Thank you.
setting the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 in the user profile works.
-Original Message-
From: Lerias, Hugo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 11:57 AM
To: Lerias, Hugo; Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat on linux : IBM JDK 1.3.1 -
Take a look at this
Hi,
>Nothing gets written to the log file.
>Catalina.out is created and the process seems to start
>when I issue the grep command.
Are the tomcat ports bound?
You may wish to set debug="99" on the various containers in server.xml
to maybe get more debugging information.
Yoav Shapira
This e-
Take a look at this post:
http://www.linux-sxs.org/programming/ibm-java.html#APPENDIX_A
Cheers,
Hugo
-Original Message-
From: Lerias, Hugo
Sent: Mittwoch, 10. März 2004 17:55
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat on linux : IBM JDK 1.3.1 -
Are you trying to use IBM
Are you trying to use IBM jdk 1.3 on red hat 9?
Hugo
-Original Message-
From: Asif Chowdhary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mittwoch, 10. März 2004 17:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat on linux : IBM JDK 1.3.1 -
Hi,
I am installing tomcat on RH9.
Tomcat version is 4.1.27
Nothing gets written to the log file.
Catalina.out is created and the process seems to start
when I issue the grep command.
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 11:51 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat on linux : IBM
Asif Chowdhary wrote:
Hi,
I am installing tomcat on RH9.
Tomcat version is 4.1.27 and the file is jakarta-tomcat-4.1.27.tar.gz
The installation works with JDK 1.4
but tomcat does not start when I try to use JDK 1.3.1
The browser returns the message Unable to connect to localhost with
http://lo
Hi,
>but tomcat does not start when I try to use JDK 1.3.1
>The browser returns the message Unable to connect to localhost with
>http://localhost:8080/.
What do the logs say?
Yoav Shapira
This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and
may contain infor
Hi,
I am installing tomcat on RH9.
Tomcat version is 4.1.27 and the file is jakarta-tomcat-4.1.27.tar.gz
The installation works with JDK 1.4
but tomcat does not start when I try to use JDK 1.3.1
The browser returns the message Unable to connect to localhost with
http://localhost:8080/.
Any su
"Gianluca Toso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In data Sat, 27 Dec 2003 19:24:33 +0100
> Gianluca Toso scrisse:
>
> > Problem build tomcat 5.0.16 with IBMJava2-SDK 1.4.1 on intel.
> > "ant" from src abort on src/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/build.xml, so
I
> > have
You should report this as a bug and attach the patch you provided here to
the bug, otherwise it may get lost in the shuffle.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/
Jake
At 11:33 PM 12/27/2003 +0100, you wrote:
In data Sat, 27 Dec 2003 19:24:33 +0100
Gianluca Toso scrisse:
> Problem build tomcat 5.0
In data Sat, 27 Dec 2003 19:24:33 +0100
Gianluca Toso scrisse:
> Problem build tomcat 5.0.16 with IBMJava2-SDK 1.4.1 on intel.
> "ant" from src abort on src/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/build.xml, so I
> have tried ant from this dir:
[...]
> /usr/local/src/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.16-src/src/jakarta-
Problem build tomcat 5.0.16 with IBMJava2-SDK 1.4.1 on intel.
"ant" from src abort on src/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/build.xml, so I
have tried ant from this dir:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.16-src/src/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/
util=>ant
Buildfile: build.xml
detect:
bu
cting with Mozilla Firebird.
There were no issues with wget either. Go figure.
Since the IBM JDK is becoming more popular perhaps there should be something in the
docs about 'IbmX509' and 'SSL' when using it. If I get a spare moment I'll try to
work up a doc patch.
Thanks
r out here ;-)
What's the secret to making SSL work in Tomcat 5.0.12 when running on Linux
with IBM JDK 1.4? I have followed the steps to the letter (thrice) and have
nothing to show for it yet. I found that you need to set algorithm to
"IbmX509" in the connector
OK, I'm tearing my hair out here ;-)
What's the secret to making SSL work in Tomcat 5.0.12 when running on Linux with IBM
JDK 1.4? I have followed the steps to the letter (thrice) and have nothing to show
for it yet. I found that you need to set algorithm to "IbmX509"
With 4.1.26 you should be able to use IBM's 1.4 JVM with the jsse jar in
server/lib. It will work without the jsee jar anywhere on the machine in
4.1.27. If you need it before then, you can grab the source files from the
CVS and compile the fixed version yourself.
"Francois Lascelles" <[EMAIL PR
I use tomcat 4.1.24 on a linux box and cannot get ssl going with ibm jvm
1.4.
I DID set the algorithm="IbmX509" in the Factory element of server.xml
and I also tried to copy jsse jars to server/lib directory but I always
end up getting the following error message.
NoClassDefFound : sun/security/p
: Richard Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: Debian, Apache 2.0.44, Tomcat 4.1.24, IBM JDK 1.4, JNI
> >inprocess
> >Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 08:45:37 -0700
> &
And you should upgrade to apache 2.0.45 anyways, since there is apparently a
un-announced security problem that was fixed.
On Thursday 03 April 2003 07:45 am, Richard Dunn wrote:
> On Thursday 03 April 2003 08:08, Peter H. wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Does someone use IB
roblems, although at least one of my sites
gets 5000 hits per day, all processing XML.
I am suprised with the relative slower performance of the IBM JDK 1.4.0 as
the IBM 1.3 JDK seemed to be faster than Sun's 1.3 for my applications.
---
r on the Debian User list.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Dunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:46 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Debian, Apache 2.0.44, Tomcat 4.1.24, IBM JDK 1.4, JNI
inprocess
On Thursday 03 April 2003 10:00, Peter H. wrote:
> Would be nice
On Thursday 03 April 2003 10:00, Peter H. wrote:
> Would be nice hint if sun's jvm runs under debian...heard it doesn't
> You know about this rumor?
>
It has been > 1 year since I last used Debian, so I am not aware of this
rumor. I hope it is not the case. I have been using the above configurati
Would be nice hint if sun's jvm runs under debian...heard it doesn't
You know about this rumor?
Thanks
From: Richard Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Debian, Apache 2.0.44, Tomcat 4.1
On Thursday 03 April 2003 08:08, Peter H. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does someone use IBM JDK 1.4 with tomcat 4.1.24 and apache 2.0.44
> Can't startup JVM exit -1 message...
I tried this setup a couple days ago (on Redhat 8.0) and it worked fine, but I
am using the mod_jk.so connector.
Hello,
Does someone use IBM JDK 1.4 with tomcat 4.1.24 and apache 2.0.44
Can't startup JVM exit -1 message...
Compiled jni*.so and
maybe its the problem because the ././classic/jvm*.so is used?
I thought jdk1.4 stops supporting classic jvm...
Greetings and thanks
Does anyone know why I need to set a system classpath when using the IBM
JDK, but have no problems if I don't set a classpath when using the Sun
JDK's?
Does tomcat add jar files from the sun package based on file name?
For example, I see that the java/lang package is in rt.jar in sun
I am have been using the Jikes compiler for about a month. Recently, we
switched to the IBM JDK and jikes will not compile any pages. We get an
error like shown below...
StandardWrapperValve[jsp]: Servlet.service() for servlet jsp threw exception
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to
On 04/25/2002 11:19 AM, did Greg Bailey write (doodah! doodah!):
> I'm not familiar with Debian but if it's a 2.4 Linux kernel, you may
> need to set the environment variable LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 to get Java
> applications (like Tomcat) to work. Some JDK's (like IBM
I'm not familiar with Debian but if it's a 2.4 Linux kernel, you may
need to set the environment variable LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 to get Java
applications (like Tomcat) to work. Some JDK's (like IBM JDK 1.3 and
1.3.1) do this for you automatically. I use IBM's JDK 1.3 with T
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Q] Using IBM JDK with tomcat 3.3
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is my setup:
>
> tomcat:
> 3.3a
> mod_jk:
> 3.3a
> Sun JDK: 1.1.8v1
> IBM JDK: 1.1.8
> OS: Debian GNU/Linux "testing"
>
> When I use Sun's JDK
Hi,
Here is my setup:
tomcat:
3.3a
mod_jk:
3.3a
Sun JDK: 1.1.8v1
IBM JDK: 1.1.8
OS: Debian GNU/Linux "testing"
When I use Sun's JDK, the ajp12 and ajp13 "workers" start accepting
connections. Here are relevant bits from the log files:
Jdk11Compat: Installing jar
I use Sun JDK 1.4 and am happy with the performance.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: ibm jdk 1.3 or sun jdk 1.4 ?
Which is faster for a tomcat webapp?
IBM JDK 1.3 or SUN JDK 1.4?
Any
Which is faster for a tomcat webapp?
IBM JDK 1.3 or SUN JDK 1.4?
Any reported problems with 1.4 & Tomcat?
Any decent benchmarking tools I can download and test with myself?
Ken
--
To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T
Hi
I have just installed IBMS JDK and am using it to run Tomcat 4. I am getting a few
exceptions
relating to the character encoding. Can someone please tell me if it is possible to
use
the IBM JDK 1.3 with UTF-8 for Tomcat 4
--
Cheers
Tony$B!#(B
I managed to start Tomcat 4.0.1 on my RH 7.0 box only after I replaced Sun's
JDK 1.3.1 with IBM's JDK 1.3.0.
This also avoids errors in some other packages (I'm experimenting with
Velocity).
So, if I want to have an SSL connection to TC 4.0.1 on IBM JDK 1.3.0, what
do I need to do
I believe the installer is only looking for registry keys
for Sun's JDK.
Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Graham Leggett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 12:10 PM
> To: Tomcat User
> Subject: Tomcat installer cannot find IBM JDK
&g
Hi all,
I just installed the IBM JDK v1.3 on a Windows 98 SE machine, then tried
to install Tomcat v4.0.1 from the .exe installer.
The installer complained that there was no JVM installed - when there
was. No clue was given by the installer as to why it could not find it,
or where it was
Philippe Muller at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> when running the jakarta 3.2.3-1 rpm it says it is
> assuming IBM JDK 1.3.0Does it matter if I run sun
> JDK 1.3.1_01
Nope, but for sure the IBM's VM multi-threading implementation is better :)
Pier
--
To unsubscribe:
when running the jakarta 3.2.3-1 rpm it says it is
assuming IBM JDK 1.3.0Does it matter if I run sun
JDK 1.3.1_01
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com
--
To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Is that really printed for each single request you make to Tomcat ? (It
> really shouldn't - since that thing is printed each time we fork a new
> processing thread in the HTTP connector -, and if it does, then it's the
> root cause of the problem)
>
>
> Hello all,
> Recently we decided we need a Java application, to be used with the Tomcat
> servlet engine. I had heard a few good things about IBM's JDK, so I went
> with that. This was a few weeks ago, and I chose tomcat 3.2.2 (the most
> recently available). The application (not written by m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Last week, when tomcat 4.0 was released, I quickly installed that on
> our test machine. Other than a minor problem with the PrintWriter
> call, everything seemed to work smoothly. No more slowness, and
> everything seemed fine (I should mention this is after having
Hello all,
Recently we decided we need a Java application, to be used with the Tomcat
servlet engine. I had heard a few good things about IBM's JDK, so I went
with that. This was a few weeks ago, and I chose tomcat 3.2.2 (the most
recently available). The application (not written by me or my co
cx130-20010626 (JIT enabled:
jitc))
I'd really rather use IBM's JDK, since in general it
is much more reliable than Sun's. How can I get Tomcat
running with the IBM JDK?
Many thanks,
Steve
Extract from localhost_log.2001-08-27.txt: (scan down for exception)
2001-08-27 12:27:44 S
For one year we are using it on our server. And this package is faster than
the sun's package.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Mike McGuinness [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Dienstag, 14. August 2001 18:21
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: IBM JDK
Has anyone tried IBM jdk/ru
Another reason to use IBM's jdk is that IBM will support it. They will
not support sun's jdk. It doesn't hurt that IBM's jdk is a very good
implementation.
"James, Stuart" wrote:
>
> why would you want to run the IBM JDK
Works great, similar environment to yours, except I am using the IBM HTTP
Server (modifid Apache) v1.3.19
My tests have shown that the IBM JDK is way faster than Sun's for my
application scenarios and you can also look at the Volano benchmarks.
Aravind
-Original Message-
From:
At 09:36 AM 8/14/2001, you wrote:
> Works very well for me running tomcat 3.2.3, rh 6.2 and IBMJava2-13
>(build 1.3.0, J2RE 1.3.0 IBM build cx130-20010329 (JIT enabled: jitc)
The IBM JVM is supposed to be considerably faster than Sun.
Yes, based on my experience with certain applications the IBM jdk was
faster than sun's. Your mileage may vary.
The other reason is I'm porting my apache/tomcat application to AIX and
wanted to run IBM's jdk there.
Mike
The main reason is I am porting from Linix to AIX
Jame
why would you want to run the IBM JDK ? is it faster/better than suns jdk ?
-Original Message-
From: Paul Rubenis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 5:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IBM JDK
Works very well for me running tomcat 3.2.3, rh 6.2 and
Works very well for me running tomcat 3.2.3, rh 6.2 and IBMJava2-13
(build 1.3.0, J2RE 1.3.0 IBM build cx130-20010329 (JIT enabled: jitc)
Mike McGuinness wrote:
>
> Has anyone tried IBM jdk/runtime environment on Linux with Tomcat 3.2.3?
>
> I'v got sun jdk 1.3, runni
Works great for me.
--mikej
-=-
mike jackson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike McGuinness [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: IBM JDK
>
>
> Has anyone tried IBM jdk/runt
Has anyone tried IBM jdk/runtime environment on Linux with Tomcat 3.2.3?
I'v got sun jdk 1.3, running on Red Hat 7.1, with apache 1.3.20, and
tomcat 3.2.3.
I was wondering how or if IBM's jdk/runtime works.
Mike
x27;t quitte get that question, as everyone is able to download sun's jdk
from their site isn't it?? That's the same for the IBM jdk, with the only
difference that you have to register yourself before you can download it.
>
> And, if you do not plan to redistribute your appl
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 3:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Compile JSP with Tomcat/IBM JDK 1.2.2/AIX4.3.3
Hi,
I did not mean Jikes because I already have a javac (which comes with the
JDK), and I don't want to compile Jikes from source for the AIX platform.
But your directions po
..)
Rgrds,
Klaas
> -Original Message-
> From: Gautam Sinha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: donderdag 2 augustus 2001 16:11
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Compile JSP with Tomcat/IBM JDK 1.2.2/AIX4.3.3
>
>
> I assume you mean the Jikes compiler when you say
Klaas van der Ploeg wrote:
> I managed to install Tomcat 3.2.3 on AIX with IBM's JDK 1.2.2. I also
> deployed my application on it using a .war file. But, when I
> request a jsp page, I get an exception "sun.tools.javac.Main" etc
>
> Of course, this is related to the fact that I'm not using
Hi All,
I managed to install Tomcat 3.2.3 on AIX with IBM's JDK 1.2.2. I also
deployed my application on it using a .war file. But, when I request a jsp
page, I get an exception "sun.tools.javac.Main" etc
Of course, this is related to the fact that I'm not using sun's jdk.
My question:
- C
rom: "Edward MacGillivray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 8:35 AM
> Subject: Re: Linux IBM JDK + Tomcat + SMP hangs
>
>
> > On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 22:42:18 -0500
> > "brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
y, March 23, 2001 8:35 AM
Subject: Re: Linux IBM JDK + Tomcat + SMP hangs
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 22:42:18 -0500
> "brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been having a really tough time to say the least
> > trying to get the
>
,
--Jeff
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 06:35:13PM -0600, Edward MacGillivray wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 22:42:18 -0500
> "brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been having a really tough time to say the least trying to get the IBM
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 22:42:18 -0500
"brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been having a really tough time to say the least
> trying to get the
> IBM JDK 1.3 to work on an SMP machine under linux. I
> don't think my
> problem is uni
Hi
have a look at http://www.volano.com/report.html
some interesting benchmarks
Holger
Todd Carmichael wrote:
>
> I have done some stress tests with Tomcat 3.2.1 and IBM VM 1.3 on a NT quad
> box. This configuration performs quite well. However, after a certain
> amount of time being stres
Interesting - we are currently running Sun's 1.2.2 VM and evaluating IBM 1.3 -
performance is pretty good, and so far no issues with the VM (Linux though, not
Windows).
Are you using a single VM with native threads, or just green? Conventional
wisdom use to be that green threads was the way to go
I have done some stress tests with Tomcat 3.2.1 and IBM VM 1.3 on a NT quad
box. This configuration performs quite well. However, after a certain
amount of time being stressed, the VM just crashes. No informational,
nothing just exits. I have tried turning on verbose at the vm level with no
lu
Recently I have tried IBM JDK1.3 to run my tomcat and everything seems ok.
However, when I wanted to pre-load a servlet from a package, I found that
the behavior of IBM¡¦s JDK & Sun¡¦s JDK are different where IBM¡¦s only
works with . while Sun¡¦s is /. Can anyone
advise which is correct?
*** Cu
Recently I have tried IBM JDK1.3 to run my tomcat and everything seems ok.
However, when I wanted to pre-load a servlet from a package, I found that
the behavior of IBM¡¦s JDK & Sun¡¦s JDK are different where IBM¡¦s only
works with . while Sun¡¦s is /. Can anyone
advise which is correct?
*** Cu
Hi,
I've been having a really tough time to say the least trying to get the
IBM JDK 1.3 to work on an SMP machine under linux. I don't think my
problem is unique. The JDK hangs, consuming 99% of the CPU.
>From what I can tell, this problem is specific to the IBM JDK 1.3 on SMP
ma
Hi! All,
I got the following error when starting Tomcat 3.2 with IBM JDK 1.3 in
Japanese Linux(Laser5 Linux). Can anyone help me? Thanks in advance.
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError:
java.lang.NullPointerException
69 matches
Mail list logo
