Saturday, October 16, 2004, 3:08:35 PM, Mary wrote:
MB I know you are on a large continent, also.
AJ Umm. Nope. One timezone.
MB Well, but with the entire Pacific on either side. ;)
Actually wrong again! (Sorry!) Pacific to the North, East and South,
but the Tasman Sea to the West.
AJ
Saturday, October 16, 2004, 2:49:38 PM, Bob wrote:
BM I finally took the plunge and downloaded version 3.0.1.33 the other
BM day and paid my registration via CIFNET. My registration e-mail
BM arrived this morning and I viewed in from the Ticker. Immediately
BM after I got a pop-up window
Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 5:09:35 PM, Greg wrote:
GS Anyway to hard code a percent sign (i.e. %) so it actually shows up in a
GS message derived from a quick template?
Don't know for fact, but often something like %% should work. I.e.
double-up the 'escape' character (% in this case).
--
Saturday, February 19, 2005, 8:53:01 AM, Marten wrote:
Not the first time I did not receive an announcement email from
RitLabs.
MG I must have got yours then - I got it twice!
Same here, but that has been normal for recent emails from RIT.
Best vapourware I've seen in ages.
--
Cheers,
Monday, February 21, 2005, 6:35:25 AM, Alexander wrote:
ASK Flash memory is said to hold for about 100,000 write operations before it
ASK will start to fail. Depending on the number of mails you get store on the
ASK stick, the flash memory will wear out pretty soon...
That's why God (or at
Tuesday, February 22, 2005, 1:48:05 AM, Mica wrote:
That's why God (or at least the fellows at Apple) invented the iPod.
:-)
MM What's that, actually?
Essentially, a hard-disk based portable audio player. It's something of
a phenomenon lately...
http://www.apple.com/ipod/
--
Cheers,
Hello TBUDLers,
For the first time in ages, I added a new email account to TB! (I am
changing ISPs). Blow me down if that old group bug isn't still there in
version 3.0.1.33. I add the account to the group and all works fine -
until I log off. Then it disappears.
Between this and vapourware
Tuesday, March 8, 2005, 8:48:56 AM, Robin wrote:
RA I'm not sure what you mean by add the account to the group. If I did I
RA would try to reproduce your problem.
Also to MFPA.
I mean, sign on to TB! as an administrator and select Options and then
Network and Administration. On the groups tab
Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 2:08:09 AM, Gerard wrote:
G Wel this sounds like the data isn't written to file.
G But one question, how did you get you other email accounts in there?
I wish I knew! Truth be told, I think it only became an issue once I
got past about 6 accounts. From memory, one
Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 1:36:36 PM, MFPA wrote:
M After re-installing TB!, as long as I do not re-create the account
M I put into a group I am not locked out of the other accounts. As
M soon as I do, I have to enter a username to get into TB! and can
M only access that one account. This happens
Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 11:20:22 PM, MAU wrote:
M Why don't you try something? First, backup all your TB data (mail
M directory. Then move your groups.cfg file top a different directory
M and start TB to see what happens.
Inspired! Well, if I had put my own thinking cap on I *might* have come
Thursday, March 10, 2005, 9:14:39 PM, MAU wrote:
M Hello Allister,
Yes, it worked.
M Glad to hear that :-)
So you'll be unglad to hear that today it has reverted to losing that
last account again!!! I cannot fathom how it picked which account to
ignore unless it is something to do with the
Friday, April 1, 2005, 10:05:22 PM, Jeff wrote:
JG Has anybody any recommendations for an effective A/V product that will
JG work unobtrusively in the background and check my incoming email?
I recommend AVG. The best part is it is free! I've used it for years
now with zero issues and it
Saturday, April 2, 2005, 3:19:27 AM, Leif wrote:
LG From today forward, to remain a subscriber to our realm of goodness on
LG the TB lists, it'll cost you $5,000 per month.
Note the quoted time and date! Due to the fact that I live on the
leading edge of the world, I am now subject to a
Sunday, April 3, 2005, 10:57:11 AM, Alexander wrote:
ASK This perhaps leads to a meta discussion about the different types and
ASK motivations of free software, and it was not my intention to lead the
ASK discussion into that direction.
Sheesh! All I did was recommend AVG on the basis that it
Monday, April 4, 2005, 2:12:15 PM, Paul wrote:
PB Have you asked the List about grouping? The list has helped me over
PB the years.
Oh, yes! I had a gripe quite recently and many tried to help, but to no
avail.
--
Cheers,
Allister
:flag-newzealand:
New Zealand / Aotearoa
Monday, May 2, 2005, 7:12:20 AM, Marek wrote:
MM new version 3.5 with major changes in GUI will be released in May, we
MM have first Release Candidate actually.
Thank goodness for that. Thunderbird is installed and in partial use
already. I updated bug 2094 (yes, it is that old) in the hopes
Wednesday, May 4, 2005, 6:41:56 AM, MAU wrote:
M You are using a beta version, you should post this in the TBBeta list.
See my response to MikeD - I strongly suspect this could well be a
production problem!
Mine is 3.01.13.
--
Cheers,
Allister
:flag-newzealand:
New Zealand / Aotearoa
Thursday, May 5, 2005, 9:54:59 PM, Thomas wrote:
AJ Thank goodness for that. Thunderbird is installed and in partial use
AJ already. I updated bug 2094 (yes, it is that old) in the hopes it will
AJ receive some attention. I'm not holding my breath. Status after 17
AJ months is reviewed.
TF
Wednesday, May 4, 2005, 3:55:16 AM, MikeD wrote:
M3 One of the spam messages ended up in my known folder and I checked
M3 my address book three times to be sure and neither the From nor the
M3 To address appear in my address book.
I've not seen that problem, but I do have a very similar one (and
Friday, May 6, 2005, 6:58:42 PM, Allister wrote:
AJ Wednesday, May 4, 2005, 6:41:56 AM, MAU wrote:
M You are using a beta version, you should post this in the TBBeta list.
AJ See my response to MikeD - I strongly suspect this could well be a
AJ production problem!
AJ Mine is 3.01.13.
Oh, good
Hello TBUDLers,
I have PopFile marking my spam with a header which I then catch with a
TB! filter and send the way of the trash.
On the odd occasion where PopFile gives a false positive I simply drag
the email back to the inbox.
However, recently I wrote a new filter and while re-filtering the
Thursday, May 12, 2005, 7:37:28 PM, Robin wrote:
RA On Thu 12 May 2005, 17:00:22 +1000, Allister Jenks wrote:
How can I modify a received email's headers?
RA I use a manual filter that writes the email to a file in unix mailbox
RA format, opens my text editor and then when the editor closes
Friday, May 13, 2005, 9:18:44 PM, Marck wrote:
MDP Add a simple outbound mail filter to move sent mail straight to the
MDP Inbox. But here, I have to step into soapbox mode. It's not wise to
MDP use the inbox as a main storage folder - it is high traffic. I keep
MDP mine empty. Once you have a
Friday, May 13, 2005, 10:51:10 PM, Marck wrote:
AJ Surely, unless one has a large number of folders to filter out to,
AJ then any of those target folders is also going to be relatively
AJ high traffic?
MDP No folder is as high traffic as the inbox. None. every incoming
MDP message pauses in the
Hello TBUDLers,
Reported as #4639 ( https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4639 ).
If I log on as anything other than an administrator account I cannot create new
emails. This includes reply and forwarding.
This is pretty serious! (Marck, Windows won't let TB! function properly. ;-)
)
I
Saturday, May 14, 2005, 8:01:28 PM, Alexander wrote:
ASK Hello Allister Jenks everyone else,
ASK on 14-Mai-2005 at 09:08 you (Allister Jenks) wrote:
If I log on as anything other than an administrator account I cannot
create new emails. This includes reply and forwarding.
ASK I cannot
Thursday, May 19, 2005, 12:23:12 PM, Andrew wrote:
AC I'm afraid I've been guilty of changing the subject of a thread by
AC bringing this up in my original post, for which I apologise; I'm
AC rather a beginner in these things. Am I allowed to revert to the
AC original question raised by Allister?
Friday, May 20, 2005, 12:41:30 AM, Stuart wrote:
SC Sometimes persistence pays off. ;) Did you report the bugs on
SC BugTrack? What is the other bug you have?
Yes, that was me (aka ZKARJ). The other bug is #2094:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2094
It's over a year old. The bug
Saturday, May 21, 2005, 1:16:08 AM, Stuart wrote:
AJ Yes, that was me (aka ZKARJ). The other bug is #:
SC ^
SCMaybe they thought with this name you were from another
SCplanet. :)
AJ https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2094
AJ
Friday, June 3, 2005, 8:12:22 PM, Robin wrote:
RA Now that v3.5.25 has been released, can anyone volunteer an opinion
RA about whether it is worth upgrading from v3.0.1.33? Are there any
RA significant bugs, issues or other annoyances still left in it?
Well, it has fixed my Access Violation
Tuesday, June 7, 2005, 5:48:49 AM, Christian wrote:
CF I do not manage to run The Bat! as User A (Shortcut on Windows
CF Desctop exists). Every attempt ends up with this report:
CF Error during setup of working directory
CF C:\Documents...\Application data\All users\The Bat!
Have you copied
Hello TBUDLers,
I've had a few bitches and moans on here about my Number One Bug
(apologies to Stephen King, but some days I just imagine Kathy Bates in
my PC causing this mayhem with a sledgehammer).
It's the one where my TB! groups keep losing accounts (and I keep losing
hairs). Well, tonight
Tuesday, June 21, 2005, 10:13:20 PM, Allie wrote:
When logging on as a TB! group, accounts which are in the group but
not in registry under HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!\Users
Depot are removed from the group. This is a permanent removal.
AM By 'permanent removal', do you mean that
Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 8:47:31 PM, Jeff wrote:
Personally, I've never understood the fascination Windows software has
with the Registry. What on earth is wrong with properties files? If
you give the user a choice where to store them, then proper backups are
a breeze and multi-user setups
Thursday, June 23, 2005, 5:32:21 AM, Allie wrote:
AM The large apps will likely need a centralized system of configuration.
Why? Take a look at J2EE. It has bucket loads of configuration and it
is all done in properties files. Sure they are scattered a bit, but
'centralised' does not mean you
Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 10:38:11 PM, Allie wrote:
Given that TB! is clearly a multi-user application, wouldn't it be a
good idea for them to support Windows' capability?
AM Well, it does. I get the feeling that you want what happens to TB!'s
AM configuration when logged into XP as user 1,
Thursday, June 23, 2005, 3:33:58 AM, Alexander wrote:
Personally, I've never understood the fascination Windows software has
with the Registry. What on earth is wrong with properties files? If
you give the user a choice where to store them, then proper backups are
a breeze and multi-user
Thursday, June 23, 2005, 8:03:21 PM, Roelof wrote:
RO Apparently, you're the only one using your computer. What when you're
RO using it with multiple people ech with their own preferences?
No, I'm not. But I take your point.
AJ After all, if I set up a new email
AJ account, or create colour
Friday, June 24, 2005, 4:27:57 PM, Jonathan wrote:
JA Am I right in assuming you have your mail directory stored under
JA TheBat! application directory (for example c:\Program Files\TheBat!\)?
Nope. On a separate drive where I keep most of my data.
JA If that is the case, then the reason you
Friday, June 24, 2005, 6:38:09 PM, I wrote:
AJ Perhaps TB! is not to blame but that old standby 'documentation'. Given
AJ there are no instructions on how to access from multiple Windows
AJ accounts, and the default advice on TBUDL is 'copy the registry
AJ entries', then the default
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 4:32:42 AM, Alexander wrote:
what does TB! do if you *do* install it under separate Windows users?
ASK Ehhh? How do you install a program twice?
I take it you know the literal answer to your question but are wondering
why one would do it.
Further back in this thread
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 9:50:28 PM, Alexander wrote:
ASK Given your criteria, no program is multiuser aware, because they all use
ASK their own set of settings for each user that logs on (IE, OE, Outlook,
ASK Opera, Firefox are all perfectly multi-user aware, and they are not when
ASK you look
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 7:50:18 PM, Roelof wrote:
RO You don't have to install TB again.
RO TB's registry entries are created by executing the program, so it
RO suffices to run TB after you've deleted its entries from the registry.
Ah! Another snippet. See, when I was first trying to solve
Hello TBUDLers,
I've been trying to transfer some of my mail to GMail using GML (GMail
Loader). Having selected THREE messages in a TB! folder and selected
Save as... and specified a Unix MBX format, I then point the GML at
this file and here's what I get.
--8--
1 Forwarded a
Thursday, August 11, 2005, 10:44:47 PM, Robin wrote:
RA For emails without attachments, the Unix mailbox format should look
RA pretty much like what you see with View Source, except that there
RA should be an additional line at the very beginning that starts with
RA From with NO colon following
Another list member has helped me solve this problem. It appears that
TB! saves the file in Unix format, which I believe refers to the
linefeeds used. By using TextPad and resaving in PC format (thus
altering the linefeeds) the file exports perfectly with the GMail
Loader.
Thanks Jacob, for
101 - 147 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
