On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 05:54:52 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jt says BSF 'speaks of it' (the incarnation)
without 'doctrinizing' (my word) it. Does BSF speak of the Trinitarian nature
of God (one being three persons) in just the same fashion?
jt: When I wrote th
Did you think this a non ad hominem Lance or don't
you really care??
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 10:16:44 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Vacuity thy name is JUDY!
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and
Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Vacuity thy name is JUDY!From: Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 10:13:50 -0500Subject: [TruthTalk] Re:Judy asks 'DID YOU BRING IT UP AS AN ACCUSATION?"Most assuredly NOT! I've also seen it a
On Sat, 28 May 2005 18:04:47 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:John wrote: You are a legalist, David.
David wrote: Thank you. Nothing wrong with being a legalist. God is a legalist too. Read the Torah and study why Jesus had to die for your sins.
John responds: There can be no argument
I don't know why y'all are arguing. Neither of you has ever been under
the law, unless you were a Jewish proselyte.
Terry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 28 May 2005 18:04:47 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John wrote: You are a legalist, David.
David wrote: Th
On Sun, 29 May 2005 14:25:05 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jt: Christ did not become
a curse for those who keep on wilfully sinning JD. The curse is
still all over those ppl and they
are wearing
it. Sickness is the curse of the
law.
The curse of the Law
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]com>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]innglory.orgCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]innglory.orgSent: Sun, 29 May 2005 17:50:07 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
On Sun, 29 May 2005 14:25:05 -0400 [EMAIL PRO
lk through a turning propeller. -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]com>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]innglory.orgCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]innglory.orgSent: Sun, 29 May 2005 17:56:08 -0400Subject: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
Terry the law still judge
udy Taylor
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 3:50 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and
John on the Law and the Spirit
On Sun, 29 May 2005 14:25:05 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
jt: Christ did not become a curse for
th
On Sun, 29 May 2005 18:44:16 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where in scripture do I find this
requirement – that I must fulfill the Law as Christ did. Your doctrine of works is a
failure’s doctrine - offering no hope and placing one back
under bondage.
Luke 10:27 “all
things are possible with God."
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When we become gods unto ourselves, wwe attempt the
impossible --
Lev.27:34 Judy. The Mosaic law was for the "Children of Israel". No
Gentile has ever been under Mosaic law unless he/she voluntarily became
a Jew.
Terry
Judy Taylor wrote:
Terry the law still judges us whenever we
break it - because the "righteous judgment of God" says that we wi
I understand what you are saying is dispensational
teaching Terry - but there is just one tree and it has always
been Christ. Israel are the natural branches and
we have been grafted in (see Romans 11). God's ppl are God's
ppl in every generation and basically Jesus is the Word
of God. If
eaven—just sooner. is a thought I certainly agree with, if I read it correctly.
JD
JKD -Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 29 May 2005 19:07:14 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
No, no they are not.
JD -Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 29 May 2005 19:15:06 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
Luke 10:27 “all things are possible with God."
F
John’s response in bold type
JD: A redundant question on Paul’s part; the correct answer to both questions is the "hearing with faith" as opposed to the works (obedience) of the Law. I think "He" is God, but I will give you Paul for the sake of argument -- How did Paul provide you with
On Sun, 29 May 2005 20:48:58 -0400 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jt: Christ did not
become a curse for those who keep on wilfully sinning JD. The curse
is still all over those ppl and they
are wearing
it. Sickness is the curse of the
law.
contrary to
philosophi
The world of philosophical religion belongs to you and
Bob Dylan Gary because you are both full of your own
thoughts rather than Gods and you do not rightly divide
the Word of Truth. Gal 3:10 emphasizes what is written
in Deut 27:26 "Cursed is he
who does not confirm the words of this law b
the blessings of obedience). Iz
Jn 14:15
“"If you love Me, you will keep My commandments.”
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 11:45
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and
Jo
ShieldsFamily wrote:
If you are
a true Believer and don’t
obey the Law you will still go to heaven—just sooner. Izzy
If this is true, would it not be better to disobey?
I disagree, but only because you are wrong.
Terry
Judy Taylor wrote:
I understand what you are saying is
dispensational teaching Terry - but there is just one tree and it has
always
been Christ. Israel are the natural
branches and we have been grafted in (see Romans 11). God's
rry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 09:43:25 -0400
Here is the perfect example of someone who either does not comprehend at a
high level (say , si
Why do you think I am wrong Terry and how am I
wrong? Can you show me in scripture where I
am missing it? judyt
On Mon, 30 May 2005 08:01:13 -0500 Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
I disagree, but only because you are wrong. TerryJudy Taylor
wrote:
I understand w
but (e.g.) Flipper
never seemed to take this stuff too seriously
On Mon, 30 May 2005 07:59:40 -0700 "Charles Perry
Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:> .. a veiled ad hominem reference:> >
"...someone who either does not comprehend at a high level (say , >
similar to a dolphin)"||
ShieldsFamily wrote:
If you are a true
Believer and don’t obey the Law you will still go to heaven—just
sooner. Izzy
If this is true, would it not be better to disobey?
Only if you want to be ashamed when you
get
I showed you in scripture ,Judy. If you want additional stuff along
the same line from the NT, check out what both Peter and Paul had to
say about gentiles not being under (Mosaic ) Law.
You have read them many times I am sure, or you would never have eaten
a rabbit or crab or shrimp or a ham
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry
CliftonSent: Monday, May 30, 2005 11:09 AMTo:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on
the Law and the Spirit
I showed you in scripture ,Judy. If you want additional stuff
along the same line from the NT,
Gary wrote:
> but (e.g.) Flipper never seemed to take this
> stuff too seriously
Maybe that's why Flipper isn't a son of God and why he isn't on TruthTalk.
:-)
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you oug
Gary wrote:
> All who rely on observing the law are under a curse
I hope everyone on the list understands that most everyone posting on this
list right now seems to believe this. The key word here is "RELY." I do
not hear Judy saying that we need to rely on observing the law. I hear her
sayi
Amen, David. And does Terry believe this? Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 1:27 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
Gary wrote
Oh, you are referring to the Levitical system that was
nailed to the cross; John and I have been discussing God's
moral law (at least I have). Surely you don't believe
the 10 Commandments were just for the children of Israel
or do you? jt
On Mon, 30 May 2005 12:09:13 -0500 Terry Clifton <[E
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 1:27 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
Gary wrote:
All who rely on observing the law are under a curse
I hope everyone on the list understands
. I am hoping that you agree.
If not, its cultsville for you, my dear.
JD
-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 30 May 2005 11:58:24 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
Obv
I believe that all the law given to Moses was for the children of
Isreal. That is what the Bible says and I believe the Bible to be
true. That includes the ten commandments. Even if you tried, you
could not keep the law, Judy. It has never been done by anyone but
Christ. I live by the teac
somebody made his
kind a valid reference point for inteligence--Flipper may enjoy
that circumstance wherever he comes up
On Mon, 30 May 2005 15:08:01 -0400 "David Miller"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:>Flipper isn't.. on TruthTalk.
[Rom
8:3]
the law was
powerless..[8:4].. [therefore] ..walk not after the flesh, but after the
Spirit
'was powerless' (in
Rom 8:3, above) also refers to (e.g.) Neh 10, as does Gal 3:10,
below--that the Law was powerless while in effect is germane to the Ap
Paul's point in both NT/argume
occult and the heretical.
JD -Original Message-From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 30 May 2005 15:26:55 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
Gary wrote:
> All who rely on observing the law are under a
She IS speaking of the Mosaical Law. Read her posts, sometime.
JD -Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 30 May 2005 13:43:17 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
Terry, she
Terry, I agree with you. I don’t
know anyone “under the law” except my Jewish friends. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 3:22 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and
John on
Say goodnight Flipper.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 3:26 PMTo:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on
the Law and the Spirit
Your allegation was that we can only
obey God and
gt;To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 31 May 2005 03:38:53 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
Say goodnight Flipper.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 3:26 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.inn
Terry have you ever done a study of the teachings of
your Savior? If so, I am sure you found that they are all rooted in the Old
Testament God's statutes, testimonies, and
commandments have not changed because He has not changed (Mal 3:6). Paul
wrote "Do we then nullify the law through fait
Judy believes that walking in love fulfills the Law and
when we obey the gospel and walk in love toward others we establish the law
(Romans 3:31). When we speak evil of the law we put ourselves in the
position of judging God's Law
(James 4:11). We shall be judged by the Law of
Liberty whic
mit adultery" It is not a part of the Levitical law, is it?
JD
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]com>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]innglory.orgCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]innglory.orgSent: Tue, 31 May 2005 07:59:58 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the
Message- From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]com>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 31 May 2005 08:08:14 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
Judy believes that walking in love fulfills the Law and when we obey the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you agree or disagree AND who is calling whom a "dolphin"
In order to qualify for dolphinhood, you must not only be able to think
and learn. You must have a nose like a bottl
d. Our bodies remain dead because of sin but our spirit is alive IN CHRIST.
JD
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]com>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]innglory.orgCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]innglory.orgSent: Tue, 31 May 2005 08:15:28 -0400Subject: [TruthTalk] Judy and Joh
the issue of
'discipleship' is at the core and crossroads of numerous issues on the TT table;
e.g.,
the
observation, below, is accurate in its NT context but 'following' JC today
requires redefining discipleship per se...it's not that the NT fails to
make this point; Jesus himself realize
Judy Taylor wrote:
Terry have you ever done a study of the
teachings of your Savior? If so, I am sure you found that they are all
rooted in the Old Testament God's
statutes, testimonies, and commandments have not changed because He has
not changed (Mal 3:6). Paul wrote "Do we then
Judy Taylor wrote:

You refer to the Levitical Law which was
nailed to the cross Terry; I am speaking of sin which transgresses
God's moral law and when we continually
choose to practice this (whether or not we have said our
words) God's Law judges us. Satan's hands are tied so lo
:
[TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
There never was a 'plan B' with God.
It never was: first Law (oops, didn't work) then Grace.This is really
rather important as it says something about the sort of God we serve.
- Original Message -
From
hTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on
the Law and the Spirit
Terry have you ever done a study of the teachings of
your Savior? If so, I am sure you found that they are all rooted in the Old
Testament God's statutes, testimonies, and
commandment
On Tue, 31 May 2005 09:36:07 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You refer to Romans 8:2. You need to be careful, here, Judy,
not to have Paul in Romans contradicting Paul in Galatians. Romans 8:2 is to be considered along with the
larger context and (especially) vers
3.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry
CliftonSent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 7:33 AMTo:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on
the Law and the Spirit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you agree or disagree AND who is calling
Please define your understanding of "Mosaical Law".
Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 9:30 PMTo:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on
the Law and the Spirit
She IS s
All those words, JD, and you still did not answer her
questions. Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 7:36 AMTo:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on
the Law and the Spirit
You
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Exactly
right. The only way to be “under”
the law is by trying to keep the law w/o Christ—or by walking “in
the flesh” (Self) instead of in Christ. The moral laws in the OT are
the same moral laws of the NT. They never changed. But when we are
in
I sincerely appreciate your time and comments. Well put and something to think about.
JD -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 31 May 2005 07:37:56 -0600Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
the issue of
Whew !! -- I have a rather cute little nasal facade so call me Ralph or Barry, anything but Flipper !!!
-Original Message-From: Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 31 May 2005 08:32:38 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on t
31 May 2005 09:20:29 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
Judy Taylor wrote:
Terry have you ever done a study of the teachings of your Savior? If so, I am sure you found that they are all rooted in the Old Testament God's statutes, testimonies, and commandments h
Tue, 31 May 2005 11:48:23 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
Exactly right. The only way to be “under” the law is by trying to keep the law w/o Christ—or by walking “in the flesh” (Self) instead of in Christ. The moral laws in the OT are the same moral laws of t
thTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 31 May 2005 11:54:44 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
Surely you consider yourself to be as smart as you think I am? Iz
Your allegation was that we can only obey God and enter the Kingdom by becoming gods to our
In Jesus Day, it meant the whole Old Law. Probably meant that in Moses day, as well.
JD -Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 31 May 2005 12:04:44 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the
In Jesus Day, it meant the whole Old Law. Probably meant that in Moses day, as well.
JD -Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 31 May 2005 12:04:44 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]innglory.orgSent: Tue, 31 May 2005 12:07:37 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
All those words, JD, and you still did not answer her questions. Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesda
From: Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Judy, Judy,
Judy! If you have never been under the law, you cannot fall back to
it.
jt: Never said I was ever under the Levitical Law and
am not falling back to anything Terry.
Study the two laws given us by Jesus. Try to fi
On Tue, 31 May 2005 16:42:15 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Romans 8:4 is not talking about a righteousness that comes from obeying
the Law, whether with the Spirit or otherwise. Rather, it is talking
about a righteousness that is atributed to us because of
the events of th
NO! duh.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 2:48
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and
John on the Law and the Spirit
There is the question you are avoiding
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 2:42
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and
John on the Law and the Spirit
Romans 8:4 is not talking about a righteousness that comes
from obeying the Law, whether with the Spirit or otherwise. Rather, it is
talking
bedience that comes from a relationship with Christ rather than from a written Law.
JD -Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]com>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 31 May 2005 19:14:19 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
cool !! -Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 31 May 2005 19:14:40 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
NO! duh.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beh
To quote Izzy: with God, all things are posible. -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:20:06 -0400Subject: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
JD do you b
Tue, 31 May 2005 16:42:15 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED]com writes:
Romans 8:4 is not talking about a righteousness that comes from obeying the Law, whether with the Spirit or otherwise. Rather, it is talking about a righteousness that is attributed to us because of the events of the Incarnation and
nal Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 01, 2005 05:37
Subject: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the
Law and the Spirit
On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 02:33:32 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Romans 8:4 is
You and JD seem to worship “the Bishop”.
Is he your Pope? Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005
3:55 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and
John on the Law and the Spirit
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 05:54:52 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jt says BSF 'speaks of it' (the incarnation) without 'doctrinizing' (my word) it. Does BSF speak of the Trinitarian nature of God (one being three persons) in just the same fashion?
jt: When I wrote this Lance I was s
On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 08:55:59 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 05:54:52 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:Jt
says BSF 'speaks of it' (the incarnation) without 'doctrinizing' (my word) it.
Does BSF speak of the Trinitarian nature of God (one being three persons)
2005 08:34
Subject: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the
Law and the Spirit
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 05:54:52 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Jt says BSF 'speaks of it' (the incarnation)
without 'doctrinizing' (my word) it. Do
-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 31 May 2005
07:37:56 -0600Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the
Spirit
the issue of
'discipleship'
||
Expand on this , please.
JD -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 19:43:24 -0600Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy and John on the Law and the Spirit
what do you think, isn't there an interesting correlation betw NT discipleshi
John wrote:> Do you understand that I believe that "event sin"> can be stop immediately but other types of sin> cannot? There are addictions, character failures> such as pride and selfishness that are the foundation> for other sin AND are listed as sin (selfishness is a> sin but it is not an e
David Miller wrote:
>> Jesus had these same temptations.
John wrote:
> So Christ was selfish, covetous, bigoted,
> lustful, arrogant and the like ???
No, I said he was tempted in this way because his flesh had the same nature
within it as you and I. Remember his temptation in the desert, when S
She can speak ill of the saints of God without
having read a word of primary source material yet, our beloved MODERATOR gives
her a total 'pass'. Happily, David Miller did not. Kudos to you,
David.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Want to add anyone else to the
list?
x27;incarnational gospel'? With what do you 1. agree 2
disagree?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 30, 2005 05:04
Subject: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] Judy and John
on the Law and the Spi
ay 30, 2005 06:30
Subject: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] Judy and John
on the Law and the Spirit
Yes I am saying that the apostle Paul preached the
cross - I see it in his writings. As for this Perichoresis
and Icarnation it would be better if you tell us what
their significance is since you a
Lance wrote:
> Please read my post one more time. Tell me what
> it is that you believe I'm saying to you and, asking
> of you.
Be careful in telling Lance what you believe he is saying to you, Judy. We
all saw how John interpreted such action on my part as misquoting him or
misrepresenting him
Advice heeded DavidM and I do appreciate the
encouraging words.
Thank You. jt
On Mon, 30 May 2005 08:28:28 -0400 "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:>
Lance wrote:> > Please read my post one more time. Tell me
what> > it is that you believe I'm saying to you and, asking>
> of y
Subject: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] Judy and John
on the Law and the Spirit
I understand you to be asking me what I believe about
the incarnation Lance - if I am setting 'the cross over against the
incarnation' and if Paul preached the cross over against the
incarnation.
If the i
No I am asking you Lance since you are the one I am
communicating with at present.
The way I see it responding to the cross causes us to
agree with God that in our flesh dwells no good thing so we agree to die to the
old man and walk in the newness of the Spirit. Whereas the "incarnational
I suspect that that is probably true.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 30, 2005 12:37
Subject: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] Judy and John
on the Law and the Spirit
He was not
lor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 30, 2005 15:38
Subject: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] Judy and John
on the Law and the Spirit
It's not; actually it is Jesus of Nazareth, only
begotten Son of God who was the Word made flesh who came
and dwelt fo
Could it be that such are the 'silly women' spoken
of in 2 Timothy 3? Let us hope not brethren and 'sistren'. There's never a
Debbie, Caroline, Lise, Tanya, Marina, Barb, Lydia etc. around when you need
one!
Kindly clarify for me what it is that you think of:
John Calvin, Karl Barth, Michael Polanyi, Thomas F. Torrance, Dave Hunt, C. I.
Scofield, J. F. Dake? Which of the foregoing have you actually read? (I
mean a book of their's in your actual hands). For that matter, what primary
source mater
Geez, Lance, all these different retorts to Judy via subject lines makes me wonder if the discussion is more about Judy than any theological issue. Or has Judy become the issue for you?::yawn::Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: She can speak ill of the saints of God without
Christine:
Is there a great gap between what you say and who
you are? Seriously!
- Original Message -
From:
Christine
Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 03, 2005 10:57
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy WON'T
answer because SHE CANNOT WI
Take note:
This is an excellent lesson in the art of "evasion" of
which Lance is the undisputed King
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 11:10:10 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Christine:
Is there a great gap between what you say and who
you are? Seriously!
From: Christine Mille
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 03, 2005 11:15
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy WON'T
answer because SHE CANNOT WITHOUT FALSIFICATION OR EMBARRASSMENT
Take
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 09:18:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
She [maligns, maliciously--g] the saints of
God without having read a word of primary source material yet, our beloved
MODERATOR gives her a total 'pass'. Happily, David Miller did not. Kudos to
you, David
Oophs!! I forgot about you Gary but I can in good
conscience add you to the list of infected ones
since your affiliation sticks out like a sore thumb in
everything you write... and you defend both
Calvin and Barth .. even to the point of calling them
'saints'
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 10:39:37 -0
101 - 200 of 303 matches
Mail list logo
