Re: [tor-talk] Using a Solid Tor Configuration

On 07/23/2020 08:36 AM, con...@secmail.pro wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to setup a solid Tor configuration in the States. I get a lot > of harassment from corrupted law enforcement and nosy corporations. My > goal is to keep my online activity private, but it appears Tor isn't doing > that

Re: [tor-talk] I don't understand two things about the node "freja".

On 06/30/2020 03:13 PM, sean_sulli...@danwin1210.me wrote: > I have questions about the Tor node “freja”. > > First, according to https://torstatus.rueckgr.at/, the node is at > 194.88.143.66 which is in Italy. Yet WHOIS says the addresses > 194.88.142.0-194.88.143.255 are in Pune, India. The

Re: [tor-talk] Jitsi Meet over Tor

On 04/07/2020 08:32 AM, grarpamp wrote: > Voice and video conferencing apps can and do > work over I2P, Tor, Phantom, etc. > Use the lowest quality, bandwidth, window size, > frame rate, etc settings possible. > > UDP and IPv6 can and do work over all three of the above networks. > With .onion

Re: [tor-talk] Jitsi Meet over Tor

On 04/03/2020 02:19 AM, namer...@mailo.com wrote: > Has anyone managed to use Jitsi Meet over Tor, either with Tor Browser > or with a normal browser+SOCKPort? > > Every time I try, the video/audio quality is unusable. Things drop out, > I can't hear people, they can't hear me, etc. THis is true

Re: [tor-talk] Revisiting youtube blocking TBB, virtually all 1st attempts to load YT

On 03/08/2020 02:40 PM, nusenu wrote: >> What would stop a bad actor from creating a bunch of new circuits and >> making all Tor IPs look bad if they were so inclined? > > yes there are distribution strategies that can prevent that > or make that very expensive (an /48 IPv6 block has a **lot** of

Re: [tor-talk] How secure is a hidden service?

On 02/21/2020 03:41 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote: > Services on the internet are inherently harder to make safe than clients, > (a) because they stay at the same place for long periods of time, and > (b) because the attacker can induce them to generate or receive traffic, > in a way that's harder

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Speculated Broken by FBI Etc - Freedom Hosting, MITTechReview - Magneto

On 02/09/2020 12:19 PM, Felix wrote: > Hi everybody > > Am 2020-02-09 um 12:40 PM schrieb grarpamp: >> Given the variety of known weaknesses, exploits, categories >> of papers, and increasing research efforts against tor and >> overlay networks in general, and the large number of these >>

Re: [tor-talk] Tor and sources.list

On 02/02/2020 07:02 PM, mimb...@danwin1210.me wrote: > In my /etc/apt/sources.list I have: > > deb https://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org bionic main > deb-src https://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org bionic main > > My version of tor is 0.4.2.5. Am I correct that, at some point, it will >

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Browser without Tor

On 02/02/2020 04:12 PM, Jeremy Rand wrote: > Jason Evans: >> Hi all, >> >> This is a question that we get from time to time in the Stack Exchange >> group. Can I use Tor Browser without without actually using the  Tor >> network? For example, I want to use the browser for checking my back >>

Re: [tor-talk] restricting output to the tor process, when using Tor browser

On 01/28/2020 04:21 AM, Nicolas Vigier wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jan 2020, Mirimir wrote: > >> But, in a Debian VM running Tor browser, I found that the tor process is >> running as the login user. And so iptables is totally useless. >> >> However, it's apparently easy t

[tor-talk] restricting output to the tor process, when using Tor browser

OK, so I don't use standalone Tor browser, just in Whonix. And when I use Tor in Debian, I use iptables rules like: *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] -A INPUT -s 127.0.0.1/32 -d 127.0.0.1/32 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j

Re: [tor-talk] Ports required for Tor and hidden services

On 01/26/2020 10:53 PM, Jim wrote: > Forst wrote: >> In that case, what would be best approach to achieve that all traffic >> is forced though Tor and direct internet connection blocked, >> preferably even if/when the system is breached? > > Roger gave a good reply for the case where the system

Re: [tor-talk] Brave Review Mentions Tor

On 11/16/2019 01:50 PM, Mirimir wrote: > On 11/15/2019 11:57 AM, d...@foundingdocuments.org wrote: >> A few-days-old review. >> >> Since Brave is the browser for OnionBrowser on iOS, I figured I’d read the >> article. >> >> https://www.pcworld.com/article

Re: [tor-talk] Brave Review Mentions Tor

On 11/15/2019 11:57 AM, d...@foundingdocuments.org wrote: > A few-days-old review. > > Since Brave is the browser for OnionBrowser on iOS, I figured I’d read the > article. > >

Re: [tor-talk] Open tickets

On 05/30/2019 02:26 AM, Wallichii wrote: > On Tue, 28 May 2019 16:57:59 + > martin590 wrote: > >> why are there so many tickets which are open since years without any >> visible progress? Will they ever be solved or were they forgotten by >> its owner? > > no activity generally means no one

Re: [tor-talk] Hidden service persistent connections

On 05/20/2019 07:55 AM, George Kadianakis wrote: > Memory Vandal writes: > >> Hi, >> >> Are client connections to a hidden service .onion address that do not >> disconnect for hours safe? >> >> It may be a big file download or multiple keep-alive transactions that uses >> the established

Re: [tor-talk] How to use Tor without a website knowing I am using Tor - possible?

On 05/19/2019 01:51 PM, jiggytwi...@danwin1210.me wrote: > What's the best way to connect to a site via Tor if the site engages in > exit censorship? There is no entirely good way. There's the Cloudflare Onion Service.[0,1,2] Basically, Cloudflare redirects Tor users to its onion service, which

[tor-talk] Decent guide to setting up an .onion site on a VPS?

On 05/11/2019 02:33 PM, jiggytwi...@danwin1210.me wrote: > >> >> Have you read Configuring Onion Services for Tor [1]? >> >> >> [1] https://2019.www.torproject.org/docs/tor-onion-service.html.en >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> ~Vasilis > > > I had seen this before but it assumes one runs the onion on

Re: [tor-talk] Building Tor Browser on ARM

On 05/07/2019 11:37 AM, J.S. Evans wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm attempting to build Tor Browser on an ARM64 machine. However, the install > tool requires that you download some x64 packages which of course breaks the > build. The following has details where it is breaking: >

Re: [tor-talk] No Script

On 05/04/2019 02:28 PM, libertyinpe...@riseup.net wrote: > No Script has been disabled. How do I get around this problem? > Although having used Tor for years, I am no expert at this. Not being > able to use No Script has compromised security. A number of websites > are now asking for my

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Browser disabled NoScript, but can't update

On 05/04/2019 12:21 AM, Joe wrote: > I've used the latest stable TBB 8.0.8 (Linux) since released with the > latest NoScript (at that time). > Today is the 1st day I saw that NoScript was disabled by TBB. > > I see now that it's not a TBB only issue, but also Firefox. > A comment on Reddit said,

[tor-talk] temporary fix for disabled browser extensions

| All extensions disabled due to expiration of intermediate signing cert https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1548973 See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19823928 for workarounds in MacOS and Linux. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change

Re: [tor-talk] How Greypony fucks everyone over

On 05/03/2019 03:04 AM, Stirling Newberry wrote: > Greypony just attracts a bunch of script kiddies who have no business running > HS relays. All of those morons that run instances with Greypony are lazy and > cheap who don't want to pay for server colocation and don't want to pay their > dues

Re: [tor-talk] [tor-relays] Explain yourself Conrad Rockenhaus

lace because that would be meaningless. Oh, so you don't want to see posts from paul.syver...@nrl.navy.mil? > Mirimir: >> On 05/02/2019 02:10 AM, Herbert Karl Mathé wrote: >>> I strongly believe certain issues need be brought up into conscious, and >>> into presence: into

Re: [tor-talk] [tor-relays] Explain yourself Conrad Rockenhaus

On 05/02/2019 02:10 AM, Herbert Karl Mathé wrote: > I strongly believe certain issues need be brought up into conscious, and into > presence: into discussion, actually. > > Therefore appreciating this as it might fit too well into context, at the > same time definitely deprecating 'filth' and

Re: [tor-talk] Checking if an IP address is a Tor exit server though an API call

On 04/30/2019 12:06 AM, andre wrote: > > Hello, > > I know there is an API call to check if my own IP address is going through > tor, but I would like to know if there is an API call I can use, to check the > same with any up address. See https://www.dan.me.uk/tornodes. There's also

Re: [tor-talk] Nice to meet you! / WhatsApp by Tor?

On 04/17/2019 08:19 AM, GTI .H wrote: > Em ter, 16 de abr de 2019 às 17:26, Mirimir escreveu: > >> On 04/16/2019 12:39 PM, GTI .H wrote: >>> Em ter, 16 de abr de 2019 às 13:36, Mirimir >> escreveu: >>> >>>> On 04/16/2019 08:48 AM, GTI .H wrote: &g

Re: [tor-talk] Nice to meet you! / WhatsApp by Tor?

On 04/16/2019 12:39 PM, GTI .H wrote: > Em ter, 16 de abr de 2019 às 13:36, Mirimir escreveu: > >> On 04/16/2019 08:48 AM, GTI .H wrote: >>> Please, how can I use Tor to hide the origin IP in WhatsApp Android? >> >> Your safest option, if you must use WhatsApp,

Re: [tor-talk] Nice to meet you! / WhatsApp by Tor?

On 04/16/2019 08:48 AM, GTI .H wrote: > Hi everyone, this is my first post here! > > Excuse me if this is not the right place to ask this, I also think this may > have been asked a lot, if that's the case, please direct me. > > I want to use Tor to hide the origin IP in WhatsApp. I already have

Re: [tor-talk] Onion website on "usual" server

On 04/13/2019 01:28 AM, xxx wrote: > Hello, > > I am running a dedicated box (Centos 7-64) with a few usual domains and > websites. > > Is it possible to host an .onion website there? If so, how to setup, is > it safe (so that the .onion site IP won't be disclosed)? > > Thank you! Read the

Re: [tor-talk] What is the weirdest/creepiest thing you have found on the dark web?

On 04/07/2019 06:19 PM, Seth Caldwell wrote: > I know the dark web can be a terrible place, with content not suitable for > anyone, basically. Like illegal drug cartel, fake passports/IDs,creepy > websites, and generally all around messed up stuff. If you feel comfortable > talking about your

Re: [tor-talk] Is there a way to use internet in a sandbox environment? (Linux)

On 04/03/2019 05:40 PM, Jim wrote: > Mirimir wrote: >> On 04/03/2019 08:03 AM, Ben Tasker wrote: >>> When the system boots from the disk, it loads the OS into memory, so >>> things >>> like your browser cache files are written into memory (and so lost >>

Re: [tor-talk] Is there a way to use internet in a sandbox environment? (Linux)

On 04/03/2019 08:03 AM, Ben Tasker wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 3:17 PM npdflr wrote: > >> Thanks a lot Jim for the information. >> >> >> >> If I am running a live system on a DVD for internet access and booting >> from that DVD then the DVD should be able to write some data on itself >>

Re: [tor-talk] Syncing bookmarks

On 03/31/2019 05:37 PM, anan wrote: > > >> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ >> On Saturday, March 30, 2019 5:55 PM, anan wrote: >> >>> Anyone syncs Torbrowsers' bookmarks? >>> How do you do it? >>> Maybe with your self-hosted server? In the old browser, look in .../foo.default/bookmarkbackups.

Re: [tor-talk] tor project website change

curious amounts of potentially highly > user adversarial funding sources. > ..." He means the US government, I think. > Il 29/03/19 14:36, Mirimir ha scritto: >> On 03/29/2019 06:07 AM, dns1...@riseup.net wrote: >>> I'm not in the position to talk about the architecture

Re: [tor-talk] tor project website change

On 03/29/2019 06:07 AM, dns1...@riseup.net wrote: > I'm not in the position to talk about the architecture or other > technical aspects because I'm not expert enough. I don't say that the > network doesn't have problems. > > But i think that some things you said are a bit of stretch; for example,

Re: [tor-talk] tor project website change

On 03/28/2019 02:27 AM, Nicolas Vigier wrote: > On Wed, 27 Mar 2019, Mirimir wrote: > >> On 03/27/2019 08:01 AM, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Who changed the web content at https://www.torproject.org/download/ ? >>> Previously I

Re: [tor-talk] tor project website change

standalone use of Tor in Windows for some years. And so has gradually buried links to anything but Tor Browser. > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:23 AM Udo van den Heuvel > wrote: > >> On 27-03-19 18:46, Mirimir wrote: >>> Yes, the Tor Project site has increasingly focused on

Re: [tor-talk] tor project website change

On 03/27/2019 08:01 AM, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: > Hello, > > Who changed the web content at https://www.torproject.org/download/ ? > Previously I could relatively easily check for the latest tor version > but now I get only a number of tor browser options in a page that is way > too big for

Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] Implementing full Internet IPv6 end-to-end encryption based on Cryptographically Generated Address

On 01/25/2019 04:32 AM, Alec Muffett wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2019, 10:43 Mirimir >> >> I don't do audio on this box. > > > I'll wait; most questions about "what do [I] mean?" are answered in that > video. OK. Hopefully you point to some resources for lea

Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] Implementing full Internet IPv6 end-to-end encryption based on Cryptographically Generated Address

On 01/25/2019 02:40 AM, Alec Muffett wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 at 08:54, Mirimir wrote: > > I've not heard of "Tor v3 Onion Networking". Does it exist? Or if not, are >> there plans? Or do you mean just using v3 onion-onion sockets? That would >> be pain

Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] Implementing full Internet IPv6 end-to-end encryption based on Cryptographically Generated Address

On 01/24/2019 12:44 PM, Alec Muffett wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 19:33, grarpamp wrote: > >> As readers may be aware, >> Tor has an interesting capability via OnionCat and OnionVPN >> ... > > There's an open project for anyone who wants it... >> To bring IPv6 over v3 onions to Tor. >> > >

Re: [tor-talk] WTF? [was Re: Why do you use Tor?]

On 12/11/2018 12:13 AM, Masayuki Hatta wrote: > HI, > >> Mirimir wrote: >>> So hey, I just got this. Anyone else? > > I got this too. Seems a list member (allmyjenks at gmail.com?) uses > this service and reply to the author of the mail. Very annoying. Yes, that'

Re: [tor-talk] Why do you use Tor?

d. Maybe even HMA ;) That's so I blend in. Where I am, it's quite common to use VPN services for torrenting, streaming, etc. So my family and I do all that, and I just chain additional VPN services for other personas. But Tor, that would be unusual, and the less of that the better. Mirimir uses

Re: [tor-talk] What happens when an .onion site is compromised?

On 12/06/2018 01:51 PM, Nathaniel Suchy wrote: > If an onion site is compromised, you can serve the user malicious content and > with a Tor Browser Vulnerability can harm it's users. > > If your private key is compromised, your only recourse is to go create a new > onion address. > > We don't

Re: [tor-talk] Tor official list of new .onion addresses?

to specify a v2-sized subset of v4 onions? >> On Dec 3, 2018, at 10:28 PM, Mirimir wrote: >> >> On 12/03/2018 10:42 PM, Nathaniel Suchy wrote: >> >> >> >>> You mentioned "HiddenServiceAuthorizeClient", a feature I did not know >>> about

Re: [tor-talk] Tor official list of new .onion addresses?

On 12/03/2018 10:42 PM, Nathaniel Suchy wrote: > You mentioned "HiddenServiceAuthorizeClient", a feature I did not know about. > I'm going to figure out if this is possible to implement on the SSH System as > that would solve some concerns about a leaked onion address. Could you > elaborate

Re: [tor-talk] Tor official list of new .onion addresses?

On 12/03/2018 02:35 PM, s7r wrote: > There are other techniques lower at little-t-tor protocol level that > suite your concerns, like HiddenServiceAuthorizeClient - you should > better look into those if you are concerned about someone trying to > connect to your onion address. I use that,

Re: [tor-talk] tor-talk@lists.torproject.org

On 11/21/2018 06:56 PM, mi...@secmail.pro wrote: >> https://www.dan.me.uk/tornodes > > No. > > Forbidden - TOR Node / Anonymous Proxy > I'm sorry, but I really don't see why anyone would need to use a TOR node > or Anonymous Proxy server to look at my site. > So i'm afraid you can't look. Stop

Re: [tor-talk] tor-talk@lists.torproject.org

On 11/19/2018 05:33 PM, mi...@secmail.pro wrote: > now the torstatus.blutmagie.de is going down, I need an alternative. > > I need a list of "Tor nodes IPv4". > The IP list of (All Tor nodes) - (Tor Exit nodes) if possible. > > Can't Tor Project host one PHP script for this? > I really need it

Re: [tor-talk] Yet another Tor failure - DanWin1210.me Hosting hacked

be I'll give it a shot. If I can find suitable hardware for anonymous lease, anyway :) > Mirimir: >> On 11/15/2018 10:23 PM, Daniel Winzen wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> yes my server got hacked. How - I do not know yet and I will need to do >>> an exte

Re: [tor-talk] Yet another Tor failure - DanWin1210.me Hosting hacked

ly self-taught. I mostly just use shell scripts. And I lack the patience and organization to actually operate a shared-hosting site. > Any updates will be posted on my front page: https://danwin1210.me/ > > Regards, > Daniel > > On 16/11/2018 06:13, Mirimir wrote:

Re: [tor-talk] Yet another Tor failure - DanWin1210.me Hosting hacked

On 11/15/2018 09:52 PM, tor...@secmail.pro wrote: > DanWin1210.me hosting service was hacked. > https://danwin1210.me/ > > All Tor Onions are dead. I guess that he didn't maintain backups :( Maybe some of those .onion owners did, though. > FH1: Unknown > FH2: Took down by FBI > FH3: Unknown >

Re: [tor-talk] (no subject)

SMTP id n26-v6so3434767lfl.1 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 02:34:28\ -0700 (PDT) ... Unless they did a good job at spoofing. My email skills are iffy :( > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 9:10 AM Mirimir wrote: > >> On 10/24/2018 02:34 AM, Today's Yug wrote: >>> Contact to me in case of g

Re: [tor-talk] (no subject)

On 10/24/2018 02:34 AM, Today's Yug wrote: > Contact to me in case of girlfriend trace So is this grounds for unsubscribing this address from the list, and blocking it and its IP address from resubscribing? -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other

Re: [tor-talk] Does Facebook .onion work?

On 10/15/2018 02:35 PM, bobby...@danwin1210.me wrote: > Facebook https://www.facebookcorewwwi.onion/ has existed since 2014. > However, I am unconvinced that it works. > > I go to the URL, register, get a confirmation email, click it, then have > to enter my phone and receive a code. Fair enough.

Re: [tor-talk] Media Write Protection / Crypto Devices / BadUSB - #OpenFabs #OpenHW

On 10/12/2018 11:56 PM, grarpamp wrote: This is the use case for Tails. . . . [T]here are no writes to storage, unless users configure [otherwise] . . . . > >> Sure, but this isn't a _Tor_ issue. It's just about Tor browser, which >> is just (heavily) modified Firefox. And although I'm

Re: [tor-talk] if browser remembers URLs visited before shutdown even during Never Remember History

On 10/12/2018 01:47 PM, Nick Levinson wrote: >> This is the use case for Tails. . . . [T]here are no writes to storage, >> unless users configure [otherwise] . . . . > > One need not use Tails to use Tor (I used to sometimes use Tor and never used > Tails), so, while Tails may be a good idea,

Re: [tor-talk] if browser remembers URLs visited before shutdown even during Never Remember History

On 10/05/2018 05:19 PM, Nick Levinson wrote: > This replies to a September 26 post with the same title. > It took some effort to find the bug in FF, it took some more effort > to convince people at FF that data is persistently stored, and a FF > derivative is being used in Tor, so I would not

Re: [tor-talk] ascertain trustworthyness of entry-nodes and obfs4 bridges?

On 10/03/2018 04:36 AM, ithor wrote: > Ok, so basically I have to stick with trust... kinda dangerous really in my > geographical location. > > I know there's a lot of talk about the pro and contra of using some kind of > VPN before entering the Tor network, how it can deanonymize you and how

Re: [tor-talk] Tor browser and VPN or web proxy

On 09/29/2018 08:35 PM, Paul Syverson wrote: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 04:28:46PM -0700, Mirimir wrote: >> On 09/29/2018 09:29 AM, panoramix.druida wrote: >>> >>> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ >>> El sábado, 29 de septiembre de 2018 11:58, J B >>>

Re: [tor-talk] Tor browser and VPN or web proxy

l that you connect with Tor, or what you otherwise connect with directly. But your VPN provider _does_ know all that. Also, some argue that VPN services are more likely malicious than ISPs, and so potentially compromise your Tor use. But others (including Mirimir) argue that ISPs are more readily co

Re: [tor-talk] Bridge and Hidden service

On 09/27/2018 12:45 PM, MegaBrutal wrote: > Hi, > > If I'm about to run a Hidden service, can I run it on a bridge node, > or at least on the same IP as a bridge node without uncovering the > bridge node? I'm not sure what you mean by this. > Maybe it boils down to the question whether a node

Re: [tor-talk] TBB 8 GUI changes

In Whonix 13 (Debian jessie with KDE) TBB 8 seems to ignore themes. On 09/12/2018 12:00 PM, Joe wrote: > Can anyone in Torland confirm whether any Linux TBB version - or latest > v8, ever uses any UI colors from the active Linux theme, that usually > affects all Linux apps? > > On 09/08/2018

Re: [tor-talk] Measuring on-line anonymity

y is useful sometimes, when you need to tell plausible lies. Not that Mirimir is all that plausible, of course. But that's intentional. > Gmail for example > almost always requires you register from a residential IP Address and > verify a phone number - I won't even call Gmail pseudonymous, it's

Re: [tor-talk] Measuring on-line anonymity

On 08/14/2018 04:48 PM, panoramix.druida wrote: > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > El 14 de agosto de 2018 8:17 PM, Mirimir escribió: > >> On 08/13/2018 07:52 PM, panoramix.druida wrote: >> >>> Hi, is there a way to measure the level of anonymity on a sy

Re: [tor-talk] Measuring on-line anonymity

On 08/13/2018 07:52 PM, panoramix.druida wrote: > Hi, is there a way to measure the level of anonymity on a system? Sure. There's some literature. Check out . > For example Signal es a very good keeping secret on communications, but is > very bad for

Re: [tor-talk] ProxAllium - A Tor frontend for Windows

On 08/04/2018 10:17 AM, Damon (TheDcoder) wrote: > Hello everyone! > > I would like to first say that [ProxAllium](https://proxallium.org/) is in no > way affiliated with the Tor > Project and it is developed independently by me at the moment. > > Introduction: ProxAllium is a simple GUI

Re: [tor-talk] torjail - run programs in tor network namespace

On 07/27/2018 05:34 AM, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: > On 24-07-18 16:58, lesion wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 02:51:36PM +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: >>> On 23-07-18 09:51, bic wrote: I want to share a project made in _to hacklab. https://github.com/torjail/torjail >>> >>>

Re: [tor-talk] torjail - run programs in tor network namespace

On 07/25/2018 01:26 AM, Roman Mamedov wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 01:14:12 -0700 > Mirimir wrote: > >> True. But I'd rather use the Whonix approach. It's doable using two VPS. >> That is, if the provider will cooperate. One VPS runs the web server, >> and it h

Re: [tor-talk] torjail - run programs in tor network namespace

On 07/24/2018 07:58 AM, lesion wrote: > the whole point of torjail is to force all traffic via a virtual network > interface that's routed into tor's sock5 (tor is started by torjail > itself). > > an use case could be an hidden service: > let's say you're running a website as an hidden

Re: [tor-talk] How do tor users get past the recapacha and it's super short 2min exemption

On 07/11/2018 02:04 AM, Alec Muffett wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 at 09:33, Roger Dingledine wrote: > >> They did some internal measurements and realized that the number of >> people connecting to Facebook over Tor was growing and had become huge: >> > > I wrote this process of realisation up

Re: [tor-talk] How do tor users get past the recapacha and it's super short 2min exemption

On 07/10/2018 06:59 AM, Lara wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, at 12:12, David Niklas wrote: >> grarpamp wrote: >>> One email, and ticket opened, and tweet complaint, per each >>> captcha click, from each affected tor user... that should do the >>> trick ;-) >> >> I think I'll try that. > > Hence

Re: [tor-talk] Digital IDs needed to end 'mob rule' online, says UK security minister Ben Wallace - Digital IDs should be brought in to end online anoymity that permits "mob rule" and lawlessness onli

On 06/10/2018 09:13 PM, Kevin Burress wrote: > It is like they are saying they want the apocalypse without saying it by > really saying it (anonymous) that's their way of asking, and christians who > are good christians and israel says "yes come Lord" But hey, some Islamic fundamentalists also

Re: [tor-talk] Digital IDs needed to end 'mob rule' online, says UK security minister Ben Wallace - Digital IDs should be brought in to end online anoymity that permits "mob rule" and lawlessness onli

On 06/10/2018 08:28 PM, Kevin Burress wrote: > I mean for example historically the people of Canaan worshipped God but > Canaan was cursed. And it was about the place of the Hittites and > Canaanites who were slaughtered. But they worshipped the same God. They worshiped a bunch of gods. Including

Re: [tor-talk] Anonymity and Voip

On 05/10/2018 01:35 PM, panoramix.druida wrote: > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > El 10 de mayo de 2018 7:41 PM, Mirimir <miri...@riseup.net> escribió: > [] >> However, keep in mind that VoIP is fundamentally inconsistent with >> >&g

Re: [tor-talk] Anonymity and Voip

On 05/10/2018 01:43 AM, panoramix.druida wrote: > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > El 9 de mayo de 2018 5:22 PM, grarpamp escribió: > >> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Nathan Freitas nat...@freitas.net wrote: >> >>> In general, the issue with VoIP over Tor, is that

Re: [tor-talk] Fwd: TOR

? Do you see the Tor browser unpacked on the desktop? Or wherever you put it? > On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 12:36 AM, Mirimir <miri...@riseup.net> wrote: > >> On 04/20/2018 04:46 PM, RONALD DOMINIC wrote: >>> CAN YOU HELP ME? >> >> Caps don't help ;) >

Re: [tor-talk] Fwd: TOR

On 04/20/2018 04:46 PM, RONALD DOMINIC wrote: > CAN YOU HELP ME? Caps don't help ;) So hey, Tor browser has _nothing_ to do with your system's browser (such as Firefox) or what search service you use there (such as DDG). And it's really _very_ simple. As Jacki M wrote, you download and install

Re: [tor-talk] What is the name of the project that maps onion addresses to IPv6 addresses?

rch 27, 2018 12:41:13 AM EDT, Mirimir <miri...@riseup.net> wrote: >> On 03/26/2018 12:05 PM, grarpamp wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:22 PM, Yuri <y...@rawbw.com> wrote: >>>> I remember seeing this project. It creates a virtual IPv6 network by >> s

Re: [tor-talk] What is the name of the project that maps onion addresses to IPv6 addresses?

On 03/26/2018 12:05 PM, grarpamp wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:22 PM, Yuri wrote: >> I remember seeing this project. It creates a virtual IPv6 network by such >> onion->IPV6 mapping. > > There are two of them, the first being more well known, > they interoperate, useful for

Re: [tor-talk] Tor and TBB Issues Needing Good Advice

On 01/24/2018 06:20 AM, Wanderingnet wrote: You rather highjacked the thread, but hey ;) > I'm afraid you miss the point. > 1. To operate TBB with an attendant IPTables setup, including for reasons of > potential leaks, admittedly more of a risk in Torification of other apps. DNS > leaks are

Re: [tor-talk] Tor and TBB Issues Needing Good Advice

On 01/21/2018 10:06 PM, Andreas Krey wrote: > On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:05:01 +0000, Mirimir wrote: >> On 01/21/2018 04:52 AM, Andreas Krey wrote: > ... >>> TBB works right out of the box. Dear casual reader, please don't be alarmed >>> by this post. >> >>

Re: [tor-talk] Tor and TBB Issues Needing Good Advice

On 01/21/2018 04:52 AM, Andreas Krey wrote: > On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 09:13:29 +, Wanderingnet wrote: >> So far I have been unable to gain a working torrc and iptables setup for >> either tor, or, particularly, Tor Browser Bundle. > > TBB works right out of the box. Dear casual reader, please

Re: [tor-talk] hidden service - for dummies ?

On 09/27/2017 11:52 PM, Franps wrote: > Hi, Whonix is other free distro that forces all Internet connection through > Tor Network. However, if your friend search a good tutorial, it is not > difficult to install Tails (you need 30 minutes and 2 USB ) Yes, it's not hard to run an onion in a

Re: [tor-talk] hidden service - for dummies ?

On 09/26/2017 10:21 AM, Muppet96 wrote: > Hi, > > today my colleague told me that he would like to start to write some kind of > blog and publish it in the tor network. Because I`m not use to say people > that I`m using TOR Network, I answered that I simply do not know how its > working and

Re: [tor-talk] can't connect data bases and scientific journals

On 09/15/2017 07:36 AM, Franps wrote: > Dears, I am Fran. > I am a new member of this list. I would like to ask you an important question > for me: > Using TAILS OS (which forces all Internet connections through Tor Network), I > need to get access to data bases related to academic and

Re: [tor-talk] Tor E-mail gateway - how to transfer messages from the Tor Network ?

does not. > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017, at 07:35 PM, Mirimir wrote: > >> Neither VFEmail.net nor Cock.li require phone numbers. > > Thanks, I appreciate that info. and I'm sure that it can be useful to > others as well. > > I think you would agree, though, that as much a

Re: [tor-talk] Tor E-mail gateway - how to transfer messages from the Tor Network ?

On 07/24/2017 11:07 PM, Random User wrote: > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017, at 06:03 PM, Katya Titov wrote: >> Yandex has a light version that works without JS. The others require it. > > Thanks. > > Come to think of it, what about a valid phone number? Did you have to > provide one? > > My impression

Re: [tor-talk] Alec Muffet "Tor is a very attractive proposition for secure networking"

On 06/01/2017 10:45 AM, grarpamp wrote: > And many application protocols are incompatible with onion addressing. > > So you'll need OnionCat to do those and other cool things... :) > > https://www.onioncat.org/ > https://cypherpunk.at/onioncat_trac/ Requisite reminder about how well MPTCP

Re: [tor-talk] TBB users, please give 1 minute of your time for science

On 04/25/2017 04:26 PM, krishna e bera wrote: > On 25/04/17 05:37 AM, c...@browserprint.info wrote: >> I'm a PhD student. >> I have no employer other than my university. >> All my work is done with the intention of publishing it in academic >> journals, conferences, my blog, and my thesis. > >

Re: [tor-talk] TBB users, please give 1 minute of your time for science

On 04/24/2017 07:00 PM, c...@browserprint.info wrote: > Hello, Tor community! > > Could you please do me (and science) a favor and go to my site ( > https://browserprint.info ) using the Tor Browser Bundle and submit a > fingerprint, making sure to fill in the optional questionnaire? > > At the

Re: [tor-talk] Suspicious rise in direct users connection from Israel (from ~9k to >100k)

On 04/13/2017 08:52 AM, Lolint wrote: >> This can mean that something is forcing rapid reconnection, right? > > Yes, as with the Turkey block (see Annex A): > > https://turkeyblocks.org/2016/12/18/tor-blocked-in-turkey-vpn-ban/ Right, that's what I was thinking (vaguely) of.

Re: [tor-talk] tbb (disable network is set)

On 04/05/2017 07:01 AM, 0xdog wrote: > 2017-04-04 12:30 GMT-04:00, Mirimir <miri...@riseup.net>: >> Is there another uplink that you could test on? Alternatively, you could >> try connecting through a VPN. If either eliminates the problem, you know >> that your normal up

Re: [tor-talk] tbb (disable network is set)

On 04/04/2017 10:01 AM, 0xdog wrote: > 2017-04-03 21:46 GMT-04:00, Mirimir <miri...@riseup.net>: >> Tor browser may do this if your uplink gets interrupted at a particular >> stage in getting the network consensus. I believe that it's a defense >> against attempts to fo

Re: [tor-talk] tbb (disable network is set)

On 04/03/2017 09:13 AM, 0xdog wrote: > Hello. > I don't know if this is the correct mailing list to post this > question, so in that case my apologies in advance. > > Last year I was using TBB (on windows server 2003 32bits PC) for a > while and it was working perfect, suddenly it stopped working

Re: [tor-talk] This video has been censored by YouTube many times

On 04/01/2017 06:17 PM, Kevin wrote: > Maybe youtube doesn't know about this vid yet. By the way that > was...interesting. That was fucking evil. And totally off-topic. Just sayin'. > On 4/1/2017 5:32 PM, John Pinkman wrote: >> it explains problems that the world faces today >>

Re: [tor-talk] BitPay seems to be rejecting payments via Tor

On 03/18/2017 12:38 AM, grarpamp wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Mirimir <miri...@riseup.net> wrote: >> it arguably ought to be a private VPN. > > Run by relay operators was the general idea, a bit more spine, > and more flexible setup. But certainly not re

Re: [tor-talk] BitPay seems to be rejecting payments via Tor

On 03/17/2017 02:40 PM, grarpamp wrote: > An 'exit bridge' in this sense could just be requesting > 'getexitbridges' to send you connection details to > such an OpenVPN termination point. > Operators and others could run this without TPI > involvement and perhaps resist what accurates TorDNSEL.

Re: [tor-talk] BitPay seems to be rejecting payments via Tor

On 03/17/2017 04:01 AM, Mirimir wrote: > I've checked a few VPN and VPS providers that use BitPay, and payments > are being rejected. No CAPTCHA, just a message to check with the > provider. I've heard similar reports from others. > > What to do? If anyone has contacts at BitPay,

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >