RE: classical conditioning of nausea

2005-10-05 Thread Paul Brandon
Title: RE: classical conditioning of nausea Paul Brandon wrote: Its special nature is demonstrated by the fact that all stimuli present during ingestion do not become CS's; just the taste/smell of the food. You don't usually acquire an aversion to the person you ate the food

RE: classical conditioning of nausea

2005-10-05 Thread Rick Froman
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 11:21 AM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences Subject: RE: classical conditioning of nausea Isn't this an example of higher order conditioning in which the CR is transferred from one CS to another? In other words, being ill (the US

RE: classical conditioning of nausea

2005-10-05 Thread DeVolder Carol L
Davenport, Iowa 52803 phone: 563-333-6482 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rick Froman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 11:32 AM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences Subject: RE: classical conditioning of nausea Thank you for your

Re: classical conditioning of nausea

2005-10-05 Thread Ken Steele
Rick Froman wrote: Warning: unpleasant topic (nausea) ahead My son and I were walking across the grass and we came to an area where some wood chips were covering the ground. My son says the smell of the wood chips makes him feel sick. I thought that was unusual because wood chips usually

RE: classical conditioning of nausea

2005-10-05 Thread Rick Froman
http://www.jbu.edu/academics/sbs/faculty/rfroman.asp -Original Message- From: DeVolder Carol L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 11:42 AM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences Subject: RE: classical conditioning of nausea Yes, I agree, but isn't it true

RE: classical conditioning of nausea

2005-10-05 Thread Lavin, Michael
Message- From: Rick Froman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 12:54 PM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences Subject: RE: classical conditioning of nausea My understanding is that that kind of backward conditioning usually produces an inhibitory response although

RE: classical conditioning of nausea

2005-10-05 Thread Lavin, Michael
in the Psychological Sciences Subject: RE: classical conditioning of nausea Isn't this an example of higher order conditioning in which the CR is transferred from one CS to another? In other words, being ill (the US) evokes vomiting (the UR). The smell of vomit becomes the CS and nausea

RE: classical conditioning of nausea

2005-10-05 Thread Frigo, Lenore
Third, isn't it backward for something produced by illness to make you ill? In fact, after vomiting don't you usually feel relief? Certainly, the physical result of illness could not be a reliable predictor of illness. My (disgusting) hypothesis: The smell of vomit is a UCS. It naturally causes

RE: classical conditioning of nausea

2005-10-05 Thread David Hogberg
://web.sbu.edu/psychology/lavin -Original Message- From: Rick Froman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 12:54 PM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences Subject: RE: classical conditioning of nausea My understanding is that that kind of backward conditioning