ource-file called " mod_jk.c"
> >>
> >>whereas the same location on the cvs server has a file called mod_jk2.c.
> >>
> >>Although this doesn´t mean much, it at least shows some form of a change
> >>:-). It might be worth trying to compile this
gt; >
> > > Although this doesn´t mean much, it at least shows some form of a change
> > >
> > > :-). It might be worth trying to compile this version and see if it runs
> > >
> > > more reliably. I´m going to give it a go.
> > >
> > > bye M
runs
>>more reliably. I´m going to give it a go.
>>
>>bye Michael Delamere
>>
>>
>>- Original Message -
>>From: "Michael Delamere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>S
od_jk2.c.
> > >
> > > Although this doesn´t mean much, it at least shows some form of a
> > > change
> > >
> > > :-). It might be worth trying to compile this version and see if it
> > > : runs
> > >
> > > more reliably. I´m going
bye Michael Delamere
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -
> > From: "Michael Delamere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:03 PM
> > Subject: Re: Ap
Costin,
I appreciate you taking the time to further explain jk!!!
Thank You,
Anthony
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Anthony W. Marino wrote:
> > The example for "mod_jk2" shows a worker's config for "AJP13" but I
> > thought that "jk2" is "AJP14"?
>
> Well, there is a lot of confusion ( and I'm talking
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Michael Delamere wrote:
> I think another point of confusion is what future mod_jk is going to have.
> I´ve read a lot about the future of this connector lately and it appears
> that a lot of work is taking place right now in order to get mod_jk2 running
> stable and to impro
Delamere
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 3:57 AM
Subject: Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Simon Stewart wrote:
>
> > The workers can be called
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Simon Stewart wrote:
> The workers can be called anything you want them to be (for example, I
> use "tomcat1") What tends to happen is that people take their
> (working) apache 1.3.x + mod_jk combo and use the same config files
> with apache 2.x and mod_jk2.
Well... I was th
--- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Delamere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2
>
>
> > I just found an interesting post
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Anthony W. Marino wrote:
> The example for "mod_jk2" shows a worker's config for "AJP13" but I thought
> that "jk2" is "AJP14"?
Well, there is a lot of confusion ( and I'm talking about those of us who
are working on the connector !). We used to call 'ajp13' 3 things:
- a
Not the worker name however the type is defined as "AJP13" and not "AJP14" in
the example.
Anthony
> The workers can be called anything you want them to be (for example, I
> use "tomcat1") What tends to happen is that people take their
> (working) apache 1.3.x + mod_jk combo and use the same co
The workers can be called anything you want them to be (for example, I
use "tomcat1") What tends to happen is that people take their
(working) apache 1.3.x + mod_jk combo and use the same config files
with apache 2.x and mod_jk2.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:09:42AM -0400, Anthony W. Marino wrote:
ye Michael Delamere
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Delamere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2
> I just found an interesting post here about th
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2
> Well there appears to be a "jk_ajp14_worker". I wonder if this is the
> reason for mod_jk2 being so unstable at p
thony W. Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2
> The example for "mod_jk2" shows a worker's config for "AJP13" but I
thought
>
The example for "mod_jk2" shows a worker's config for "AJP13" but I thought
that "jk2" is "AJP14"?
Anthony
> Thanks to Michael Delamere and Pascal Forget, I'm happy to shout out
> that there's a HOWTO for setting up Apache 2, mod_jk2 and Tomcat on
> Linux (and therefore probably other UNIX fla
Thanks to Michael Delamere and Pascal Forget, I'm happy to shout out
that there's a HOWTO for setting up Apache 2, mod_jk2 and Tomcat on
Linux (and therefore probably other UNIX flavours)
It's linked from http://www.pubbitch.org/jboss
Regards,
Simon
--
"I'm moving to Mars next week, so if you
18 matches
Mail list logo