(4.0.38) simply includes
all recipients, including those on the BCC line, in
the encryption list of a single outgoing message. The
identity of the BCCs is potentially leaked to each
other and to the other recipients.
Can anybody tell me whether this privacy issue has
been fixed in a later TB
Hi
On Friday 28 November 2014 at 2:43:03 PM, in
mid:436417159.20141128214...@gmx.net, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Susanne sent me a PM with CC to the list, I don't know
why it didn't make it to the list. Here it is:
[Snipped]
I received a copy via the list. It came in Susanne's TSL handshake
outgoing message. The
identity of the BCCs is potentially leaked to each
other and to the other recipients.
Can anybody tell me whether this privacy issue has been
fixed in a later TB! version?
Sorry to reply to my own message, but can anybody confirm this
behaviour?
--
Best regards
recipients, including those on the BCC line, in the
encryption list of a single outgoing message. The
identity of the BCCs is potentially leaked to each
other and to the other recipients.
Can anybody tell me whether this privacy issue has been
fixed in a later TB! version?
Sorry to reply
recipients.
Can anybody tell me whether this privacy issue has been fixed in a
later TB! version?
--
Best regards
MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net
A bird in the hand makes it awfully hard to blow your nose
Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Hi,
I've got a big problem with mails sent with TB : When I send an email to a
person with my TB, this person can see my computer name in the headers of the mail.
The problematic field is Received:. I can accept that he can see my IP address to
avoid
piracy, but why my computer name? Imagine, if
Hello WilWilWil,
Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 9:10:36 AM, you wrote:
W I 've done a test with a self sent email, and I can see this header
W ! My friend use TB to, but his mail I receive haven't his computer
W name in header !
W What 's wrong with my TB ?
It looks like you use your own SMTP
Hello WilWilWil,
Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 11:10:36 PM, you wrote:
W I've got a big problem with mails sent with TB : When I send an email to a
W person with my TB, this person can see my computer name in the headers of the mail.
W The problematic field is Received:. I can accept that he can
==Original message text===
From: drifthat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WilWilWil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 6:27:33 PM
Subject: Problem of privacy in TB ?
d Hello WilWilWil,
d Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 11:10:36 PM, you wrote:
W I've got a big problem
Hello WilWilWil,
11-Aug-2004 19:04, you wrote:
The only one difference between them and me is that I 'm connected to
Internet trough an other PC which share his connection...
There you have it. :-) I've seen similar on messages I've sent @ work vs.
messages I've sent from my home PC. The
Hello,
Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 12:10:36 PM, you wrote:
I've got a big problem with mails sent with TB : When I send an
email to a person with my TB, this person can see my computer name
in the headers of the mail. The problematic field is Received:. I
can accept that he can see my IP
Hello Leif,
On 11 August 2004, 09:29 -0600 (16:29 local time) Leif Gregory [LG] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
W I 've done a test with a self sent email, and I can see this header
W ! My friend use TB to, but his mail I receive haven't his computer
W name in header !
W What 's wrong with my
Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 3:12:59 PM, Martin wrote:
Martin Is this a problem? You can see my machines FQDN is the header but I
Martin wouldn't have thought that was a security breach.
I think what he is referring to is the name of the computer. See the
headers of this reply from me and notice
Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 3:22:29 PM, Plan9 wrote:
Plan9 Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 3:12:59 PM, Martin wrote:
Martin Is this a problem? You can see my machines FQDN is the header but I
Martin wouldn't have thought that was a security breach.
Plan9 I think what he is referring to is the name
Hello Plan9,
On 11 August 2004, 15:22 -0400 (20:22 local time) Plan9 [P] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Is this a problem? You can see my machines FQDN is the header but I
Martin wouldn't have thought that was a security breach.
P I think what he is referring to is the name of the
Hello all,
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on TBBETA I was referring
to the re-implemented bug, that a new mail gets not sent, if Sign
When Complete is enabled. Simply nothing happens if you hit F2.
Noticed that, when I wrote the above mentioned mail on TBBETA - but it
is not reproducable anymore - at
Hi daniel,
on Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:35:13 +0100GMT (09.12.03, 13:35 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
dh in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on TBBETA I was referring
dh to the re-implemented bug, that a new mail gets not sent, if Sign
dh When Complete is enabled. Simply nothing happens if
daniel hahler writes:
This is strange - so I would like to see, if it is happening to someone
else with 2.02 CE..
I've had similar problems with 2.01, but nobody would ever believe me.
It is difficult to isolate the exact conditions in which it occurs.
Usually the message just doesn't get
on Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:48:00 +0100 Peter Meyns wrote:
dh in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on TBBETA I was referring
dh to the re-implemented bug, that a new mail gets not sent, if Sign
dh When Complete is enabled. Simply nothing happens if you hit F2.
PM No problems in this respect with GnuPG on Win98.
I
daniel hahler wrote:
dh in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on TBBETA I was
dh referring to the re-implemented bug, that a new mail gets not
dh sent, if Sign When Complete is enabled. Simply nothing happens
dh if you hit F2.
The reason is further down in your message, i.e., the PGPSDK Service
was no longer
on Tue, 9 Dec 2003 08:18:28 -0500 Allie Martin wrote:
dh I then took a look at my XP Services and PGPsdkService was stopped,
dh but start type is automatic, of course..
AM The automatic is for XP startups. The services set as automatic will
AM be automatically started when you boot XP. Those set
daniel hahler wrote:
dh Ok. Thought of that already. What about setting it to manual?
dh would it then be started if needed (and/or crashed before)?
No. That will not help. :/ XP will start particular services set to
manual as it needs to. One example is the service for Faxing. AFAIK,
most 3rd
On Tuesday, December 9, 2003 at 8:09:54 AM, daniel hahler wrote in the
message PGP: No send if Privacy/Sign When Completed checked /
PGPsdkService crashed on exit
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But as the service's start type is automatic it should be started
again, if needed, IMHO.
This is not true
Chris wrote:
C To set the recovery settings, log on as an administrator. Then,
C open up the Services MMC snap-in. (Start - Run - services.msc
C - OK). Then scroll down until you find PGPsdkService. Double click
C on it. Go to the Recovery tab. Then, set the recovery options you
C want. I have
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, 6:00:30 PM, Mark Knipfer wrote:
MK In TheBat! 1.60h compose window when I select Privacy | Encrypt when
MK Complete, TheBat! displays this error initially:
MK The Bat!
MK (X) Access violation at address 00431F43 in module 'thebat.exe'.
MK Read of address
In TheBat! 1.60h compose window when I select Privacy | Encrypt when
Complete, TheBat! displays this error initially:
The Bat!
(X) Access violation at address 00431F43 in module 'thebat.exe'.
Read of address 0008.
OK
When I click 'Send the letter
One more reason for me to like the way TB! handles HTML:
http://www.havetheyreadityet.com
While the idea is probably good, I still like the idea of controlling
what people know about what I do. Although this does show you a
glimpse of what is capable of implanting into HTML email.
--
ò¸ó
Hello Marck,
Please be assured that this group is private although the member
names
(but not addresses) do appear in the archives.
I use Azrael not for any concern with TBUDL but rather because I
post to hardware use-groups with munchkin hackers of dubious
repute and switch
Hello azrael,
Tuesday, April 17, 2001, 12:55:42 PM, you wrote:
a The TBUDL *is* the beginners list.
a I'd feared as much. I know there is a huge gap between my
a awarenesses and those of say Nick A., Allie or Douglas and terms
a like Regex, PGP, or XLAT are all new to me.
Hello TBUDL,
Does anybody know how to set up TheBat! to work with PrivacyX?
www.privacyx.com --It uses certificates and I don't know how to set
up TheBat! to work with those.
Thanx,
Georg
--
Best regards,
Georg mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TheBat!1.52
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Georg,
On 03 April 2001 at 17:48:57 -0400 (which was 22:48 where I live)
Georg Omenitsch wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these
points:
GO Does anybody know how to set up TheBat! to work with PrivacyX?
GO www.privacyx.com --It uses
Hello Kari,
Thursday, December 07, 2000, 6:54:58 PM, you wrote:
KJ D'oh! I'm too fast for my keyboard... ;-) I know of an overclocking
KJ tool for the PS/2 bus for the mouse but is there a. o/c'ing tool
KJ for the PS/2 keyboard also? ...muahaha...
Maybe you could underclock yourself.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick,
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, at 23:02:41 h [GMT +]
you wrote this about "Folder-specific privacy settings?":
KJ This way you could disable "Sing when completed" by default.
NG "Sing when completed"? I like
Good people (and knowledgeable too, I trow)
Abject apologies if this is in the
oh-no-not-that-old-question-again-why-don't-they-rtfm-or-at-least-the-FAQ-and-help-file
category, but:
Is there a way to make privacy setting folder-specific. For example,
most of the business email I send I want
Hello The Bat! users,
Nick Gordon wrote on 12/6/2000, 9:10 PM
NG Is there a way to make privacy setting folder-specific. For example,
NG most of the business email I send I want to PGP sign, so I have the
NG "Sign when completed" option checked. But I don't want
NG to sign most of w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick,
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, at 20:10:28 h [GMT +]
you wrote this about "Folder-specific privacy settings?":
NG Abject apologies if this is in the
NG oh-no-not-that-old-question-again-why-don't-they-rtfm-or-at-least-
NG the-FA
Hello Kari,
Wednesday, December 06, 2000, 8:33:31 PM, you wrote:
KJ This way you could disable "Sing when completed" by default.
"Sing when completed"? I like the sound of that (ouch!)
Oh - and thanks
--
Best regards,
Nickmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Karin Spaink !
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000 23:08:38 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was 05.10.2000, 23:08 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote:
[...]
Make sure that under the
e-mail tab S/MIME is unckeched
I have seen this quite often in this list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Karin Spaink !
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000 01:02:43 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was 05.10.2000, 01:02 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote:
[...]
Make sure that under the
e-mail tab S/MIME is unckeched
I have seen this quite often in this list
installing in your opinion?
It is, Jan ! IMHO it has to do with privacy: do you send anything written on a
postcard or don't you close the envelope ? If no and if you don't send illegal
things, why not on a postcard ?? Because it is your privacy !!
That's why I do it.
My 0.02 worth
Hello Gerd
On 05 October 2000, at 16:39, you wrote:
-- Wait. Have you installed PGP?
GE Great, Karin !! I just imagine this had been the error: ROTFLMAO !
Ho Ho
--
have a good day
Charlie (ceejay)
--
--
View the TBUDL
On 05-10-2000 at 17:39, Gerd Ewald kindly wrote:
Hello Karin Spaink !
Make sure that under the
e-mail tab S/MIME is unckeched
I have seen this quite often in this list and always wondered why ?? When I
tested S/MIME and PGP I tried to sign my messages both ways and it did work:
I don't
PGPtray- Current Window- Sign, because
Privacy- PGP- Sign Entire Text does nothing. I'm going to have to
spend some time looking into how I set up PGP to work with TB.
--
have a good day
Charlie (ceejay)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use http
through a mail server. Privacy.com and other such services CLAIM
to ensure your privacy, but since THEY undertake the encryption,
how are you sure? Also, can you be sure of the encryption
algorithm they use? Is it easily cracked? PGP has another
advantage: you can sign messages at source
Hi TBUDL
In a post time stamped 11:27:49 +0700 re: Re privacy
encryption ClueBusDriver wrote:
TBUDL The current version of pgp is 7. I tried it and found
TBUDL numerous problems. NAI needs to make a few revisions before
TBUDL it's worth installing. However, 658
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000 19:12:40 +0100
"Charlie Turner (ceejay)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CT( Hello Graham
CT( On 04 October 2000, at 09:48, you wrote:
CT(
CT( G Go to Tools/Privacy/Choose PGP Version and check the radio button
CT( G for &quo
Hello Graham
On 04 October 2000, at 20:11, you wrote:
CT( I've been looking around for the .dll Graham. Do you have the URL for
CT( it by any chance?
G Certainly, Charlie, its
G http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html
I've downloaded the PGP Plugin DLL 98k file (v5.5, v6.0 v.6.5)
Also never having had the occasion to install .dlls before I could
CTcdo with some pointers. Any help greatly appreciated Graham.
Unzip the DLL's into your TB! installation directory. Close and restart
TB!.
You may then go to the Tools | Privacy | Choose PGP Version menu item.
Select
Hi TBUDL
In a post time stamped 21:49:12 +0700 re: Re[2]: privacy encryption
Graham wrote:
TBUDL Quite easily Jan. PGP is a tried and trusted form of encryption
TBUDL which allows you to encrypt BEFORE your electronic mail goes
TBUDL through a mail server. Privacy.com
that, and still nothing! I've checked to confirm that the
batpgp60.dll is in the same directory as TB!
ACM You may then go to the Tools | Privacy | Choose PGP Version menu item.
Yep, no problem there.
ACM Select the appropriate version and you should then have things working
ACM fine
that
batpgp65.dll is in the TB! installation directory. You can forget the
others as I've done.
ACM You may then go to the Tools | Privacy | Choose PGP Version menu item.
CTc Yep, no problem there.
ACM Select the appropriate version and you should then have things working
ACM fine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Charlie,
On 04 October 2000 at 23:18:51 GMT +0100 (which was 23:18 where I
live) Charlie Turner (ceejay) wrote and made these points on the subject
of "privacy encryption":
ACM Unzip the DLL's into your TB! installation directory. Clo
to the Tools | Privacy | Choose PGP Version menu item.
Yep, no problem there.
ACM Select the appropriate version and you should then have things working
ACM fine. This will be evidenced by new Privacy menu items appearing, ie,
ACM PGP Preferences and PGY Key Manager.
The menu items
Hello A
On 04 October 2000, at 23:52, you wrote:
ACM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
ACM On Wed, 4 Oct 2000 23:18:51 +0100, Charlie Turner (ceejay) wrote:
CTc Ok done that, and still nothing! I've checked to confirm that the
CTc batpgp60.dll is in the same directory as TB!
ACM
checked to confirm that the
batpgp60.dll is in the same directory as TB!
ACM You may then go to the Tools | Privacy | Choose PGP Version menu item.
Yep, no problem there.
ACM Select the appropriate version and you should then have things working
ACM fine. This will be evidenced by new
ography and PGP in
particular, see the comp.security.pgp FAQ or sci.crypt for
the really heavy technical details. As complicated as this
may all sound, it is now quite easy to do.
It is not perfect privacy, as there is no such thing, but it
is Pretty Good Privacy.
ptsc
=== end forwarded messa
Hello Charlie Turner (ceejay),
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000 19:12:40 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, October 05, 2000, 1:12:40 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Charlie Turner (ceejay) wrote:
Hello Graham
On 04 October 2000, at 09:48, you wrote:
G Go to Tools/Privacy/Choose PGP Version
Hello BatListers,
Could someone explain the advantages/disadvantages of using a
service like privacy.com VS PGP? And does the current version
of TheBat! work with Version 6.5.8, the current version of
PGP?
Regards,
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
Reply to: [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jan,
On 03 October 2000 at 16:57:24 GMT -0400 (which was 21:57 where I
live) Jan Rifkinson wrote and made these points on the subject
of "privacy encryption":
JR Could someone explain the advantages/disadvantages of using a
JR se
he bug report under advisement and fix it, but they wouldn't let the
"unlicensed" reporter know about it).
As u know, of course, the license number includes in the body of bug
reports message automatically.
And about surprised... Yes, i'm registered user, but i consider some
information
Hello Alexander and Batmans,
As u know, of course, the license number includes in the body of bug
reports message automatically.
And about surprised... Yes, i'm registered user, but i consider some
information in x- as my privacy. It's well known discussion about
'Does RIT break people's
Hello all,
on Fri, 24 Dec 1999, at 23:43:42 local time (GMT -0700), Keith wrote:
I, too, would like a translation or a brief readme.
Alex Sanyukovitch, the author, put an an english readme on :
http://members.tripod.co.uk/xraysoft
--
Rob ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
using The Bat! 1.38e
... Go
[re: Maillita]
I had a quick look and while I am buzy fixing up 3 computers I did
notice that the guy who wrote it must be Dutch.
yep, i noticed that too. some filenames in the package are Dutch.
also the Maillita homepage was with a Dutch provider (dds.nl).
I wouldnt mind having a go
Hello Rob,
On Wed, 29 Dec 1999 14:54:17 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, December 29, 1999, 8:54:17 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Rob wrote:
Rob [re: Maillita]
I had a quick look and while I am buzy fixing up 3 computers I did
notice that the guy who wrote it must be Dutch.
Rob
Hello, The Bat Users!
Another program is X-Ray (http://xraysoft.cjb.net/)
do you know if there's a translation of whatever the readme.txt of that
package is written in ?? (i guess it's Russian ...)
KR Well, it certainly isn't English. I'm not about to run the executable
KR without having
Another program is X-Ray (http://xraysoft.cjb.net/)
do you know if there's a translation of whatever the readme.txt of that
package is written in ?? (i guess it's Russian ...)
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at
Hello Andrew K. Lovetski,
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 22:57:15 +0300 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, December 23, 1999, 2:57:15 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Andrew K. Lovetski wrote:
Andrew Hello, The Bat Users!
AM So, after all this. Is there a way to suppress the serial number?
write the
Hello Listmembers,
On Wed, 23 Dec 1998 at 00:12:40 [GMT +0500] Denis V. Petelin wrote:
^^^
You don't accept Y2K _this_ end of December?
Regards
Dieter
...Don't stop at one bug.
|Running TheBat! 1.38e [reg] on |
|Windows NT v4 Build 1381 Service Pack 6|
--
Dieter
On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 23:54:55 +0100, Dieter Hummel wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 1998 at 00:12:40 [GMT +0500] Denis V. Petelin wrote:
^^^
You don't accept Y2K _this_ end of December?
Sorting messages by received time, to the rescue. :
--
Ali Martin |
can i suppress the s/n in the field x-mailer?
'cause i don't want the possibility to identify all my mails!
chris
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double
Hallo C.,
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 21:38:02 +0700 GMT (22.12.1999, 22:38 +0800 GMT),
C. Raskob wrote:
CR can i suppress the s/n in the field x-mailer?
CR 'cause i don't want the possibility to identify all my mails!
probably because your S/N is a duplicate. Nice organisation you have
filled in, as
Hi there!
On 22 Dec 99, at 22:41, Thomas Fernandez wrote
about "Re: privacy":
CR can i suppress the s/n in the field x-mailer?
CR 'cause i don't want the possibility to identify all my mails!
probably because your S/N is a duplicate. Nice organisation you have
filled i
Hi Thomas Fernandez,
On Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 1999 at 15:41:35 you wrote:
CR can i suppress the s/n in the field x-mailer?
CR 'cause i don't want the possibility to identify all my mails!
TF probably because your S/N is a duplicate. Nice organisation you have
TF filled in, as well.
Well,
Hallo Oliver,
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 16:42:56 +0100 GMT (22.12.1999, 23:42 +0800 GMT),
Oliver Sturm wrote:
OS Well, my s/n is no duplicate, but I didn't ever like it to appear in
OS the header, either. That's one step on our way to the transparent
OS internet user, IMHO.
The serial number
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 8:12:54 AM, Thomas wrote:
The serial number of your email client is? What about your email
address? Should that be suppressed too? ;-)
Ah, but we can have multiple accounts on TB!. Just because my personal
account is [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I don't mind people
Hello TBUDL!
Reas about the MSID and the HWID at the following web page:
http://www.macintouch.com/msprivresponse.html
This is about Mac, and I use an IBM compatible. But I have no reason
to think that I'm not effected. Worrisome
--
Ciao,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL
f
yourself? -- ?
Another thing is the serial number of the Pentium-III. This can be
checked while you're web browsing (I was told), and that *is* an
invasion of privacy. Actually a reason for me not to stick with Intel.
SL Exactly. This is about on par with that since anywhere your mail
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:02:39 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[]
I don't have a scenario in my way of life that would require me to hide my
identity when sending a mail to someone. To the contrary.
That is *you*. *You* are not the totality of humanity. How about a
political person in
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 9:15:27 AM, Thomas wrote:
I did visit www.m-w.com for "echelon", but still don't get your
meaning. You want to go left and right of the other guys? Or of
yourself? -- ?
From another message I sent out on another list, pardon the tone, it was
in a heated and
Hi Steve Lamb,
On Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 1999 at 18:02:39 you wrote:
Another thing is the serial number of the Pentium-III. This can be
checked while you're web browsing (I was told), and that *is* an
invasion of privacy. Actually a reason for me not to stick with
Intel.
That's
Hi Ali Martin,
On Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 1999 at 18:37:08 you wrote:
AM On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:02:39 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
AM []
I don't have a scenario in my way of life that would require me to hide my
identity when sending a mail to someone. To the contrary.
That is *you*.
Hello List Members,
on Wednesday, December 22, 1999 at 18:37, Ali Martin wrote:
So, after all this. Is there a way to suppress the serial number?
Yep! I use the outgoing filter section... it's not such a big problem
:-)
Regards
Dieter Hummel
Running TheBat! 1.38e [reg] on
Windows NT
Hello List Members,
on Wednesday, December 22, 1999 at 20:01, Oliver Sturm wrote:
I asked that some time ago and was told there wasn't.
Wasn't? Really?
Regards
Dieter Hummel
Running TheBat! 1.38e [reg] on
Windows NT v4 Build 1381 Service Pack 6
on a PPro200, 256MB EDO-RAM, UW-SCSI Disk
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Dieter,
DH Hello List Members,
DH on Wednesday, December 22, 1999 at 20:01, Oliver Sturm wrote:
I asked that some time ago and was told
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 18:37:07 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
CR can i suppress the s/n in the field x-mailer?
CR 'cause i don't want the possibility to identify all my mails!
probably because your S/N is a duplicate. Nice organisation you have
filled in, as well.
Actually, if he
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 1:22:46 PM, Ali wrote:
Would you be so kind as to expand on your knowledge on this?
He uses an outgoing filter to call an external script which modifies the
headers.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
Hello Listmembers,
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 at 16:22:46 [GMT -0500] Ali Martin wrote:
Wasn't? Really?
Yeah who speaks in riddles.
Would you be so kind as to expand on your knowledge on this?
It's quite easy and you may say 'this could have been my idea' :-). But
I only can tell about my
Hi there!
On 22 Dec 99, at 14:39, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: privacy":
SL He uses an outgoing filter to call an external script which modifies the
SL headers.
Now that's what I call a mailer feature :-)
*shrug* PMMail2000 PMMail/2 have been doing it for years
AM The official release of TB version 1.38 is available at:
AM ftp://ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/the_bat.exe
SOmething cute I just discovered: double click on that link and it fires
up my FTP client and goes to get the file. I knew this worked with http
urls. It's very clever to do it with
hi,
i never like HTML in e-mail to start with, but now i'll just disable it ...
just read that the spammers found a new trick ; when you view a message in
HTML they retrieve an 'invisible' picture from a site and put your e-mail
address in a cookie ...
http://www.eff.org/pub/Privacy
://www.eff.org/pub/Privacy/Profiling/19991202_joint_profiling_pressrel.htm
http://www.tiac.net/users/smiths/privacy/cookleak.htm
any idea if TheBat! is also 'leaky' when displaying HTML messages ??
AFAIK, that's only possible if you are viewing HTML mail with a client
that can access the internet
Hello all,
on Tuesday, December 07, 1999 at 10:28:01 AM, Ali wrote :
TB! will only view HTML and nothing more. The reason why TB! will not
view imbedded images in HTML pages sent,
but it does !! someone sent me an e-mail with a background and pictures and
TheBat shows it all ... as long as
Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
TB! will only view HTML and nothing more. The reason why TB! will not
view imbedded images in HTML pages sent,
but it does !! someone sent me an e-mail with a background and pictures and
TheBat shows it all ... as long as the stuff is attached to the
Hi there!
On 7 Dec 99, at 23:53, Rob wrote
about "Re: OT : HTML privacy risk ??":
TB! will only view HTML and nothing more. The reason why TB! will not
view imbedded images in HTML pages sent,
but it does !! someone sent me an e-mail with a background and pictures and
Th
94 matches
Mail list logo
