Ciao TonyM
I'm replying here from a particular perspective. One of the Reluctant Crap
"Forced" Programmer. I like what TW can do. I loathe having to fiddle
around trying to get something done (one way around this would be to have a
route to pay people to do it for me--but that is another issue)
Hey Tony,
Is there somewhere I can "subscribe" or follow your efforts on this front?
I am 100% behind this!
Diego
On Tuesday, November 28, 2017 at 4:40:51 PM UTC-6, TonyM wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I plan to start contributing to the TiddlyWiki documentation. I want to
> spell out what I am keen t
Diego/Ed/Josiah ,
I think this thread is the only place to subscribe at this point. In my
view we need to hear from a few others who have or can help integrate such
documents with the tiddlywiki effort as a whole, it is best not to step on
each others toes, however such waiting is often the de
Hey Tony,
I wonder if we should ask Jeremy to let us use
- tiddlywiki.com/dev-docs
- dev.tiddlywiki.com
- etc.
That way we are actually using a tiddlywiki on GitHub. I assume that would
be easiest for merging the docs back into the actual tiddlywiki.com. If we
cant use that, then
Ciao TonyM
Three points ...
1 - I do NOT encourage you to open any other forum. Not because I don't
think its a good idea but simply because all attempts I seen like that have
largely failed so far. The fundamental fact is there are not that many
people here. We are a finite number. Though, wh
Thanks for your contribution Josiah,
On your response to item 1 I agree in principal but if no one starts to act and
say 5 of us worked together in a side Forum posting end product here I see no
problem there.
On 2 we can start work on side doco now and petition to have it referenced from
tidd
Just chiming in to point out that this sounds like a very good idea.
Improved, copy-and-pasteable examples would be a huge step forward.
Oftentimes I read an explanation on www.tiddlywiki.com, don't quite grasp
it, but wonder how much easier this might be if there was a fully usable
example.
I
Nice to see new energy! It's been painful to watch as 80/20 mediocrity has
quenched / stiffled so many innitiative. (I used to use Technorati to
spider certain topics / key words as a way of surveying / exploring /
discovering new blogs. It's like a memory from some long gone golden age.)
fair
This looks like a good Solution for Edit Contributions, to specific
Tiddlers, Provide a Way to submit tiddlers would help?
http://twaddle.tiddlyspot.com/#Comments%20using%20Google%20Drive%20'Forms'
Regards
Tony
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 09:40:51 UTC+11, TonyM wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I plan
TonyM wrote:
>
> This looks like a good Solution for Edit Contributions, to specific
> Tiddlers, Provide a Way to submit tiddlers would help?
>
> http://twaddle.tiddlyspot.com/#Comments%20using%20Google%20Drive%20'Forms'
>
Kawabunga! - please, everyone, let me first make sure it still works. It
Hello everybody,
I just want to let you know that the project who seek to improve the
TiddlyWiki documentation structure is not dead. It received green light
from Jeremy and others and soon we should have a new docs structure.
Maybe you should take this also into account.
If you want to know more
Mat,
Thanks for the warning,
Just exploring, I have not worked through the whole idea, but was thinking
multiple contributions in wikitext could be submitted, collated, curated then
submitted to GitHub.
I would appreciate your ideas, but commenting on any tiddler requiring improved
doco is o
Looks great,
We have the desire, the need, the volunteers, a clear image of what we want in
the doco and now an improved structure.
Can you explain how we would contribute using got or is that a seperate issue?
Tony
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Are you referring to contributing through GItHub? The new structure is not
implemented yet, so you'll have to wait a little bit.
Anyway we need good docs about contributing through GitHub, although some
people are afraid of it from what I understand.
This will have it's place in the "Helping the
moros...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> some people are afraid of it from what I understand.
I don't think we are afraid of it so much as non-comprehending of it.
In my case I can raise a GitHub Issue (with work & a lot more restrain than
my usual want). Doing a "PR" (whatever the hell that is) is someth
I'm no Git guru, or big GitHub user for that matter.
I do use Git a bit for my sysadmin related scripts at work, some html stuff
etc.
Real GitHub people please feel free to step in as needed
The normal flow with GitHub as I understand it is this:
0 - create a GitHub account
1 - 'Clone' or c
Perhaps this is better - the official docs
https://help.github.com/articles/github-flow/
and for an 'illustrated' version of that
https://guides.github.com/introduction/flow/
I can see where that's pretty intimidating for someone not used to the
tools...
--
You received this message because
This explanation was very helpful to me. I kind of thought of clones and
branches as altering a timeline in a sci fi movie, where it never goes back
to the original timeline again, and gets orphaned. Now I understand it is
about branching off, editing, and suggesting adding the change to the
or
I have always had used the following interactive tutorials to teach git:
- https://learngitbranching.js.org/
- https://try.github.io/levels/1/challenges/1
On Thursday, December 14, 2017 at 3:48:19 PM UTC-6, Dave Gifford -
http://www.giffmex.org/ wrote:
>
> This explanation was very he
Folks,
Thanks to the Git Reference materials.
I have collated all Git Usage References below
I will use these to discover how to submit Doco updates via Git and See if
it is suitable for a wider audience,
Please share your own experience with Git.
Regards
Tony
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017
Just to revive this, I'll share a short Tiddler I've been keeping with some
great explanations by Eric Shulman recently (attached).
It clarifies the use of < vs << amd { vs {{ in and out of filters, and has
been very helpful to me.
Im not sure where something like this would go in the current
Hi,
a suggestion made elsewhere on this group (by me)
Build on top of the latest pre-release. Document your play. Then when the
pre-release is released collect the play and documentation into an
accompanying TiddlyZine.
best
Alex
On 10 December 2017 at 01:42, TonyM wrote:
> Thanks for your
Ciao Alex, TonyM & all
AlexHough wrote:
>
> Build on top of the latest pre-release. Document your play. Then when the
> pre-release is released collect the play and documentation into an
> accompanying TiddlyZine.
>
Small, slightly quibbling, footnote to Alex: I don't understand why you
connec
Alex,
I saw you post before about the idea of a tiddlyzine, it sounds interesting
but I personally do not have a depth of understanding on this, could you
outline the idea of a TiddlyZine?
The trick I think is to collect contributors or lift content from Google
Groups and post in a dedicated b
TonyM, to save you time I'll say this:
Expecting people to go to *some other web-address*, be it to some forum or
a wiki, will not work. All attempts have failed, and there have been many
over the past 10+ years. IMO people go here and to tiddlywiki.com.
The most promising strategy I can think
Mat,
I made a point of not wanting to step on each others toes, and I want to
ensure this.
My view is that improved documentation needs to be produced and added to
TiddlyWiki.com, and where not practical references from tiddlywiki.com.
There is no harm building and collating this elsewhere, es
Ciao TonyM
Your thread is causing me to think.
I'm feeling its really beginning to register the problem with documentation
in a more move-on-able way.
A few comments. To support your overview and mark a few places that maybe
don't get so easily noticed ... more sociology of behaviour than a so
TonyM,
I agree with you.
I'd like to say thank you to @Jeremy Ruston for the amazing work he did
with Tiddlywiky that I love, but I never seen before a so difficult project
to find doc for.
It's not clear where to found it and if you find something, probably it's
not up to date.
Igor
Il giorno
28 matches
Mail list logo
