Hi Guys,
Bit the bullet and have switched our intranet test server over to JDK 5 /
Tomcat 5.5.4 Stable.
Anyway, I've hit a small hurdle and believe it or not it is not JNDI data
sources .. that stuff worked perfectly!
No, it's the other one .. logging. I am not quite getting where the old sty
Hi,
>I have tried what I believed to be how to do this, e.g I placed a basic
>console appender log4j.properties file into tomcat/common/classes and
>popped log4j1.2.8 into the common/lib. No logging though.
Where did you attach the console appender? To the root logger or on of
your own packaged
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 November 2004 15:31
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.4, Logging and the death of my friend
> localhost_log
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> >I have tried what I believed to be how to do this, e.g I
> placed a basic
> >co
=DEBUG, R
Cheers! A.
> -Original Message-
> From: Allistair Crossley
> Sent: 11 November 2004 15:35
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.4, Logging and the death of my friend
> localhost_log
>
>
> Hey Yoav,
>
> tomcat/common/cl
nder.R.layout.ConversionPattern=%p %t %c - %m%n
log4j.logger.org.apache.catalina=DEBUG, R
Cheers! A.
-Original Message-
From: Allistair Crossley
Sent: 11 November 2004 15:35
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.4, Logging and the death of my friend
localhost_log
Hey Yoav,
tomcat/common/classes/log4j.p
: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 November 2004 15:31
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.4, Logging and the death of my friend
localhost_log
Hi,
I have tried what I believed to be how to do this, e.g I
placed a basic
console appender
listair Crossley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 9:41 AM
Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.4, Logging and the death of my friend
localhost_log
> Hi again,
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:25:48 -, Allistair Crossley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, I know Logger has been removed from 5.5 series and that we are supposed
> to be using some kind of log4j / commons-logging stylee way but am fairly
> surprised that 5.5.4 did not come with a basic setup for t
Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 1:54 PM
Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.4, Logging and the death of my friend localhost_log
this is very true actually, i.e the old JSP stack trace errors and so on
will not be directed into log4j-type logs .. that's not go
Hi,
>BTW, does anyone know if there are any advantages to using Log4J over
Java
Numerous: http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/documentation.html has
several articles. If you're looking for anything but the simplest
logging features, log4j is far superior.
Yoav
This e-mail, including any a
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:09:08 -0500, Shapira, Yoav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you're looking for anything but the simplest
> logging features, log4j is far superior.
I disagree with this statement, as it's too general. Personally, I
consider what is definitely superior in log4j are the many lo
Hi,
>I disagree with this statement, as it's too general. Personally, I
>consider what is definitely superior in log4j are the many logger
>implementations. As far as I can tell, these could (= should) be
>ported to the java.logging API.
Sun can port those any time it wants -- they have the sou
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:34:09 -0500, Shapira, Yoav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Many of the relevant logging "standards" (given that there's no JSR) are
> derived (if not plain copied) from log4j. Furthermore, the log4j people
> have been working for improve standards and teamwork in this area, wit
logged by Tomcat 5.5.4.
Cheers, Allistair
> -Original Message-
> From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 November 2004 20:34
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.4, Logging and the death of my friend
> localhost_log
>
>
>
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:55:20 -, Allistair Crossley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some new information on this for my case. I created a small JSP that
> had a scriplet error and ran it. I am definately using 5.5.4 with Java 5.0.
> In this case, I got the error stack trace in std
configuration in
common/classes has just appeared hooray!
Will play around a bit more and let you know how it goes ...
> -Original Message-
> From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 November 2004 10:07
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.4, Logging and
ations?
Jon
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.4, Logging and the death of my friend localhost_log
On Thu, 11 Nov 200
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:53:18 -0600, Jonathan Eric Miller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, I guess the default isn't that bad for UNIX/Linux anyway. In
On Windows, I think it's time to start using the .exe wrapper (or
another similar wrapper), rather than keep using the .bat scripts,
given th
At 01:26 AM 11/13/2004 +0100, you wrote:
>On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:53:18 -0600, Jonathan Eric Miller
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Actually, I guess the default isn't that bad for UNIX/Linux anyway. In
>
>On Windows, I think it's time to start using the .exe wrapper (or
>another similar wrapper), ra
Jacob Kjome wrote:
What I liked about the ServletContext logging was that I could
dynamically create the file using a simple in the
element of my context configuration file. This way, all I have to do is
the deploy the app and the log file is created and rolled for me.
> I'd like to see somet
your decision I suppose.
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andreas Schildbach
> Sent: 17 November 2004 15:27
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.4, Logging and the death of my friend
> localhost_log
>
>
>
Hi,
>There is even one more reason why Tomcat 5.0 logging was better:
>
>With Tomcat 5.0, it was possible to log different web applications to
>different log files by using the "swallowOutput" attribute of the
>Context element, even if those applications used the same libraries. I
This is still
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
There is even one more reason why Tomcat 5.0 logging was better:
With Tomcat 5.0, it was possible to log different web applications to
different log files by using the "swallowOutput" attribute of the
Context element, even if those applications used the same libraries. I
This i
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:37:10 -, Allistair Crossley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Put simply, if you want per-web application logging, you need per-web
> application log4j configuration. It's very easy to do but I do understand
> that those using System.out will have to spend time refactoring.
24 matches
Mail list logo
