[tw] Re: Call for ideas on how you might Collaborate on "one document"

2008-10-13 Thread S. Sriram
Morris Gray wrote: > And here's food for thought: > > Since the original designer of TiddlySnip has been forced to abandon > its development and with your expertise with Firefox plugins it would > fit well in coordination with FireBaggr. TiddlySnip could be used t If you see the right-mouse menu

[tw] Re: Call for ideas on how you might Collaborate on "one document"

2008-10-13 Thread Morris Gray
On Oct 14, 9:38 am, "S. Sriram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My question is what ideas do readers of this list have for something > like this and how might they want to use such a facility. I have been using FireBaggr for a few days and I can see a lot of potential. It needs some tweaking and ta

[tw] Re: Call for ideas on how you might Collaborate on "one document"

2008-10-13 Thread wolfgang
> My question is what ideas do readers of this list have for something > like this and > how might they want to use such a facility. > Replacing GoogleGroups would be the first thing I would love to do - once it would be possible to edit TiddlyWikis collaboratively - be it with FireBaggr, ccTiddl

[tw] Re: Call for ideas on how you might Collaborate on "one document"

2008-10-13 Thread S. Sriram
wolfgang wrote: > Hi Sriram, > > I don't understand you. Do you mean a locally installed Firefox > extension as FireBaggr would make it possible to have multiuser > collaboration with TiddlyWikies stored on servers, like the one at > TiddlySpot? > Yes, one example would be that any file within

[tw] Re: Call for ideas on how you might Collaborate on "one document"

2008-10-13 Thread wolfgang
Hi Sriram, I don't understand you. Do you mean a locally installed Firefox extension as FireBaggr would make it possible to have multiuser collaboration with TiddlyWikies stored on servers, like the one at TiddlySpot? Or how? Regards, W. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Yo