Dick Steflik wrote:
I had the same question. In all of the years I've worked with Java I've
always thought it was free of memory leaks. If you use a different
compiler does the problem go away. Is that how people like JRun
(Macromedia) and WebSphere (IBM) avoid the problem?
It could be.
. They are
problems of reference scope.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
-Original Message-
From: Nikola Milutinovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 1:16 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Need some Tomcat Configuration help badly
Dick Steflik wrote
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 1:16 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Need some Tomcat Configuration help badly
Dick Steflik wrote:
I had the same question. In all of the years I've worked with Java
I've
always thought it was free of memory leaks. If you use a different
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Need some Tomcat Configuration help badly
Dick Steflik wrote:
I had the same question. In all of the years I've worked with Java
I've
always thought it was free of memory leaks. If you use a
different
compiler does the problem go away. Is that how people
15, 2003 1:16 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Need some Tomcat Configuration help badly
Dick Steflik wrote:
I had the same question. In all of the years I've worked with Java
I've
always thought it was free of memory leaks. If you use a
different
compiler does
Millennium ChemInformatics
-Original Message-
From: Oscar Carrillo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:38 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Need some Tomcat Configuration help badly
Thanks.
I'm still not sure what kind of code would produce a memory leak. Any
: RE: Need some Tomcat Configuration help badly
Thanks.
I'm still not sure what kind of code would produce a memory leak. Any
chance you could give a brief description or example of this?
Thanks,
Oscar
http://daydream.stanford.edu/tomcat/install_web_services.html
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003
: I had the same question. In all of the years I've worked with Java I've
: always thought it was free of memory leaks.
This is a touchy topic, because a lot of it comes down to semantics:
Java frees the developer of explicitly destroying objects. This is key
in Java because your code only
-Original Message-
From: Philipp Taprogge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2003 3:39 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Need some Tomcat Configuration help badly
Hi!
Dick Steflik wrote:
I'm on W2000, just for the record. With this in mind which way should
the fork
PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2003 3:39 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Need some Tomcat Configuration help badly
Hi!
Dick Steflik wrote:
I'm on W2000, just for the record. With this in mind which way should
the fork be set; true ot false.
Concidering that this poor excuse
BTW, there is a bug with Tomcat which will cause it to run out of
memory after a number of restarts. You will probably run into this
with 30 students uploading new classes. You will also want to make
sure that the fork attribute for the JspServlet is set to true as well
as compiling
I had the same question. In all of the years I've worked with Java I've
always thought it was free of memory leaks. If you use a different
compiler does the problem go away. Is that how people like JRun
(Macromedia) and WebSphere (IBM) avoid the problem?
Dick Steflik
Nikola Milutinovic
Hi!
Dick Steflik wrote:
If you use a different
compiler does the problem go away.
I think so. I often hear that using jikes instead of javac would get
rid of the problem, which, if true, rises the question why tomcat does
not use jikes by default...
Phil
Dick Steflik wrote:
I had the same question. In all of the years I've worked with Java I've
always thought it was free of memory leaks. If you use a different
compiler does the problem go away. Is that how people like JRun
(Macromedia) and WebSphere (IBM) avoid the problem?
Which bug are you
Philipp Taprogge wrote:
Dick Steflik wrote:
If you use a different
compiler does the problem go away.
I think so. I often hear that using jikes instead of javac would get rid
of the problem, which, if true, rises the question why tomcat does not
use jikes by default...
Because jikes isn't as
Steflik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:24 AM
Subject: Re: Need some Tomcat Configuration help badly
I had the same question. In all of the years I've worked with Java I've
always thought it was free of memory leaks. If you use a different
task. Or write an Ant script to reload
it.
rgds
Antony Paul.
- Original Message -
From: Dick Steflik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:24 AM
Subject: Re: Need some Tomcat Configuration help badly
I had the same question. In all
Make sure you have reloadable=true in the contexts they're putting
their beans into:
Context path=/examples docBase=examples debug=0
reloadable=true crossContext=true
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Dick Steflik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday,
And you may also need to apply the class reloading hotfix for 4.1.27
http://www.apache.org/newsletter/200307.html#Jakarta_Tomcat
The hotfix jar is now here:
http://archive.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-4/binaries/
HTH,
Jon
Matt Raible wrote:
Make sure you have reloadable=true in the contexts
OK, I downloaded the zip file; how do I install it. It contains
StandardContext.class but i don't see that class file anywhere on my server.
Dick Steflik
Jon Wingfield wrote:
And you may also need to apply the class reloading hotfix for 4.1.27
I already did that Matt. Thanks
Dick
Matt Raible wrote:
Make sure you have reloadable=true in the contexts they're putting
their beans into:
Context path=/examples docBase=examples debug=0
reloadable=true crossContext=true
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Dick
Jon (or anyone else that is out there),
If you are still out there could you tell me the correct way to install
the hot fix.
Dick Steflik
Jon Wingfield wrote:
And you may also need to apply the class reloading hotfix for 4.1.27
http://www.apache.org/newsletter/200307.html#Jakarta_Tomcat
The
Unzip/untar it to your $CATALINA_HOME - it will extract it into the
proper folders.
-Original Message-
From: Dick Steflik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 4:01 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Need some Tomcat Configuration help badly
Jon
- it will extract it into the
proper folders.
-Original Message-
From: Dick Steflik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 4:01 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Need some Tomcat Configuration help badly
Jon (or anyone else that is out there),
If you are still out
Dick Steflik wrote:
Thanks, that did the trick , the entire Fall2003 class of CS328
(actually the kids were probably hoping that it wouldn't get fixed and I
would excuse them from the project) THANKS you .
BTW, there is a bug with Tomcat which will cause it to run out of memory
after a number
Hi!
David Rees wrote:
BTW, there is a bug with Tomcat which will cause it to run out of memory
after a number of restarts. You will probably run into this with 30
students uploading new classes. You will also want to make sure that
the fork attribute for the JspServlet is set to true as well
Philipp Taprogge wrote:
David Rees wrote:
BTW, there is a bug with Tomcat which will cause it to run out of
memory after a number of restarts. You will probably run into this
with 30 students uploading new classes. You will also want to make
sure that the fork attribute for the JspServlet is
: You will also want to make sure that
: the fork attribute for the JspServlet is set to true as well as
: compiling JSPs will leak memory unless the compiling process is forked.
I didn't catch the OP's OS, but this could be a catch-22.
I once ran into this one: Solaris fork() does
I'm on W2000, just for the record. With this in mind which way should
the fork be set; true ot false.
Dick Steflik
QM wrote:
: You will also want to make sure that
: the fork attribute for the JspServlet is set to true as well as
: compiling JSPs will leak memory unless the compiling process
Hi!
Dick Steflik wrote:
I'm on W2000, just for the record. With this in mind which way should
the fork be set; true ot false.
Concidering that this poor excuse for an OS does not even know the
meaning of fork(), I'd say you set it to true. W2K should then start a
completely new process from
30 matches
Mail list logo
