and Sons.
>
> High School Psychology and Advanced Psychology Graphic Organizers,
> Pacing Guides, and Daily Lesson Plans archived at www.Teaching-Point.net
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:27:03 -0400
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: tips@acsun.frostburg.edu
&g
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:27:03 -0400
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: tips@acsun.frostburg.edu
> > Subject: [tips] Out of Work for Doing Extra Work? :: Inside Higher
> Ed
> >
> > What would you do if an adjunct instructor at your school
> responded to
> > s
d Psychology Graphic Organizers,
Pacing Guides, and Daily Lesson Plans archived at www.Teaching-Point.net> Date:
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:27:03 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
tips@acsun.frostburg.edu> Subject: [tips] Out of Work for Doing Extra Work? ::
Inside Higher Ed> > What would y
The comments/reactions to this article are strongly against the
administration and very sympathetic to the adjunct. The adjuncts at
Oakton Community College are well-organized and thereby their stature and
rights have been enhanced accordingly. Fifteen years ago or so they were
like treated like p
Linda discussed problems with the formalizing of syllabi and texts to
produce uniformity and limit freedom. I have been teaching AP Psychology
since
before there was an AP and, for the first time,we were required to submit
syllabi last year in order to have our courses certified as AP. The
Paul Brandon wrote:
>
>
> In this case it does not appear that there was anything controversial
> about what he was teaching.
> The only question is whether he was requiring specifics not specified
> in the syllabus.
I guess my syllabi are going to become much, much longer now that I know
that
On Jul 23, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Linda Woolf wrote:
> Paul Brandon wrote:
>>
>> First of all, this is not an academic freedom question since he
>> was not fired because of the content of what he was teaching.
>> Rather, the issue is whether he was requiring his students to know
>> (and answer te
Paul Brandon wrote:
>
>
> First of all, this is *not* an academic freedom question since he was
> not fired because of the *content* of what he was teaching.
> Rather, the issue is whether he was requiring his students to know
> (and answer test questions on) content not specified in the syllabus
On Jul 23, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Christopher D. Green wrote:
> Paul Brandon wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> First of all, this is not an academic freedom question since he
>> was not fired because of the content of what he was teaching.
>
> This is not true. Academic freedom extends well beyond that. Please
Paul Brandon wrote:
>
>
> First of all, this is *not* an academic freedom question since he was
> not fired because of the *content* of what he was teaching.
This is not true. Academic freedom extends well beyond that. Please read
the 1940 AAUP statement on academic freedom (which is widely con
First of all, this is not an academic freedom question since he was
not fired because of the content of what he was teaching.
Rather, the issue is whether he was requiring his students to know
(and answer test questions on) content not specified in the syllabus
-- a violation of the contract
What would you do if an adjunct instructor at your school responded to
students' complaints that the mandated textbook was unclear, by creating
original supplementary materials to help the students understand the
topic better? Give him a pat on the back? One Indiana college decided to
fire him
12 matches
Mail list logo
