On 10/10/2011 01:30 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>> I find that I now ignore this report since it doesn't indicate the
>> package name. Too many entries to chase down via clicking thru. Not
>> sure of the reason for the change, the old format seems, to me at least,
>> better.
>>
>
> I am, of cours
On 10/10/2011 12:59 PM, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> If we're really talking EFI here it should really be grub2-efi-mkconfi
> -o /boot/grub2-efi/grub.cfg and grub2-efi-install (without arguments).
>
> But grub2-efi is not installed by default.
>
> Jurgen
>
>
>
Hmmm .. is it still buggy? If not i
On 10/10/2011 01:02 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> What's eventually going to happen is that grub2 will replace grub and
> you'll have to write a new config manually. You can beat the rush and do
> it now - install grub2, remove grub (you can use yum shell mode to do
> this without any complaints
On 10/09/2011 11:39 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> Or as intended, because the older reports became less readable due to
> updates containing N>1 packages. Also see
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2011-October/103410.html
> which sums it up.
Says someone else doesn't like the
The email now says things like:
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13785
instead of
rpm-4.9.1.2-1.fc15 critical path security update
I'm assuming this is a bug with the script ..
gene
--
test mailing l
On 10/07/2011 03:38 AM, JB wrote:
> Eric Blake redhat.com> writes:
>> No. cp is not atomic. rename(2) (via mv(1), if both files are on the
>> same device) is. Any solution that does not use rename(2) is flawed,
>> because an ill-timed power-outage will leave the file in an inconsistent
>> s
On 09/14/2011 09:02 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 09/14/2011 01:01 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
>> Dne 14.9.2011 09:57, Joachim Backes napsal(a):
>>> Having sound problems after the todays updates: Playing some sound stops
>>> after 1-2 secs, and the sound control symbol in the gnome-shell title
>>> bar
> On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 23:14 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>
>> I need guidance. I've installed the F14 libcap from updates-testing.
>> I have no idea if it works or how to test it--it doesn't appear to
>> "break" anything as far as normal operation of my system. Is that
>> good enough to give
On 09/05/2011 12:06 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Welp, I reported before when had KDE installed that my system was slow
> to respond when opening programs, maneuvering through emails, browsing,
> etc...
>
...
Please run top and see what if any processes are hogging CPU or memory ...
--
test mail
On 08/26/2011 02:42 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> In the long term, yeah, btrfs will have support for everything that
> makes LVM (and soft RAID, in fact) interesting. Probably be F18 before
> we really stop using LVM and RAID separately from the filesystem by
> default, though (that's just a WAG).
On 08/23/2011 06:49 PM, Andy Lawrence wrote:
>
\
>
> According to this:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Grub2
>
> grub2 is used by default with F16, so I'm gonna guess that's what I'm using!
>
> I tried this: grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg, which does give
> parameters in /boot/grub
On 07/15/2011 10:59 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 07/15/2011 08:50 PM, Rob Healey wrote:
>> Greetings:
>>
>> I would like to explain what I am trying to do, and then see if there is a
>> solution to my issue?
>>
>> I have a wireless print server in my lan, and it has a specific ip address,
>> som
On 06/23/2011 04:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 15:50 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
>> On 06/23/2011 03:05 PM, Fedora QA wrote:
>>> #202: Create test case for firstboot
On 06/23/2011 03:05 PM, Fedora QA wrote:
> #202: Create test case for firstboot (graphic and text)
> ---+
> Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill
> Type: task | Status: new
> Priority: majo
On 06/19/2011 03:47 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 1:26 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
>> I have a fully updated f15 x86_64 system in which I have mock installed.
>>
>> I set up a mock chroot for building f15 x86_64 which appeared to work
>> normally, and then inside the chroot I insta
On 06/08/2011 02:35 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 06/08/2011 05:36 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>> The bug is still outstanding after more than 8 months .. it was briefly
>> closed in March 2011 when one reporter could not reproduce it using a
>> rawhide ver
On 06/08/2011 01:15 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 06/08/2011 05:54 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
>> The headline says it all. They have to be started in rc.local
>
> This is pure nonsence and please provide proper description of your
> problem which is needed to properly diag
On 06/08/2011 11:31 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
.
>
> The solution posited in the thread I referenced is not via automount
> (one of the posters misreferenced a man page so you need to read the
> whole thread). It's simply an option in /etc/fstab. I've tried it and it
> works as advertised.
On 06/08/2011 08:31 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 07:53 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
>> On 06/08/2011 01:58 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>> On 06/08/2011 12:54 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
>>>> The headline says it all.
On 06/08/2011 01:58 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 06/08/2011 12:54 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
>> The headline says it all. They have to be started in rc.local
>
> Your headline is very cryptic and is for a stable version of Fedora,
> which is best served on the users[1] list.
On 06/02/2011 09:54 AM, Vitezslav Humpa wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
(1) I think showing the executable name for every application is vital.
Whether its directly in menu, popup or alternating pink flashing
lights .. :-)
The gnome and kde search tools alreadys search for executable names,
so only
On 06/01/2011 01:51 AM, Pasha R wrote:
> Thanks.
> I didn't realize it is still present in fedora. I always liked
> xscreensaver responsiveness. With gnome-screensaver, it sometimes
> takes few seconds until it swaps in its login dialog, even on quite
> modern machine, while xscreensaver always pr
On 05/31/2011 02:53 PM, Pasha R wrote:
>
> Generally, screensavers were part of computing experience for a long
> time (15 years at least). People developed tons of different
> screensavers -- ranging from some chaotic graphics to cartoon
>
Lots of business computers use screenvertizing to sho
On 05/31/2011 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
...
usefule information not duplicated .
>
>> I assume the backend NetworkManager daemon is not lacking functionality ?
>
> Correct.
Thanks ... helpful reply ..
I was just wondering, vainly it seems, if there might be a temporary
work aroun
On 05/31/2011 11:27 AM, Pasha R wrote:
> This Fedora release is simply too useless for me - DSL connection is
> just one of many features I lost with this release (actually, it
> isn't, I never used NetworkManager before as it never supported
> configuration that I want to use).
Speaking of netw
On 05/29/2011 12:31 PM, Tom London wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Rob Healey wrote:
>
> An update to shadow-utils (rawhide) changed the minimum UID/GID from
> 500 to 1000, so if all your 'normal users' have UIDs less than 1000
> they will not be displayed by the gdm greeter.
Grea
On 05/28/2011 06:42 PM, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
>
> The new connection editor is not finished yet. You can still use the
> old one; it's in the applications list as "Network Connections."
>
> P.S. Please assume that we mean well.
Could we start making a habit of naming the executable as well
On 05/23/2011 12:35 PM, James Laska wrote:
>
> I just completed a F-15 DVD install (no online repos enabled) on
> baremetal. After installation and boot-up, the network is not enabled
> (as expected). When I click the NM icon in GNOME3, and turn 'on' wired
> networking, a network connection is
I got a bunch of these - this kernel is the F15 2.6.38.6-27 kernel
compiled from src rpm on F14
(sorry for wrap).
Anywone else seeing any issues with iwlagn ? I thought a bunch of fixes
for iwlagn went into 2.6.38.6 ?
g/
- /var/log/messages snippet ---
May 20 14:10:14 lap1 ke
On 05/15/2011 04:11 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> 1. Setting network params in the install was ignored by the installed Linux.
>
> 2. It takes a bit of hacking to get the Nvidia driver into a Fedora 15 that
> was installed with Noveau.
>
> Given that the anointed Gnome 3 needs a compe
On 05/14/2011 01:57 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Please don't assume malice where none is intended.
you deleted the smiley .. it was intended in good humor -
one thing I most certainly did not assume (nor say) was malice on
anyone's part ... sorry if you took it literally ... with all the
On 05/13/2011 11:47 PM, Angel wrote:
> Go to Activities and then search by the keyword ¨network¨. Now from the
> search result click Network Connections. This is the old nm-applet of
> Gnome 2.
>
> If you click the network icon of the panel then Network Settings, that´s
> the different thing (dum
On 05/13/2011 01:55 PM, a...@clueserver.org wrote:
> I have to admit, this is the most painful Fedora installation I have ever
> done. (And I have used them all.)
>
...
>
> The reason I went to this version when I did was due to a sort of double
> bind. Fedora 13 uses 2.6.34. USB3 does not wo
On 05/13/2011 12:09 PM, Per Bothner wrote:
...
>
> and then it hangs.
>
> Same problem using both the full DVD (burned to a DVD) and
> a Live CD (nightly from a few days ago, on a USB stick).
..
>
> This is on a semi-new Sandy Bridge laptop. I succe
There is some discussion on the linux-ke
On 05/11/2011 06:48 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> Dear fellow testers,
>
> I see that recently kernel 2.6.38.6 has been released and a rc7 has been
> released for 2.6.39. It is getting close to being released, if it comes out,
> will it go into Fedora 15 or will Fedora 15 continue with 2.6.38.X
On 05/03/2011 04:11 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> With all the Gnome 3 usability issues et al, perhaps it would be a
> good idea to release a re-spin of Fedora 14.
>
Unlikely there will be official respin - never has been one yet - even
tho its very easy to do.
Its easy to make y
On 04/30/2011 10:06 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/01/2011 06:23 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> Meanwhile, the gnome-font-properties or gnome-appearance
>> apps seem to have vanished from the face of f15, so I can't
>> play with any of the font setting I used to be able to
>> play with to influence t
On 04/27/2011 11:11 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
...
>> You forgot the other old guideline for all mailing lists
>>
>> 3. Keep ones signature to a minimum.
>>
4) do it in private email instead of blasting the entire group ...
:-)
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 04/27/2011 05:05 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> it is unlikely to
> influence desktop environment choices for the majority of users
speak for yourself please ... unless you have real data ..
> and if
> some other desktop environment is more suitable for such users, why not
> use that?
Thi
On 04/27/2011 08:16 AM, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>
> Perhaps a minor point, but important.
>
> Fedora has not made Gnome 3 its default (this implies that Fedora has
> somehow actively evaluated Gnome 3 and decided that it is the best,
> which hasn't happened).
>
> What has been true since Fedora
On 04/26/2011 01:27 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> Tom is wrong. It is a ongoing series of blogs and nothing so far
> written in any part of the series is outdated now
well good .. coz they are rather nice docs :-)
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://adm
On 04/26/2011 12:14 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:04:35 -0400
>
> The great section on systemd for administrators appears to be
> a historial set of blog entries that reflect the truth at the
> time the blog was written, not the truth as it stands today
> with the evolved relea
On 04/26/2011 11:59 AM, Fulko Hew wrote:
>
>
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd
>
>
> I'll admit that I haven't tried F15 yet, but I will have to soon, (so
...
> But I would be starting my search for help information with 'man
> systemd' and failing that...
> 'apropos sys
On 04/26/2011 11:23 AM, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>> Why did Fedora decide to abandon Gnome 2, instead of offering Gnome 3 as
>> >an experimental college-level project via a spin (as one poster here already
>> >asked),
...
> As much as I dislike Gnome 3 and am considering my alternatives, it is
> v
On 04/25/2011 05:23 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Ian Pilcher (arequip...@gmail.com) said:
>> On 04/25/2011 11:19 AM, drago01 wrote:
...
>
> http://git.gnome.org/
> http://spins.fedoraproject.org/
>
Perhaps there are different issues being discussed here - if so we
should be more clea
On 04/25/2011 12:35 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 04/25/2011 12:19 PM, drago01 wrote:
>
>> "If I'd asked people what they wanted, they would have said a faster
>> horse.” – Henry Ford
Far more likely ... if they had been asked they would have asked for
flying
On 04/25/2011 12:19 PM, drago01 wrote:
> "If I'd asked people what they wanted, they would have said a faster
> horse.” – Henry Ford
>
> Horses even had a *much* longer tradition then the windows 95 style desktop ;)
o We didn't move from horse to car - we moved from horse to donkey :-)
o Or
On 04/22/2011 10:45 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 11:57 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
...
>
> Aunt Tilly (or Uncle Tilson) wouldn't be setting up any apps which
> didn't provide their own menu entries. You can't expect Tilly / Tilson
> to be w
On 04/22/2011 11:57 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 04/22/2011 11:37 AM, Angel wrote:
>
>>
>> A .desktop file needs to be placed in /usr/share/Applications or
>> ~/.local/share/applications/.
>>
>
Someone made a comparison to Mac OS being new and different
On 04/22/2011 11:37 AM, Angel wrote:
>
> A .desktop file needs to be placed in /usr/share/Applications or
> ~/.local/share/applications/.
>
Great - Aunt Tillie can learn to use Emacs and XML at the same time ..
yay ... certainly new and different as one poster put it ... better ..
time till
On 04/20/2011 03:43 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> seth vidal wrote:
>> wasteful to what?
>
> When I create updates in the future should I make them hundreds of lines
> long like I'm in detention at school, too? I don't like resulting to
> sarcasm, but I don't see how you see this as not waste
On 04/20/2011 01:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> First I get this console message:
>> mkdir: cannot create directory `/run': File exists
>
> This is known, and harmless (currently systemd tries to create /run when
> it starts in case it doesn't exist in the filesystem, but F15's
> filesystem
On 04/05/2011 11:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 08:11 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
>
>> It would be appropriate to discuss here which DE fedora should using
...
>
> Not 'here' as in test list, really, no: it would probably make more
>
On 04/05/2011 12:57 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 10:49 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
>
>> Indeed ... there is something simplistically elegant about:
>>
>> 3
>> vs
>> multi-user.target
>
> Or, you could look upon
On 04/05/2011 04:33 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 08:15 AM, JB wrote:
>
> No you are actually wrong here Gnome design and any other *DE or spin
> design flaws or praises should be mentioned on their relevant list
> within the project or upstream where all the relevant develop
On 04/02/2011 04:44 AM, Adam Pribyl wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
...
>
>> systemd's native concept is 'targets'; graphical.target is roughly
>> equivalent to runlevel 5 and multi-user.target is roughly equivalent to
>> runlevel 3. rescue.target is roughly equal to runleve
On 03/29/2011 02:47 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 03/29/2011 12:23 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>>
>>
>> Also worth pointing out that this is an entirely 'focus on the negative'
>> faq.
>
In fairness to the wiki author(s) - there has been a lot more negative
feedback than positive - certainly o
On 03/25/2011 06:52 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 16:52 -0500, John Watzke wrote:
>>
>> Like maybe it's trying to mount my nfs mount before the
>> network and/or services to do it have started yet? (just to
>> try, I'll
>> make sure it's not sleepi
On 03/21/2011 03:08 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Montag, den 21.03.2011, 15:00 -0400 schrieb Genes MailLists:
>> On 03/21/2011 01:11 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> On 03/21/2011 10:21 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>>>> Is there a chance 4.8 could be packaged for f1
On 03/21/2011 02:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Erm. We already do exactly this, and the offending update is only in f15
> updates-testing, not in dist-f15. It has -4 karma and will never be
> promoted to 'stable' without a fix.
Understood - although I thought the point being bandied about her
On 03/21/2011 01:11 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 03/21/2011 10:21 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>> Following Alan's suggestion to consider xfce as an alternative to gnome
>> shell - I see the f14 version is 4.6.2 and the current (as of january
>> 2011) is 4.8
>>
&
Following Alan's suggestion to consider xfce as an alternative to gnome
shell - I see the f14 version is 4.6.2 and the current (as of january
2011) is 4.8
Is there a chance 4.8 could be packaged for f14 ?
thanks!
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fe
On 03/21/2011 04:18 AM, cornel panceac wrote:
>
> indeed, is a good workaround for now but, leaving aside that it requires
> prior knowledge, the general problem remains.
fair enough
> imho, selecting a few
> required services (like assigning priorities) and making the others
> optional may rel
On 03/20/2011 04:20 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>>
>> what happens if you replace After= with Wants= ?
>
> After is used to define order in which services should be started.
> Wants is used to define required dependencies.
>
>
>
so replace it with:
Prefers.foo
Prefers.foo.DontWaitMoreTh
On 03/20/2011 03:43 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>
> In a stable distribution such situation would not be possible because
> of the whole testing procedures etc.
>
> But of course there should be a way to avoid such situation. I hope
> that Lennart will find a good way to solve this problem soon
On 03/20/2011 02:41 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>
> Perhaps the problem is that most systemd services requires to start
> them when rsyslog is running
> After=syslog.target
>
> This should be fixed somehow - there should be a way to tell systemd
> that service B isn't critical to start service
On 03/20/2011 01:57 AM, cornel panceac wrote:
>
>
>
> indeed, yum downgrade rsyslog fixed it. can systemd be configured in
> such a way that not so important services are not preventing the system
> to work properly?
>
>
Agreed - logging failure probably should not prevent the system from
On 03/19/2011 11:10 PM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Vaclav Misek wrote:
>
>> it was the rsyslog package.
>
> Thanks a million!
>
> yum downgrade rsyslog
>
> cured it. I am back using F15 again.
>
I'm curious - how does a bad rsyslog package prevent the system from
booting ? Should it ??
On 02/21/2011 11:49 AM, Fedora QA wrote:
> #172: Printing test day
> ---+
> Reporter: twaugh| Owner: johannbg
> Type: task | Status: assigned
> Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 15
On 02/09/2011 01:00 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 02/09/2011 09:46 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
>>>
>>> OK - just thought maybe this would be of interest to more than just me
>>
>> Possibly. A RFE on bugzilla can be posted to the mailing list
On 10/31/2010 03:54 PM, stan wrote:
> What is strange is that when I turn on javascript, the Fedora 13 logo
> has scroll bars on it under some circumstances.
>
Looks completely fine to me (google-chrome, 64 bit) - at least I didnt
manage to trigger what I think you're saying.
--
test mailing
On 10/30/2010 12:05 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>
>> I just installed an F12 VM, updated it, then updated it from
>> updates-testing, rebooted, and +1'ed all the critpath updates (since it
>> works fine). We need at least one other person to do this to push all
>>
On 10/29/2010 11:52 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 15:45 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>>> Even though it is not as bad as it appears, it is still obvious that we
>>> lack the testing resources to properly enforce our current critical path
>>> policies for older stable releas
> On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 12:31 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
>> I've beaten my head against revisor for two days now, actually
>> patching python code
>> and examinig debug output. I'm retired from programming on disability
>> for a good
>> reason, my head hurts (bad) and I'm depressed and confus
On 10/03/2010 09:51 AM, Stefan Grosse wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:54:50 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>
> OP> R uses latex for documentation. Not sure if there is a sensible
> OP> split that would make it optional. It should be able to require
> OP> tex(latex) I believe for generic latex s
On 10/01/2010 10:54 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 10/01/2010 06:40 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>>
>> Is there any way to decouple the bulk of R from requiring texlive [1]?
>> It seems bizarre that a stats package has a deep coupling with a
>> typesetting language .
On 10/01/2010 07:04 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> dikshie wrote:
>
>> anyone aware about libpoppler issue in rawhide?
>
> Yes, a new poppler landed recently, and rebuilds are proceeding. One of
> those just done recently was texlive.
>
> -- Rex
>
>
Is there any way to decouple the bulk of R from
On 09/24/2010 02:51 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:02:57 -0400
> James Laska wrote:
>
>> Hard drive ISO installs are still available, but, a
>> I understand it, are not the most common installation method given the
>> setup involved.
>
> Hey, the way I look at the setup involved
On 09/16/2010 02:38 PM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
>
> nss-tools package does not provide any of those; just a bunch of
> utilities.
>
Mea culpa - I had simply done a yum list installed | egrep nss to see
what was installed and added the i686 versions ...
I erased nss-tools.i686 and for good
On 09/16/2010 12:57 PM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
I have sometimes to run 32 bit apps as there is as yet no 64 bit version.
So, for me, all I need is the right suite of 32 bit runtime libs to be
available.
What I have been doing so far is ldd'ing the apps and figuring out
what needs to be
On 09/16/2010 12:49 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> multilib_policy=all
>
> in yum.conf [main]
>
> it's in the man page.
>
> -sv
>
>
To be clear - lets say I do a clean 64 bit install. Then I edit the
yum.conf - add the above as you suggest.
yum update does not install any 32 bit libs (or apps
On 09/16/2010 12:49 PM, seth vidal wrote:
>> What do you recommend I do now to clean up - Heres what I have
>> installed (those whose names start with nss):
>
> multilib_policy=all
>
> in yum.conf [main]
>
> it's in the man page.
>
> -sv
>
>
Great thanks - I had man yum (instead of yum.c
On 09/16/2010 09:48 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> So, you should not have installed nss-tools.i686 manually.
Ah - but yum update did not work without installing it. I imagine when
I added the i686 libs - I did not do it right ...
I could find no clean way to make the box multiarch aside from ad
On 09/16/2010 09:09 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 09/16/2010 08:58 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
>>
>> Then let Yum handle it instead of asking explicitly for i686 or x86_64.
>
>Thats where I started last week .. and this was an attempt to see if
> I could
On 09/16/2010 08:58 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> Then let Yum handle it instead of asking explicitly for i686 or x86_64.
Thats where I started last week .. and this was an attempt to see if
I could get further.
. what is broken here ? rpm, yum or the
>> packages ?
>
> What's strange her
I have both 64 and 32 bit libs installed.
-
(Try 1)
-
yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nss nspr nss-tools
Error: Package: nss-tools-3.12.6-12.fc13.i686
(@/nss-tool
On 08/31/2010 04:00 PM, martin tack wrote:
> quote :*This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style
> sheets (CSS) enabled.
>
> and quote : **Please consider upgrading your browser software or
> enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.
>
I dont use firefox any m
As a side note - google chrome has native flash builtin ..
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
88 matches
Mail list logo
