Hello Susanne,
Sunday, November 17, 2013, 1:26:27 AM, among other things, you wrote:
S Hi,
S I've been using TB for a long time now (starting with v.1), and am
S currently on version 4.2.
S Is it worth upgrading to v.6?
Version 6 still has a number of problems, I suggest that you rather
On 17 November 2013, 10:39, Chris Wilson wrote:
I keep seeing references to version 5.8.10 yet my 5.8.8 said it was
the current version right up until the release of V6.0~~~
FWIW, I'm still using 5.2 because every time I've clicked on
Help-Check for update, I got a message back telling me that
Hi Susanne
On Saturday 16 November 2013 at 11:26:27 PM, you wrote:
Hi,
I've been using TB for a long time now (starting with v.1), and am
currently on version 4.2.
I started with v2, and got my fingers burnt because they released v3
within a fortnight and my licence didn't cover it. I
Hi,
I've been using TB for a long time now (starting with v.1), and am
currently on version 4.2.
Is it worth upgrading to v.6?
How is html working with that version, and would I need to buy a
completely new licence, or can I get a discounted upgrade one?
If I did upgrade, would my current
Hello Susanne,
Sunday, November 17, 2013, 1:26:27 AM, among other things, you wrote:
S Hi,
S I've been using TB for a long time now (starting with v.1), and am
S currently on version 4.2.
S Is it worth upgrading to v.6?
Version 6 still has a number of problems, I suggest that you rather
RS (FEDARA) wrote:
Do they allow usage of v4 if a client have v5 licence?
Yes, I e-mailed Ritlabs to ask how I should proceed, and they told me to
upgrade to v5 (with a 30% discount), then e-mail them with the serial number
and they'll give me a registration key valid for v4.x.
--
Hi Mary,
RS (FEDARA) wrote:
Do they allow usage of v4 if a client have v5 licence?
Yes, I e-mailed Ritlabs to ask how I should proceed, and they told me to
upgrade to v5 (with a 30% discount), then e-mail them with the serial number
and they'll give me a registration key valid for v4.x.
Thanks for the replies, everyone.
I'm not really bothered about the html editor - I normally use plain
text anyway.
MFPA wrote:
Not sure if this is relevant to your situation, but 4.0.38 is the
newest version you can use with a v3 licence.
I have a v1.60h business edition licence, so I'm
Hi
On Sunday 3 July 2011 at 5:12:42 PM, in
mid:9df87297cf9e3ba6d0ac892619ece049@95.227.42.41, Mary Cassidy
wrote:
I have a v1.60h business edition licence, so I'm not
sure how I should upgrade. It isn't clear from the
website, but I assume I'll have to buy a licence from
scratch. I'll try
Hi MFPA,
I have a v1.60h business edition licence, so I'm not
sure how I should upgrade. It isn't clear from the
website, but I assume I'll have to buy a licence from
scratch. I'll try e-mailing them, anyway.
You get a 30% discount on a v5 licence if you already have an earlier
licence.
Hi all,
I'm still using version 1.60h, which I've been very happy with, so I've
never bothered upgrading.
I've been thinking of upgrading recently because the Scheduler would be very
useful, but having read recent posts here and on the Ritlabs forum, it
doesn't sound as though an upgrade to
Hi Mary,
Are there any major problems with v4.2.44 that I should be aware of?
Moved back from version 5 to 4.2.44 due to all reported by me issues.
So far none of them happened in v.4 (almost 4 weeks) ; except that
for some e-mails while replying there is no text at all after
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 at 14:28:33 +0200,Mary wrote:
I've been thinking of upgrading recently because the Scheduler would be very
useful
...snip...
Are there any major problems with v4.2.44 that I should be aware of?
Alternatively, I see v4.0.38 and some earlier ones are still availble for
Hello Mary,
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:28:33 +0200 GMT (30/Jun/11, 19:28 PM +0700 GMT),
Mary Cassidy wrote:
MC Are there any major problems with v4.2.44 that I should be aware of?
MC Alternatively, I see v4.0.38 and some earlier ones are still availble for
MC download.
v4.2.44 is good for POP users
Hi
On Thursday 30 June 2011 at 1:28:33 PM, in
mid:90e3f71b1f530c07c6c573709a11ee61@95.227.42.41, Mary Cassidy
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm still using version 1.60h, which I've been very
happy with, so I've never bothered upgrading.
[...]
Are there any major problems with v4.2.44 that I should
Hello BatList,
as you can see i have been busy using the bat - i have not been
happy with the program since i bought it . is there any trouble
upgrading this thing and does it work better? especially the
formatting of letters - it seems it has its own mind when you reply
Hello Mark,
On Monday, May 15, 2000 at 18:39:14 GMT -0500 (which was 4:39 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
i have not been happy with the program since i bought it .
That's not good. But just remember, no program can do exactly what
every individual wants. Hopefully we can
17 matches
Mail list logo
