Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-30 Thread costinm
ource-file called " mod_jk.c" > >> > >>whereas the same location on the cvs server has a file called mod_jk2.c. > >> > >>Although this doesn´t mean much, it at least shows some form of a change > >>:-). It might be worth trying to compile this

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-30 Thread costinm
gt; > > > > Although this doesn´t mean much, it at least shows some form of a change > > > > > > :-). It might be worth trying to compile this version and see if it runs > > > > > > more reliably. I´m going to give it a go. > > > > > > bye M

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-30 Thread Jeffrey Bonevich
runs >>more reliably. I´m going to give it a go. >> >>bye Michael Delamere >> >> >>- Original Message - >>From: "Michael Delamere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>S

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-30 Thread Anthony W. Marino
od_jk2.c. > > > > > > Although this doesn´t mean much, it at least shows some form of a > > > change > > > > > > :-). It might be worth trying to compile this version and see if it > > > : runs > > > > > > more reliably. I´m going

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-30 Thread Anthony W. Marino
bye Michael Delamere > > > > > > ----- Original Message - > > From: "Michael Delamere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:03 PM > > Subject: Re: Ap

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-29 Thread Anthony W. Marino
Costin, I appreciate you taking the time to further explain jk!!! Thank You, Anthony > On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Anthony W. Marino wrote: > > The example for "mod_jk2" shows a worker's config for "AJP13" but I > > thought that "jk2" is "AJP14"? > > Well, there is a lot of confusion ( and I'm talking

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-28 Thread costinm
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Michael Delamere wrote: > I think another point of confusion is what future mod_jk is going to have. > I´ve read a lot about the future of this connector lately and it appears > that a lot of work is taking place right now in order to get mod_jk2 running > stable and to impro

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-27 Thread Michael Delamere
Delamere - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 3:57 AM Subject: Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2 > On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Simon Stewart wrote: > > > The workers can be called

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-27 Thread costinm
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Simon Stewart wrote: > The workers can be called anything you want them to be (for example, I > use "tomcat1") What tends to happen is that people take their > (working) apache 1.3.x + mod_jk combo and use the same config files > with apache 2.x and mod_jk2. Well... I was th

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-27 Thread costinm
--- Original Message - > From: "Michael Delamere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:03 PM > Subject: Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2 > > > > I just found an interesting post

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-27 Thread costinm
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Anthony W. Marino wrote: > The example for "mod_jk2" shows a worker's config for "AJP13" but I thought > that "jk2" is "AJP14"? Well, there is a lot of confusion ( and I'm talking about those of us who are working on the connector !). We used to call 'ajp13' 3 things: - a

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-26 Thread Anthony W. Marino
Not the worker name however the type is defined as "AJP13" and not "AJP14" in the example. Anthony > The workers can be called anything you want them to be (for example, I > use "tomcat1") What tends to happen is that people take their > (working) apache 1.3.x + mod_jk combo and use the same co

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-26 Thread Simon Stewart
The workers can be called anything you want them to be (for example, I use "tomcat1") What tends to happen is that people take their (working) apache 1.3.x + mod_jk combo and use the same config files with apache 2.x and mod_jk2. On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:09:42AM -0400, Anthony W. Marino wrote:

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-26 Thread Michael Delamere
ye Michael Delamere - Original Message - From: "Michael Delamere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:03 PM Subject: Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2 > I just found an interesting post here about th

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-26 Thread Michael Delamere
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 4:30 PM Subject: Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2 > Well there appears to be a "jk_ajp14_worker". I wonder if this is the > reason for mod_jk2 being so unstable at p

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-26 Thread Michael Delamere
thony W. Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 4:09 PM Subject: Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2 > The example for "mod_jk2" shows a worker's config for "AJP13" but I thought >

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-26 Thread Anthony W. Marino
The example for "mod_jk2" shows a worker's config for "AJP13" but I thought that "jk2" is "AJP14"? Anthony > Thanks to Michael Delamere and Pascal Forget, I'm happy to shout out > that there's a HOWTO for setting up Apache 2, mod_jk2 and Tomcat on > Linux (and therefore probably other UNIX fla

Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-25 Thread Simon Stewart
Thanks to Michael Delamere and Pascal Forget, I'm happy to shout out that there's a HOWTO for setting up Apache 2, mod_jk2 and Tomcat on Linux (and therefore probably other UNIX flavours) It's linked from http://www.pubbitch.org/jboss Regards, Simon -- "I'm moving to Mars next week, so if you