Don't forget that you're addressing someone who talks about
bit-perfectness as if it was a relative concept.
Soulkeeper's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35297
View this thread: http://forums.slimde
OK, I can't resist.
I know this will probably convince nobody, but while doing the
high-sample-rate audio stuff n iPeng I got quite a bit of experience
with FLAC vs. PCM handling and also quite a bit of testing mileage.
And of course an iPhone is not a Touch and it's of course always on
WiFi.
But
I've been using LMS 7.7.2 for a while now without any major dramas.
Usually, if I add (say three) albums from the left pane to the playlist
on the right pane - all the songs in album 1 would be displayed in order
first, followed by all the songs in album 2, and then the songs in album
3.
A few da
syrah wrote:
> I've been using LMS 7.7.2 for a while now without any major dramas.
> Usually, if I add (say three) albums from the left pane to the playlist
> on the right pane - all the songs in album 1 would be displayed in order
> first, followed by all the songs in album 2, and then the songs
thanks mate, that was the problem. you can't imagine how peevish i feel
right now. muchos gracias.
syrah's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=54856
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showt
If someone built an (official/unofficial) update of the software.
Updated with the function WLAN on/off. That would be so nice. Like an
app in the server but in this case the tiny Touch server. I would
definitely buy such an app even if it's open software...
-
garym wrote:
> This thread is starting to remind me of a posting I really like from
> another forum regarding the typical "audiophile" response to being
> questioned about his beliefs:
>
> http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=92856&view=findpost&p=785522
>
> Repeated below:
>
Pascal Hibon wrote:
> Windows 7 users might want to read this:
>
> -There is a gross problem with the Windows 7 RECORD Sample Rate
> Converter. This problem actually dates back to Windows Vista, and is
> also a problem with Windows Server 2008. This problem causes spectral
> contamination of th
garym wrote:
> OK. Aubuti and I just don't understand because we're either too lazy,
> too stupid, or too poor. But SBGK understands your points. 'nuff said.
> ;-)
ad homimem attacks, Gary, I think you have lost the argument.
--
SBGK wrote:
> funny how other forums look at hydrogenaudio as a bunch of kooks and
> here they are revered, nuff said !!!
What other forums?
The almost dead Stereophile forum?
The just about dead Absolute Sound forum?
The only pattern I see here is that the forums which have a decidedly
subje
No no silver is best for USB1.0 copper is better for USB2.0 .2.0 is "
faster " and must be tamed with the more mellow copper ;) and is there
synthetic material in those ? Asphalt saturated hemp is the best.
But I'm actually astonished that there is no paper/oil/lead/asphalt
cables in hifi ? It's
Mnyb wrote:
> No no silver is best for USB1.0 copper is better for USB2.0 .2.0 is "
> faster " and must be tamed with the more mellow copper ;) and is there
> synthetic material in those ? Asphalt saturated hemp is the best.
>
> But I'm actually astonished that there is no paper/oil/lead/asphal
SBGK wrote:
> funny how other forums look at hydrogenaudio as a bunch of kooks and
> here they are revered, nuff said !!!
You're confirming that at the "other" forums, the inmates are in charge
of the asylum.
garym's Prof
On 10/5/2012 3:40 PM, ralphpnj wrote:
Mnyb wrote:
>No no silver is best for USB1.0 copper is better for USB2.0 .2.0 is "
>faster " and must be tamed with the more mellow copper ;) and is there
>synthetic material in those ? Asphalt saturated hemp is the best.
>
>But I'm actually astonished that
SBGK wrote:
> funny how other forums look at hydrogenaudio as a bunch of kooks and
> here they are revered, nuff said !!!
Even more funny is how in "other forums" some are very good in quoting
studies to proof things (often totaly out of context and wrongly
interpreted) and linking to pdfs of
nyaskivor wrote:
> If someone built an (official/unofficial) update of the software.
> Updated with the function WLAN on/off. That would be so nice. .
You can do this now with TT3.0. I have no idea why one would want to,
but it is easy enough to do.
---
dsdreamer wrote:
> I have the Rega DAC too, BTW. Anything that has SPDIF as its output is
> going to suffer from the main design flaw of SPDIF: namely the need to
> recover the clock from the data. If you could go USB to I2S such that
> the clock is transmitted explicitly and separately from the
Sold out and marked discontinued on Crutchfield
Sold out and no indication of restocking on Amazon.com (except third
party sellers)
travelfotografer's Profile:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48355
View thi
18 matches
Mail list logo