if it runs
more reliably. I´m going to give it a go.
bye Michael Delamere
- Original Message -
From: Michael Delamere [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2
I just
]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2
I just found an interesting post here about the ajp14 connector. At
this point though no testing had been done on apache2 :-).
http://archives2.real
Subject: Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2
I just found an interesting post here about the ajp14 connector. At this
point though no testing had been done on apache2 :-).
http://archives2.real-time.com/pipermail/tomcat-devel/2001-June/018332.html
bye Michael Delamere
- Original Message
List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2
I just found an interesting post here about the ajp14 connector. At
this point though no testing had been done on apache2 :-).
http://archives2.real-time.com/pipermail/tomcat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2
I just found an interesting post here about the ajp14 connector. At this
point though no testing had been done on apache2 :-).
http://archives2.real-time.com/pipermail/tomcat-devel/2001
Costin,
I appreciate you taking the time to further explain jk!!!
Thank You,
Anthony
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Anthony W. Marino wrote:
The example for mod_jk2 shows a worker's config for AJP13 but I
thought that jk2 is AJP14?
Well, there is a lot of confusion ( and I'm talking about those
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Michael Delamere wrote:
I think another point of confusion is what future mod_jk is going to have.
I´ve read a lot about the future of this connector lately and it appears
that a lot of work is taking place right now in order to get mod_jk2 running
stable and to improve
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Anthony W. Marino wrote:
The example for mod_jk2 shows a worker's config for AJP13 but I thought
that jk2 is AJP14?
Well, there is a lot of confusion ( and I'm talking about those of us who
are working on the connector !). We used to call 'ajp13' 3 things:
- a wire
: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2
I just found an interesting post here about the ajp14 connector. At this
point though no testing had been done on apache2 :-).
http://archives2.real-time.com/pipermail/tomcat-devel/2001-June/018332.html
bye
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Simon Stewart wrote:
The workers can be called anything you want them to be (for example, I
use tomcat1) What tends to happen is that people take their
(working) apache 1.3.x + mod_jk combo and use the same config files
with apache 2.x and mod_jk2.
Well... I was
Delamere
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 3:57 AM
Subject: Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Simon Stewart wrote:
The workers can be called anything you want them to be (for example, I
The example for mod_jk2 shows a worker's config for AJP13 but I thought
that jk2 is AJP14?
Anthony
Thanks to Michael Delamere and Pascal Forget, I'm happy to shout out
that there's a HOWTO for setting up Apache 2, mod_jk2 and Tomcat on
Linux (and therefore probably other UNIX flavours)
PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2
The example for mod_jk2 shows a worker's config for AJP13 but I
thought
that jk2 is AJP14?
Anthony
Thanks to Michael Delamere and Pascal Forget, I'm happy
]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2
Well there appears to be a jk_ajp14_worker. I wonder if this is the
reason for mod_jk2 being so unstable at present. It might be worth a test
to see if it works better
- Original Message -
From: Michael Delamere [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2
I just found an interesting post here about the ajp14 connector. At this
point though no testing had
The workers can be called anything you want them to be (for example, I
use tomcat1) What tends to happen is that people take their
(working) apache 1.3.x + mod_jk combo and use the same config files
with apache 2.x and mod_jk2.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:09:42AM -0400, Anthony W. Marino wrote:
Not the worker name however the type is defined as AJP13 and not AJP14 in
the example.
Anthony
The workers can be called anything you want them to be (for example, I
use tomcat1) What tends to happen is that people take their
(working) apache 1.3.x + mod_jk combo and use the same config
Thanks to Michael Delamere and Pascal Forget, I'm happy to shout out
that there's a HOWTO for setting up Apache 2, mod_jk2 and Tomcat on
Linux (and therefore probably other UNIX flavours)
It's linked from http://www.pubbitch.org/jboss
Regards,
Simon
--
I'm moving to Mars next week, so if you
18 matches
Mail list logo
