In a message dated 1/13/2005 11:01:50 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The blood of Jesus was shed for the remission of sin - meaning that as we confess and turn from it (repentance without regret) the blood cleanses our conscience.. otherwise we are trying to use it as a rabbit
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:35:01 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 1/13/2005 8:45:36 AM Pacific
Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Judy, You are impossible! If I
answer you at all, it will be at a time that I would otherwise be wasting
anyway. I did highlight one
The blood of Jesus was shed for the remission of
sin - meaning that as we confess and turn from it (repentance without regret)
the blood cleanses our conscience.. otherwise we are trying to use it as a
rabbit's foot. Jesus' blood was never supposed to be a cover for
sin. The blood of bulls
Then John you have your own private interpretation so
that what God says about it makes no difference to you...
At least this is the way it appears to me.
His word clearly says SIN IS LAWLESSNESS - and it also says that
no
prophecy of scripture is for private
interpretation. 1 John 3:4 i
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:30:43 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:14:11 PM Pacific
Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:I'm not sure I understand how you
are understanding this passage. What does "assurance of salvation" or a
"guaranteed ticket to heav
In a message dated 1/13/2005 10:30:01 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John, I think Kevin posted this originally, but I will respond anyway. Yes,
I think the blood of Christ covers them from the moment they believe. Not
all "conversions" are miraculouis instant fixes for life
In a message dated 1/13/2005 10:29:49 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jd: Judy, you really do not have a clue as to "the practice of lawlessness." Your use of the phrase "This is sin" forces this conclusion.
jt: Just agreeing with God's Word John ie: "Everyone who practi
John, I think Kevin posted this originally, but I will respond anyway. Yes,
I think the blood of Christ covers them from the moment they believe. Not
all "conversions" are miraculouis instant fixes for life's problems. Many
come to believe then, thorough a slow process, become transformed. Some
John, I think Kevin posted this originally, but I will respond anyway. Yes,
I think the blood of Christ covers them from the moment they believe. Not
all "conversions" are miraculouis instant fixes for life's problems. Many
come to believe then, thorough a slow process, become transformed. Some
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:21:01 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My turn now John .. Don't want
to burst your bubble but it isn't up to God who gets in and who doesn't ..
because God has given all judgment in heaven and on earth over to Jesus, so he
is the one who has the say so and we
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:04:22 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
must you argue with every word I speak? Give me a break. Izzy
Back atcha on that -- in triplicate.
Grace and unmerited love and patience are the first things I think of. Just an observation.
J
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:13:41 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you knew you were going to die tomorrow, and you had a chance to tell me something, what would it be?
BYE!
The best of the bunch. I am laughing so hard I can barely respond.
You have earned an a
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:13:46 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just skimmed most of this. But I'm not understanding why God would
allegedly tell you something contrary to His Wordsuch as this "age of
this and that". Sounds like dispensationalism to mewhich is c
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:13:48 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, is it loving to try to evangelize others to a damning religion? I think not.
How do you figure? I do not pretend that my reality is Daveâs
You can't see this? Really? Whose reality is it when yo
DAVEH: Hi all TTers. I appreciate the responses to some of my posts,
and would like to reply to them. However, I think I came down with the
flu or something that is no fun for the stomach. Furthermore, I'm
headed out of town tomorrow and won't return until Tuesday. Soif I
feel better o
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:14:07 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sure you do Jonathan..I can tell from your language. Try to
show a little more class next time you write.
Terry
Lots of way of being classless, Terry.
JD
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:38:30 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is why the Lord instructs us to walk in love, give others the benefit of a doubt, and assume the best wherever possible
And you are an example of this? You have been no less the problem than the one to
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:14:11 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not sure I understand how you are understanding this passage. What does
"assurance of salvation" or a "guaranteed ticket to heaven" have to do with
the effect of the conscience upon the mind? I have f
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:14:17 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth (jt resolves most biblical questions apriori w/ finality, not via negotiatg vigorous, rigorous hermeneutic expertise existentially; if it's 'hermeneutic', DavidM, then it's after the fashion of pseudo-i
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:14:24 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My turn now John .. Don't want to burst your bubble but it isn't up to God who gets in and who doesn't .. because God has given all judgment in heaven and on earth over to Jesus, so he is the one who has the s
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:36:21 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..nor does it inc a leGitimate 'hermaneutic' (thus far)..the correlation to you
In a message dated 1/13/2005 8:55:32 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eat less; run more.
The word "eviiil" comes to mind ! LOL
Jd
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you knew you were going to die tomorrow, and you had a chance to tell
me
something, what would it be? I's like to know the answer to that one from
anyone on this list.
Eat less; run more.
--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that yo
Prophets stopped
MT11:13 For all the prophets and the law prophesied until John.
Luke 16:16 The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.
John 8:52 Abraham is dead, and the prophets;
Past Tense: Rom 1:2 Which he had prom
It takes a lot to shock and discourage me,
but there are a few on TT today who have managed to do just that. May the
Holy Spirit bring conviction and repentance.
One of my personal beliefs, for what it’s
worth, is this: Whatever pain you inflict upon others is going to return
to you
..nor does it inc
a leGitimate 'hermaneutic' (thus far)..the
correlation to your point, below, Pastor, seems like 'beauty in the
eye...'
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:03:38 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
|| 1)
Filled with His
Spirit2)
Walk in His Spir
Yes,
Judy...makes it FULLER. For instance...you have heard...do not commit adultery.
But I'm telling you if you even look upon a woman with lust in your
heart...you've done it. You have heard...do not murder. But I tell you that if
you even hate your brother, you have murdered. If we were co
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005
3:30 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon
Related #2
In a message dated 1/13/2005 8:44:31 AM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROT
Yea,
not to add to or take awayseems to me you read the book form the beginning.
You don't start 2/3 of the way through, otherwise you don't get the whole story.
Comprehension could be lacking if we begin at the last 1/3. Build the foundation
up from the beginning, realize the penalty fo
You
have a prophet right here on TT, Kevin. Do you follow him? If so, why? If not,
why not? Do you have a way of determining when to follow in your midst who claim
to be so?
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kevin
DeeganS
However, the manner in which you treat them would not make me, if I were
a Mormon, want to become a "true Christian". Telling someone they are reprobate,
or not a Christian, or bound for hell, well, tain't cool.
I
posted a few days about Cheryl and my experience with her. One of the reasons
makes sense, Slade; abt 1 post per
day i figure/d
thx,
G
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:12:21 -0500 "Slade
Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> In the third quarter of 2004
(Jul-Sep), these are the ending > numbers:..Ottoson,
Gary 101
Items 3.31% of the total
In the third quarter of 2004 (Jul-Sep), these are the ending numbers:
A total of 3,052 messages passed our port.
Barr, Chris 48 Items1.57% of the total
Brown, Elizabeth 2 Items0.07% of the total
Clifton, Terry 225 Items7.37% of the total
Douglas, Michael
Slade Henson wrote:
I've got a question, then. First of all, I'm not
too awful bright...so bear with me.
Let's seeyou who practice lawlessness.
Lawlessnesswithout law, or, in other words, sin. Without
lawh...gimme a bit to think. Adding or taking away from the
Word of
Terry says: In more than one place in God's word, we are warned not to add to or take from God's word. The punishment is having your name removed from the book of life if I remember correctly. Would you consider the BOM to be adding to God's word? If so, are Mormons saved?
CMON Terry You Know B
Not sure what the question is Kay but I'm assuming it
has to do with the "Law" am I right? Didn't Jesus say
that love fulfills all of the law and the
prophets? He fulfilled the law and we fulfill it also through Him while
being conformed to His image.
In writing about becoming all things
myth (jt resolves most biblical
questions apriori w/ finality, not via negotiatg
vigorous, rigorous hermeneutic expertise existentially; if it's
'hermeneutic', DavidM, then it's after the fashion of
pseudo-intellectual cult/sect administrators wielding
autocratic self-confirmation, rubber
I've
got a question, then. First of all, I'm not too awful bright...so bear with
me.
Let's
seeyou who practice lawlessness. Lawlessnesswithout law, or, in other
words, sin. Without lawh...gimme a bit to think. Adding or taking away
from the Word of God.I've heard that be
In a message dated 1/13/2005 1:05:36 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I said, for the life of me, I don't get it. I am sorry. You caught the brunt of my frustration. I have posted numerous times on the sufficiency of Christ's finished work to save babies the same way he has save
Hehehe...
Kay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 13 January, 2005 19.45
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
I don't know about Messi's being the only real Christians, b
Some have it more than others. I can smell a rat from several states away,
too.
:)
Kay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Thursday, 13 January, 2005 18.15
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers wi
In a message dated 1/13/2005 9:42:04 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. Jack tells him: You need to Repent! The kingdom of God is forbidden to
you except you repent. Stop your sinning, and get right with God.
2. Sam tells him: No worries, my good friend. You are alrig
Jonathan Hughes wrote:
Terry, you are such a prick. It is bad enough that Judy monopolizes the
idiot portion of this forum to have you tack on such an insensitive comment.
You are an embarrassment to this forum.
Jonathan 'ticked off at how people have treated Bill, ticked off at how the
hypocrite
I don't know about Messi's being the only real Christians, but I know Utah is
the only true state. I still maintain Ross Perot would have made a great Pres!!
:)
-- "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, David, I didn't.
You do realize, though, that Messi's are the only real Christians
Perry wrote:
> David, "as I have defined it" is the way moral
> relativists justify sin.
But what does the term "Christian" have to do with morality? When you are
ready to exclude Roman Catholicism and United Pentecostals from
Christianity, then maybe we can talk more about your definition.
Pe
Slade Henson wrote:
I just skimmed most of this. But I'm not understanding why God would
allegedly tell you something contrary to His Wordsuch as this "age of
this and that". Sounds like dispensationalism to mewhich is clearly NOT
Scriptural. I'm not going to debate over this, but I ask...w
In a message dated 1/13/2005 1:14:10 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2 Co 11:2 For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ.
Perry, knowing Corinth the way we do, the above passag
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:40:05 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Allow me to chim in here.
Salvation is not a legal issue. Not any more. Do you presently claim
to be doctrinally correct about every biblical issue? Is there a chance,
perhaps a good chance that you will change your mind abo
Terry, you are such a prick. It is bad enough that Judy monopolizes the
idiot portion of this forum to have you tack on such an insensitive comment.
You are an embarrassment to this forum.
Jonathan 'ticked off at how people have treated Bill, ticked off at how the
hypocrite and lying Judy gets aw
In a message dated 1/13/2005 1:30:34 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Looks like the men of Nineveh pleased God by Believing
This belief produced outward fruit when they proclaimed a fast Jonah 3:5 &repenting in sackloth &ashes Jonah 3:6
Perry:
Two things -- your p
John wrote:
> Romans 2:15 -16 speaks only of a maybe
> situation : "..their conscience either
> accusing or defending them "
> In Christ, we have the assurance of our salvation
> --- or, at least, some of us do.
> ...
> Does "either accusing or defending" sound like
So Sara has a new album out? I'd like to see her
and Troy again. I haven't seen them since I turned down Sara's offer to
tour with them as her Sound Tech.
Jeff
Life makes warriors of us all.To emerge the victors,
we must armourselves with the most potent of weapons.That weapon is
prayer.-
In a message dated 1/13/2005 2:51:53 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way, John... The financing on the home and property came through.. in duplicate. We can choose between two banks (Wells Fargo, I guess just took too long.).
By the way, warn Bill T for me. I plan
In a message dated 1/13/2005 2:42:56 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
=
In more than one place in God's word, we are warned not to add to or take from God's word. The punishment is having your name removed from the book of life if I r
I just skimmed most of this. But I'm not understanding why God would
allegedly tell you something contrary to His Wordsuch as this "age of
this and that". Sounds like dispensationalism to mewhich is clearly NOT
Scriptural. I'm not going to debate over this, but I ask...was it God you
heard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you knew you were going to die tomorrow, and you had a chance to
tell me something, what would it be? I's like to know the answer to
that one from anyone on this list.
John
===
I would say that I am a little afraid because I ha
Slade,
I agree that DaveH is a kindly person of exemplary manners—his words are always
loving. However, is it loving to try to evangelize others to a damning
religion? I think not. Izzy
You pretend that your reality is Dave's and then you draw your
conclusion. Izzy believes thus and
Speaking of such, I am of the opinion (have
I ever been taught this???) that we are born with a propensity to sin—not actually already condemned by sin (since
we haven’t yet). So, in that case, anyone who dies prior to actually
sinning is not under God’s judgment, and does not go to hell.
If you knew you were going to die tomorrow, and you had a chance to tell me something, what would it be?
BYE!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/13/2005 8:45:36 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That I
wouldn't know, but I would venture to guess, uh... YES! However, I'd have to ask my brother who
married a Mexican gal whose mother cooks a killer menudo (did I spell that
correctly?) -- or so I've heard. I eat vegetarian at his home (that's a joke...
kinda).
By the w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/13/2005 2:54:45 AM
Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I
read you correctly, you're asking "Does God allow people to worship him
differently than the Jewish?" And the answer ifs Yes. One of my
professors sees the Je
In a message dated 1/13/2005 2:13:07 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Try this
buk buk buk buk b'gock!
<:^
-- slade
AAA -- the theater of the mind
I've heard that eggs taste better than tripe?
John
Try
this
buk
buk buk buk b'gock!
<:^
--
slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, 13 January, 2005
16.12To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Whose Names are Writ
David Miller wrote:
Bill Taylor wrote:
Good bye, everyone. I hope that you
were at least to a certain degree edified
by my contribution. I pray the best for
you all.
I have greatly appreciated your contribution. I consider you to be the
greatest theologian on TruthTalk. I sure hope you a
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What I find curious is why you find the word "Christian" so sacred
that it
must only include those who truly believe in Christ. Does one come into
relationship with Christ by joining the Christian religion, or by simple
faith in
In a message dated 1/13/2005 8:45:36 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy, You are impossible! If I answer you at all, it will be at a time that I would otherwise be wasting anywa
David do you also use this approach on Sodomites?
If a Sodomite claims to follow Jesus is he a Christian?
If you tell him so don't you give him a False Hope?
That is the problem with your False definition.
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Charles Perry Locke
In a message dated 1/13/2005 8:44:31 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
âOne who is truly in (the real) Christ.â (Not a member of a church.) How do we know if we are truly in the real Chist? Off the top of my head I will say we are:
1) Filled with His Spirit
2) Wal
John says: Would God's tolerance of other religions , alla Ninevah
God did not TOLERATE Nineveh he laid it waste details in the Bible; Read it. Nahum 2:8,3:7
I think the interesting thing is God sends a preacher to one of Israels greatest enemies Asyria.
No wonder Jonah was not keen on the idea
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The term "Christian" as I have defined it does not lose all meaning. Only
those who profess an attempt to follow Christ would be included. This
would
exclude Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Pagans, etc. who do not see that
Jesus Christ holds such a pro
In a message dated 1/13/2005 8:44:13 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If they never hear about Jesus they are guaranteed a ticket to heaven.
Actually, once again, you missed the point. No one is saying this. Romans 2:15 -16 speaks only of a maybe situation : ".
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:33:24 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would say -- "How about them Dodgers?"
Bill :>)
What if I said that "free moral agency" is a problem for God -- who is not a free moral agent; that His "all knowing" acclaim (a claim h
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:27:55 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Slade, I agree that DaveH is a kindly person of exemplary mannersâhis words are always loving. However, is it loving to try to evangelize others to a damning religion? I think not. Izzy
You pretend that
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:14:02 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I said, for the life of me, I don't get it. I am sorry. You caught the brunt of my frustration. I have posted numerous times on the sufficiency of Christ's finished work to save babies the same way he has save
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:23:08 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Slade Henson wrote:
How many wives do you have, Dave?
DAVEH: Just one, Kay.
But not because JSmith said so, right DaveH? Izzy
I don't think Dave or his lovely ever met Smith. Was it a temple weddi
HUH?
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Bill
TaylorSent: Thursday, 13 January, 2005 11.37To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: [TruthTalk]
Good bye, everyone. I hope that you were at least
to a certain degree ed
DavidM, perhaps we are not far apart but I still feel very uncomfortable with your definition
I knew a guy who told everyone how much he loved his wife.
He said he was never happier than when he was a married man and his wife was wonderful.
Anumber of years into the marriage they broke up after
In a message dated 1/13/2005 4:44:13 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyway..Some folks consider Mormons to be those who belong to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. A broader definition would be...Mormons are those who belong to one of the denominations
In a message dated 1/13/2005 2:54:45 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I read you correctly, you're asking "Does God allow people to worship him differently than the Jewish?" And the answer ifs Yes. One of my professors sees the Jerusalem Council in Acts as permission to den
I was just wanting your definition of Mormon you have since sent it.
Thanks
Do you disagree with the fact that for a Mormon the Living Prophet is the ultimate Authority on this earth?
How do you determine just WHEN to FOLLOW the PROPHET?Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DAVEH: Hey Kevin...
Perry wrote:
> ... if you want to open up the definition to include
> everyone who may use the name of Christ in the
> name of their Church, or may claim to believe in
> Him but does not, and says they follow Him, but
> do not, or claims that some strange alien jesus
> from Kolob is the same one as
David Miller wrote:
>> ... the Lord told me that I was functioning as a
>> prophet ...
SLADE wrote:
> How clear was this message? Was it riddled
> with parables? Was the message clear, concise,
> and very much to the point?
The message was very clear, but perhaps not the absolute clearest revelat
My point is why do you continue to exclude David from the "Christian" category? He said he worships GOD, though he believes there are other gods.
Only God can really exclude him.
Now according to the definition I provided of Christian
One valid way of determining what fits that definition is t
Amen, David, amen. Izzy
-Original Message-
Now which of these two people, given the facts established, should be
considered to be the most loving? I think it would be Jack.
Proverbs 27:5-6
(5) Open rebuke is better than secret love.
(6) Faithful are the wounds of a friend; but the kis
Izzy wrote:
> I agree that DaveH is a kindly person of exemplary
> manners-his words are always loving. However,
> is it loving to try to evangelize others to a damning
> religion? I think not.
We do have to be careful how we interpret love. I'm sure Jesus did not
appear to be loving the times
Oracles that should be
remembered, as spoken by David Miller! Izzy
-Original Message-
1.So rather than using my theology to interpret the
passage, I let the passage speak for itself and then adjust my theology
to
align with all the remaining passages of Scripture.
Bill Taylor wrote:
> I am fairly confident that most Trinitarians would agree
> with me on the wooing. I am certain that James and
> Thomas Torrance do in fact believe this, and teach it
> (although dear old J.B. is now deceased). The wooing
> is but one aspect of a thoroughly participatory salvati
Nice talk, Bill. I did “ask
questions for clarification”, and this is what I get? Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Taylor
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005
10:31 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose
Names are W
Bill Taylor wrote:
> Good bye, everyone. I hope that you
> were at least to a certain degree edified
> by my contribution. I pray the best for
> you all.
I have greatly appreciated your contribution. I consider you to be the
greatest theologian on TruthTalk. I sure hope you are not saying goodb
Bill Taylor wrote:
> Please do not take offense at this, but it concerns
> me very much the way you are wont to re-direct
> a discussion away from the big picture which holds
> it all together. Perhaps this is not so great a problem
> -- your method -- in the physical sciences, but I find
> it quit
My
point is why do you continue to exclude David from the "Christian"
category? He said he worships GOD, though he believes there are other
gods.
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kevin
DeeganSent: Thursday, 13 January, 2
Correct, so what is your point?Slade Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Still overly vague and broad. This would include many brands of people and many different denominations.
Kay
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kevin DeeganSent: Thursda
Very interesting this talk of plural wives
Any member of the "Utah" Mormons would be EX'ed if it was public knowledge or he publicly spoke of multiple wives in this life. Of course you can be sealed to more than one in the Temple. In the afterlife you can have a harem full.
http://scriptures.l
Good bye, everyone. I hope that you were at least
to a certain degree edified by my contribution. I pray the best for you
all.
Bill Taylor
Bill, you call what I
wrote above venting??? I call it calm, sincere questions which you have
avoided answering by calling it venting.
This is what I would call venting:
Judy, You are impossible!
Bill
Izzy
I
am glad we are getting to know each other better. No, That is the truth!
Yeah, Izzy, I know. At that point I was just beginning to
brew. The pot boiled later on -- poor Debbie! I think that your answer is
a practical-outworking part of the full answer, but it does not address
the theological 'whys' of this issue. Like why were those babies even alive in
the fi
jt: Bill if I apologized to you back then it may have
been for misunderstanding Newbigin, it certainly wasn't
for consigning him to hell which was your accusation
yesterday and which incidentally John has picked up on.
Amazing how bad news spreads. I am not turning on
you, nor am I reframing
jt: How loving and how comforting for you to let
me know I am a waste of time Bill. Oh well, I can't say I expected much
more than a big "rejection" sticker from you - but then hope springs eternal :).
You are definitely not open to question or examine anything you have been taught
by the "
Thanks for the helpful information. If you come across anything more, would
you please let me know about it. I am very interested.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Creationism
> Bill
Excuse me, Judy, for what do I need to repent? At
the time this took place you apologized to me for your accusation and admitted
that you had judged him without first understanding his position. Are you now
taking that back and turning on me? I am at a loss to know how to take you. You
asked
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
