In a message dated 6/10/2004 4:09:43 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
if you don't mind, pls compare/contrast the two 'shared' concepts, below
G
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 02:40:31 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In fact, Job himself || shared [the belief
if you don't mind, pls compare/contrast
the two 'shared' concepts, below
G
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 02:40:31 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:In fact, Job
himself || shared [the belief that he had done something wrong] || except
for the knowledge that he
In a message dated 6/9/2004 10:58:48 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
what verse/s do/es this comment interpret?
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 23:34:23 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In fact, Job himself shared [the belief that he had done som
what verse/s do/es this comment
interpret?
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 23:34:23 -0500
"ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:In fact, Job himself shared [the belief that he had done something
wrong] except for the knowledge that he had done nothing
wrong.
In a message dated 6/9/2004 10:36:27 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"In fact"--eh?
One could calmly comment that this post sounds kinda suspicious, like it turns on the unreconcilable tautology somebody made up below.
(Perhaps you'd care to revisit, even revise it befor
"In
fact"--eh?
One could calmly comment that this
post sounds kinda suspicious, like it turns on the
unreconcilable tautology somebody made up below.
(Perhaps you'd care to revisit,
even revise it before it stirs up another
controversy:)
G
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 23:34:23 -0500 "S
John, I think this is the kindest post I have ever read on TT.
Thank you my friend. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004
7:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Trustworthy?
I
In a message dated 6/9/2004 8:12:30 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Izzy: I believe you to be approx 100% correctamundo on this point.
David/Judy (interesting combo) espouse an understanding that, though they
understand to be 'biblical', comes from a sort of 'perversion', held
er it a huge blessing to
have all of my family killed so that I could get a new one later on. I've
never understood that one.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 6:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj
dnesday, June 09, 2004 3:23
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Trustworthy?
this is dishonest--a
distortion of the truth
G
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 15:33:05 -0500
"ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:>>
Glad to hear it, G.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004
3:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Trustworthy?
this is dishonest--a distortion of the
truth
G
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Trustworthy?
Izzy:Try:http://www.RefugeBaptist.org Let me know if it works. I connected
with Faust concerning his book. We carry it.
- Original Message -
From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
this is dishonest--a distortion of
the truth
G
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 15:33:05 -0500
"ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:>>>We have ALL been disappointed when we
trusted the Lord..
Izzy:Try:http://www.RefugeBaptist.org Let me know if it works. I connected
with Faust concerning his book. We carry it.
- Original Message -
From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: June 09, 2004 16:33
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Trustwo
That address doesn't seem to be working; are you sure it isn't just an email
address? Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 1:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Trustwo
G offers more proof that it is very risky to be totally honest on TruthTalk.
Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004
10:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Trustworthy?
Long on
See: [EMAIL PROTECTED] for details. I'd appreciate any comments
- Original Message -
From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: June 09, 2004 15:32
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Trustworthy?
> Lance, Can you tell us about this book?
: Re: [TruthTalk]
Trustworthy?
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:58:47 -0400 "Slade
Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Izzy:
As one who spent too many years in the ..
movement, I thought all I had
to do was "trust Jesus" ..
however, th
Lance, Can you tell us about this book? Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 7:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Trustworthy?
DavidM: "The Rod:Will God Spare It" J.D.
Long on promise short on delivery..politics is like
that.(politicians too) Honesty is in short supply like far too many
Christians.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 09, 2004 11:29
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Trustworthy
y perceptive of you. And here I was
thinking...well, like less complimentary stuff 'bout you on occasion ya
know?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 09, 2004 11:45
Subject: [TruthTalk] Trustworthy?
What is the point Lance? [
*
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:29:32 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:58:47 -0400 "Slade
Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Izzy:
As one who spent too many years in
the .. movement, I thought all I had
to do was "trust Jesus"
..
however, this
y then can we learn what REAL
trust is.>> Izzy>> PS I don't know about Job, but I
wouldn't consider it a huge blessing to> have all of my family killed so
that I could get a new one later on. I've> never understood that
one.>> -Original Message-&g
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:58:47 -0400 "Slade
Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Izzy:
As one who spent too many years in
the .. movement, I thought all I had
to do was "trust Jesus"
..
however, this reflects
the underlying religious ideology of another 'movement', the
republican party
e.
- Original Message -
From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: June 09, 2004 10:31
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Trustworthy?
> David, As one who spent too many years in the "name it and claim it"
> movement, I thought all I had
MAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 09 June, 2004 10:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Trustworthy?
David, As one who spent too many years in the "name it and claim it"
movement, I thought all I had to do was "trust Jesu
L PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 6:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Trustworthy?
Izzy wrote:
> Bill, In my experience Jesus has not always been
> entirely someone I can trust in every sense of the
> word.
DavidM: "The Rod:Will God Spare It" J.D.Faust Have you read it? If so will
you comment on it?
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: June 09, 2004 08:54
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Trustworthy?
> Izz
Izzy wrote:
> Bill, In my experience Jesus has not always been
> entirely someone I can trust in every sense of the
> word. Sometimes He is quite beyond any possibility
> of my understanding, let alone "trusting" Him. ...
> Job trusted, but was shocked by what happened to him.
> We have ALL b
LOL. I wish. J Iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 2:23
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Trustworthy?
now it's the Bushes
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 15:03:00
now it's the
Bushes
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 15:03:00 -0500
"ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I used to
think I could trust Jesus to make everything
rosey.
Exactly. Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 12:10
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Trustworthy?
ShieldsFamily wrote:
By
the way, would you also agree that many things happen that
:20
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Trustworthy?
this ideology is not Job's:
In a message dated 6/5/2004 9:07:12
PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
..Jesus has not always been entirely someone I can trust..
ShieldsFamily wrote:
By
the way, would you also agree that many things happen that
are not God’s
will? Izzy
God allows
mothers to kill their babies, men to beat their wives, theives to steal
and Muslims to worship Allah. None of the afoe
this ideology is not
Job's:
In a message dated 6/5/2004 9:07:12 PM Pacific
Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..Jesus has not always been
entirely someone I can
trust..
Izzy: Not even MUCH of the time.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 07, 2004 10:35
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Trustworthy?
Yes
he did, and rightly so. Which proves my pointtrusting God does not mean that all will
: [TruthTalk]
Trustworthy?
so what? Job trusted God
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 20:48:13 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
..What happened to [Job] was the sovereign choice of the Lord.
By the way, would you also agree that many things happen that
are not God’s will? Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 5:21
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Trustworthy?
Amen on
so what? Job trusted
God
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 20:48:13 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
..What
happened to [Job] was the sovereign choice of the Lord.
06, 2004 6:42
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Trustworthy?
(on the aromatic topic of theological
'mixtures': perfectionists who require JC to assume responsibility
for imperfection)
In a message dated 6/5/2004
ï
(on the aromatic topic of theological
'mixtures': perfectionists who require JC to assume responsibility
for imperfection)
In a message dated 6/5/2004 9:07:12 PM Pacific
Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..Jesus has not always been
entirely someone I can trust.. Can
Amen on every point, Terry. Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Good morning
Iz. Thanks for the brutally honest testimony. No, you are not alone
in feeling this way. I would suspect that we have all felt that at some
p
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Bill,
In my experience Jesus has not
always been entirely someone I can trust in every sense of the word. Sometimes He is quite beyond any
possibility of my understanding, let alone “trusting” Him.
(Many times I have asked my husband,
“But
In a message dated 6/5/2004 9:07:12 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bill, In my experience Jesus has not always been entirely someone I can trust in every sense of the word. Sometimes He is quite beyond any possibility of my understanding, let alone âtrustingâ Him.
Bill, In my experience Jesus has not
always been entirely someone I can trust in every sense of the word. Sometimes He is quite beyond any
possibility of my understanding, let alone “trusting” Him. (Many times I have asked my husband, “But
what can I trust Him FOR?” And he cannot answer,
45 matches
Mail list logo
