Antonio,
In fact, cap it at 10 and watch the app dring to a halt before it even
gets going. This is a pretty compelling example. If the pool is drying
up, they're definately screwing up.
It is. But developers may reply: You are using less connections than
those specified in (the contract) /
of the developers responding his thread and get the issues fixed for
the project.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 9:49 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat
Kannan,
Being yourself as SYSADMIN
On Monday March 01 2004 06:42 pm, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Tried that. Capped it at 35 and the webserver stopped servicing any
DB request as soon as the pool reached 35. This is why I believe the
pool management is faulty and/or something is hogging all the
connections.
I share
PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat
Sysadmins are sysadmins AND developers are developers. No one
cannot cross the borderline or even compare.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Stephen,
In fact, cap it at 10 and watch the app dring to a halt before it even
gets going. This is a pretty compelling example. If the pool is drying
up, they're definately screwing up.
Whoa there pardner: I am not going to deliberately cripple a production box.
The problem has been
Yes, But that doesn't mean that we can put and point on developers for any
problem.
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Einfeldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 10:59 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat
No that's not true,
My
Kennan,
I can agree partially to yours. But if you see him, he doesn't know about
the impact of JVM and tuning parameters, as he mentioned in his email. Do
you expect him to take a lead in fixing that? I have seen the projects
losing its focus by the nature of peoples deviating to get their
omcast.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
03/02/2004 10:42 AM Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts
Here is some more information on the problem. From a developer:
According to the document that the link below refers to, a single
instance of Tomcat will have multiple JVMs, where each JVM represents a
virtual host. The following link clearly states this virtual host concept
as it applies to
... You are using
4.1.x and they are quoting 3.x docs. They should know better!
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Carville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 9:18 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat
Here is some more
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 10:18 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat
Here is some more information on the problem. From a developer:
According to the document that the link below refers to, a single
instance of Tomcat will have multiple JVMs, where
Antonio,
And bad. Every time I restart, Tomcat loses the state information for
established login sessions. Customer don't like that.
That (with a high probability) is because some objects they store in
sessions are not Serializable. IOW, they violate the Servlet Specification.
I'm just
Kannan,
Being yourself as SYSADMIN for UNIX and Network, it would be nice that
developers or professional should take a lead into get into this problem.
Easy for you to say.
Let's face it: these guys have a connection leak. Plain and simple. Your
devs need to find their leak. It is
That (with a high probability) is because some objects they store in
sessions are not Serializable. IOW, they violate the Servlet
Specification.
I'm just curious: is this actually a violation of the servlet spec?
The API seems to indicate that you can put anything in the session
that you
Stephen,
I am having a problem with tomcat opening up up a number of connections to an
oracle server that never get closed. This causes the number of open
connections to build up over time and, eventually, causes the oracle server
to use all of its swap.
That's not good :(
Restarting tomcat
On Sunday February 29 2004 11:58 am, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Stephen,
I am having a problem with tomcat opening up up a number of connections
to an oracle server that never get closed. This causes the number of
open connections to build up over time and, eventually, causes the oracle
Your developers may be right in the end but with wrong arguments.
With virtual hosting or several webapps you have just one jvm.
But each webapp has it's own classloader.
If the pool is loaded by the wepapp classloader you will have
one instance of the pool for each webapp.
-Original
Stephen Carville wrote:
Restarting tomcat clers this up.
That's good! :)
And bad. Every time I restart, Tomcat loses the state information for
established login sessions. Customer don't like that.
That (with a high probability) is because some objects they store in
sessions are
OK, just figured it out. Duh! I just had to add [uri:www.mydomain.tld/*]
entry in addition to an existing [uri:mydomain.tld/*]. Now it works. :-)
Ed
- Original Message -
From: Tomcat Newbie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 9:27
Hi
I'm having the same trouble using Apache 2.0.40, Tomcat 4.1.10 and mod_jk2
with virtual hosts
It works without problem without v.h., but the only doc I've found about
mod_jk2 doesn't talk about v.h.(
http://www.apache.org/~jfclere/jk2_docs/configweb.html)
Maybe mod_jk2 isn't ready for v.h ?
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:16 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Virtual hosts using Apache 2.0.40, Tomcat 4.1.10 and
mod_jk2
Hi
I'm having the same trouble using Apache 2.0.40, Tomcat
4.1.10 and mod_jk2
with virtual hosts
It works without problem
21 matches
Mail list logo