Yes...and even fewer people care.
lol
--Mike
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Mike Palij m...@nyu.edu wrote:
I think that few people actually think about why the calendar is
structured the way it is and even fewer think about how to make
the calendar more rational (e.g., each month having a
I thought so.
Either noone have read it, or if any have, they don't wan't to admit it.
Catch-22.
lol.
--Mike
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Michael Smith tipsl...@gmail.com wrote:
I've noticed The Secret pops up every now and then.
I was wondering, has anyone on TIPS has actually read
I've noticed The Secret pops up every now and then.
I was wondering, has anyone on TIPS has actually read it (reading
primary sources and all that)?
The only thing that annoys me about The Secret, is that I wish I had
written it--it obviously works for the author!
lol
--Mike
On Sun, Nov 15,
Nancy wrote:
Mentioning day care in a list of evills that include poverty and drug abuse
suggests that the writer assumes it HAS to be bad.
Actually, I don't --assume-- it has to be bad (daycare), that is at
least partly an empirical question: Empirical as to its effects, moral
as to whether it
Long Beach CA
-Original Message-
From: Michael Smith tipsl...@gmail.com
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) tips@acsun.frostburg.edu
Sent: Mon, Nov 2, 2009 7:58 pm
Subject: Re: [tips] Article in WSJ on study how brain develops without
Dad.
oops
At the end of my last
I think it's probably true in canada as well.
I know of one hypnotherapist in toronto who has a B.A. in psych.
I know of several who have an Med.
And I have known one who had no official qualification whatsoever but
who had read a lot about dream interpretation and ran a counselling
service.
Hi Don.
I previously said:
Well, that sounds like a pretty safe bet. I doubt whether anyone can
reliably determine anything about your typical adult's early life
experiences by observing their current adult behavior.
To which Don responded:
Glad you agree with me that most typical childhood
oops
At the end of my last post I meant to say that I don't know the
literature but it seems implausible to me that one can claim that
there are no long lasting effects of divorce and day-care etc.
As mentioned, the issue is complex and their are many intervening
variables between the daycare
I think we have pretty well established that kids do fine when raised
by two same-sex parents
If doing fine means they are alive and surviving then yes of course,
and I don't think that doing fine can mean much more than that.
I have a standing bet of
$10,000 that no one can reliably determine
As this forms a makeshift projective test, your responses indicate
that you are all deeply disturbed.
lol
--Mike
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 8:47 AM, tay...@sandiego.edu wrote:
OMG I'm so glad someone else saw something else. I thought it was me. I
looked at that and said to myself, Self, I don't
no luck.
-Don.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Smith
Date: Sunday, November 1, 2009 6:31 am
Subject: Re: [tips] Article in WSJ on study how brain develops without
Dad.
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
I think we have pretty well established that kids do fine when
(1) Are there gender differences in the numbers of rods and cones in the
retina?
Probably not systematic differences, but they do of course vary
between individuals.
There is of course red/green color blindness mostly confined to men.
What might be interesting is that some women have 4 opsins,
I guess if it has to come to a petition, then the APA is not big on customer
satisfaction the way any good and reputable company would be.
Perhaps they should consult with their ethics department.
--Mike
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Christopher D. Green chri...@yorku.cawrote:
It has
“With so much in the book, it’s unavoidable that we wouldn’t need to
make corrections of some kind.”
I guess the advent of computers and word processing which should make
things better by freeing human intelligence to look carefully at the
content hasn't really helped.
Of course the very least
No.
If you don't get any answers what's the point?
--Mike
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:35 AM, michael sylvester
msylves...@copper.net wrote:
Is it ok to talk to yourself as long as you do not get the answers back?
And I do have a follow-up question.
Michaei omnicentricSylvester,PhD
Daytona
I thought that's the way it was in psych---the grad students and
post-docs get first authorship and the PI gets the last position.
Everyone I know in my area of research works that way. I have heard in
some related area where perhaps some 'old school' types always take
first authorship, but I
Dennis Earl Bradford was arrested for the horrific crime.
He could get life apparently.
From previous discussions at TIPS, though, civilized countries don't
have a real life sentence where you stay in prison until you die.
I am rather hoping that the states isn't a civilized country. And
Journal of Psychology Human Sexuality. Vol 2(1),1989, 39-55.
Describes 2 experiments ... testing the hypotheses that men are more
eager for sex than are women and that women are more likely to set
limits on such activity...
Of course the later of the studies is pert near 30 years old.
But I also
Allen wrote:
Mike: Referring to someone whose views on a specific subject you strongly
disagree with as a clown is not conducive to rational discussion. I happen
to disagree with some aspects of Dawkins' views on religious belief (though
not his atheism), and when he steps outside his
Mike Palij wrote:
If he pleases, Prof. Smith might answer these questions.
In summary, it appears that there are two answers to the question I posed
in the Subject line:
(1) Not at all.
(2) Very, very carefully if one doesn't want to lose their job.
Hmmm. Let me see.
I would say neither.
Mike Palij wrote:
It is unfortunate how Prof. Smith edits posts because he edited out
the questions I asked which I reproduce here:
...Why he focuses on the summary answer I provide to the question in
the Subject line is beyond me.
Well, Mike, it may be beyond you, but if you look at your own
Jim Clark commented:
I missed one disturbing part of Mike S's statement here ... namely
the phrase (And I would say just by doing good scientific work.).
This seems to be saying that scientists' jobs are done once they have
conducted the research and they have no further responsibilities to
the
And as the cross-cultural
dude on Tips
Starbucks appeal more to whites than to blacks because the sense of
community is already inherent within blacks.
lol
--Mike
---
To make changes to your subscription contact:
Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)
Feeling a bit verbose, a few notes about what Mike P wrote.
In the U.S. it is possible to run a college
along religious line (i.e., secterian) and there can be an uneasy
tension between the religious orientation maintained by the administration
and the individuals working there, especially the
in order to do so (otherwise, they would have found a way to get
rid of me years ago).
John
--
John Serafin
Psychology Department
Saint Vincent College
Latrobe, PA 15650
john.sera...@email.stvincent.edu
From: Michael Smith tipsl...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS
Perhaps we shouldn't care
It's amazing how juvenile people are.
--Mike
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Mike Palij m...@nyu.edu wrote:
I don't watch reality TV shows and only pay attention to news
reports about them when something really unusual happens like,
say, former U.S. congressman Tom
Man. 95 minutes no wonder half of them left (although I suppose his
apparent hatred might have helped).
I think our prime minister had the right idea. He was promoting Tim
Horton's instead of attending :)
--Mike
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:05 PM, michael sylvester
msylves...@copper.net wrote:
Reminds me of a study apparently with dead people, who's blood
pressure rose when shown picutures of threatening situations.
I can't remember the study though.
This one makes a good point that people often forget. An fMRI is NOT a
picture of the working brain (as it is often promoted) but a
I suppose one would have to define exactly what one means by a little age. :))
--Mike
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Dr. Bob Wildblood drb...@rcn.com wrote:
How can anyone with a little age under their belt not have mentioned Kukla,
Fran, and Ollie. Perhaps the original of all of those
Yes, I remember about the tape. And I believe 'circumstantial'
evidence can also be sufficient for convictions.
But I would say a 12 year prison term is getting off lightly
considering that she participated in (or was the instigator) in the
abduction, rape and slaughter of 3 young girls one of
I have to agree with Mike Palij (this is getting to be a habit) that
women may operate differently (may tend to prefer poison for example)
and crime statistics may beg the question a little.
So for example, women may be more the instigator/orchestrator in the
Bernardo or Garrido case (for
email: tshea...@collegeofidaho.edu
teaching: intro to neuropsychology; psychopharmacology; general; history and
systems
You can't teach an old dogma new tricks. Dorothy Parker
From: Michael Smith [tipsl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 5
Anyone have a guess on the probability that Nancy Garrido the wife of
Phillip Garrido (the couple accused of the abduction, rape, and
confinement for 18 years of Jaycee Dugard) will be pleading that she
is just another victim of the bad man?
--Mike
---
To make changes to your subscription
A nice response by Mike Palij--I really don't know how he has the time.
I echo Mike's caution on press releases. such as...
|However, US distributors have resolutely passed on a film which will
|prove hugely divisive in a country where, according to a Gallup poll
|conducted in February, only
James Clark wrote:
but I believe the new atheists arose BECAUSE these attacks continued
unabated despite decades of politeness and attempts to educate people (i.e.,
disabuse them of the numerous falsities available at sites like AIG). When
another group literally hates your worldview and will
Well, I wouldn't consider any psychologist past or present a hero,
nor am I proud of any.
I also usually try to introduce a life context to the particular
person's contribution. This is usually enough to dispel any hero
worship
I also find it a peculiar idea that a psychologist serves as a
I don't know who phil is or why you loved him, but...
Marc Carter commented:
Bugs me a lot when philosophers tell us what we should or shouldn't do. I
mean, I love phil (majored in it in college), but in order to
know what a science is you have to watch what scientists do -- and that would
Mr. Palij.
We have had conversations about this before. I have not included the
original statements to which you responded, but I have responded to
some of your comments (you will find them in brackets). Those to which
I have not responded suffer from the same weaknesses. Please take note
of them
lol
Yes!
--Mike
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Don Allendal...@langara.bc.ca wrote:
snip That is, a wonton disregard for proper citation
Is a wonton disregard when you turn down an offer of soup at a chinese
restaurant? ;o)
-Don.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Smith
Date
Mike Palij wrote another extended response. Man. Are you retired? lol.
My main point was that scientists no less than anyone else have
biases. And, like everyone else, tend to select only the references
(which presumably contain evidence) that supports their biases. Of
course, this is not what
Oh! and Allen wrote an extended response too.
The issue about references I was making would be with regard to the
entire sum of people involved with psychology (researchers and
teachers). Not the tiny percentage who subscribe to TIPS which may not
be a representative sample, and as you noted
Of
Today's main story on the CNN website is (believe it or not) is that
Brown say's he doesn't remember hitting Rihanna (that's the
repression bit). Nevertheless he has admitted guilt and apologized
for assaulting his then-girlfriend (tha't the conflicted part).
The human mind is hard to figure out,
Michael Sylvester said he is tired of the demand for references. lol
Well that's not likely to change, but I agree that you have a point.
Generally someone makes a point and provides a reference and the point
tends to be considered proven and true.
Of course the public position of almost
Oh sorry. when you said the number of B's an institute produced I thought
you meant something other than billionaires. lol
Valuing human life: Reminds me of a friend's father who used to do exactly
that for the army. I guess they needed some kind of monetary measure of
training invested vs.
I hope they are not implying it is an index of how good the school is.
Wouldn't it be awful to equate money with the quality of the school (or lack
thereof for the B's that dropped out)? One might be tempted to think that
the bottom line in education is the business/money aspect of education and
Except they didn't get the H1N1 shot they came in for.
So later, when they all died, you would have to say you were sorry.
--Mike
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:28 PM, michael sylvester msylves...@copper.netwrote:
Hey tipsters,what do you think of this idea: you want to do a study on the
placebo
Mike Palij replied to my latest email with a bunch of stuff. Phew!
Suffice it to say that the entire response completely misses the only point
I have illustrated in all of my posts with regard to this issue.
--Mike
---
To make changes to your subscription contact:
Bill Southerly
Well let me see.
No I don't have a character or personality analysis of MacAskill that
indicates the type of person he is. I don't think that psychology has a
good enough handle on character and personality to produce a very valid one,
and anyway I wouldn't be qualified to conduct one since I'm
that a Maltese shopkeeper
said that he had purchased a shirt whose remnants were found wrapped around
the bomb http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=111881314.
I'll leave alternative explanations to the readers.
On Aug 24, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Michael Smith wrote:
Well let me see
No.
--Mike
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 8:44 AM, michael sylvester msylves...@copper.netwrote:
In the final analysis,are we just our neurotransmitters? nothing
more,nothing less!
Michael Sylvester,PhD
Daytona Beach,Florida
---
To make changes to your subscription contact:
Bill Southerly
: Michael Smith tipsl...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: The compassion of Braveheart
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:03:19 -0600
I think we also need to remember that it wasn't Europeans or Brits or
the Scots who wanted the guy released. It was a single misguided
individual imposing his will on everyone involved
As I understand comments from the people in the States via the news, It was
agreed by the US that the terrorist would serve a life sentence in Scotland.
That means he is supposed to die in prison. That's the point. That was the
sentence.
The fact that he gets terminal cancer doesn't change the
Or rabid liberalism raises its cancerous head yet once again
--Mike
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:43 AM, michael sylvester msylves...@copper.netwrote:
The release of the Libyan terrorist by Scottish authorities so that he
could spend his terminal days at home and with family is an example of
I think we also need to remember that it wasn't Europeans or Brits or
the Scots who wanted the guy released. It was a single misguided
individual imposing his will on everyone involved. Another case of Judicial
fiat by an irresponsible individual who no doubt thinks he can create a
better world by
It may have some good points, but it presents rather a caricature. But I
suppose the cartoon format is fitting then.
--Mike
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Marc Carter marc.car...@bakeru.edu wrote:
This is great. In my intro class tomorrow I'm going to start talking about
science and why
Thank you Beth and David for your suggestions, they will help tremendously!
--Mike
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Beth Benoit beth.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been happiest with the Sue brothers' text, *Understanding Abnormal
Psychology.* For personality, you'll need to decide whether
Hi all.
I would like to solicit the opinion of those who have experience teaching
Personality and Abnormal.
Normally, these were taught by the clinical guy, but I find that I will
now have the pleasure of teaching them this coming Winter.
Would those on TIPS please nominate their first couple
Because scientific findings do not represent flawless objectivity.
The ideal observer is a myth
--Mike
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:26 PM, michael sylvester
msylves...@copper.netwrote:
If scientific findings represent flawless objectivity,why do need
replications?
Send me something.
Allen wrote in response to my response of Allen's response to Michael
Sylvester
(Common sense has a lot going for it)
Of course it has – but in terms of understanding the natural world in
its widest sense, other people, other cultures, etc, it also has severe
limitations
Of course we haven't
Looking at human history I see the common sense of culture and
religion as much a source of dissension as of human stability. But
perhaps Michael means individual human stability, in which case, yes,
culture and religion play a strong role in that. But I would say at
some cost, e.g., in providing
Frankly, I find the digital revolution a pain in the...
And I'm getting pretty tired of hearing how great the upcoming generation is
at multi-tasking. I'm sure the DSM VI will no longer classify ADD or ADHD as
a disorder. Instead, it will simply be someone who is very good at
multi-taksing.
More innocence.
At conferences, the Europeans I know didn't mind sharing a bed with another
male they didn't see anything problematic with it. North American males
however were generally opposed to the same and would rather sleep on the
floor.
There is a passage in the New Testament that talks
Wow. That's a shocker. But I would have been able to predict the outcome of
the task force with 100% accuracy. (I knew I was psychic).
Since there are 5 members on the committee, I guess that settles it.
One thing that was curious to me though, was the statement: Even though the
research and
I don't think the class matters. For example. If we take French cuisine you
pick the best the culture has produced when we are talking about cultural
achievements. So that means you take the best techniques and invented
cuisine from the best France has to offer. You don't go to French peasants
and
Already it no longer exists :)
--Mike
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Frantz, Sue sfra...@highline.edu wrote:
A resource for your adjuncts. (Use this link to go directly to the
manual:
http://www.apa.org/ed/pcue/ptcc-adjunct-faculty-resource-manual.pdf)
Sue
The direct link that is
--Mike
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Frantz, Sue sfra...@highline.edu wrote:
A resource for your adjuncts. (Use this link to go directly to the
manual:
http://www.apa.org/ed/pcue/ptcc-adjunct-faculty-resource-manual.pdf)
Sue
The
, I would really like to meet that person! --
just joking around :)
--Mike
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Mike Palij m...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:30:27 -0700, Michael Smith wrote:
The machine could make the toss come out heads every time
Maybe it was just an extended pattern
:
- Original Message -
*From:* Michael Smith tipsl...@gmail.com
*To:* Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)tips@acsun.frostburg.edu
*Sent:* Monday, August 03, 2009 11:32 PM
*Subject:* Re: [tips] Psychology irrelevant to African-Americans
Well, what do you want
The machine could make the toss come out heads every time
Maybe it was just an extended pattern that we all know sometimes occurs in
random sequences! lol
--Mike
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Mike Palij m...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:54:32 -0700, Christopher D. Green wrote:
The
Well, what do you want? Psychology was invented by Europeans.
--Mike
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 8:31 PM, michael sylvester msylves...@copper.netwrote:
Except for Physiological,Euro and U.S-centric psychology reflect models
that are far removed to African-American reality.And the reason why this
I guess I missed the thread if there was one.
But profiling doesn't apply.
If one self-identifies as a member of a criminal organization one should be
treated as one shouldn't one?
(That's one two many ones!)
Besides, music or how much fun you had as a DJ has nothing to do with how
much 'fun'
That's hillarious.
--Mike
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Christopher D. Green chri...@yorku.cawrote:
Here's a teachable moment for your stats courses. Bill O'Rielly says that
it is to be expected that Canada's life expectancy is higher that the US's
because the US has 10 times as many
I doubt universities in general, including psychology, have much of a
diverse representation.
But isn't diversification the wrong word? Is it not really about being
politically correct? Are there not really only 3 groups that count as
diversity? That is, women, gays, and blacks.
Since when did
Yes. Highly recommended!
I started RSS feeds because of her review. And very glad I did. In fact I
have her blog as an RSS feed. Indeed, because of my getting more up to
speed because of her reviews I checked out I-Google and now have the RSS
feeds appear on I-Google along with my primary Gmail
No doubt obvious to all, but I think the posts show that how we define
behavior is dependent on what use we are going to make of it—‘the data we
profitably record’ and the sub-specialty comments. For a sociologist
‘behavior’ might be en-masse as in a group where there is clearly behavior
which can
.
But it was a nice family outing :)
--Mike
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 6:01 AM, sbl...@ubishops.ca wrote:
Hello out there in Edmonton, Michael Smith. Did you get blown away
(literally)?
http://tinyurl.com/mfyya8
As Hebb would say, if you want to know about storms, don't ask a
psychologist, try Shakespeare
Yes,
I had to wait 3 months to get re-established with the Canadian system after
being in the US for a couple of years.
Alghough I must admit I did like the treatment we had in the US system.
Fast, efficient, and excellent care. I had good insurance through the
university though.
During the 3
Good comment on the survey issue.
From my experience I would guess that teaching and scholarship about
teaching just isn't held in as high esteem as 'real' research (stuff that
brings in the money, the grad students and post-docs, and the prestige).
Even within undergraduate institutions where
How am I ever going to get used to going back to typing two spaces at the
end of a sentence?
Can't one just ignore the entire thing?
Perhaps if it is ignored it will go away.
Isn't there another way the APA can make money?
--Mike
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Rick Froman rfro...@jbu.edu
Annette said: I think that we can teach general principles of thinking
biases and build a course, with the usual content, around those biases.
After all, that is what psychologists study, so it would be what we
should/could focus on--thinking biases.
Doesn't everyone (or most) already do that?
I would think that the criticisms brought by Ken's group are valid.
An introduction to a discipline should be just that--an introduction to the
discipline, not a watered down version to pique the interest of possible
future students of the area. As such, it needs to have content: all the
basic
Well, since it's slow.
What's wrong with people in the US (and Canada will no doubt soon follow
suit.)? I haven't heard but probably Europe has already beaten us to it.
That is, letting pets fly in the cabin with people (according to CNN). Never
mind you may have a severe alergy to animals. You
But isn't San Deigo beach weather all year round? Can you really drink beer
on the beach? In Canada, as far as I know, it's illegal to drink alchohol in
a public place (so you have to sneak drink it in a brown paper bag)!
--Mike
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 6:43 PM, tay...@sandiego.edu wrote:
I've
...I guess that will balance the slightly left wing.
That reminds me, I still have to read her book The War Against Boys
--Mike
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Paul Brandon paul.bran...@mnsu.edu wrote:
and slightly right wing, though she often makes good points.
On Jul 3, 2009, at 2:59
It seems to me, people who can't read shouldn't be hired as firefighters
--Mike
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:32 PM, michael sylvester msylves...@copper.netwrote:
It would seem to me that if one gives a promotion test to firefighters and
only the white firefighters pass the test,there must be
observed:
It would seem to me that if one gives a promotion test to
firefighters
and only the white firefighters pass the test,there must be something
wrong with the test.
to which the other Michael (Smith) rejoined:
It seems to me, people who can't read shouldn't be hired
I gave zamar a trial run (without joining) and never got the video.
But perhaps it's because I'm in Canada.
--Mike
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:00 PM, tay...@sandiego.edu wrote:
Never mind. I finally remembered. It was on the tip of my tongue for over
an hour!
It's zamar.com
So for those of
H.
Well I doubt you're the only one :)
Nevertheless, I do think there tends to be an emphasis on rationality and
quantitative research here at the expense of emotional/spiritual
and qualitative research. But, perhaps the majority of Tipsters are
quantitative types and the content of the
I would disagree that mindfulness is a meditation technique. Rather, my
understanding of it is that it is a state of mind required of and acquired
through 'standard' zen or more traditional branches of Buddhist meditation.
It could be described as a kind of meta-awareness of where one's
Hmmm.
The Fisher King with Robin Williams
--Mike
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Mike Palij m...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:06:09 -0700, William Scott wrote:
If you know the author of Joan's allusion, take this trivia quiz at:
Neither would I.
The concept of human intelligence is definately unclear and looking to apply
it to robots seems questionable.
As well, I don't think robots or computers are intelligent at all. That is,
their IQ score is zip, nothing, nada.
ALL they have is the result of programming, which to be
Moderated! Shivers. Tooo scary for me. Besides a one-eyed view of education
isn't that great of an idea.
Yes Canajun, and I may actually have come across it a long time ago, but if
it was moderated I wouldn't have bothered with
--Mike
---
To make changes to your subscription contact:
Bill
first name is stated to be Michael, may, in fact, be someone
else who wants to poke at us with a different approach than his usual
one.
No, Michael Smith is really Michael Smith, just as he claims. There is
really no need for anyone to self-identify on posts but most of us are
proud (sometimes
OK what is this other list I keep hearing about on here. I need to get on
it. They obviously need some help :)
--Mike
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Mike Palij m...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 05:55:01 -0700, Michael Sylvester wrote:
What would Tips be like without those outstanding
I don't think a physician needs to be a medical researcher to be a good
physician.
To me, this again seems like this condescending attitude among at least some
people in scientific psychology.
That is, if you don't do research:
you won't be able to think properly,
you won't be up on stuff
No really, I’m me. And yes it is my real last name, although I think I
should change it!
Congratulations that you had the choice of either clinical psych or
medicine. This is usually not the case, especially for empirical psychology,
since (at least in Canada) clinical requires an A average,
There is no paradigmatic change. It is all in your head. So stop being
silly.
lol
--Mike
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:57 AM, michael sylvester
msylves...@copper.netwrote:
Recently there seems to be a paradigmatic change re Tips post-snake oil
alternatives,dreams,near death experiences.Are we
Beth,
I didn't see anything about NDEs in the article, unless I am missing
something. I'm assuming you mean events such as the tunnel and the lights
etc
--Mike
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Beth Benoit beth.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
...may be able to change your life, for at least a while.
are
shirking their responsibilities.
Take care
Jim
James M. Clark
Professor of Psychology
204-786-9757
204-774-4134 Fax
j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca
Michael Smith tipsl...@gmail.com 08-Jun-09 9:06:52 PM
Just a comment.
Although I surmise scientific types in general don't condone alternative
Just a response:
:)
A quick response to your response
Scientific types? Are you being Jungian or merely stereotypical?
Stereotypical of course. But not merely. There is some truth in them thar
stereotypes
I believe the proper phrasing might be that people who realize that
knowledge is
1 - 100 of 251 matches
Mail list logo
