RE: CVS / mod_webapp / web-connector sub-project

2001-04-19 Thread cmanolache
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >I think Dan is right on this one - improving the configuration > >of mod_jk > >is probably the most important thing, and merging with mod_webapp and > >porting it's protocol and config mechanism would be a good way > >to do that. > > I agree that int

RE: CVS / mod_webapp / web-connector sub-project

2001-04-19 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>I think Dan is right on this one - improving the configuration >of mod_jk >is probably the most important thing, and merging with mod_webapp and >porting it's protocol and config mechanism would be a good way >to do that. I agree that integrating mod_webapp functionnalities is not a priority

Re: CVS / mod_webapp / web-connector sub-project

2001-04-18 Thread cmanolache
Henri, I think Dan is right on this one - improving the configuration of mod_jk is probably the most important thing, and merging with mod_webapp and porting it's protocol and config mechanism would be a good way to do that. I think the best way to do that would be a revolution ( like jasper34

Re: CVS / mod_webapp / web-connector sub-project

2001-04-18 Thread Dan Milstein
In terms of integrating mod_jk/mod_webapp, I think this might be worthwhile -- specifically, mod_jk was built to handle a variety of protocols (ajp12, ajp13, etc.). So writing a protocol handler for the mod_webapp protocol would give a lot of benefits -- load-balancing, support for a variety of w

Re: CVS / mod_webapp / web-connector sub-project

2001-04-17 Thread cmanolache
> Why not use mod_webapp/mod_jk to start the > web-connector sub-project allowing us to remove many question > related to connectors from Tomcat user/dev lists ? > > The same web-connector project could be used against > Tomcat 3.2/3.3/4.0 but not be restricted to Tomcat. > Any project unde

Re: CVS / mod_webapp / web-connector sub-project

2001-04-17 Thread cmanolache
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > * Configuration complexity - The above issues can often be dealt with > by tediously configuring everything twice (once in web.xml and once > in httpd.conf). A better approach would be to make ajp12/ajp13 > auto-configure Apache from the we

Re: CVS / mod_webapp / web-connector sub-project

2001-04-17 Thread cmanolache
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: > > mod_jk is the de-facto standard to link a web server (not only > > Apache) to tomcat. mod_webapp is really new and having it > > incompatible with mod_jk will raise more questions and requests > > than necessary. > > Huh? mod_jk is not 100% compatible

Re: CVS / mod_webapp / web-connector sub-project

2001-04-17 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: > on 4/17/01 5:12 PM, "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip] > > > [ ] I want to have a ajp12/ajp13 in Tomcat 4.0 ? > > Is the requirements of the Servlet API technically feasible for allowing > this to exist? > There are some very signific

Re: CVS / mod_webapp / web-connector sub-project

2001-04-17 Thread Jon Stevens
on 4/17/01 5:12 PM, "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mod_jk is the de-facto standard to link a web server (not only > Apache) to tomcat. mod_webapp is really new and having it > incompatible with mod_jk will raise more questions and requests > than necessary. Huh? mod_jk is not 100% c

RE: CVS / mod_webapp / web-connector sub-project

2001-04-17 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> 3) You still didn't tell us what you think into merging mod_webapp >> and mod_jk. > >And I'll continue to be silent on that... As I don't really >want to start another flamewar... >I've been thru enough already on that, and >all I can say >is that I'll let the people on this list (but me)

Re: CVS / mod_webapp / web-connector sub-project

2001-04-17 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
Pier P. Fumagalli at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > GOMEZ Henri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Fine to see mod_webapp back to life :) > > Well, I don't really know how happy I am... That sounds not right... I'm happy to have something working, I'm not happy about how we ended up there... (yeah..

Re: CVS / mod_webapp / web-connector sub-project

2001-04-17 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Fine to see mod_webapp back to life :) Well, I don't really know how happy I am... > 1) You added many features interesting in building (autoconf, apr) > which we could study to adapt to mod_jk (at least autoconf). That's what was expected, I believe.