OT]Re[3]: HTML Removal from Replies--any faster ways?

2000-04-21 Thread Pasquale J. Festa Sr.
Hello Woofie, April 21, 2000, 12:11:53 AM, you wrote: W> Howdy Pasquale, W> Friday, April 21, 2000, 11:57:19 AM, you wrote: = PL>>> Try: PL>> http://www.notetab.com The freeware NoteTab light W> strips HTML. PJFS>> I use notespad. W> Notepad that comes with Windows or another product?

[OT]Re[3]: HTML Removal from Replies--any faster ways?

2000-04-20 Thread Woofie
Howdy Pasquale, Friday, April 21, 2000, 11:57:19 AM, you wrote: = PL>> Try: PL>> http://www.notetab.com The freeware NoteTab light strips HTML. PJFS> I use notespad. Notepad that comes with Windows or another product? Notetab is a very nice little editor and of course a great improve

Re[3]: HTML

2000-01-30 Thread Gary
Hi Chuck, On Sunday, January 30, 2000, 3:49:07 PM, you hammered out: Gary>> I have been playing with this too. The only way I have come Gary>> across, (spent very little time on this project yet) is to make Gary>> a document, let's say in Word or WordPerfect, save it in HTML Gary>> format, and t

Re[3]: HTML

2000-01-30 Thread tracer
Hello Chuck Mattsen, On GMT your local time, which was Monday, January 31, 2000, 4:49:07 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Chuck Mattsen wrote: > That *does* work rather well ... just did a short test to myself, and > it came through nicely except, of course, for the graphics referenced > in the HTM

Re[3]: HTML

2000-01-30 Thread dMb
Gary>> I have been playing with this too. The only way I have come Gary>> across, (spent very little time on this project yet) is to make Gary>> a document, let's say in Word or WordPerfect, save it in HTML Gary>> format, and then send it as a MIME attachment. Chuck wrote: > That *does* work rat

Re[3]: HTML & adding an additional user

1999-11-16 Thread Roel
\\\|/// / ~ _ \ (- O o -) --oOOo-(_)-oOOo--- Hello Al, I went to menu: ->> new AC> ALL my mail moved to the new address "inbox"! ( I dont want that ) AC> I need to set up a seperate account. eve