Re: [PATCH] flood: install target

2002-09-12 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 12:48:15AM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote: Here's a snippet from 1.3 INSTALL file: Note: To reduce the pollution of shared installation locations (like /usr/local/ or /etc) with Apache files to a minimum the string ``/apache'' is

Re: [PATCH] flood: install target

2002-09-12 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:16:26PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: We shouldn't ever be installing apr or apr-util as part of flood. Ideally we will depend on an already-installed version of flood, be that in some standard location or not. Some work has been done lately to make apr and apr-util

Re: [PATCH] flood: install target

2002-09-12 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:30:24PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:16:26PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: We shouldn't ever be installing apr or apr-util as part of flood. Ideally we will depend on an already-installed version of flood, be that in some standard

Re: [PATCH] flood: install target

2002-09-12 Thread Jacek Prucia
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002 20:29:09 -0700 Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I'm fine with bundling it for now, but as soon as apr and apr-util can be installed on their own we stop bundling it. So for now let us have /usr/local/flood as default prefix, but we will change that to

Re: [PATCH] flood: install target

2002-09-12 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 12:08:00PM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote: So for now let us have /usr/local/flood as default prefix, but we will change that to /usr/local as soon as we get rid of APR/APR-util. Makes sense? +1 :) To me having bundled apr and apr-util just makes everything way more

Re: [PATCH] flood: install target

2002-09-11 Thread Jacek Prucia
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:39:58 -0700 Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] This patch has one problem. Install dir is cluttered with lotsa apr/apu stuff (*-config scripts, includes, libraries) -- even when flood is built with --disable-shared. I've had enough of autoconf magic

Re: [PATCH] flood: install target

2002-09-11 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 04:22:36AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: if you really don't like /usr/local (why? :), then we could use ... /usr/local/flood +1 /usr/local/flood is fine with me. It fits with how httpd and APR are setup by default. -- justin I don't understand why this is an

Re: [PATCH] flood: install target

2002-09-11 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:29:56PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: httpd and APR both do not have their default prefix set to /usr/local, but rather /usr/local/{apache2,apr}. I think it's better to follow that strategy than /usr/local for the clueless newbie who doesn't use --prefix. --

Re: [PATCH] flood: install target

2002-09-11 Thread Jacek Prucia
wiadomosc od Aaron Bannert, z dnia Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 01:08:42PM -0700 On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:29:56PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: httpd and APR both do not have their default prefix set to /usr/local, but rather /usr/local/{apache2,apr}. I think it's better to follow that

Re: [PATCH] flood: install target

2002-09-10 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 07:04:08PM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote: Here's my take at flood install target. Since I'm total automake newbie, you might want to take a closer look at this. It does what is desired -- it copies flood to $PREFIX/bin. There's no special place for examples and DESIGN,