Any comments on Dan Rather from the TT
team? Found this on a weblog.
Dan Rather, CBS News Anchor
1) given documents he thought were true
2) failed to thoroughly investigate the facts
3) reported documents to the American people as true to make his case
4) when confronted with the
What is below is taken from www.sojo.net.
Please read it and discuss. Based upon the criteria below who should
you vote for? Shall we take each issue below and see who is the best
candidate? Is anyone willing to discuss the issues?
It is the responsibility of every political
Such liberal nonsense. No comparison,
Jonathan, between getting CIA information as President and a journalist with
political motives seeking out something with which to smear said President from
sleazy, secret sources. Give us a break. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
DaveH, My ex-husband and I owned a hot air
balloon for sport. Its like buying a boatfor a while you
love it, and then it gets old fast. No it wasnt my Dadjust a
fellow balloonist. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Hansen
Sent: Tuesday,
Lets change our name to PoliticalTalk???
Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hughes
Sent: Wednesday, September 22,
2004 6:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote
for, and WHY?
What is below is taken from
Well I did ask for comments :) You are correct in one
thing; there is no comparison. One is slightly wrong, the other absolutely
disastrous.
Jonathan Hughes
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
ShieldsFamilySent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 9:12
AMTo: [EMAIL
In a message dated 9/21/2004 7:58:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"It is a sense of one religion being a true religion," Miller said. "He
has made a choice. But it is very complicated. It involves emotions.
And you are in fact negating something in favor of something
Izzy in a tizzy. Shall I understand your answer to be
that you will not discuss the issues in light of the Bible? Should our
Christianity infuse our politics? Is this an area of life that Christ
cannot touch? Does Christ only infuse conservative politics? Is God
a Republican? Is it not
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:26:09 -0400 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Michael D: When I've share with believers things
(even idiomsand slang) that they need to watch, they've frown on it or
dismissed it as nonsense
I am one who disagrees
with you. Our Master and King
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:17:53 +0100 (BST) michael douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Slade Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
jt said: Hi again Slade; I don't know about others but we do
need to watch what comes out of our mouths as we have another Kingdom
watching and
In a message dated 9/22/2004 5:30:34 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dan Rather, CBS News Anchor
1) given documents he thought were true
no evidence for this whatsoever
2) failed to thoroughly investigate the facts
within 3 hours of the release of these "documents,"
God has given us a Republican president and it appears as though he will be
around for another four years. Christ has addressed politics in Romans 13; we
are told that Government is instituted by God and to submit to governing
authorities. As individuals we are to vote according toconscience
Judy,
Please read the whole article below and comment on the
biblical passages in light of the candidates, not your generalizing without any
mention of facts. It is unlike you to avoid the Bible on issues like
this. And since when did God give you the president? Don't blame God
for your
Jonathan in blue.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 10:24
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Dan Rather
In a message dated 9/22/2004 5:30:34 AM Pacific
Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jonathan:
We are on vacation - I am using a laptop and am not online long enough to
read articles because we are using someone elses phone line, we mainly send and
receive email. By the time we are back in VA and I could read the article you
will have lost interest. I have my own opinions
I agree; this liberal trend of untruth in
journalism is the biggest threat to American freedom. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hughes Jonathan
Sent: Wednesday, September 22,
2004 7:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Dan
John, I didt remember posting the
quote below, and have no idea what you are talking about. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22,
2004 8:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] from
Jonathan, I am just waiting for the Holy
Spirit to work in your heart in this realm of politics. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hughes Jonathan
Sent: Wednesday, September 22,
2004 8:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Who to
How Would
The D-Day Invasion be Reported by Today's liberal press?
Alex McRae Reports...
June, 6, 1944. D-Day.
The Normandy
invasion. The beginning of the end of World War II, and one of the most storied
days in American military history. Today we celebrate not just the 60th
Judy,
As usual, when pressed you run into the corner and
hide. You have responded to a number of emails with a number of
paragraphs. You have the time to respond. Use it. You
obviously connect at least once an hour. You can at least read the Bible
verses in your own Bible and comment how
CBS has apologized and Rather is still sticking to his guns, there is
something wrong with this picture but not much point
in arguing about it since noone knows what Rather knew or how/when he knew
it. It's just sad that he chooses tohold to the
lie when his story has been exposed already. As
Sigh Judy. More lies. Rather has apologized
personally on air, not just CBS.
The jury is still out on the WMD issue? Your jokes
are funny.
Jonathan Hughes
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judith H
TaylorSent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 12:00 PMTo:
[EMAIL
As a follow-up, the information contained in the memos is
true. Note how the Bush administration has not denied it. The memos
themselves are forged. Can you see the difference?
Jonathan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judith H
TaylorSent: Thursday, July 22,
I am just waiting for you to use your God-given mind.
A real conservative would find you embarrassing.
Jonathan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
ShieldsFamilySent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 11:56
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Who to
I'm
just wondering if anyone has ever thought of not voting the "normal"
Republican or Democrat way...and voting for another party completely. Any
thoughts?
Kay
Oh, yes, even though the documents are
forgeries, the information in them is true. Even though Dan Rather has not
denied his conspiracy in this slanderous fraud, you still think he is innocent.
Can you see the difference? Why
would you even bring up and try to defend such sleaze? Izzy
Why do you feel compelled to insult me
when I try to avoid arguing with you? Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hughes Jonathan
Sent: Wednesday, September 22,
2004 10:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Who to
Vote for, and WHY?
Why not just stay home, rather than go to
the polls to throw away your vote? Or were you thinking of writing in Smithson?
Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Wednesday, September 22,
2004 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Because you are fake. You pretend to be one thing and
preach a nice party line but when it comes to facts you always come up short or
run away with a one-liner hoping you got in the last word. You malign
anything even remotely liberal and yet are unable to discuss why. If
someone points out
I know this would require you to use the internet for more
than your hate-Democrat campaigns but spend a few minutes researching the
content of the memos. Read the interviews of the people who knew Bush at
the time. Spend 30 seconds (about the time you take to think through any
post on TT)
Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
michael douglas wrote:
Michael D: I lend my voice here to Judy's and Terry's. As I have repeated often recently, God has made faith the Law by which He intervenes on man's behalf. That's why we are justified by faith. God can do anything He chooses, but our
In a message dated 9/22/2004 8:47:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dan Rather, CBS News Anchor
1) given documents he thought were true
no evidence for this whatsoever
Other than his own word. You may dislike Rather (and I am probably in that crowd) but there is no reason
No,
actually, I'm just wondering what others' thoughts were. I'm not in to politics.
I understand the concept of throwing away a vote by not voting either Democrat
or Republican, however, if enough people vote a different party, then it
wouldn't be throwing it away. Seems to me from what
Good for you Kay. As Izzy illustrates below, putting
some thought into who to vote for is usually considered a rather ungodly and
anti-american thing to do on this forum. For the record I would seriously
consider voting for Smithson.
Jonathan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I have never, ever, ever like Dan
Blather. Everyone knows what liberal bias he has. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hughes Jonathan
Sent: Wednesday, September 22,
2004 11:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Dan
Rather
I
Never heard of it. So I guess youll
be one in a handful. Another wasted vote, when you could vote for someone
who fights against abortion and many other evils. Just my opinion, Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Wednesday,
Well,
I've just been reading the CP site and I like what they say. Not that I believe
any politician, mind you. :) BUT...there's information on what they think of
marriage, family, gambling, life, gun control, etc. and I tend to agree with
them on most issues. I've checked out how many CP
Sorry you feel that way, Jonathan. Ill
bow out so you can try trashing President Bush and America with everyone else. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hughes Jonathan
Sent: Wednesday, September 22,
2004 11:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Well,
according to the CP information, so do they. And, according to the numbers I
found, there seems to bea bit more than a handful of registered CP voters.
Their stand on Abortion is as follows:
Sanctity of
Life
The pre-born child, whose life begins at fertilization,
is a human being
http://www.constitutionparty.com/
Jonathan Hughes
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
ShieldsFamilySent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 2:44
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Who to Vote for, and WHY?
Interesting. Why dont
you post their
Show me where I trashed president Bush? Quote
it. Show me where I trashed America. Quote it. Otherwise stop
the lies. You are aware that everyone sees through your smokescreen?
Read through the thread. I posted an article with several verses backing
up several issues that may or may not be
Interesting. Why dont you post their
website? While Im VERY sure that we MUST have a Republican House, Senate, and
President to help us overthrow the liberals who are re-writing the
Constitution, I wonder who I would vote for if we did not have a godly Presidential
candidate like we have
Izzy,
Please show us how Bush has fought against abortion.
What has he done to stop it? Abortion seems to be your number one
issue. If this is true then demonstrate how it is Bush's number
issue. If it was important to him don't you think he would have done
something about it? In fact he
Izzy,
Did you know Bush supports 'civil unions' for homosexuals
or that he has no intention of making abortion illegal? What exactly do
you know about George Bush? Quoting from the
Constitutional Party's website:
On most matters of substance, there is hardly any difference in the policies
More stuff on Bush and abortion. Izzy, do you still
feel the same way about Bush after reading this? Does abortion really
matter to you?
And while we are on the subject of abortion, President G.W. Bush signed
legislation in 2002 that increased funding for International Family Planning to
http://www.constitutionparty.com
http://www.peroutka2004.com
I just
spoke with one of their campaign people...whatever you call them...and they are
snail mailing me more information. I asked specific questions about issues I'm
personally concerned with involving family.
Kay
In a message dated 9/22/2004 10:55:09 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John, I didt remember posting the quote below, and have no idea what you are talking about. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
In a message dated 9/22/2004 10:55:16 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not just stay home, rather than go to the polls to throw away your vote? Or were you thinking of writing in Smithson? Izzy
If nominated, I will not run; if elected, I will not serve. But I will
In a message dated 9/22/2004 11:25:43 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good for you Kay. As Izzy illustrates below, putting some thought into who to vote for is usually considered a rather ungodly and anti-american thing to do on this forum. For the record I would seriously
In a message dated 9/22/2004 11:20:29 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, actually, I'm just wondering what others' thoughts were. I'm not in to politics. I understand the concept of throwing away a vote by not voting either Democrat or Republican, however, if enough people
In a message dated 9/22/2004 11:36:46 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I've just been reading the CP site and I like what they say. Not that I believe any politician, mind you. :) BUT...there's information on what they think of marriage, family, gambling, life, gun
I just got back from the Constitutional Party site (http://www.constitutionparty.com/party_platform.php ) Out of some 38 "statements of faith," I have a few, and I mean few, issues with perhaps 6 or 7 headings. You would think, therefore, I would heartily endorse this party. Perhaps it is my
In a message dated 9/22/2004 12:28:27 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.constitutionparty.com
http://www.peroutka2004.com
I just spoke with one of their campaign people...whatever you call them...and they are snail mailing me more information. I asked specific
In a message dated 9/21/2004 9:04:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nor dissent?
Wow -- I am embarrassed fr some reason.
Jnho
Slade Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael D: When I've share with believers things (even idiomsand slang) that they need to watch, they've frown on it or dismissed it as nonsense
I am one who disagrees with you. Our Master and King used idioms when He was walking the Earth and Our Father in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/21/2004 9:04:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nor dissent?
Wow -- I am embarrassed fr some reason. Jnho
Michael D: One might be excused for wondering why you spelt your name wromg all the time, Jhno...
ALL-NEW
Yahoo!
It's
unbelievable how this concept is not getting through. Let me give an example or
two to express my meaning.
Jan
said to John, "Quit beating around the bush!"Let me ask you a question...
Was John ACTUALLY beating around the bush or was he verbally not getting to the
point?
Slade
said,
My
questions were if they REALLY support gun ownership and the right to bear arms.
I also spoke to him about problems I've seen in the court system...violation of
1st, 4th, 5th, 8th, and 14th amendment rights to begin with. I've personally
heard judges tell litigators that there is no
Jonathan, We will not discuss anything
until you calm down. Right now you are not appearing to be open to any
reasoning at all. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hughes Jonathan
Sent: Wednesday, September 22,
2004 12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL
Izzy,
Stop running.
Now that you know what Bush actually
thinks about abortion do you still support him? If so why. If not why? Do you
agree with what Bush has done in the White House for abortion? Do you think he
should be supporting organizations that approve of abortion?
Here is a poem I wrote in April of 2000. Perhaps you can see why I latched onto much of Baxter Kruger's thinking four years later. I write as I speak - it is only a "poem" because I say it is a poem. I originally wrote it with the view that I might, someday, read it aloud at a Barnes and Noble.
In a message dated 9/22/2004 3:39:12 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
questions were if they REALLY support gun ownership and the right to bear arms. I also spoke to him about problems I've seen in the court system...violation of 1st, 4th, 5th, 8th, and 14th amendment rights to
In a message dated 9/22/2004 3:20:08 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jan said to John, "Quit beating around the bush!" Let me ask you a question... Was John ACTUALLY beating around the bush or was he verbally not getting to the point?
Slade said, "I'm all ears!" Is Slade a
In a message dated 9/22/2004 4:27:06 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you on this forum to discuss or just belittle those that disagree with you as liberals? Once again either put up or shut up.
Jonathan !! Go easy. What is interesting to me in this discussion is the
hehehehehehe
yes.
Izzy,
A week and a half ago David Miller emailed
me asking me to take over the moderator position on this forum. Surprised I
sent back an email to him asking why me when it is obvious that most of my views
are disregarded and considered heretical. He wrote back that I took the
In a message dated 9/22/2004 4:51:41 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hehehehehehe
yes.
;-)
In a message dated 9/22/2004 4:53:41 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A week and a half ago David Miller emailed me asking me to take over the moderator position on this forum.
No Perry?
JD
Hi John,
I guess it is obvious that Izzy has me
going today. I just am so fed up with someone claiming something and
refusing to actually look into the details. You are right: I am so
cotton-picken upset because I do accept Lindas claim to be a
Christian. To me that is not in doubt at
Perry is just too busy to be able to give
the time to the forum that he would like and has begged to be relieved of
duty. For the record I put your name forward as being the most mature and able
to handle this lot.
Jonathan
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Which
ones are the same and what experiences do you have with
them?
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, 22 September, 2004
19.41To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Who to
In a message dated 9/22/2004 3:39:12 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which ones are the same and what experiences do you have with them?
Kay
My questions were if they REALLY support gun ownership and the right to bear arms.
I support the right -- but I do not own a gun.
Slade Henson wrote:
I'm just wondering if anyone has ever thought of
not voting the "normal" Republican or Democrat way...and voting for
another party completely. Any thoughts?
Kay
I tried that during the last presidential election. It did not
work. Still, I
Was it Cat Stevens who sang "Cats in the Cradle?"
I'll
reply in purpleK.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, 22 September, 2004
20.21To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?In a message dated 9/22/2004
In a message dated 9/22/2004 5:50:32 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would take either a blithering idiot or the world's most gullible person to believe that this man could be a good senator, let alone a good president. Al Sharpton looks good compared to Kerry.
Terry
On
Yep.
Then Ugly Kid Joe did a version...
--slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, 22 September, 2004
20.51To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?Was it Cat
Laugh out loud!
*breathes*
I also do not think Kerry will make a good
president. I dont mind his running mate John Edwards though.
Kerrys platform is remarkably similar to Bushs. On many of
the points Terry made Bush is equally as guilty (Bush is not for firearms, Bush
was a far
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a poem I wrote in April of
2000. Perhaps you can see why I latched onto much of Baxter Kruger's
thinking four years later. I write as I speak - it is only a "poem"
because I say it is a poem. I originally wrote it with the view that
I might, someday, read it
Quick correction. Bush was a governor.
Kerry is the Senator.
J
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hughes
Sent: Wednesday, September 22,
2004 9:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Who to
Vote for, and WHY?
Laugh out
In a message dated 9/22/2004 6:26:34 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I also do not think Kerry will make a good president. I dont mind his running mate John Edwards though. Kerrys platform is remarkably similar to Bushs. On many of the points Terry made Bush is equally as
In a message dated 9/22/2004 6:35:20 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You might think about changing that line that says "We cannot aquire it", 'cause God gives grace to the humble. Being humble would seem to be the only way to aquire it.
Am I nitpicking, or does that seem
Kay, Who is the candidate they are running
for the CP party? The problem I see with the courts is simply this: once
a man/woman is elected or worse yet appointed to a judicial seat he becomes a
little god. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
They are almost NEVER removed
Jonathan, You seem oblivious of the fact
that I am fast tiring of your insults. SO if you think you can stop insulting
me I will promise to look at all of your recommended websites re: Bush and
abortion and then discuss it with you. But if you lapse into emotional
name-calling of me or
Jonathan, What if she chooses Bush? J Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hughes
Sent: Wednesday, September 22,
2004 6:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Who to
Vote for, and WHY?
Hi John,
I guess it is obvious
It's only been
very recentlythat I've even been interested in the voting scheme. I did
not vote last election because I thought Gore would win anyhow and I felt it
wasn't worth. I believe I wrote in my own candidate...Mickey Mouse. I did vote
Bush Sr. against Clinton
before that. I
Careful, Johnyoure going to
make G jealous with all that nifty prose. J Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22,
2004 5:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] a poem
for Smitty
Here is
By the way, Jonathan, the last time I
asked you a simple question (and didnt even ask you to read twelve books
and consult two dozen websites) you refused to answer it. Now youre bellyaching
because I havent read all your propaganda sites. Is this fair? So when
are you going to answer
Terry, You grow more brilliant by the day.
J Izzy
Prov 4:18: But the path of the just is as the shining light,
that shineth more and more unto the perfect
day.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Wednesday, September 22,
2004
In a message dated 9/22/2004 8:32:52 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And why is he a terrorist suspect, exactly? Izzy
They probably do not know for sure. Maybe it was his singing.
John
In a message dated 9/22/2004 8:37:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kay, Im so happy to hear that you are finally realizing how important your vote is to the future of our children and all of society. If you had known how close the election was going to be last time in
91 matches
Mail list logo
