RE: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-05 Thread Jim Cheesman
At 06:02 AM 05/12/01, you wrote: You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me. So, any insight on the little penguins? I've given up on discussing Tomcat. I assume he's referring to the little penguin that is the Linux mascot... I think it's what is technically known as a

Re: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-05 Thread Nikola Milutinovic
You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me. So, any insight on the little penguins? I've given up on discussing Tomcat. I assume he's referring to the little penguin that is the Linux mascot... I think it's what is technically known as a joke - a

Re: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-05 Thread Tom Oinn
java programmer wrote: snip webapps should never have made it into the spec. Name three well known web sites running in a mass virtual hosted environment and deployed as webapps with a web.xml file to boot ! Hell, name *any*. /snip Hi, We're the main european hub for bioinformatics

RE: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-05 Thread Justin Rowles
webapps should never have made it into the spec. Name three well known web sites running in a mass virtual hosted environment and deployed as webapps with a web.xml file to boot ! Hell, name *any*. We're the main european hub for bioinformatics research and resources, the fact that

AW: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-04 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun Micael Padraig Og mac Grene wrote: [...] snip Padraig og mac ? What kind of a name is that ? It sounds similar to the sound I make when I fart. Smells about the same too. Since you are so apt in making suggestions, allow me to make two of my own

Re: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-04 Thread hanzo
You know what ? Even though -java programmer- sounds rude, I must admit that all his points are right Apache's docs is just slightly better than Tomcat's, but since its structure is not so complicated, Apache is easier to learn. Browsing through Tomcat's docs gets you nowhere. *sigh* Its

Re: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-04 Thread Vladimir Grishchenko
Message - From: java programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jan Labanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 10:56 PM Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun --- Jan Labanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You must be working for Microsoft, I assume

Re: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-04 Thread Vladimir Grishchenko
Unfortunately, you missed the point... - Original Message - From: java programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 10:35 PM Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun Vladimir Grishchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED], looked

Re: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-04 Thread Nikola Milutinovic
You know what ? Even though -java programmer- sounds rude, I must admit that all his points are right Some of them... Apache's docs is just slightly better than Tomcat's, but since its structure is not so complicated, True (Budwiser TM), and it is better documented. Apache is

AW: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-04 Thread Lauer, Oliver
Nachricht- Von: Vladimir Grishchenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Dezember 2001 10:45 An: Tomcat Users List Betreff: Re: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun A collection of java designer's newsgroup posts can be found here: http://groups.google.com/groups?[EMAIL

RE: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-04 Thread Cato, Christopher
Hi guys, I really appreciate those mails below. I takes my mind off all my (technical) worries and the pressure I've meanwhile the day :-)) We still shouldn't forget that all the guys are doing that for nothing and are helping us earning our money ! AND we shouldn't forget to

AW: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-04 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
, server.xml and a lot of fun snip/ Okay. Now, I have to meddle. I'd say that being on the development team of TomCat might not actually make you rich - but it sure rubs off on your carreer. My guess is that you'll find actually getting paid for doing something is a lot easier if you can

RE: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-04 Thread Justin Rowles
Please don't top post. Replies go under the original post. Only MS weenies with MS outlook top post. Agreed. Ok. I am going to rant here. You want to complain? About a free product?! *Do* something *constructive* instead, like help with the project or the documentation. Enough said.

Re: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-04 Thread Nikola Milutinovic
Ok. I am going to rant here. You want to complain? About a free product?! *Do* something *constructive* instead, like help with the project or the documentation. OK. Let's be constructive. Let's say I'm a newcomer to Tomcat, just as I was a couple of months ago... How am I

RE: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-04 Thread Justin Rowles
OK. Let's be constructive. Let's say I'm a newcomer to Tomcat, just as I was a couple of months ago... How am I supposed to write docs? You're not. You're supposed to hang out on lists like this one till you know what you are doing and then write docs. Complaining that no-one has done is

Re: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-04 Thread Nikola Milutinovic
You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me. So, any insight on the little penguins? I've given up on discussing Tomcat. Nix.

Re: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-04 Thread August Detlefsen
We KNOW the docs are tough to understand! That's why it is so important to be on this list! (And to be nice so you get some answers back besides flames) --- Nikola Milutinovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You know what ? Even though -java programmer- sounds rude, I must admit that all his

RE: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-04 Thread William Tansill
Okay. Now, I have to meddle. Mr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] has a bunch of valid points. Regardless, it is entirely possible to make a point without being uncivil. Esp. since the folks s/he's asking the questions of are *volunteering* the time to answer the questions, and it is known that they embody

RE: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-04 Thread William Tansill
You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me. So, any insight on the little penguins? I've given up on discussing Tomcat. I assume he's referring to the little penguin that is the Linux mascot... -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands:

Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-03 Thread java programmer
Hi all: Tomcat 3.3 (on linux) seems to be quite shoddily developed. Surprising that, given it's high visibility and posture. Consider for instance: I downloaded the binary distro of tomcat 3.3. I have set and exported both TOMCAT_HOME and JAVA_HOME. Compiled and installed mod_jk.so too.

Re: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-03 Thread Vladimir Grishchenko
03, 2001 6:06 PM Subject: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun Hi all: Tomcat 3.3 (on linux) seems to be quite shoddily developed. Surprising that, given it's high visibility and posture. Consider for instance: I downloaded the binary distro of tomcat 3.3. I have set and exported both

Re: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-03 Thread java programmer
Vladimir Grishchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED], looked up from a pending proctological exam, butthole opening, and contracting and gushing rectal mucous and opined: I used almost every version of TC since 3.x to 4.0. [..a buncha crap flushed..] Jeez. It must be part of the human condition that there

Re: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-03 Thread java programmer
--- Jan Labanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You must be working for Microsoft, I assume... BTW... servlet.xml cannot have DTD, since people can add their own stuff (classes), instantiate it in server.xml, and name it the way they want, and DTD would not allow it... Jan Please don't top

Re: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-03 Thread Micael Padraig Og mac Grene
You said: rant I ... I I I I I I I I I I I I I know I can do it, but I I I . I . I I /rant Best regards, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pretty personal stuff for a brilliant software engineer and a Yahoo fella. You miss

Re: Tomcat 3.3, server.xml and a lot of fun

2001-12-03 Thread java programmer
Micael Padraig Og mac Grene wrote: [...] snip Padraig og mac ? What kind of a name is that ? It sounds similar to the sound I make when I fart. Smells about the same too. Since you are so apt in making suggestions, allow me to make two of my own: a) look up the word 'rant' in an English