Hello Jim,
Have you tried Antispam Servant for TB? This filter works extremely
well and there is no need in my opinion for a third party program to
interface with TB. I have tried Mailwasher Pro and I found it's more
work than it's worth. Antispam Servant resides within TB as a plug-in
so it's tra
Hello Tony,
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 you wrote in
T> I've installed AntispamSniper 15 minutes ago.
I don't think you'll regret it and the author answers questions in the
forum, normally the same day, should you have any problems.
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.99.8 with POP3 account & AntispamS
On Tuesday, July 17, 2007, at 5:14:03 PM, Code 2 wrote:
> I like Richard's blacklist solution for .pdf attachments, but I just
> can't risk a false positive on an important e-mail. Maybe the solution is
> to filter these to an "Unknown" folder for periodic review. Kind of a
> nearly-Junk Mail fold
T> AntiSpamSniper.
T> I'll put that on my todo list.
T> Was is/it performing well with picture spam? Or where you along
T> the happy few that didn't receive 50 stockmarket picture spams a
T> day.
T> Those guys are busted according to a news article. Not that it
T> matters because Now the subject ju
Hello Richard,
Tuesday, July 17, 2007, 11:53:16 PM, you wrote:
RW> Hello Tony,
RW> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 you wrote in
RW>
T>> I'm sure you/the author is right.
T>> But that forces us/me to the white list path.
T>> In that case I would even need a spam filter.
RW> Fair enough, I can understand y
Hello Tony,
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 you wrote in
T> I'm sure you/the author is right.
T> But that forces us/me to the white list path.
T> In that case I would even need a spam filter.
Fair enough, I can understand your reticence. I was actually replying to
Code2's post but it doesn't make it any th
Hello Richard,
Tuesday, July 17, 2007, 11:10:37 PM, you wrote:
RW> Hello Code,
RW> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 you wrote in
RW>
C2>> If it wasn't for those darn spammers sending blank
C2>> messages with .pdf spam attachments lately, I expect it would be well
C2>> over 99% accurate.
RW> Here's what th
Hello Code,
Tuesday, July 17, 2007, 10:46:48 PM, you wrote:
T>> I'm looking into some anti-spam solutions MailWasher Pro looks like
T>> something useful but has one major flaw. If it can't be 'fixed' I
T>> wouldn't even want it for free... :P The problem is that I doesn't
T>> work as a proxy. I h
Hello Code,
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 you wrote in
C2> If it wasn't for those darn spammers sending blank
C2> messages with .pdf spam attachments lately, I expect it would be well
C2> over 99% accurate.
Here's what the author has just posted in the forum. Maybe that'll help
you:
Add the mask "pdf" t
T> I'm looking into some anti-spam solutions MailWasher Pro looks like
T> something useful but has one major flaw. If it can't be 'fixed' I
T> wouldn't even want it for free... :P The problem is that I doesn't
T> work as a proxy. I have to switch of auto mail checking in The Bat
T> and let MailWash
Hello tbudl,
I'm looking into some anti-spam solutions
MailWasher Pro looks like something useful but has one major flaw. If it can't
be 'fixed' I wouldn't even want it for free... :P
The problem is that I doesn't work as a proxy. I have to switch of auto mail
checking in The Bat and let MailWas
11 matches
Mail list logo
