tomcat 4.0.4 rpm release 2

Available at : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.4/rpms/ More FHS compliant and misc fixes in spec files. Important change from previous version, is that the rpm didn't use no more IBM SDK 1.3.1 as default SDK. Read the following RPM info : ---

Re : mod_jk JkAutoMount - mod_jk 1.2.0

Hi Milt, >Anyone know anything about the mod_jk directive JkAutoMount? I've >seen some about it in the documentation, in the source, and via a web >search, but it's all a little bit sketchy. It sounds like it can be >used instead of JkMount, to have the web server query the servlet >container f

tomcat 4.0.4 rpm release

Available at : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.4/rpms/ This rpm use external rpms from the Jpackage Project (http://www.jpackage.org) Only needed binary rpm will be present in jakarta rpms directory : jakarta-commons-logging-1.0.1.cvs20020612-1jpp.noarch.rpm re

RE: Distribution Policy? Where did the RPMs go?

>Don't take me as a definitive source as I'm not a commiter (or >even a developer) but I believe there is work to make the RPMs >for tomcat4 more FHS compliant. There is also some debate as >to how FHS compliance should be achieved (proper directory >structure, symlinking in post-install, etc

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Tomcat 3.3.1 Final Released

Second release of RPM uploaded to match update in source tarball. http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1/rpms/ tomcat3-3.3.1-2.src.rpm tomcat3-3.3.1-2.noarch.rpm tomcat3-javadoc-3.3.1-2.noarch.rpm tomcat3-webapps-3.3.1-2.noarch.rpm also added latest IBM SDK 1.3.1 detecti

[RPMINFO] Tomcat 4.0.3 rpms reuploaded

The TC 4.0.3 rpm have been reuploaded since there was a nasty problem in previous upload and only .asc file where present. Sorry for the disturbance. - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...

RE: mod_proxy and getRemoteAddr()

>so, what do I need to make work TC 4.0.2-2, apache 1.3.22.1-7 >with ajp13 >? > >mod_jk-1.3-1.0-1.4.0.2.i386.rpm ??? > >seems to fail the RPM are built against apache + mod_ssl. I've got no problem to use Apache 1.3.23-2.8.6 + mod_jk-1.3-1.0-1.4.0.2 mod_jk-1.3-1.0-1.4.0.2 = mod_jk for A

RE: mod_proxy and getRemoteAddr()

>Does anyone know how I can get the remote address if I am >using mod_proxy? I >tried mod_webapp and had too many problems - has that matured since >Tomcat-4.0? What about using AJP13? mod_jk is now fully support in TC 4.0.2, with ajp13 and load-balancing support :) -- To unsubscribe:

RE: I give up!! - SOMEONE PLEASE HELP!

>You can't configure *apache* with mod_webapp and tomcat so that it >serves .html and .jsp from the same directory - right... (I >can't that's >for sure) Via mod_jk (supported by TC 4.0.2), you could have tomcat serve jsp/servlets and apache html, gif (everything which is not jsp/servlet) In

Problems with RPM

Nice page :) I read : Tomcat 4.0.2 -- RPM Version javax.servlet.ServletException: sun/tools/javac/Main JSP examples will not execute in the default installation. To "fix" the problem, you need to manually create a symbolic link between the JAVA_HOME/lib/tools.jar and the CATALINA_HOME/lib.

Re: web connectors

>What web connectors are available for connecting apache 1.3.x to tomcat >4.0.x? I recall trying to setup mod_webapp a while back but the attempt >failed in frustration and I ended up reverting back to tomcat 3 and mod_jk. >What connectors are available? (urls are good) Tomcat 4.0.2 support now

[RPMANN] Tomcat 3.3.1-b1/4.0.2 updated & connectors created

Hi, A quick note to say that the Tomcat 3.3.1-b1 and Tomcat 4.0.2 have been upgraded to RPM release 2 TC 3.3.1-B1 http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1-b1/rpms/ TC 4.0.2 + CONNECTORS http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.2/rpms/ The newly

RE: Tomcat - OMVS/S390 - Urgent

>> De: Brown Bay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Enviado el: jueves 14 de febrero de 2002 22:42 > >> Has anyone got Tomcat (any version) running under OMVS on S390. If you have a Linux VM on your S390 it will be easy since we package Tomcat 3.3/4.0.2 as RPM ;) BTW, Tomcat is a java apps which coul

Tomcat 4.0.2 Final RPM available

Hi to all, TC 4.0.2 rpms are available at : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.2/rpms/ But read the following before rushing : Tomcat 4.0.2 in light mode need : servletapi 2.3, regexp 1.2 and xerces 1.x, that are for some compiled (servletapi), present in source

Re: Tomcat 4.0.2 - Startup fails after moving xerces.xml from /common/lib to /server/lib

>> I am using xerces 2.0.0 in one of my webapps so I need to move xerces.jar >> out of /common/lib and into /server/lib. This works just fine with >>4.0.2-b2. >> With 4.0.2 If I keep xerces.jar in /common/lib and use xerces.jar 1.4.3 in >> my web app everything starts up just fine. But if I move x

RE: Tomcat 3.3a RPMs updated

The Tomcat 3.3 rpms has been updated to release 2 to fix a problem with launchers configuration paths. http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3/rpms/ -- To unsubscribe: For additional commands: Troubles with the list: <

RE: Tomcat 4.0.1 Suse 7.2 Can't Get It To Work In Stand Alone Mode

Did you tried the RPM for TC 4.0.1 ? - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From: Steve [mailto:[EMA

RE: Tomcat 4.0.1, Apache 1.3.22, Warp Connector and Loadbalancing

Tomcat 4.0.2 will support load balancing with mod_jk. Stay tuned - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message--

RE: Configuring Multiple Tomcat JVMs with Apache - Load Balancing

>in my application i want two servers(tomcat 3.2.3) you should upgrade to 3.3 ;) >residing on >two different >machines to cater to requests coming another different >machinewhich keeps >forwarding the requests to either of the servers.Pls guide how >can i achieve >the same.I have added two w

RE: Stability of Tomcat 3.3 vs. 4.0

>Load balancing can be simulate it with several warp connectors >and virtual >host, the load balancing is not more than a very good >configured pooling >connection, that's what is in 4.x It's not totally true. VirtualHost and warp connectors didn't do a real load-balancing. ie: If you have 500

RE: Configuring Multiple Tomcat JVMs with Apache - Load Balancing

>there hasn't been done anything on that topic yet ? What's >the status of >loadbalacing, either mod_jk or mod_webapp ? >Is that political due to if loadbalacing is working properly >there won't be >any reason to take (buy) anything else than TC ? State of the art is that today only mod_jk

RE: Connection reset by peer

May I recommand you to switch to Tomcat 3.3, for strict 2.2/1.1 RI, which fixes quantities of problems like this ? The RI for 2.2/1.1 is Tomcat 3.3 today, just take a look at java.sun.com :) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP

RE: Connecting TC40 with Apache 1.3 using mod_jk

>using mod_jk for connecting TC40 and Apache1.3 works fine for >Windows NT, >2000 and Solaris. I could easily build the connector from >source using the >download and the documentation from >http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/ajp13-tc4.0/. > >The only difference between Solaris and Win is that I

RE: Netscape 3.6.2 with TC4.0

Use mod_jk for that :) for TC 4.0 take stuff from : http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/ajp13-tc4.0/ for TC 4.0.1, ajp support is included. In both case you should take a recent mod_jk like the one for Tomcat 3.3 http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3/bin/win32/i386/ - He

RE: mod_jk vs. mod_webapp & tomcat4

>Which connector is the preferred or suggested connector for tomcat 4? >I've seen some people saying they switched back to mod_jk. Is >mod_jk more >desireable until mod_webapp is more advanced? As a mod_jk developper, I will say use mod_jk with TC 4.0.1 since it support more WebServer and is s

RE: repost mod_jk with ip-based virtual host

>http://a.b.c.d:5476/ shows apache default page, as expected. >http://a.b.c.d:5475/ also shows apache default page. >but, http://a.b.c.d:5475/examples/ shows apache's 404 page >'Apache/1.3.20 Server at a.b.c.d Port 5476' > >thanks again for your thoughts. Using mod_jk it should be easy : Could

RE: This would be cool in tomcat as well...

>> Tomcat is a _reference_ implementation. >> I doubt it will be polluted by non-portable extensions, even >if they seem to >> be useful. > >Such as connectors to specific web servers? :) What do you mean ? >While I did post this knowing I was at risk of appearing to troll, I >wasn't, and th

RE: Byte Serving PDF's

Not necessary, if tomcat 3.x/4.0 forward the Range information to the end Servlet - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >--

RE: STARTUP.SH DOESN'T WORKS FINE

If you want a process to be independant from user connection, disconnection on a Unix boxes (and more generally on any system), you should make it run as a service. For example on Linux, you make it run at init time via script in /etc/rc.d/init.d/. And to be sure your tomcat has nothing to do w

RE: mod_jk / Ajp13 config fix on heavily loaded system

to be threads communicating >on a particular >>port with an open socket to a Tomcat instance. Each separate Tomcat >>instance has its own VM and is listening on a different port >number/host >>combination. I don't think the workers actually do much >work. They jus

mod_jk / Ajp13 config fix on heavily loaded system

Hi to all, Some of you may have experienced problems on heavily loaded system with mod_jk and Tomcat 3.2/3.3 when using ajp13. As you may know, the Ajp13 connection is permanent and is created each time a WebServer task, for example an Apache child, have to forward a request to Tomcat. And in

RE: Integrate Apache 1.3.20 and Tomcat 3.2 in Win2k

You could use also Tomcat 3.3 with mod_jk : JkMount /examples/servlet/* ajp13 JkMount /examples/*.jsp ajp13 JkMount /onjava/servlet/* ajp13 JkMount /onjava/*.jsp ajp13 JkMount /web_change/servlet/* ajp13 JkMount /web_change/*.jsp ajp13

RE: problem tc 4.0.1 and Apache 1.3.2

It's normal, the error code is in fact a warning code, telling you that the remote (Apache), closed the connection. It's just informative : PS: The latest version of Ajp13 for TC 4.0.1 from jakarta-tomcat-connectors fix that 'bad report' You could find the right and corrected jars at : ht

RE: AJP13 bad read -113?

It's a normal behaviour and happen when IIS didn't have to works anymore with Tomcat (may be thread cleanup on IIS) No problem here - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9

RE: Reg. Multiple Server certificates at one Webserver for SSL connection

> Hi, > This ques. is Reg. to Multiple Server certificate support at one > Webserver for SSL connection. > > How can l map different multiple server Certificates to one > webserver? > Impossible my friend, you could only have ONE SSL Server certificate by IP adress.

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Tomcat 3.3 RPM Updated

Some minor glitches appears and reported also bu Nicolas: RH 6.x use nobody user to run Apache HTTP server, so I used also that one to operate tomcat but RH 7.x use apache user to run Apache HTTP server ===> The new RPM will create a tomcat user which will run tomcat. Other updates : -

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Tomcat 3.3 RPM Fixed

A little problem was discovered by Nicolas Mailhot, in the tomcat 3.3, java part, with an incorrect tomcat init script which wasn't used the new 'nobody' work mode. Now tomcat run as nobody by default for security purposes. The RPM has been updated to -2 release and the old one removed : http:/

IBM iSeries (AS/400) using Apache 2.0 and Tomcat

Apache 2.0.18 is present in iSeries (AS/400) http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/software/http/services/apache.h tm And they use tomcat also http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/software/http/services/tomcat.h tml And to link the both they use mod_jk (ajp12/ajp13/jni) ;) -

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Tomcat 3.3 Final Released

RPMs and Linux binaries (i386) are available. http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3/rpms/ You'll find mod_jk for Apache 1.3 STD and EAPI, and mod_jk for Apache 2.0 grabbed from jakarta-tomcat-connectors (20011123). http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat/rele

RE: AJP bad read - 113

gt;and so far it´s been ok, except for this error message, but I will >report when we do more testing on it (probably later today). >I will try to switch the logging flag on, to get more error info. > >thanx, > -reynir > > >-Original Message- >From: GOMEZ Henri [ma

RE: EAPI Vs DEAPI

Allready answered, just search the mail archive >-Original Message- >From: Mradul Awasthi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:49 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: EAPI Vs DEAPI > > >hi , >i have mod_jk.so file. >i made with > >/usr/local/apache/bin/a

RE: tomcat 4 & jsvc

Typo : s/roto/root/ it's root not roto :) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >

RE: tomcat 4 & jsvc

You should be roto to launch anything listening on port less than 1024. You could try to use sudo or maybe switch to port 8080, as it's by default - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP

RE: has anybody mod_webapp.dll ? Me too!!

Why not take a look at mod_jk with TC 4.0 ? http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/ajp13-tc4.0/ - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6

RE: Ideas for future versions of Tomcat (a bit controversial maybe)?

Good stuff Chris. I forwarded to tomcat-dev, where evolutions of Tomcat are discussed... - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6

RE: Which Apache connector?

>First mod_jserv, then mod_jk, now mod_webapp. >First ajp12, then ajp13, now warp. > >Which Apache connector will be around in the longer term? >Should we abandon mod_jk and ajp1x? mod_jk is here for a long time, supporting TC 3.2/3.3/4.0 :)

RE: 4.0 RPMs: when

>From: Jonathan Eric Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:43 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: 4.0 RPMs: when > > >What's wrong with the .zip file? > >Jon Problems with license of all the required jar (jta, jmx, ldap, tyrex). I asked Craig to have all the ja

RE: Loadbalancing with mod_jk and stickiness ?

>We just encontered a problem, when a session is started on one tomcat >and then through a load balancer it ends up on the another webserver >that webserver dosen't direct the session to correct tomcat ? > >Is this a bug or isn't mod_jk supposed to work that way ? > >This is working with mod_jserv

RE: ssl performance

...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 > -Original Message- > From: Rams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 6:19 PM > To: GOMEZ Henri > Cc: Manu L'Malin; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subjec

RE: 4.0 RPMs: when

>I heard a lot of good things about 4.0. But there are no RPMs >released:( >Can anyone comment the situation with them (or just give URL:)? We still have problems with related jars, like jdbc2.0ext, jta, jmx, ldap which are copyrigthed by Sun and so couldn't be included in RPM

RE: tomcat on Embedded Systems?? (J2ME )

>Is there a lite edition of tomcat available for using with >J2ME-CDC-Foundation profile. We want to use tomcat in a memory >restricted >environment. What are the possibilities. Take a look at tomcat-3.3. Costin have conducted some test on it's PALM :)

RE: Where can I find the WebApp connector windows binary forTomcat RC2?

>I know that somehow mod_jk can work with Tomcat 4.0, but I >seriously don't >know their level of compliancy to the spec, and about the >quality of their >code. You should take a look at mod_jk found on jakarta-tomcat-connectors. It's works with TC 3.2/3.3/4.0 and support web-servers like A

RE: Error ajp13_process_callback - write failed

>Hello, >I have an error, which will occure, when I refresh in the Web Client >is too fast, >Tomcat will throw an Error (or better mod_jk ?), which popup on >stdout: > >java.io.IOException: Broken pipe >at >java.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputStream.java:83) >at >org.apa

RE: 2 Webservers -> 1 Tomcat Engine

>I would like to force 2 separate iPlanet 4.1 Web servers to >redirect servlet >requests to a Tomcat 3.2.3 servlet engine running on an >additional box. Is >Tomcat capable of keeping session and responding to the >correct, requesting >Web server? Yes, mod_jk for iPlanet handle that case, I'

RE: ApacheModuleJServ.dll is gone?

>Thanks for the replies! >Just to be very sure, if I try mod_jk.dll then I'll have to >change this line >in /conf/tomcat-apache.conf >LoadModule jserv_module modules/ApacheModuleJServ.dll >to >LoadModule jserv_module modules/mod_jk.dll >and all of this will stil work with version 3.2.2? > mod_jk

RE: bug 1006 - v3.2.3

>We are using Tomcat 3.2.3, ibm jdk 1.2.2 (aix). >(our) Tomcat has a similar symptom than the bug 1006 >described in the bug database : Tomcat standlone >accumulate blocked thread and stop responding. In TC 3.2.3 the code setSoTimeout is in HttpConnectionHandler ! >Isn't it supposed to be fixed

RE: Multiple Tomcat workers (using mod_jk)

>I've got a couple of quick newbie questions: >Environment: Apache 1.3.20 on Solaris 8; Tomcat 3.2 (using >mod_jk); Apache >and Tomcat running on the same box. > >If I configure and run multiple Tomcat workers on the same machine >(listening on different ports of course), and let's say they >are

RE: mod_jk.so differences

It was answered many times before. http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg09075.html People should really take a look at : USER LIST : http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user%40jakarta.apache.org/ DEV LIST : http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-dev%40jakarta.apache.org/

RE: mod_jk.so differences

Thanks Jan, I'll add this as readme.txt in directory :) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From

RE: TC323 standalone/ajp13 & thread pools

>Hi (.*), > > Hope all is well around the globe. > > We've been doing some stress testing here with Tomcat >3.2.3 operating > in standalone mode and with apache via the mod_jk ajp13 >connector. > > We've noticed something interesting which we're not sure about. > >

RE: mod_jk.so differences

>Yes.. but the difference with mod_jk.so is that mod_jk-eapi.so >can use SSL protocol? How many times I have answered to that ? eapi is for apache compiled with mod_ssl noeapi for std apache >I use Apache 1.3.. no matter that?? > >Roby. > > >> GOMEZ Henri wrote

RE: mod_jk.so differences

>I use Debian... > >R. > >----- Original Message - >From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:17 AM >Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences > > >> If you using Linux, may I propose you

RE: mod_jk.so differences

If you using Linux, may I propose you take a look at my RPMs : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/rpms/ - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9

RE: jk_module loading problem

Take a look at mod_jk in Tomcat 3.3 cvs or better in jakarta-tomcat-connector. There is a working version for Apache 2.0 :) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8

RE: mod_jk required for apache/tomcat/SSL?

>In any documentation about using SSL with >apache/tomcat I >allways find configuration examples for mod_jk, but none for mod_jserv >(which I use). Is mod_jk a must when using apache/tomcat/SSL? >If not, how >can it be done with mod_jserv? Yes, mod_jk will forward to your servlet/JSP the SSL i

RE: mod_jk required for apache/tomcat/SSL?

>Hi there! > >I want to use tomcat togehter with apache+mod_ssl. However, >accessing my >servlets via SSL doesn't work at all, whereas using normal >http requests it >all works fine. In any documentation about using SSL with >apache/tomcat I >allways find configuration examples for mod_jk, but

RE: link tomcat <-> apache

mod_webapp is ONLY for Tomcat 4.0. For 3.2 and 3.3 (or 4.0), use mod_jk instead # httpd.conf AddModule mod_jk.c JkWorkersFile /etc/httpd/conf/workers.properties JkLogFile /var/log/httpd/mod_jk.log JkLogLeveldebug Alias /examples "/var/tomcat/webapps/examples" Options Inde

RE: Patch to bug #345 complete ?

Thanks to forward the request to tomcat-dev instead :) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From:

RE: Help w/ Tomcat 4.0b6 and Apache

May I suggest you to try mod_jk with ajp13 port for Tomcat 4.0 ? All stuff on jakarta-tomcat-connectors :) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B

RE: IIS + SSL + tomcat configuration

>Is there anything I need to do with tomcat 3.2 configuration >when I turn on >SSL in Win2k IIS 5? > >All of the supposely https://server/... are changed to >http://server:443/... https://server/ should be use instead of http://server:443/ Did you install IIS connector and did you try IIS/To

RE: mod_jk for solaris

>It appears we are fighting the same battle at the same time. >I have ripped >through this for an entire night. Not only isn't there a >build script for >solaris in the default tar, the apxs compile directions are wrong! The build script is obsolete and you should use instead Makefile.linux

RE: jk_nt_service and NT error 2140

I've got no idea yet. Could you forward the question to TC dev list ? - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Messa

RE: jakarta-tomcat-connectors (was: help with building mod_jk)

a symbolic link to sbin? You should use autoconf. ./buildconf.sh ./configure -- (check options) cd apache-1.3 make -f Makefile.apxs >I'm obviously in over my head here being a newbie... but I'd >like to fix >that by learning why the apxs command looks like it all but >jus

RE: mod_jk.log messages

Could you switch to mod_jk found on jakarta-tomcat-connectors ? It contains up to date codes and have timestamp in logs. Write failed seems to indicate you have restarted Tomcat at some time or may be you add too many mod_jk process in Apache compared to available threads handling ajp13 in Tomcat

RE: IIS and Tomcat 3.3

>I have setup Tomcat to work with Apache and it is fine. I try >to use IIS and it does not work. The latest millenium (M4) get its IIS code from jakarta-tomcat-connectors. But from what I see in logs I'll be for a configuration mistake. Could you send the IIS config files ?) >Does anyone have

RE: help with building mod_jk

>(Jakarta Tomcat something?) > >Thanks > >Michael > >on 7/10/01 9:05 AM, GOMEZ Henri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> You should take a look at J-T-C, there is a build conf stuff >> which should help you >> >> - >> Henri Gomez ___[

RE: help with building mod_jk

You should take a look at J-T-C, there is a build conf stuff which should help you - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-

RE: mod_jk.so-eapi vs mod_jk.so-noeapi

apache is compiled with any non-standard libraries >(mod_so for example)? > >Ryan > > >----- Original Message - >From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:00 AM >Subject: RE: mod_jk.so-e

RE: mod_jk.so-eapi vs mod_jk.so-noeapi

mod_jk.so-eapi is to be used when your apache is using EAPI (mod_ssl) mod_jk.so-noeapi when using plain std Apache :) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53

RE: mod_webapp.so

>p.d.: what is the difference between mod_jk and >mod_webapp?(It is The >version of tomcat?) mod_jk is the current reference for connecting a web-server (Apache 1.3/2.0, IIS, iPlanet, Domino, ...) to tomcat web-server. It supports load-balancing and all the Tomcat release 3.1/3.2/3.3/4.0 mo

RE: mod_jserv/mod_jk

>ya but i need to get the .so file also as i want to put it on HP-UX. >.h files are missing ... > Could I recommand you grab jakarta-tomcat-connectors CVS and use the new build system. It's using autoconf and let you build your stuff in minutes :)

RE: jk_nt_service -- where exactly is it?

JK_NT_SERVICE is present on mod_jk and you'll find up to date versions on jakarta-tomcat-connectors sub-project. All remarks and contributions will be welcome :) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_

RE: mod_jserv/mod_jk

You should use Makefile.apxs which will use apxs to build your mod_jk.so - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 -Original Messa

RE: variable jk_b_set_buffer_size in mod_jk module....

And suddenly it did. It's highly >unpredictable. >I can just hope that I have a good luck, not to see this happen again. 1) What's your platform ? Linux/BSD. if you're using Linux use our RPM please :) 2) Did you do makefile -f Makefile.linux ? What's the output ? &g

RE: variable jk_b_set_buffer_size in mod_jk module....

You didn't compile ALL the source files - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From: Anshul [mailto:

RE: Socket problems under heavy load on Win2K

> The description is right, but the implications are >wrong. Due to >how TCP/IP works, these sockets will be closed by the OS within a few >minutes. I know on some UNIXs you can set this at run time >(i.e. Solaris) >and some its a compile time directive (i.e. FreeBSD). I don't >know ab

RE: mod_jk load-balancing and errors

mod_jk found in TC 3.3 and jakarta-tomcat-connector handle correctly the Tomcat restart. Could you test it ? - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B

RE: multipart/form-data&tomcat 3.2.2 problem

>We use mod_jk with Tomcat and Apache on a number of servers and have >never seen this problem. I honestly don't believe mod_jk has anything >to do with it. Thanks Simon :)

RE: multipart/form-data&tomcat 3.2.2 problem

>I had the same problem. Someone told me to use mod_jserv >instead of mod_jk >and it works fine May we recommand you try (and insist) using mod_jk and ajp13. That's the current connector and if there is problem we'll fix them. The step are know, first try mod_jk + ajp13 and next try mod_jk + a

RE: [Tomcat Documentation Redactors To Hire] - WAS: TOMCAT SUCKS

>I'd be willing to proofread and validate any docs for the j-t-c (i.e. >Apache/Tomcat integration). I don't have time to actually write the >docs, but I could conceivably help those who don't understand how it >works, but do have the time and patience to learn it and write docs >for it. Be ou

[Tomcat Documentation Redactors To Hire] - WAS: TOMCAT SUCKS

> Not to get into a great big argument over OS version commercial >products, but if OS projects expect to be taken with the same >consideration >as commercial they have to accept to be compared across the board. This >includes documentation. You can't just pick and choose the >battles you

RE: URGENT jk_connect.c problem / UPDATE: weird log entry in mod_jk.log & other problems

>i have some strange entries in my mod_jk.log, generated almost >every minute: > >[jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 111 >[jk_ajp12_worker.c (152)]: In jk_endpoint_t::service, Error sd = -1 >[jk_uri_worker_map.c (335)]: >jk_uri_worker_map_t::uri_worker_map_close, NULL

RE: Odd Tomcat 3.3m3 Problem

> I'm going to throw my 2 cents worth in here, did you, >perhaps, stop >Tomcat after starting Apache? I seem to remember that every >time you stop >Tomcat, you must also stop Apache, then start Tomcat and start Apache. No more a problem on mod_jk for TC 3.3-m3 :)

RE: Odd Tomcat 3.3m3 Problem

ince Apache will loose time to reestablish the connection. Also did you have a firewall between Apache and Tomcat, something which could drop connections after a certain time of inactivity ? >Best Regards, > >Jason > > >On Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:20:57 +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote: >

RE: apache & tomcat as services under Linux

>The scripts should be named "apache" ant "tomcat" and should be >in /etc/rc.d/init.d/ or named httpd and tomcat. if you're a Linux user and could use RPM, there is pre-packaged RPM for you which take care of that :) >then you should make a symbolic link to them in /etc/rc.d/rc3.d/ >in the cas

RE: Odd Tomcat 3.3m3 Problem

>I have one site running three contexts with Apache 1.3.19 on FreeBSD >running against Tomcat 3.3m3 on a Solaris machine. Right now, I'm >using ajp13. > >Everything seems to be going fine except every once in a while, almost >randomly, I get back a directory listing of the first context >in

RE: huge problem with mod_jk and Apache

Take a look at your mod_jk.conf. For example check the JkMount command and LogLevel - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-

RE: Problems with ajp13, mod_jk, and load balancer

You could try to increase the number of Ajp13 threads in server.xml Also try to increase mod_jk cachesize : worker.ajp13.port=8009 worker.ajp13.host=localhost worker.ajp13.type=ajp13 worker.ajp13.lbfactor=1 worker.ajp13.cachesize=8 - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTEC

RE: why tomcat doesn't run?

Please make us a favor, try our RPM. http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.2/rpms/ - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 90

RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.x RPMS : Which XML Parser to be put in ? : WAS : XML parser: old version

>I do not know whether it is JAXP-compatible and native but some MS XML >parser does exist... I'm not sure we will ever saw a MS XML parser on Linux and may never a MS Java XML Parser >> I started think at this that's why my latest xerces-j RPM have a : >> >> Provides jaxp 1.1 >Great! This

  1   2   3   4   >